AzTrials
AzTrials

EpilepsyNCT02394639

EEG@HOME (Phase 4 of the Project)

A study testing video-EEG monitoring in people with Epilepsy, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 2 sites in Belgium.

Withdrawn

Withdrawn. The study stopped before anyone enrolled.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this project is the development of an EEG-cap (min. 21 electrodes) with user-friendly active dry electrodes that meets the expectations of the users regarding comfort and esthetics, without losing sight of the functional and technical demands for recording high quality EEG signals. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 4 to 80 years
Conditions the study is for
Epilepsy
What is being tested?
video-EEG monitoring
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
0 participants
Where
2 sitesBelgium
Study dates
Apr 2015to Sep 2016
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 4 to 80 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Epilepsy with on EEG prominent IEDs

Who cannot join

  • /

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Belgium2 sites
  • University Hospital, Ghent

    Ghent, 9000

  • University Hospital, Leuven

    Leuven, 3000

Other trials in Belgium

About this study

The goal of this project is the development of an EEG-cap (min. 21 electrodes) with user-friendly active dry electrodes that meets the expectations of the users regarding comfort and esthetics, without losing sight of the functional and technical demands for recording high quality EEG signals. The purpose is to use the EEG-cap to investigate clinical neurological disorders (e.g. epilepsy). The EEG-cap could also be used at home so that hospital admission in the EMU can be avoided for some patients and an increasing number of patients can be examined.

In this stage of the project video-EEG recording with the prototype will be compared to the conventional way (cup-electrodes and collodion) of recording in the EMU.

Read more

Minimum 1 - maximum 10 patients with prominent IEDs will be included. After the conventional recording is completed, the patient will undergo a recording of maximum 5 hours with the prototype.

There will be an visual and clinical evaluation of the EEG-signals (blinded) and a technical evaluation of the EEG-signals. User experience and experience of the EEG-technologists will also be collected.

Conditions
Epilepsy
Being tested
video-EEG monitoring
Medical subject headings
Epilepsy

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • video-EEG monitoringOther

Study groups in NCT02394639
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
conventional video-EEG monitoringActive comparatorconventional video-EEG monitoring with cup-electrodes and collodion
Receives: Other: video-EEG monitoring
video-EEG monitoring with prototypeExperimentalvideo-EEG monitoring of 5 hours with EEG-cap with dry electrodes
Receives: Other: video-EEG monitoring

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. EEG signal quality (visual and clinical) (scale)

    Measured: 5 hours

  2. EEG signal quality (technical) (signal to noise ratio)

    Measured: 5 hours

  3. User experience (questionnaire)

    Measured: 5 hours

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. EEG-technologist experience (questionnaire)

    Measured: 5 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2015
  3. Primary completionAug 2016 (estimated)
  4. Study completionSep 2016 (estimated)

Why it stopped: Project funding ended before reaching Phase 4.

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Non-randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
0 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02394639
Sponsor's protocol ID
EC/2015/0140
Status last verified
Nov 2017
First submitted
10 Feb 2015
Last updated
28 Nov 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing video-EEG monitoring in people with Epilepsy, run by University Hospital, Ghent at 2 sites in Belgium.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Belgium. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

EEG signal quality (visual and clinical) (scale) (time frame: 5 hours). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Nov 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in