Long QT SyndromePhase 2NCT02412709
Long QT Syndrome Screening in Newborns
A Phase 2 study testing QTScreen ECG Recorder in people with Long QT Syndrome, run by QT Medical, Inc. at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this project is to test a new, very compact, 12-lead ECG device as a way to detect long QT syndrome (LQTS) in infants. The device -- called QTScreen -- was developed in Phase I of this project. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 2 to 4 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Long QT Syndrome
- What is being tested?
- QTScreen ECG Recorder
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 4,000 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to Mar 2017
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 2 to 4 weeks
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Who may be able to join
- Born at ≥36 weeks of gestation.
- Birth weight 2.5-4.5 kg
Who cannot join
- Babies that have been born with a heart disease.
- Babies who have a skin condition, allergies, or chest deformities making ECG on the chest difficult or impossible.
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites, 3 recruiting
- Recruiting
St. Francis Medical Center
Lynwood, California, 90262
Andy Moosa, M.D., 310-900-2004, andymoosa@dohs.org
Andy Moosa, M.D.
- Recruiting
Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center
Torrance, California, 90502
Eva M Villa, M.S., 310-222-5383, evilla@labiomed.org
Henry J Lin, M.D.
- Recruiting
Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center-Torrance
Torrance, California, 90503
Elaine Shoji, M.D., 310-541-8801, ecsmd@verizon.net
Elaine Shoji, M.D.
About this study
Official title: ECG Device for Long QT Syndrome Screening in Newborns
The purpose of this project is to test a new, very compact, 12-lead ECG device as a way to detect long QT syndrome (LQTS) in infants. The device -- called QTScreen -- was developed in Phase I of this project.
In Phase II, the goals are to test the capacity of the device for LQTS screening in newborns and to obtain prevalence data on LQTS in California.
The 4 main objectives are:
- To validate the capacity of QTScreen for LQTS screening in newborns.
- To determine the extent to which parents are able to use QTScreen on their babies at home.
- To survey end-user experience and opinions.
- To estimate the LQTS prevalence in California.
Read the detailed description
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a genetic disorder characterized by a prolonged QT interval on the ECG and occurrence of syncope, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death. LQTS is a major cause of sudden death in infants, children, and young adults. Treatment by β-blockers and/or placement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are effective in preventing sudden death, if the diagnosis of LQTS is made early.
The efficacy of ECG screening of newborns for LQTS has been demonstrated in Italy. Furthermore, within the national healthcare system in Italy, universal ECG screening in newborns (<30 days old) is cost-effective. The U.S. debate for universal LQTS screening started in the mid-2000's. In a 2007survey completed by North American pediatric cardiologists, 27% favored optional ECG screening of newborns, whereas 11% supported mandatory screening (363 responses, 35% response rate). There may be stronger support for universal screening, now that more data are available.
Obtaining a good standard 12-lead EKG on a neonate in the clinic is difficult and time consuming. If an ECG device for newborn screening were readily available, reliable, easy to use, and cost-effective, then universal screening of all 4 million newborns in the U.S. each year would identify 2,000 infants with LQTS who are at risk for sudden death, assuming the prevalence is the same as in Italy. Perhaps more than 300 deaths per year from SIDS could be prevented, as well as many more sudden deaths in children, adolescents, and young adults.
During Phase I of this project, a new device was developed to meet this clinical need (called QTScreen). In Phase II, the aim is to test the capacity of QTScreen for LQTS screening in newborns and the feasibility of home screening by parents in an ethnically diverse population of Northern and Southern California. The results of this clinical trial may validate the device as a screening tool for LQTS, and also provide important scientific data for supporting newborn screening for LQTS in the U.S.
The 4 main objectives are:
- To validate the capacity of QTScreen for LQTS screening in newborns. This will be a clinical trial on 4,000 newborns, conducted at the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute (LABioMed).
- To determine the extent to which parents are able to use QTScreen on their babies at home.
- To survey end-user experience and opinions. The target users of QTScreen are parents. Participating parents will be asked to complete a survey, to obtain data for further development of the device.
- To estimate the LQTS prevalence in California. To date, the only population-based estimate of LQTS prevalence is 1 in 2,000 in Italy. In a recent study in Japan, 4,285 1-month-old infants had ECG screening. The LQTS prevalence was not reported, because only 10% of subjects with QTc values >450 msec had gene testing. There has been no population-based study of LQTS in the US. In a study of 707 children with hearing loss in California, 2 subjects had potassium voltage-gated channel KQT-like subfamily member 1 (KCNQ1 potassium channel) mutations, truncation or splicing. This trial will provide data on the LQTS prevalence in California.
