AzTrials
AzTrials

Depressive Disorder, MajorE-COMPARED_CHNCT02410616

E-Compared-CH: Comparative Effectiveness Research on Internet-based Depression Treatment - Swiss Trial

A study testing Blended CBT and Treatment as usual in people with Depressive Disorder, Major, run by University of Bern at 2 sites in Switzerland.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of blended Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) with treatment as usual (TAU) in Swiss patients in secondary care Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Depressive Disorder, Major
What is being tested?
Blended CBT and Treatment as usual
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
50 participants
Where
2 sitesSwitzerland
Study dates
Mar 2015to Jul 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Being 18 years of age or older
  • Meet DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for MDD confirmed by MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview version 5.0
  • Informed Consent
  • Having access to a PC and Internet connection
  • Having a Smartphone that is compatible with the mobile component of the intervention
  • Understanding of the German language spoken and written

Who cannot join

  • Current high risk for suicide according to the MINI Interview section C
  • Serious psychiatric co-morbidity: substance dependence, bipolar affective disorder, psychotic illness, obsessive compulsive disorder, as established at the MINI interview
  • Currently receiving psychological treatment for depression
  • Being unable to comprehend the spoken and written language (German)
  • Not having access to a PC and fast Internet connection (i.e. broadband or comparable).
  • Not having a Smartphone that is compatible with the mobile component of the intervention that is offered or not willing to carry a Smartphone during the duration of treatment

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Switzerland2 sites
  • Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy

    Bern, 3014

  • Sanatorium Kilchberg

    Kilchberg, Canton of Zurich, 8802

Other trials in Switzerland

About this study

Official title: European Comparative Effectiveness Research on Internet-based Depression Treatment - Swiss Trial

To compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of blended Cognitive Behavioural Therapy (CBT) for adults with major depressive disorder (MDD) with treatment as usual (TAU) in Swiss patients in secondary care

Read the detailed description

Background

Depression is a common mental disorder with a negative impact on mental well-being, quality of life, and social and work-related functioning both in the short and longer term. Additionally, depression is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, health care utilization and health care costs. On a population level, depression is one of the most costly diseases. The economic costs of depression were estimated at €136.3 billion (EU25) in 2010 in the EU and are still rising. European health care systems face the challenge of improving access to cost-effective treatments while simultaneously working to sustain budgetary stability in times of economic austerity.

Internet-based depression treatment appears a very promising alternative to current routine depression treatment strategies. Meta-analyses have demonstrated the clinical effectiveness and potential cost-effectiveness of Internet-based treatment for depression in controlled research setting. Internet-based treatment thus has the potential to keep depression treatment affordable, as it enables mental health care providers to reach out to large populations needing depression treatment at a better cost-effectiveness than those of standard treatment as usual (TAU), but with similar levels of clinical efficacy and quality of care. The trials will be conducted in 8 European countries.

Objective

To compare the clinical and cost-effectiveness of blended CBT and TAU in secondary care

Methods

In Switzerland, a randomized-controlled trial will be carried out in secondary care, comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of CBT and TAU for adults with major depressive disorder (MDD). Respondents will be followed until 12 months after baseline (measures will be taken at BL, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 6 months and 12 months).

Being tested
Blended CBT, Treatment as usual
Keywords
Psychotherapy, Comparative Effectiveness Research, Randomized Controlled Trial, Secondary Care
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Blended CBTBehavioural

    Internet based blended CBT depression treatment combines individual face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with CBT delivered through an Internet based treatment platform with mobile phone components. The core components of the CBT treatment are: (1) psychoeducation, (2) behavioural activation, (3) cognitive restructuring, and (4) relapse prevention.

  • Treatment as usualBehavioural

    Treatment as usual (TAU) is defined as the routine care that subjects receive when they are diagnosed with depression in the secondary care system. The investigators will not interfere with treatment as usual but they will monitor carefully which health care services are utilized by usual care patients using patient records and through self-report.

