AzTrials
AzTrials

Peripheral Vascular DiseasesNCT02406131

Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Restenosis Post Lower Limb Revascularization Angioplasty

A study testing Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in people with Peripheral Vascular Diseases, run by National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland at 2 sites in Ireland.

Suspended

Paused. Enrolment is on hold for now and may resume.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators will established relation between restenosis and inflammatory response to shearing stress caused by angioplasty suggest that any mechanism that affect inflammatory response can consequently affect the restenosis rate. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Peripheral Vascular Diseases
What is being tested?
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
40 participants
Where
2 sitesIreland
Study dates
Apr 2018to Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • 1. Patients planned for lower limb Angioplasty

Who cannot join

  • Known upper limb PVD
  • Previous history of upper limb deep vein thrombosis
  • Patients on glibenclamide or nicorandil- May affect RIPC
  • Raynaud's Disease
  • Intra operative decision to use graft - will be documented

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Ireland2 sites
  • University Collage Hospital Galway

    Galway, Co Galway

  • Limerick University Hospital

    Limerick

Other trials in Ireland

About this study

Official title: Effects of Remote Ischemic Preconditioning on Restenosis Post Lower Limb Revascularization Angioplasty: A Pilot Randomized Control Trial

The investigators will established relation between restenosis and inflammatory response to shearing stress caused by angioplasty suggest that any mechanism that affect inflammatory response can consequently affect the restenosis rate. There is accumulated evidence that remote ischemic precondition has modifying suppressive effect on inflammatory response and the investigators hypothesized that RIPC may lead to reduction in post angioplasty restenosis rate.

Read the detailed description

Rationale:

The father of interventional radiology Charles Dotter (1920-1985) performed the first percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in university of Oregon hospital on Laura Shaw in 16th of January 1964. She presented with typical rest pain and foot gangrene on left leg and her angiogram show distal superficial femoral artery focal stenosis. He saved her leg and she was walking for the next 3 years of her life using his experimental dilating catheter Later in 1977 Zurich witnessed the first coronary angioplasty by German cardiologist Andreas Gruentzig (1939-1985) using same technique .

The angioplasty utilized gradually in the next years after Dotter to provide less invasive option for the growing number of peripheral vascular disease patients estimated to be in the range of 3% to 10%, increasing to 15% to 20% in persons over 70 years. Early diagnosis remains difficult because patients tends to be asymptomatic up to 50% or more of vessel narrowing. the strong association between prevalence of peripheral vascular disease and age increase the demand with world population ageing specially in western Europe and USA. The lower extremity revascularization USA statistics in year 2000 was 40/100,000 and increasing.

Restenosis or the gradual narrowing of the re vascularized vessel remains one of the main problems usually it occurs within 6 months of angioplasty . Restenosis percentages varies between 12% up to 63 % in different studies largely depends on the lesion type and site with below knee interventions being more liable for restenosis.

The restenosis phenomena can be explained by the physiological response to the trauma caused by the balloon when inflated to compress the atheroma. Many factors can influence the process e.g. patient , procedure and vessel condition before intervention.it can be considered as hypertrophic wound healing from the interaction between monocyte-derived macrophages , T cells and arterial wall .the inflammatory response lead to Neointimal Hyperplasia the terminology uses to describe the proliferation and migration of vascular smooth muscle cells . Elevated inflammatory and coagulation factors markers levels after angioplasty has been suggested as predictors for the possibility of restenosis . The inflammatory theory was more supported when using immunosuppressive drugs like Sirolimus shows positive effects on reducing restenosis rate.

Ischemic precondition introduced first as mechanism to reduced subsequent myocardium injury after applying intermittent periods of sub-lethal ischemia . Subsequently the concept examined on other body organs . The mechanisms through which remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) work was the subject for many studies suggesting neural, humoral and anti-Inflammatory pathways . Animal studies suggest powerful anti-inflammatory effect for RIPC . other studies shows endothelial protections by decrease formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and upregulates endothelial nitric oxide (eNOS) synthase which responsible for most of vasculature Nitric Oxide a very important protective molecule in reperfusion and shearing stress injuries . In human studies Ischaemic, preconditioning show endothelial protective effect and altered Neutrophils function including reduced adhesion, exocytosis, phagocytosis, and modified cytokine secretion. . In one study, RIPC stimulates modified leukocyte inflammatory gene expression in correlations with the first and second windows of the RIPC, which is 1-2 hours and 12-24 respectively.

Sampling Frame the peripheral vascular disease patients with medical profiles, which match trial criteria who are waiting for or admitted from emergency department for lower limb revascularization angioplasty in Galway university hospital, will be identified. Recruitment will be stopped at 10 months of 16 months of the trial period.