Study Sites:
Study procedures will be conducted at subjects' homes. Subjects will be recruited from LA BioMed at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center-Torrance, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, and St. Francis Medical Center. Approval from each of the recruitment sites will be obtained prior to commencing recruitment.
Consent:
Consent will be sought from one parent only. Parents will be given the opportunity to thoroughly read the consent form and to ask questions.
Risk/Benefit:
ECG is a routine test performed on infants, children and adults every day in the hospital for many years with no problems or adverse events. The QTScreen system used in this study is a simplified way of performing an ECG test on infants. Some subjects may undergo genetic testing as part of this research and there are some risks associated with genetic testing, such as emotional and confidentiality.
There is a very small risk of infection or rash related to the procedure involved in ECG testing. The subject may feel some discomfort from the sticky patches placed on and removed from his/her chest. Discomfort will be minimized by using an adhesive remover wipe which is commercially available and used by hospitals. Although infection is very unlikely to occur, rules and procedures of the nursery and clinic will be followed. This includes cleaning the ECG equipment and sanitizing it using a disinfecting wipe before and after each use to prevent infection.
The effects of drawing blood are usually pain, bleeding and/or a bruise where the needle is inserted. Occasionally the area around the vein may swell. Serious complications such as a blood clot or infection may occur but these are rare. Some people feel faint when having blood drawn. Necessary precautions, such as gloves and proper sterilization, will be taken to minimize pain and infection. A small amount of local anesthetic cream may be placed on the child's forearm.
Appropriate precautions will be used to minimize the risks associated with this project and feel that in general the risks associated with this project are low.
The information gained from this study will help to find ways to possibly simplify the ECG test. This research study may also lead to a better understanding of LQTS which can provide important insight for future treatments and research. Therefore the general feeling is that the benefits of this project outweigh the risks.
- Conditions
- Long QT Syndrome
- Being tested
- QTScreen ECG Recorder
- Keywords
- Long QT Syndrome, LQTS, genetic testing, ECG, saliva testing
- Medical subject headings
- Long QT Syndrome
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
QTScreen ECG RecorderDevice
Subjects will be randomly assigned to the: Parents Performing ECG (PPE) group or Staff Performing ECG (SPE) group. This will assess whether parents are able to use QTScreen on babies at home.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Parent Performing ECG (PPE) | Experimental | Parent Performing ECG (PPE) Group--When the baby is 2 weeks old, research staff will contact interested parents to schedule a home visit. During the visit, a research assistant will provide the parents with a kit that includes the QTScreen system and instructions. The parents will perform an ECG on their child using the QTScreen and instructions. If after attempting the ECG on their own parents encounter problems, parents can ask the research assistant for assistance. Receives: Device: QTScreen ECG Recorder |
| Staff Performing ECG (SPE) | Active comparator | Staff Performing ECG (SPE) Group--When the baby is 2-4 weeks of age, research staff will contact the family to schedule a home visit. The QTScreen test will be done by a research assistant. Receives: Device: QTScreen ECG Recorder |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Determine LQTS risk via QTc Measurement and family/personal history
A standard 12-lead ECG will be printed from the QTScreen recording. Investigators will manually measure a corrected QT interval (QTc) from lead II, and examine any clinical ECG abnormalities. Subjects with a positive history, or subjects with a median QTc ≥450 ms on the first QTScreen will be categorized as Intermediate Risk and undergo a repeat QTScreen in 2-4 weeks (before 2 months of age).
Measured: within 1-2 business days after QTScreen recording
Determine if parents are able to use QTScreen on babies at home
Participants in the PPE group will be provided with the QTScreen recording device along with instructions for conducting an ECG on their baby. While conducting the ECG, a research assistant will access the parents' ability in properly conducting the ECG via a questionnaire.
Measured: 18 to 24 months (within 6 months after the clinical trial is completed)
Secondary outcomes (2)
Follow-up for false negatives and survey end-user experience
A research assistant will conduct a follow-up of each subject when the subject turns 1 year of age. For subjects <1 year of age when the project ends, the family will be contacted at the end of the project period and when the subject turns 1 year. Parents will be inquired about: any diagnosis of LQTS, heart disease, fainting, seizures, or sudden death (SIDS) after the screening. If a subject had fainting or seizures but no subsequent cardiac evaluation, he/she will be scheduled for a repeat QTScreen. If a subject died of sudden unexplained death or SIDS, the parents will be offered ECG and genetic testing for LQTS. After the follow-up questions, parents will be surveyed on their experience with QTScreen.
