Multiple MyelomaPhase 2OPTIMALNCT02424851
Optimising Renal Outcome in Myeloma Renal Failure
A Phase 2 study testing Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Bendamustine in people with Multiple Myeloma and Chronic Kidney Disease, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 9 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of bortezomib versus thalidomide in reducing free light chains in the blood of myeloma patients. In addition participants will receive bendamustine (chemotherapy) and dexamethasone (steroids), which increase the effectiveness of both bortezomib and thalidomide. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Myeloma, Chronic Kidney Disease
- What is being tested?
- Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Bendamustine
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 31 participants
- Where
- 9 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Nov 2014to 20 Apr 2020
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial.
- Patients attending NHS (National Health Service) Haemato-oncology centres.
- Patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma.
- Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) <30 mls/min.
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) staging is based on estimated or measured GFR. CKD stage 4 (15-29 ml/min) and CKD stage 5 (<15 ml/min) are eligible to enter the study. It is expected centres will consider use of fluid resuscitation and pulsed dose of steroid therapy in this group of patients to salvage renal function prior to trial screening.
- A number of patients with newly diagnosed myeloma and renal failure will have a pre-existing medical condition (hypertension, diabetes etc.) causing renal damage. Where there is a medical condition (e.g. hypertension, diabetes) which may cause renal damage, there must have been a further decline (≥15 mls/min GFR) between previous steady state and the study screening.
Show all 11Show fewer
- Female participants of childbearing potential and male patients whose partner is a woman of childbearing potential must be prepared to use contraception in accordance with (and consent to) the Celgene-approved process for thalidomide and lenalidomide Risk Management and Pregnancy Prevention Programme.
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test performed by a healthcare professional in accordance with the Celgene-approved process for thalidomide and lenalidomide Risk Management and Pregnancy Prevention.
- Free of prior malignancies for ≥ 2 years with exception of currently treated basal cell, squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, localised prostate cancer or carcinoma "in-situ" of the cervix or breast.
- In the Investigator's opinion, is able and willing to comply with all trial requirements.
- Willing to allow his or her General Practitioner and consultant, if appropriate, to be notified of participation in the trial.
Who cannot join
- Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the trial or the female partner of a male participant planning a pregnancy during the course of the trial.
- Known allergy to investigational drugs.
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial.
- Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1.0 x10^9/L
- Platelet count <75 x 10^9/L
Show all 13Show fewer
- Serum SGOT/AST or SGPT/ALT (serum glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase/aspartate aminotransferase or serum glutamic pyruvic transaminase/alanine aminotransferase) >3 x upper limit of normal.
- Use of any standard/experimental anti-myeloma drug therapy excluding dexamethasone 14 days prior to trial entry.
- CKD stages < 4.
- Intention to use a physical method of serum free light chain removal such as plasma exchange or high cut off dialysis.
- Grade 2 neuropathy or more (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v 4.0) will preclude use of thalidomide and bortezomib.
- Participants who have participated in another research trial involving an investigational product in the past 12 weeks.
- Contraindicated to receive either one of the study drugs, thalidomide, bortezomib, bendamustine based on the respective summary of product characteristics.
Trial locations and contacts
9 sites in 1 country.
9 sites in 1 country
United Kingdom9 sites
Basingstoke & North Hampshire Hospital
Basingstoke
Heartlands Hospitals
Birmingham
Kent & Canterbury Hospital
Canterbury, CT1 3NG
St Helier Hospital
Epsom
Royal Liverpool Hospital
Liverpool
Kings College Hospital
London
Churchill Hospital
Oxford, OX3 7LE
Queen Alexandra Hospital
Portsmouth
Great Western Hospital
Swindon
About this study
Official title: A Study of Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BTD) Versus Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BBD) in Patients With Renal Failure Defined as a GFR Below 30 Mls/Min
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of bortezomib versus thalidomide in reducing free light chains in the blood of myeloma patients. In addition participants will receive bendamustine (chemotherapy) and dexamethasone (steroids), which increase the effectiveness of both bortezomib and thalidomide. The trial will also study whether an earlier reduction of free light chains increases the chances of the kidneys recovering.
Read the detailed description
Renal impairment is a life threatening condition of myeloma. 20-25% of patients will present at diagnosis with renal dysfunction. Outcome is poor due to high early mortality, with 28% of newly diagnosed myeloma patients in myeloma trials with renal failure not surviving beyond 100 days, compared with 10% overall.
This study aims to establish:
- Whether proteosomal inhibition (bortezomib) or immunomodulatory (thalidomide) based therapy achieves threshold reduction of serum free light chains (sFLCs) in a significant majority of patients.
- Whether sFLC response to the first 2 cycles (early responder) predicts haematological and renal response to the next 2 cycles of therapy.
- An early time point for assessment of sFLC reduction as a biomarker for response.
