AzTrials
AzTrials

Non-celiac Wheat SensitivityNCT02421783

Osteoporosis In Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity Patients

An observational study of Non-celiac Wheat Sensitivity, run by University of Palermo at 2 sites in Italy.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) or 'wheat sensitivity' (NCWS) is included in the spectrum of gluten-related disorders. No data are available on the prevalence of low bone mass density (BMD) in NCWS. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Non-celiac Wheat Sensitivity
How many people
270 participants
Where
2 sitesItaly
Study dates
1 May 2015to 1 Jun 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The study will include consecutive adult patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like clinical presentation, according to Rome II criteria, and a definitive diagnosis of NCWS, referred at the Internal Medicine and at the Gastroenterology Units of the University Hospital of Palermo, between may 2015 and may 2017.

Who may be able to join

  • To diagnose NCWS the recently proposed criteria will be adopted. All the patients will meet the following criteria:
  • negative serum anti-transglutaminase (anti-tTG) and anti-endomysium (EmA) immunoglobulin (Ig)A and IgG antibodies;
  • absence of intestinal villous atrophy;
  • negative IgE-mediated immune-allergy tests to wheat (skin prick tests and/or serum specific IgE detection);
  • resolution of the IBS symptoms on standard elimination diet, excluding wheat, cow's milk, egg, tomato, chocolate, and other self-reported food(s) causing symptoms;
  • symptom reappearance on double-blind placebo-controlled (DBPC) wheat challenge. As the investigators previously described in other studies, DBPC cow's milk protein challenge and other "open" food challenges will be performed too.
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Additional inclusion criteria will be:
  • age >18 years; follow-up duration longer than six months after the initial diagnosis;
  • at least two outpatient visits during the follow-up period.

Who cannot join

  • positive EmA in the culture medium of the duodenal biopsies, also in the case of normal villi/crypts ratio in the duodenal mucosa;
  • self-exclusion of wheat from the diet and refusal to reintroduce it, before entering the study;
  • other "organic" gastrointestinal disorders;
  • nervous system disease and/or major psychiatric disorder;
  • physical impairment limiting physical activity;
  • menopause;
  • steroid and sex steroid therapy, hormone replacement therapy or ovariectomy.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

Italy2 sites
  • Pasquale Mansueto

    Palermo, 90127

  • Antonio Carroccio

    Sciacca, Agrigento

Other trials in Italy

About this study

Non-celiac gluten sensitivity (NCGS) or 'wheat sensitivity' (NCWS) is included in the spectrum of gluten-related disorders. No data are available on the prevalence of low bone mass density (BMD) in NCWS. Our study aims to evaluate the prevalence of low BMD in NCWS patients and search for correlations with other clinical characteristics.

This prospective observation study will include 90 NCWS patients with irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like symptoms, 90 IBS and 90 celiac controls. Patients will be recruited at the Internal Medicine and at the Gastroenterology Units of the University of Palermo. Elimination diet and double-blind placebo controlled (DBPC) wheat challenge proved the NCWS diagnosis. All subjects underwent BMD assessment by Dual Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA), duodenal histology, Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) DQ typing, body mass index (BMI) evaluation and assessment for daily calcium intake.

Read the detailed description

Celiac disease (CD) has been reported to increase the risk of osteoporosis, with a resulting augmented risk of fractures. More recently, it has been reported that a consistent percentage of the general population consider themselves to be suffering from problems caused by wheat and/or gluten ingestion, even though they do not have CD or wheat allergy. This clinical condition has been named Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity' (NCGS). In a previous paper the investigators suggested the term 'Non-Celiac Wheat Sensitivity' (NCWS), since it is not known what component of wheat causes the symptoms in NCGS patients, and the investigators also showed that these patients had a high frequency of coexistent multiple food hypersensitivity. That previous study also showed a percentage of NCWS patients had weight loss and anemia: whether these depended on the intestinal malabsorption or not remains unclear. As yet no data are available on the presence and prevalence of low bone mass density (BMD) in NCWS patients. The aims of the present study is: 1) to investigate the prevalence of low BMD in NCWS patient and 2) to search for a possible correlation between BMD and other clinical characteristics, in particular the body mass index (BMI), of NCWS patients.

Keywords
Non-celiac wheat sensitivity, Multiple food allergy, Body mass index, Osteoporosis
Medical subject headings
Osteoporosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02421783
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
NCWS patientsConsecutive adult patients with an irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like clinical presentation, according to Rome II criteria, and a definitive diagnosis of NCWS.
CD patientsSex- and age-matched subjects with CD, diagnosed according to standard criteria during the same study period and enrolled as first control group
IBS patientsSex- and age-matched subjects with IBS unrelated to NCWS or other food 'intolerance', diagnosed according to standard criteria during the same study period and enrolled as second control group

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in bone mineral density (BMD)

    BMD will be assessed by dual x-ray absorptiometry (DXA), using a QDR Discovery Hologic DXA scanner in the femoral neck and in the lumbar spine. For each scan, BMD and T-scores will be recorded. A T-score between +1 and -1 is considered normal, between -1 and -2.5 indicates osteopenia, -2.5 or lower indicates osteoporosis. The investigators also will calculate the 10-year fracture risks according to the standardized WHO FRAX equation, computed with BMD (T-score) at the femoral neck.