Measured: at 1 year after LQTS screening
Estimate the LQTS prevalence in California
The large sample size and use of genetic conformation in this study provides a unique opportunity to evaluate the LQTS prevalence, as well as differences in certain ethnic groups, such as Latinos and White. The number of subjects with confirmed LQTS includes true positives, identified by positive QTScreen testing followed by gene testing, and false negatives identified by telephone follow up and subsequent confirmation. Prevalence data will be reported as the proportion of subjects with confirmed LQTS (and binomial exact 95% CI).
Measured: 18 to 24 months (within 6 months after the clinical trial is completed)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completionDec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completionMar 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (53)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Long QT SyndromeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 4,000 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- QT Medical, Inc.
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, University of California, Irvine
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ruey-Kang Chang, QT Medical, Inc.
- Investigators
- Ruey-Kang Chang, M.D., M.P.H., Principal investigator, QT Medical, Inc.
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02412709
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 30147-01
- Status last verified
- Sep 2016
- First submitted
- 1 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 28 Sep 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Schwartz PJ, Stramba-Badiale M, Crotti L, Pedrazzini M, Besana A, Bosi G, Gabbarini F, Goulene K, Insolia R, Mannarino S, Mosca F, Nespoli L, Rimini A, Rosati E, Salice P, Spazzolini C. Prevalence of the congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2009 Nov 3;120(18):1761-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.863209. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
PubMed 19841298Ackerman MJ, Siu BL, Sturner WQ, Tester DJ, Valdivia CR, Makielski JC, Towbin JA. Postmortem molecular analysis of SCN5A defects in sudden infant death syndrome. JAMA. 2001 Nov 14;286(18):2264-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.18.2264.
PubMed 11710892Tester DJ, Ackerman MJ. Sudden infant death syndrome: how significant are the cardiac channelopathies? Cardiovasc Res. 2005 Aug 15;67(3):388-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.02.013.
PubMed 15913580Arnestad M, Crotti L, Rognum TO, Insolia R, Pedrazzini M, Ferrandi C, Vege A, Wang DW, Rhodes TE, George AL Jr, Schwartz PJ. Prevalence of long-QT syndrome gene variants in sudden infant death syndrome. Circulation. 2007 Jan 23;115(3):361-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.658021. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
PubMed 17210839Weese-Mayer DE, Ackerman MJ, Marazita ML, Berry-Kravis EM. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: review of implicated genetic factors. Am J Med Genet A. 2007 Apr 15;143A(8):771-88. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31722.
PubMed 17340630Schwartz PJ, Crotti L. Can a message from the dead save lives? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jan 16;49(2):247-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.009. Epub 2006 Dec 29. No abstract available.
PubMed 17222737Gajewski KK, Saul JP. Sudden cardiac death in children and adolescents (excluding Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2010 Jul;3(2):107-12. doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.74035.
PubMed 21234187Van Hare GF, Perry J, Berul CI, Triedman JK. Cost effectiveness of neonatal ECG screening for the long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2007 Jan;28(1):137; author reply137-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl414. Epub 2006 Dec 8. No abstract available.
PubMed 17158522van Langen IM, Wilde AA. Con: Newborn screening to prevent sudden cardiac death? Heart Rhythm. 2006 Nov;3(11):1356-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Oct 11. No abstract available.
PubMed 17074645Chang RK, Rodriguez S, Gurvitz MZ. Electrocardiogram screening of infants for long QT syndrome: survey of pediatric cardiologists in North America. J Electrocardiol. 2010 Jan-Feb;43(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.07.004.
PubMed 19665725Schwartz PJ. Pro: Newborn ECG screening to prevent sudden cardiac death. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Nov;3(11):1353-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.07.016. Epub 2006 Oct 10. No abstract available.
PubMed 17074644Chang RK, Lan YT, Silka MJ, Morrow H, Kwong A, Smith-Lang J, Wallerstein R, Lin HJ. Genetic variants for long QT syndrome among infants and children from a statewide newborn hearing screening program cohort. J Pediatr. 2014 Mar;164(3):590-5.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
PubMed 24388587Schwartz PJ. The congenital long QT syndromes from genotype to phenotype: clinical implications. J Intern Med. 2006 Jan;259(1):39-47. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2796.2005.01583.x.