Participants will be stratified by age and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage to receive either bortezomib, bendamustine and dexamethasone (BBD) or thalidomide, bendamustine and dexamethasone (BTD).
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma, Chronic Kidney Disease
- Being tested
- Bortezomib, Thalidomide, Bendamustine, Dexamethasone
- Keywords
- myeloma, multiple myeloma, chronic kidney disease, renal failure, bortezomib, Velcade, thalidomide, bendamustine, dexamethasone, serum free light chains, proteosomal inhibition, immunomodulatory
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Myeloma, Renal Insufficiency, Chronic, Neoplasms, Plasma Cell, Renal Insufficiency
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
BortezomibDrug
Also called Velcade
1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneously* days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of each cycle. Number of cycles: Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT (autologous stem cell transplant) will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised).
*intravenous infusion available in case of patient intolerance to subcutaneous bortezomib
ThalidomideDrug
100 mg daily orally, preferably at night, days 1-21 of each cycle. Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised)
BendamustineDrug
60 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 of each cycle. Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised)
DexamethasoneDrug
40mg orally days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9 and 11-12 of each cycle
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (BBD) | Active comparator | Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone Receives: Drug: Bortezomib; Drug: Bendamustine; Drug: Dexamethasone |
| Arm B (BTD) | Active comparator | Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone Receives: Drug: Thalidomide; Drug: Bendamustine; Drug: Dexamethasone |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain
Measured: End of week 6 (after receiving two cycles of therapy)
Number of Participants With Different Renal Responses to Treatment
Measured: End of week 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy)
Secondary outcomes (4)
Haematological and Non-haematological Toxicity in Both Treatment Arms
Measured: End of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy), 30 days after final treatment and 12 months after randomisation
Overall Survival
Measured: 1 month post end of treatment and 1 year post randomisation
Renal Response After Two Cycles of Trial Treatment
Measured: End of 2nd treatment cycle, week 6
Quality of Life Measured by the EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire at Baseline and 1 Month Follow up
The EQ-5D-3L descriptive system comprises the following five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is scored on a scale of 1 to 3: 1 (no problems), 2 (some problems), and 3 (extreme problems). Higher score equates to a worse outcome.
As stated in the official EQ-5D user guide, patient responses to the 5 questions were converted into a single index value as per Dolan P (1997). Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care 35(11):1095-108. These index values, with country specific value sets, facilitate the calculation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) that are used to inform economic evaluations of health care interventions. In the UK, the values range from -0.594 to +1.
Measured: Baseline and 1 month follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2014
- Primary completion20 Apr 2020
- Study completion20 Apr 2020
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (26)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple MyelomaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Janssen-Cilag Ltd., Bloodwise, University of Warwick, University of Birmingham
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Karthik Ramasamy, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
- Investigators
- Karthik Ramasamy, Principal investigator, National Health Service, United Kingdom
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02424851
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 26866138-MMY2070
- Other IDs
- 2012-003947-31
- Acronym
- OPTIMAL
- Status last verified
- Jan 2022
- First submitted
- 10 Mar 2015
- Last updated
- 27 Jan 2022
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Zeldenrust SR, Dingli D, Russell SJ, Lust JA, Greipp PR, Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2516-20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
PubMed 17975015Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Expected long-term survival of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2006-2010. Haematologica. 2009 Feb;94(2):270-5. doi: 10.3324/haematol.13782. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
PubMed 19144659Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, Katzmann JA, Caporaso NE, Hayes RB, Dispenzieri A, Kumar S, Clark RJ, Baris D, Hoover R, Rajkumar SV. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood. 2009 May 28;113(22):5412-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194241. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
PubMed 19179464Knudsen LM, Hippe E, Hjorth M, Holmberg E, Westin J. Renal function in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma--a demographic study of 1353 patients. The Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol. 1994 Oct;53(4):207-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1994.tb00190.x.
PubMed 7957804Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V, Bamias A, Gika D, Simeonidis A, Pouli A, Anagnostopoulos A, Michali E, Economopoulos T, Zervas K, Dimopoulos MA; Greek Myeloma Study Group. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: incidence, correlations, and prognostic significance. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007 Feb;48(2):337-41. doi: 10.1080/10428190601126602.
PubMed 17325894Clark AD, Shetty A, Soutar R. Renal failure and multiple myeloma: pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure and management of underlying myeloma. Blood Rev. 1999 Jun;13(2):79-90. doi: 10.1016/s0268-960x(99)90014-0.
PubMed 10414944Drayson M, Begum G, Basu S, Makkuni S, Dunn J, Barth N, Child JA. Effects of paraprotein heavy and light chain types and free light chain load on survival in myeloma: an analysis of patients receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy in Medical Research Council UK multiple myeloma trials. Blood. 2006 Sep 15;108(6):2013-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-008953. Epub 2006 May 25.