Trial Design Patients who need revascularization angioplasty classically had history of symptomatic peripheral vascular disease usually assessed in OPD using ABI and send for duplex ultrasound scan after which some get CT angiogram or Magnetic Resonance Angiography (MRA). Furthermore, intra operative images are the common practice. the investigators will be recruiting from this group in accordance with trial protocol.

The target number will be 40 patients divided into 2 groups. All groups candidates will undergo base line assessment which include history, examination, duplex, ABI and blood sample for inflammatory and coagulation markers.

The candidates will randomly allocated to:

Randomisation Age and DM are associated with many comorbidities. Randomization will be stratified for these two confounders using Minimpy computer software.

All trial candidates will have unique numbers to identify them and conceal their identity. Patients files will be locked in trial office with one-person access and each candidate will get their numbers in sequential way according to their allocation.

Projected recruitment. Galway University hospital provides vascular services for a population of approximately 750000 served by the West-North West Hospitals Group. The patients for the trial will be actively recruited from out patient's clinics, in patients and theatre booking database. Information about the trial will be given to all vascular team including criteria for selection and exclusion. Those who qualified will be counselled by the trial team and consented if the agree to join. The target of 40 patients should be achievable within the recruitment window.

Patient recruitment \& consent Eligible candidates will get all the information about the trial in written and verbal explanation for all the steps. Patients who are willing to take part will asked to provide written informed consent. Three copies of the consent form will be signed: one for the patient, one for the patient's clinical notes file and a one copy for the patient's trial folder.

Data collection Demographic and clinical data of eligible candidates who agree to participate will be collected. The candidates will be assign a trial number identifier after informed consent is signed and no personal information will be available on the data entry sheets. The original data-entry preform will be retained together with a copy of the consent form in the trial office with other trial documents in the trial office in CSI building. The code key for the trial numbers will be limited to the Chief Investigator. Encrypted back up copy will be prepared at the end of each data entry and will be kept looked separately. All data will be retained in the care of the principal investigator for a period of five years from the closure of the trial.

Statistical analysis A trial team member blinded to trial allocation will perform the statistical analysis with respect to the primary and secondary outcomes. This is a pilot study the results will be used to identify if there is a need for larger trial.

Trial monitoring Day-to-day management of the trial will be the responsibility of the trial manager, supervised by the principal investigator. A meeting will be held every two weeks between the trial manager and the principal investigator to monitor recruitment, data collection etc.

Being tested
Remote Ischemic Preconditioning
Keywords
Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Ischemic Preconditioning, Inflammation, Angioplasty, Restenosis, RCT
Medical subject headings
Peripheral Vascular Diseases, Inflammation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Remote Ischemic PreconditioningOther

    standard blood pressure cuffs applied to upper limb . The cuff will be inflated to 200 mmHg applied for 5 minutes alternating with 5 minutes rest to the total of 4 cycles

Study groups in NCT02406131
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Control Group:No interventionThis group will be getting all the routine work up including Duplex scan . we will add request for inflammatory and coagulation markers in their blood samples before and after intervention . The pre-op blood sample will be collected within the 24 hours before intervention and the post intervention in the 24 hrs after (second RIPC window). The repeated duplex scan will be schedule after 6 months.
RIPC GroupActive comparatorRemote Ischemic Preconditioning Group (RIPC):This group will have all the tests as for the control group with the additional component will be preconditioning. One hour prior to procedure candidates in this group will have structured intermittent periods of induced remote ischaemic preconditioning using standard blood pressure cuffs. The cuff will be inflated to 200 mmHg applied for 5 minutes alternating with 5 minutes rest to the total of 4 cycles, which needs 40 minutes.
Receives: Other: Remote Ischemic Preconditioning

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Restenosis

    using Duplex scan 30% stenosis increase in time of flow up. Increase of less than or 50 % stenosis to 70% or more. Loss of 50% of gain in luminal diameter.

    Measured: 6 months post procedure

  2. Changes in inflammatory and coagulation markers comparing the 2 groups

    CRP FBC D-Dimer Fibrinogen

    Measured: 24 hours post procedure

Secondary outcomes (5)
  1. Limb Amputation

    recording any limb amputation

    Measured: 6 months post procedure

  2. Minor amputations

    recording minor amputations - digits

    Measured: 6 months post procedure

  3. Percentage changes in ABI

    calculate the change in ABI pre and post intervention

    Measured: 6 months post procedure

  4. Ulcer formation/ healing

    Documents ulcers formation/ healing

    Measured: 6 months post procedure

  5. Progression of Rutherford classification

    Documents changes pre and post intervention

    Measured: 6 months post procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted2 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startApr 2018 (estimated)
  3. Primary completionDec 2019 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2019 (estimated)

Why it stopped: logistic issues - no available scans for participants at the moment need to postponed starting dates

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Care provider, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
40 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02406131
Sponsor's protocol ID
C.A. 1238
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
19 Mar 2015
Last updated
26 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Friedman SG. Charles Dotter and the fiftieth anniversary of endovascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2015 Feb;61(2):556-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2014.09.012. Epub 2014 Oct 11. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25307132
  • Berry D. The unlocking of the coronary arteries: origins of angioplasty. A short historical review of arterial dilatation from Dotter to the creative Gruentzig. Eur Heart J. 2009 Jun;30(12):1421-2. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehp182. No abstract available.