PubMed 16336512Meyer JS, Mehdirad A, Salem BI, Kulikowska A, Kulikowski P. Sudden arrhythmia death syndrome: importance of the long QT syndrome. Am Fam Physician. 2003 Aug 1;68(3):483-8.
PubMed 12924831Tester DJ, Kopplin LJ, Creighton W, Burke AP, Ackerman MJ. Pathogenesis of unexplained drowning: new insights from a molecular autopsy. Mayo Clin Proc. 2005 May;80(5):596-600. doi: 10.4065/80.5.596.
PubMed 15887426
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 Sep 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- ECG Device for Long QT Syndrome Screening in Newborns
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02412709
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 30147-01
- Conditions
- Long QT Syndrome
- Keywords
- Long QT Syndrome, LQTS, genetic testing, ECG, saliva testing
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 4,000 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- QT Medical, Inc.University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lundquist Institute for Biomedical Innovation at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, University of California, Irvine
- Study start
- Jun 2015
- Primary completion
- Dec 2016 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Mar 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 9 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this project is to test a new, very compact, 12-lead ECG device as a way to detect long QT syndrome (LQTS) in infants. The device -- called QTScreen -- was developed in Phase I of this project.
In Phase II, the goals are to test the capacity of the device for LQTS screening in newborns and to obtain prevalence data on LQTS in California.
The 4 main objectives are:
- To validate the capacity of QTScreen for LQTS screening in newborns.
- To determine the extent to which parents are able to use QTScreen on their babies at home.
- To survey end-user experience and opinions.
- To estimate the LQTS prevalence in California.
Detailed description
Long QT syndrome (LQTS) is a genetic disorder characterized by a prolonged QT interval on the ECG and occurrence of syncope, ventricular arrhythmias, and sudden death. LQTS is a major cause of sudden death in infants, children, and young adults. Treatment by β-blockers and/or placement of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) are effective in preventing sudden death, if the diagnosis of LQTS is made early.
The efficacy of ECG screening of newborns for LQTS has been demonstrated in Italy. Furthermore, within the national healthcare system in Italy, universal ECG screening in newborns (<30 days old) is cost-effective. The U.S. debate for universal LQTS screening started in the mid-2000's. In a 2007survey completed by North American pediatric cardiologists, 27% favored optional ECG screening of newborns, whereas 11% supported mandatory screening (363 responses, 35% response rate). There may be stronger support for universal screening, now that more data are available.
Obtaining a good standard 12-lead EKG on a neonate in the clinic is difficult and time consuming. If an ECG device for newborn screening were readily available, reliable, easy to use, and cost-effective, then universal screening of all 4 million newborns in the U.S. each year would identify 2,000 infants with LQTS who are at risk for sudden death, assuming the prevalence is the same as in Italy. Perhaps more than 300 deaths per year from SIDS could be prevented, as well as many more sudden deaths in children, adolescents, and young adults.
During Phase I of this project, a new device was developed to meet this clinical need (called QTScreen). In Phase II, the aim is to test the capacity of QTScreen for LQTS screening in newborns and the feasibility of home screening by parents in an ethnically diverse population of Northern and Southern California. The results of this clinical trial may validate the device as a screening tool for LQTS, and also provide important scientific data for supporting newborn screening for LQTS in the U.S.
The 4 main objectives are:
- To validate the capacity of QTScreen for LQTS screening in newborns. This will be a clinical trial on 4,000 newborns, conducted at the Los Angeles Biomedical Research Institute (LABioMed).
- To determine the extent to which parents are able to use QTScreen on their babies at home.
- To survey end-user experience and opinions. The target users of QTScreen are parents. Participating parents will be asked to complete a survey, to obtain data for further development of the device.
- To estimate the LQTS prevalence in California. To date, the only population-based estimate of LQTS prevalence is 1 in 2,000 in Italy. In a recent study in Japan, 4,285 1-month-old infants had ECG screening. The LQTS prevalence was not reported, because only 10% of subjects with QTc values >450 msec had gene testing. There has been no population-based study of LQTS in the US. In a study of 707 children with hearing loss in California, 2 subjects had potassium voltage-gated channel KQT-like subfamily member 1 (KCNQ1 potassium channel) mutations, truncation or splicing. This trial will provide data on the LQTS prevalence in California.