PubMed 16728700Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro Coy N, Cook G, Feyler S, Johnson PR, Rudin C, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Ross FM, Russell NH, Jackson GH, Child JA; National Cancer Research Institute Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients destined for autologous stem-cell transplantation: MRC Myeloma IX randomized trial results. Haematologica. 2012 Mar;97(3):442-50. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.043372. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
PubMed 22058209Augustson BM, Begum G, Dunn JA, Barth NJ, Davies F, Morgan G, Behrens J, Smith A, Child JA, Drayson MT. Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma: analysis of patients entered onto the United kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002--Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9219-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2086. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
PubMed 16275935Torra R, Blade J, Cases A, Lopez-Pedret J, Montserrat E, Rozman C, Revert L. Patients with multiple myeloma requiring long-term dialysis: presenting features, response to therapy, and outcome in a series of 20 cases. Br J Haematol. 1995 Dec;91(4):854-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1995.tb05400.x.
PubMed 8547129Kastritis E, Anagnostopoulos A, Roussou M, Gika D, Matsouka C, Barmparousi D, Grapsa I, Psimenou E, Bamias A, Dimopoulos MA. Reversibility of renal failure in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with high dose dexamethasone-containing regimens and the impact of novel agents. Haematologica. 2007 Apr;92(4):546-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.10759.
PubMed 17488666Knudsen LM, Hjorth M, Hippe E. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: reversibility and impact on the prognosis. Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol. 2000 Sep;65(3):175-81. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2000.90221.x.
PubMed 11007053Alexanian R, Barlogie B, Dixon D. Renal failure in multiple myeloma. Pathogenesis and prognostic implications. Arch Intern Med. 1990 Aug;150(8):1693-5.
PubMed 2383164Gandhi V. Metabolism and mechanisms of action of bendamustine: rationales for combination therapies. Semin Oncol. 2002 Aug;29(4 Suppl 13):4-11. doi: 10.1053/sonc.2002.34872.
PubMed 12170425Gaul L, Mandl-Weber S, Baumann P, Emmerich B, Schmidmaier R. Bendamustine induces G2 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in myeloma cells: the role of ATM-Chk2-Cdc25A and ATM-p53-p21-pathways. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2008 Feb;134(2):245-53. doi: 10.1007/s00432-007-0278-x. Epub 2007 Jul 25.
PubMed 17653574
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Jan 2022. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study of Thalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BTD) Versus Bortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone (BBD) in Patients With Renal Failure Defined as a GFR Below 30 Mls/Min
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02424851
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- OPTIMAL / 26866138-MMY2070
- Conditions
- Multiple Myeloma, Chronic Kidney Disease
- Keywords
- myeloma, multiple myeloma, chronic kidney disease, renal failure, bortezomib, Velcade, thalidomide, bendamustine
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 31 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS TrustUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Janssen-Cilag Ltd., Bloodwise, University of Warwick, University of Birmingham
- Study start
- Nov 2014
- Primary completion
- 20 Apr 2020 (actual)
- Study completion
- 20 Apr 2020 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Apr 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 27 Jan 2022
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness of bortezomib versus thalidomide in reducing free light chains in the blood of myeloma patients. In addition participants will receive bendamustine (chemotherapy) and dexamethasone (steroids), which increase the effectiveness of both bortezomib and thalidomide. The trial will also study whether an earlier reduction of free light chains increases the chances of the kidneys recovering.
Detailed description
Renal impairment is a life threatening condition of myeloma. 20-25% of patients will present at diagnosis with renal dysfunction. Outcome is poor due to high early mortality, with 28% of newly diagnosed myeloma patients in myeloma trials with renal failure not surviving beyond 100 days, compared with 10% overall.
This study aims to establish:
- Whether proteosomal inhibition (bortezomib) or immunomodulatory (thalidomide) based therapy achieves threshold reduction of serum free light chains (sFLCs) in a significant majority of patients.
- Whether sFLC response to the first 2 cycles (early responder) predicts haematological and renal response to the next 2 cycles of therapy.
- An early time point for assessment of sFLC reduction as a biomarker for response.
Participants will be stratified by age and chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage to receive either bortezomib, bendamustine and dexamethasone (BBD) or thalidomide, bendamustine and dexamethasone (BTD).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Arm A (BBD) | Active comparator | Drug: Bortezomib, Drug: Bendamustine, Drug: DexamethasoneBortezomib, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone |
| Arm B (BTD) | Active comparator | Drug: Thalidomide, Drug: Bendamustine, Drug: DexamethasoneThalidomide, Bendamustine and Dexamethasone |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (11 listed)
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the trial.
- Patients attending NHS (National Health Service) Haemato-oncology centres.
- Patients with newly diagnosed symptomatic myeloma.