    Measured: At baseline and at 24 months

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Conventional lateral spine x-ray as an assessment of suspected osteoporotic vertebral fractures, using Genant's method

    A random sample of the patients and controls will undergo conventional lateral spine x-ray for better assessment of suspected osteoporotic vertebral fractures, according to Genant's method (grade 0, no reduction; grade 1, minimal fracture, 20-25% vertebral height decrease; grade 2, moderate fracture, 25-40% vertebral height decrease; and grade 3, severe fracture, greater than 40% vertebral height decrease).

    Measured: At baseline

  2. Change in serum bone alkaline phosphatase

    Serum bone alkaline phosphatase values will be detected (refences values of adults males < or =20 mcg/L; of adults premenopausal females < or =14 mcg/L; of adults postmenopausal females < or =22 mcg/L).

    Measured: At baseline and at 24 months

  3. Change in serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D

    Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D values will be detected (refences values 30.0-74.0 ng/mL).

    Measured: At baseline and at 24 months

  4. Change in serum phosphorus levels

    Serum phosphorus levels values will be detected (refences values of subjects > or =18 years: 2.5-4.5 mg/dL).

    Measured: At baseline and at 24 months

  5. Change in serum calcium levels

    Serum calcium levels values will be detected (refences values of males age 18-21 years: 9.3-10.3 mg/dL, age 22 years and older: 8.9-10.1 mg/dL; of females age 18 years and older: 8.9-10.1 mg/dL)

    Measured: At baseline and at 24 months

  6. Change in urinary phosphorus levels

    Urinary phosphorus levels values will be detected (refences values 0.4-1.3 g per 24-hour urine sample).

    Measured: At baseline and at 24 months

  7. Change in urinary calcium levels

    Urinary calcium levels values will be detected (refences values 100-300 mg per 24-hour urine sample).

    Measured: At baseline and at 24 months

  8. Change in dietary intake and lifestyle

    All the participants will fill in a health and lifestyle questionnaire, considering menarche and age at menopause (if applicable), medical and drug abuse history, lifestyle habits (including elimination diet, smoking status, alcohol consumption, Italian espresso coffee drinking and physical activity); history of bone fractures will also be recorded. In order to assess daily caloric intake and calcium intake, the subjects will receive a dietary form containing a printed list of the most common foods.

    Measured: At baseline and at 24 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted21 Apr 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 May 2015
  3. Primary completion1 Oct 2016
  4. Study completion1 Jun 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
270 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02421783
Sponsor's protocol ID
ACPM07
Status last verified
Aug 2019
First submitted
8 Apr 2015
Last updated
3 Sep 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Mansueto P, Seidita A, D'Alcamo A, Carroccio A. Role of FODMAPs in Patients With Irritable Bowel Syndrome. Nutr Clin Pract. 2015 Oct;30(5):665-82. doi: 10.1177/0884533615569886. Epub 2015 Feb 18.

    PubMed 25694210
  • Carroccio A, D'Alcamo A, Mansueto P. Nonceliac wheat sensitivity in the context of multiple food hypersensitivity: new data from confocal endomicroscopy. Gastroenterology. 2015 Mar;148(3):666-7. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2014.11.047. Epub 2015 Jan 24. No abstract available.

    PubMed 25625764
  • Carroccio A, Soresi M, D'Alcamo A, Sciume C, Iacono G, Geraci G, Brusca I, Seidita A, Adragna F, Carta M, Mansueto P. Risk of low bone mineral density and low body mass index in patients with non-celiac wheat-sensitivity: a prospective observation study. BMC Med. 2014 Nov 28;12:230. doi: 10.1186/s12916-014-0230-2.

    PubMed 25430806
  • Mansueto P, Seidita A, D'Alcamo A, Carroccio A. Non-celiac gluten sensitivity: literature review. J Am Coll Nutr. 2014;33(1):39-54. doi: 10.1080/07315724.2014.869996.

    PubMed 24533607
  • Carroccio A, Rini G, Mansueto P. Non-celiac wheat sensitivity is a more appropriate label than non-celiac gluten sensitivity. Gastroenterology. 2014 Jan;146(1):320-1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.08.061. Epub 2013 Nov 22. No abstract available.

    PubMed 24275240
  • Carroccio A, Mansueto P, D'Alcamo A, Iacono G. Non-celiac wheat sensitivity as an allergic condition: personal experience and narrative review. Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Dec;108(12):1845-52; quiz 1853. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2013.353. Epub 2013 Nov 5.

    PubMed 24169272
  • Carroccio A, Mansueto P, Iacono G, Soresi M, D'Alcamo A, Cavataio F, Brusca I, Florena AM, Ambrosiano G, Seidita A, Pirrone G, Rini GB. Non-celiac wheat sensitivity diagnosed by double-blind placebo-controlled challenge: exploring a new clinical entity. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Dec;107(12):1898-906; quiz 1907. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.236. Epub 2012 Jul 24.

    PubMed 22825366
  • Carroccio A, Brusca I, Mansueto P, D'alcamo A, Barrale M, Soresi M, Seidita A, La Chiusa SM, Iacono G, Sprini D. A comparison between two different in vitro basophil activation tests for gluten- and cow's milk protein sensitivity in irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)-like patients. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2013 Jun;51(6):1257-63. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2012-0609.

    PubMed 23183757

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Non-celiac Wheat Sensitivity, run by University of Palermo at 2 sites in Italy.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in Italy. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in bone mineral density (BMD) (time frame: At baseline and at 24 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02421783, which also lists 8 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in