Study Sites:
Study procedures will be conducted at subjects' homes. Subjects will be recruited from LA BioMed at Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Providence Little Company of Mary Medical Center-Torrance, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center, and St. Francis Medical Center. Approval from each of the recruitment sites will be obtained prior to commencing recruitment.
Consent:
Consent will be sought from one parent only. Parents will be given the opportunity to thoroughly read the consent form and to ask questions.
Risk/Benefit:
ECG is a routine test performed on infants, children and adults every day in the hospital for many years with no problems or adverse events. The QTScreen system used in this study is a simplified way of performing an ECG test on infants. Some subjects may undergo genetic testing as part of this research and there are some risks associated with genetic testing, such as emotional and confidentiality.
There is a very small risk of infection or rash related to the procedure involved in ECG testing. The subject may feel some discomfort from the sticky patches placed on and removed from his/her chest. Discomfort will be minimized by using an adhesive remover wipe which is commercially available and used by hospitals. Although infection is very unlikely to occur, rules and procedures of the nursery and clinic will be followed. This includes cleaning the ECG equipment and sanitizing it using a disinfecting wipe before and after each use to prevent infection.
The effects of drawing blood are usually pain, bleeding and/or a bruise where the needle is inserted. Occasionally the area around the vein may swell. Serious complications such as a blood clot or infection may occur but these are rare. Some people feel faint when having blood drawn. Necessary precautions, such as gloves and proper sterilization, will be taken to minimize pain and infection. A small amount of local anesthetic cream may be placed on the child's forearm.
Appropriate precautions will be used to minimize the risks associated with this project and feel that in general the risks associated with this project are low.
The information gained from this study will help to find ways to possibly simplify the ECG test. This research study may also lead to a better understanding of LQTS which can provide important insight for future treatments and research. Therefore the general feeling is that the benefits of this project outweigh the risks.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Screening
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Parent Performing ECG (PPE) | Experimental | Device: QTScreen ECG RecorderParent Performing ECG (PPE) Group--When the baby is 2 weeks old, research staff will contact interested parents to schedule a home visit. During the visit, a research assistant will provide the parents with a kit that includes the QTScreen system and instructions. The parents will perform an ECG on their child using the QTScreen and instructions. If after attempting the ECG on their own parents encounter problems, parents can ask the research assistant for assistance. |
| Staff Performing ECG (SPE) | Active comparator | Device: QTScreen ECG RecorderStaff Performing ECG (SPE) Group--When the baby is 2-4 weeks of age, research staff will contact the family to schedule a home visit. The QTScreen test will be done by a research assistant. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 2 to 4 weeks
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Born at ≥36 weeks of gestation.
- Birth weight 2.5-4.5 kg
Key exclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Babies that have been born with a heart disease.
- Babies who have a skin condition, allergies, or chest deformities making ECG on the chest difficult or impossible.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| QTScreen ECG RecorderSubjects will be randomly assigned to the: Parents Performing ECG (PPE) group or Staff Performing ECG (SPE) group. This will assess whether parents are able to use QTScreen on babies at home. | Device | Parent Performing ECG (PPE), Staff Performing ECG (SPE) |
Primary outcome
Determine LQTS risk via QTc Measurement and family/personal history
Time frame: within 1-2 business days after QTScreen recording
A standard 12-lead ECG will be printed from the QTScreen recording. Investigators will manually measure a corrected QT interval (QTc) from lead II, and examine any clinical ECG abnormalities. Subjects with a positive history, or subjects with a median QTc ≥450 ms on the first QTScreen will be categorized as Intermediate Risk and undergo a repeat QTScreen in 2-4 weeks (before 2 months of age).
Determine if parents are able to use QTScreen on babies at home
Time frame: 18 to 24 months (within 6 months after the clinical trial is completed)
Participants in the PPE group will be provided with the QTScreen recording device along with instructions for conducting an ECG on their baby. While conducting the ECG, a research assistant will access the parents' ability in properly conducting the ECG via a questionnaire.
2 secondary outcomes
Follow-up for false negatives and survey end-user experience
Time frame: at 1 year after LQTS screening
Estimate the LQTS prevalence in California
Time frame: 18 to 24 months (within 6 months after the clinical trial is completed)
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 Sep 2016.
- Background: PubMed 19841298Schwartz PJ, Stramba-Badiale M, Crotti L, Pedrazzini M, Besana A, Bosi G, Gabbarini F, Goulene K, Insolia R, Mannarino S, Mosca F, Nespoli L, Rimini A, Rosati E, Salice P, Spazzolini C. Prevalence of the congenital long-QT syndrome. Circulation. 2009 Nov 3;120(18):1761-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.863209. Epub 2009 Oct 19.
