AzTrials
AzTrials

Hoarding DisorderCRESTNCT02402647

Cognitive Rehab and Exposure Treatment for Hoarding

A study testing Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Treatment (CREST) and Exposure Therapy (ET) in people with Hoarding Disorder, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This project will utilize a novel behavioral intervention for hoarding disorder that takes into account age and neurocognitive factors. The goal of this project is to gain knowledge on how treatment components may or may not work for Veterans with hoarding disorder. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 85 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Hoarding Disorder
What is being tested?
Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Treatment (CREST) and Exposure Therapy (ET)
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
115 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Oct 2015to 1 Feb 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 85 years
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Veterans age 18-85
  • Hoarding Disorder diagnosis outlined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5)6 as measured by the Structured Interview for Hoarding Disorder (SIHD)67
  • HD as a primary diagnosis
  • Stable on medications for at least 12 weeks, with no pharmacologic changes expected or made during the 12-month study
  • Voluntary consent to participate

Who cannot join

  • Diagnosis of:
  • psychotic disorder
  • substance abuse disorder as measured by the Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.)68
  • Current or history of any neurodegenerative disease
  • Active suicidal ideation
  • Concurrent participation in psychotherapy or ET for HD, or prior history of CREST for HD

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA

    San Diego, California, 92161

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure Therapy for Veterans With Hoarding Disorder

This project will utilize a novel behavioral intervention for hoarding disorder that takes into account age and neurocognitive factors. The goal of this project is to gain knowledge on how treatment components may or may not work for Veterans with hoarding disorder. Further, the investigators hope to increase understanding of functional and long term outcomes in response to hoarding treatment.

Read the detailed description

Objective: The investigators propose to conduct a randomized controlled trial comparing six months (26 sessions) of Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Therapy (CREST) treatment to a robust comparator, six months of Exposure Therapy alone, in 136 participants with HD.

Research Design: Assessments will be administered at baseline, during treatment (sessions 7, 13, 21), post-treatment, and 3- and 6-month follow-up, thus, all participants will be enrolled for one year.

Methodology: The primary objective is to evaluate whether CREST significantly reduces hoarding symptoms and improves functional capacity and quality of life when compared to exposure therapy alone. The investigators will also examine the impact of treatment mediators; treatment adherence, changes in executive functioning, avoidance, symptom severity on outcomes. Age and executive functioning will also be explored as potential moderators. Finally, by repeatedly measuring treatment targets, the investigators will examine time to maximum treatment effect in an effort to understand mechanisms of change.

Clinical Relationships: By providing a treatment for many Veterans with HD, the investigators can alter the course of their symptom trajectory and negative consequences, resulting in both healthcare costs savings and improved quality of life for Veterans.

Being tested
Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Treatment (CREST), Exposure Therapy (ET)
Keywords
Hoarding, Compulsive Hoarding
Medical subject headings
Hoarding Disorder, Hoarding

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Treatment (CREST)Behavioural

    Compensatory Cognitive Training is a manualized, low-tech, cognitive training intervention designed to target cognitive impairments common in people with psychiatric illness. The CCT modules specifically selected for CREST map onto known areas of HD neurocognitive deficits or weakness and include training in prospective memory, prioritizing, problem solving, planning, and cognitive flexibility.

    Symptoms of acquiring and saving are themselves avoidance behaviors that are performed to avoid internal distress related to negative thoughts and emotions. Avoidance serves to reduce distress related to the beliefs regarding the necessity and utility of possessions. In the CREST condition, the second part and the majority of treatment is dedicated to exposure therapy (ET) for discarding and not acquiring while in the control condition, the entire treatment will consist of ET.

  • Exposure Therapy (ET)Behavioural

    The investigators propose to use a robust control condition, ET, with the same frequency and amount of therapist contact as CREST. Twenty-six weekly, individual ET sessions (6 months) will be delivered. The control group will receive ET for all 26 sessions and no cognitive training. As in CREST, the ET sessions will be manualized and copies utilized during session by both the patient and therapist.

Study groups in NCT02402647
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Treatment (CREST)ExperimentalCompensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) is a manualized, low-tech, cognitive training intervention designed to target cognitive impairments common in people with psychiatric illness. The CCT modules specifically selected for CREST map onto known areas of HD neurocognitive deficits or weakness and include training in prospective memory, prioritizing, problem solving, planning, and cognitive flexibility. Symptoms of acquiring and saving are themselves avoidance behaviors that are performed to avoid internal distress related to negative thoughts and emotions. Avoidance serves to reduce distress related to the beliefs regarding the necessity and utility of possessions. In the CREST condition, the second part and the majority of treatment is dedicated to exposure therapy (ET) for discarding and not acquiring while in the control condition, the entire treatment will consist of ET.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Treatment (CREST)
Exposure Therapy (ET)Active comparatorThe investigators propose to use a robust control condition, exposure therapy (ET), with the same frequency and amount of therapist contact as CREST. Twenty-six weekly, individual ET sessions (6 months) will be delivered. The control group will receive ET for all 26 sessions and no cognitive training. As in CREST, the ET sessions will be manualized and copies utilized during session by both the patient and therapist.
Receives: Behavioral: Exposure Therapy (ET)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Saving Inventory Revised