    PubMed 19525552
  • Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, Nehler MR, Harris KA, Fowkes FG; TASC II Working Group. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45 Suppl S:S5-67. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.12.037. No abstract available.

    PubMed 17223489
  • Medical Advisory Secretariat. Stenting for peripheral artery disease of the lower extremities: an evidence-based analysis. Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2010;10(18):1-88. Epub 2010 Sep 1.

    PubMed 23074395
  • Botev N. Population ageing in Central and Eastern Europe and its demographic and social context. Eur J Ageing. 2012 Feb 9;9(1):69-79. doi: 10.1007/s10433-012-0217-9. eCollection 2012 Mar.

    PubMed 28804408
  • Anderson PL, Gelijns A, Moskowitz A, Arons R, Gupta L, Weinberg A, Faries PL, Nowygrod R, Kent KC. Understanding trends in inpatient surgical volume: vascular interventions, 1980-2000. J Vasc Surg. 2004 Jun;39(6):1200-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2004.02.039.

    PubMed 15192558
  • Nowygrod R, Egorova N, Greco G, Anderson P, Gelijns A, Moskowitz A, McKinsey J, Morrissey N, Kent KC. Trends, complications, and mortality in peripheral vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Feb;43(2):205-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2005.11.002.

    PubMed 16476588
  • Serruys PW, Luijten HE, Beatt KJ, Geuskens R, de Feyter PJ, van den Brand M, Reiber JH, ten Katen HJ, van Es GA, Hugenholtz PG. Incidence of restenosis after successful coronary angioplasty: a time-related phenomenon. A quantitative angiographic study in 342 consecutive patients at 1, 2, 3, and 4 months. Circulation. 1988 Feb;77(2):361-71. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.77.2.361.

    PubMed 2962786
  • Schillinger M, Exner M, Mlekusch W, Haumer M, Rumpold H, Ahmadi R, Sabeti S, Wagner O, Minar E. Endovascular revascularization below the knee: 6-month results and predictive value of C-reactive protein level. Radiology. 2003 May;227(2):419-25. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2272020137. Epub 2003 Mar 20.

    PubMed 12649419
  • Cejna M, Thurnher S, Illiasch H, Horvath W, Waldenberger P, Hornik K, Lammer J. PTA versus Palmaz stent placement in femoropopliteal artery obstructions: a multicenter prospective randomized study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001 Jan;12(1):23-31. doi: 10.1016/s1051-0443(07)61397-9.

    PubMed 11200349
  • Tsigkas GG, Karantalis V, Hahalis G, Alexopoulos D. Stent restenosis, pathophysiology and treatment options: a 2010 update. Hellenic J Cardiol. 2011 Mar-Apr;52(2):149-57. No abstract available.

    PubMed 21478125
  • Schillinger M, Minar E. Restenosis after percutaneous angioplasty: the role of vascular inflammation. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2005;1(1):73-8. doi: 10.2147/vhrm.1.1.73.58932.

    PubMed 17319099
  • Kleinedler JJ, Foley JD, Orchard EA, Dugas TR. Novel nanocomposite stent coating releasing resveratrol and quercetin reduces neointimal hyperplasia and promotes re-endothelialization. J Control Release. 2012 Apr 10;159(1):27-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2012.01.008. Epub 2012 Jan 17.

    PubMed 22269665
  • Wahlgren CM, Sten-Linder M, Egberg N, Kalin B, Blohme L, Swedenborg J. The role of coagulation and inflammation after angioplasty in patients with peripheral arterial disease. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2006 Jul-Aug;29(4):530-5. doi: 10.1007/s00270-005-0159-0.

    PubMed 16729229
  • Tschopl M, Tsakiris DA, Marbet GA, Labs KH, Jager K. Role of hemostatic risk factors for restenosis in peripheral arterial occlusive disease after transluminal angioplasty. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 1997 Nov;17(11):3208-14. doi: 10.1161/01.atv.17.11.3208.

    PubMed 9409313

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Remote Ischemic Preconditioning in people with Peripheral Vascular Diseases, run by National University of Ireland, Galway, Ireland at 2 sites in Ireland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: paused, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Ireland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Restenosis (time frame: 6 months post procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02406131, which also lists 32 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Sep 2017.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in