- Background: PubMed 11710892Ackerman MJ, Siu BL, Sturner WQ, Tester DJ, Valdivia CR, Makielski JC, Towbin JA. Postmortem molecular analysis of SCN5A defects in sudden infant death syndrome. JAMA. 2001 Nov 14;286(18):2264-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.18.2264.
- Background: PubMed 15913580Tester DJ, Ackerman MJ. Sudden infant death syndrome: how significant are the cardiac channelopathies? Cardiovasc Res. 2005 Aug 15;67(3):388-96. doi: 10.1016/j.cardiores.2005.02.013.
- Background: PubMed 17210839Arnestad M, Crotti L, Rognum TO, Insolia R, Pedrazzini M, Ferrandi C, Vege A, Wang DW, Rhodes TE, George AL Jr, Schwartz PJ. Prevalence of long-QT syndrome gene variants in sudden infant death syndrome. Circulation. 2007 Jan 23;115(3):361-7. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.658021. Epub 2007 Jan 8.
- Background: PubMed 17340630Weese-Mayer DE, Ackerman MJ, Marazita ML, Berry-Kravis EM. Sudden Infant Death Syndrome: review of implicated genetic factors. Am J Med Genet A. 2007 Apr 15;143A(8):771-88. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.31722.
- Background: PubMed 17222737Schwartz PJ, Crotti L. Can a message from the dead save lives? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007 Jan 16;49(2):247-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2006.10.009. Epub 2006 Dec 29. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21234187Gajewski KK, Saul JP. Sudden cardiac death in children and adolescents (excluding Sudden Infant Death Syndrome). Ann Pediatr Cardiol. 2010 Jul;3(2):107-12. doi: 10.4103/0974-2069.74035.
- Background: PubMed 17158522Van Hare GF, Perry J, Berul CI, Triedman JK. Cost effectiveness of neonatal ECG screening for the long QT syndrome. Eur Heart J. 2007 Jan;28(1):137; author reply137-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehl414. Epub 2006 Dec 8. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 17074645van Langen IM, Wilde AA. Con: Newborn screening to prevent sudden cardiac death? Heart Rhythm. 2006 Nov;3(11):1356-9. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Oct 11. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 19665725Chang RK, Rodriguez S, Gurvitz MZ. Electrocardiogram screening of infants for long QT syndrome: survey of pediatric cardiologists in North America. J Electrocardiol. 2010 Jan-Feb;43(1):4-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2009.07.004.
- Background: PubMed 17074644Schwartz PJ. Pro: Newborn ECG screening to prevent sudden cardiac death. Heart Rhythm. 2006 Nov;3(11):1353-5. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2006.07.016. Epub 2006 Oct 10. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 24388587Chang RK, Lan YT, Silka MJ, Morrow H, Kwong A, Smith-Lang J, Wallerstein R, Lin HJ. Genetic variants for long QT syndrome among infants and children from a statewide newborn hearing screening program cohort. J Pediatr. 2014 Mar;164(3):590-5.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2013.11.011. Epub 2013 Dec 31.
Related trials for Long QT Syndrome
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Observational Study to Describe Health-Related Quality of Life and Measure Disease Burden Among Patients With Long QT Syndrome Types (LQTS) 2 and 3
Long QT Syndrome Type 3, Long QT Syndrome 2
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Physical Activity and Functional Capacity in Patients With Congenital Long QT Syndrome
Long QT Syndrome, Channelopathies
Recruiting
Dual Trigger VS HCG Trigger for Final Oocyte Maturation in Normal Responders
ICSI, IVF
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Opt-IVF for Personalized Medicine for Normal Responders
Ivf
RecruitingPhase 2/3
Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of THRV-1268 in Participants With Long QT Syndrome Type 2 (LQTS2) and Type 3 (LQTS3)
Long QT Syndrome (LQTS) 2
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Ruey-Kang Chang, M.D., M.P.H. principal investigator
QT Medical, Inc.
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing QTScreen ECG Recorder in people with Long QT Syndrome, run by QT Medical, Inc. at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Sandra Sedano, M.S. (424-558-3500, ssedano@qtmedicalinc.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Determine LQTS risk via QTc Measurement and family/personal history (time frame: within 1-2 business days after QTScreen recording). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02412709, which also lists 53 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 Sep 2016.