    Hoarding symptom severity (primary outcome) will be measured using the Savings Inventory-Revised (SI-R)56, a 23-item self-report measure used to assess common hoarding symptoms. Subscales include clutter, acquisition, and difficulty discarding. The SI-R has demonstrated good internal consistency, divergent validity, concurrent validity, and test-retest reliability in clinical samples with hoarding. The total score will be used for analyses. Total of 23 items divided into 3 subscales, each item Likert scale ranges from 0-4 (0= not at all, 4= extreme), Clutter Subscale (9 items): scores greater than 13 indicate clinical significance (Max score=36), Difficulty Discarding/Saving Subscale (7 items): scores greater than 13 indicate clinical significance, Acquisition Subscale (7 items): scores greater than 15 indicate clinical significance (Max Score= 28). Total Max score = 92. A Total score greater than 40 is a typical score for people experiencing challenges with hoarding behaviors.

    Measured: Baseline to 6 month-follow-up (12 months total)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA)

    The University of California San Diego (UCSD) Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA)76 is an assessment of everyday functioning skills including household skills (e.g., writing a shopping list based on a recipe, range 0 to 4), communication (e.g., rescheduling appointments, range 0 to 12), finance (e.g., paying a utility bill, range 0 to 11), comprehension and planning (e.g., planning outings, range 0 to 14), and transportation (e.g., comprehension of a bus schedule, range 0 to 9). The subscales are scored, converted to a percentage, and weighed equally toward the total score of 100; higher score equals better performance for all subscales and total. The UPSA has demonstrated high inter-rater reliability (0.91) and convergent validity with other performance-based measures. The total UPSA summary score will be used for analyses. *Nearly half of each timepoint was out of 60 due to adjustments for COVID-19, a total of 60 was used with financial, communication, and planning subscales.

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months post-treatment (on average 1 year)

  2. UCSD SORT Test

    The UCSD SORT Test (U-SORT) is a cognitive test that will be used to measure Veteran participants' organizational skills as they relate to functional capacity. During the administration of the U-SORT, participants are instructed to sort 42 household objects (e.g., bent and unbent paper clips, used and unused condiment packets) from a hypothetical "junk drawer" into either "keep" or "trash" piles. Each item has a correct response and participants are given two minutes to complete the task and one point is awarded for each correctly sorted item, for a total of 42 points (range of 0 to 42). A higher total score indicates a higher level of organizational skills. The U-SORT has high internal consistency (? = .86) and adequate convergent validity. The total U-SORT score will be used in analyses.

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months post-treatment

  3. Specific Levels of Functioning Test (SLOF)

    Self-reported functioning (secondary outcome) will be assessed with the Specific Levels of Functioning test (SLOF)78, a 43-item Likert scale questionnaire with higher scores indicating higher levels of functioning. Subscales include interpersonal relationships (score range of 7 to 35), social acceptability (score range of 6 to 30), participation in activities (score range of 11 to 55), and work skills (score range of 6 to 30). Total of 30 items across four categories and each item ranges from the scale of 1-5 (higher values= better outcomes). Category A. Interpersonal Relationships (items 1-7): 5= Highly Typical, 1= Highly Untypical. Category B. Social Acceptability (items 8-13): 5= Never, 1= Always. Category C. Activities (items 14-24): 5= Totally Self Sufficient, 1= No Opportunity to perform. Category D. Work Skills (items 25-30): 5= Highly Typical, 1= Highly Untypical. Total Max Score Range= 30-150).The SLOF has demonstrated excellent reliability and internal consistency.

    Measured: Baseline to 6 months post-treatment

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted30 Mar 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Oct 2015
  3. Primary completion31 Dec 2021
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Model description
Cognitive rehabilitation and exposure/sorting therapy (CREST) versus Exposure therapy only
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
115 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02402647
Sponsor's protocol ID
CLNA-005-14S
Acronym
CREST
Status last verified
Aug 2024
First submitted
25 Mar 2015
Last updated
19 Sep 2024
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Ayers CR, Zakrzewski JJ, Dozier ME, Mayes T, Thomas M, Twamley EW, Carty-Campbell A, Pittman J. Cognitive rehabilitation and exposure/sorting therapy for hoarding disorder: A randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2026 Aug;94(8):470-481. doi: 10.1037/ccp0001022.

    PubMed 42658588

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive Rehabilitation and Exposure/Sorting Treatment (CREST) and Exposure Therapy (ET) in people with Hoarding Disorder, run by VA Office of Research and Development at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Sep 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 19 Sep 2024). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Saving Inventory Revised (time frame: Baseline to 6 month-follow-up (12 months total)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02402647, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Sep 2024.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in