Study groups in NCT02410616
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Blended CBTExperimentalInternet based blended CBT depression treatment combines individual face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) with CBT delivered through an Internet based treatment platform with mobile phone components. The core components of the CBT treatment are: (1) psychoeducation, (2) behavioural activation, (3) cognitive restructuring, and (4) relapse prevention.
Receives: Behavioral: Blended CBT
Treatment as usualActive comparatorTreatment as usual (TAU) is defined as the routine care that subjects receive when they are diagnosed with depression in the secondary care system. The investigators will not interfere with treatment as usual but they will monitor carefully which health care services are utilized by usual care patients using patient records and through self-report.
Receives: Behavioral: Treatment as usual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Measured: 18 weeks

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Assessment of Quality of Life (AQoL-6D)

    Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

  2. Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS-16-SR)

    Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

  3. MINI International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I; Ackenheil et al., 1999)

    Measured: Baseline, 18 weeks, and 12 months

  4. EuroQoL (EQ-5D-5L; Herdman et al., 2011)

    Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

  5. Questionnaires on Costs Associated with Psychiatric Illness (TiC-P; Hakkaart-van Rooijen, van Straten, Donker, Tiemens, 2002)

    Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 18 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

  6. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8; Nguyen, Attkinson, & Stegner, 1983)

    Measured: 12 weeks, and 18 weeks

  7. System Usability Scale (SUS; Brooke, 1996)

    Measured: 12 weeks, and 18 weeks

  8. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

    Measured: Baseline, 12 weeks, 6 months, and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2015
  3. Primary completionJul 2017
  4. Study completionJul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
50 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02410616
Sponsor's protocol ID
001/15
Acronym
E-COMPARED_CH
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
2 Apr 2015
Last updated
21 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Doukani A, Quartagno M, Sera F, Free C, Kakuma R, Riper H, Kleiboer A, Cerga-Pashoja A, van Schaik A, Botella C, Berger T, Chevreul K, Matynia M, Krieger T, Hazo JB, Draisma S, Titzler I, Topooco N, Mathiasen K, Vernmark K, Urech A, Maj A, Andersson G, Berking M, Banos RM, Araya R. Comparison of the Working Alliance in Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Treatment as Usual for Depression in Europe: Secondary Data Analysis of the E-COMPARED Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e47515. doi: 10.2196/47515.

    PubMed 38819882
  • van Genugten CR, Schuurmans J, Hoogendoorn AW, Araya R, Andersson G, Banos R, Botella C, Cerga Pashoja A, Cieslak R, Ebert DD, Garcia-Palacios A, Hazo JB, Herrero R, Holtzmann J, Kemmeren L, Kleiboer A, Krieger T, Smoktunowicz E, Titzler I, Topooco N, Urech A, Smit JH, Riper H. Examining the Theoretical Framework of Behavioral Activation for Major Depressive Disorder: Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 6;8(12):e32007. doi: 10.2196/32007.

    PubMed 34874888
  • Kleiboer A, Smit J, Bosmans J, Ruwaard J, Andersson G, Topooco N, Berger T, Krieger T, Botella C, Banos R, Chevreul K, Araya R, Cerga-Pashoja A, Cieslak R, Rogala A, Vis C, Draisma S, van Schaik A, Kemmeren L, Ebert D, Berking M, Funk B, Cuijpers P, Riper H. European COMPARative Effectiveness research on blended Depression treatment versus treatment-as-usual (E-COMPARED): study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in eight European countries. Trials. 2016 Aug 3;17(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1511-1.

    PubMed 27488181

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Blended CBT and Treatment as usual in people with Depressive Disorder, Major, run by University of Bern at 2 sites in Switzerland.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) (time frame: 18 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02410616, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Sep 2017.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
E-COMPARED_CH Clinical Trial NCT02410616 | AzTrials