- Glomerular Filtration Rate (GFR) <30 mls/min.
- Chronic kidney disease (CKD) staging is based on estimated or measured GFR. CKD stage 4 (15-29 ml/min) and CKD stage 5 (<15 ml/min) are eligible to enter the study. It is expected centres will consider use of fluid resuscitation and pulsed dose of steroid therapy in this group of patients to salvage renal function prior to trial screening.
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Female participant who is pregnant, lactating or planning pregnancy during the course of the trial or the female partner of a male participant planning a pregnancy during the course of the trial.
- Known allergy to investigational drugs.
- Any other significant disease or disorder which, in the opinion of the Investigator, may either put the participants at risk because of participation in the trial, or may influence the result of the trial, or the participant's ability to participate in the trial.
- Any of the following laboratory abnormalities:
- Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) < 1.0 x10^9/L
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| BortezomibAlso: Velcade1.3 mg/m2 subcutaneously* days 1, 4, 8 and 11 of each cycle. Number of cycles: Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT (autologous stem cell transplant) will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised). *intravenous infusion available in case of patient intolerance to subcutaneous bortezomib | Drug | Arm A (BBD) |
| Thalidomide100 mg daily orally, preferably at night, days 1-21 of each cycle. Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised) | Drug | Arm B (BTD) |
| Bendamustine60 mg/m2 i.v. days 1 and 8 of each cycle. Four 21 day cycles (participants not suitable for ASCT will continue up to 6 cycles on the treatment regimen to which they were randomised) | Drug | Arm A (BBD), Arm B (BTD) |
| Dexamethasone40mg orally days 1-2, 4-5, 8-9 and 11-12 of each cycle | Drug | Arm A (BBD), Arm B (BTD) |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain
Time frame: End of week 6 (after receiving two cycles of therapy)
Number of Participants With Different Renal Responses to Treatment
Time frame: End of week 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy)
4 secondary outcomes
Haematological and Non-haematological Toxicity in Both Treatment Arms
Time frame: End of weeks 3, 6, 9, 12 (after receiving 4 cycles of therapy), 30 days after final treatment and 12 months after randomisation
Overall Survival
Time frame: 1 month post end of treatment and 1 year post randomisation
Renal Response After Two Cycles of Trial Treatment
Time frame: End of 2nd treatment cycle, week 6
Quality of Life Measured by the EQ-5D-3L Questionnaire at Baseline and 1 Month Follow up
Time frame: Baseline and 1 month follow up
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Jan 2022.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 17975015Kumar SK, Rajkumar SV, Dispenzieri A, Lacy MQ, Hayman SR, Buadi FK, Zeldenrust SR, Dingli D, Russell SJ, Lust JA, Greipp PR, Kyle RA, Gertz MA. Improved survival in multiple myeloma and the impact of novel therapies. Blood. 2008 Mar 1;111(5):2516-20. doi: 10.1182/blood-2007-10-116129. Epub 2007 Nov 1.
- Background: PubMed 19144659Brenner H, Gondos A, Pulte D. Expected long-term survival of patients diagnosed with multiple myeloma in 2006-2010. Haematologica. 2009 Feb;94(2):270-5. doi: 10.3324/haematol.13782. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
- Background: PubMed 19179464Landgren O, Kyle RA, Pfeiffer RM, Katzmann JA, Caporaso NE, Hayes RB, Dispenzieri A, Kumar S, Clark RJ, Baris D, Hoover R, Rajkumar SV. Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) consistently precedes multiple myeloma: a prospective study. Blood. 2009 May 28;113(22):5412-7. doi: 10.1182/blood-2008-12-194241. Epub 2009 Jan 29.
- Background: PubMed 7957804Knudsen LM, Hippe E, Hjorth M, Holmberg E, Westin J. Renal function in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma--a demographic study of 1353 patients. The Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol. 1994 Oct;53(4):207-12. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0609.1994.tb00190.x.
- Background: PubMed 17325894Eleutherakis-Papaiakovou V, Bamias A, Gika D, Simeonidis A, Pouli A, Anagnostopoulos A, Michali E, Economopoulos T, Zervas K, Dimopoulos MA; Greek Myeloma Study Group. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: incidence, correlations, and prognostic significance. Leuk Lymphoma. 2007 Feb;48(2):337-41. doi: 10.1080/10428190601126602.
- Background: PubMed 10414944Clark AD, Shetty A, Soutar R. Renal failure and multiple myeloma: pathogenesis and treatment of renal failure and management of underlying myeloma. Blood Rev. 1999 Jun;13(2):79-90. doi: 10.1016/s0268-960x(99)90014-0.
- Background: PubMed 16728700Drayson M, Begum G, Basu S, Makkuni S, Dunn J, Barth N, Child JA. Effects of paraprotein heavy and light chain types and free light chain load on survival in myeloma: an analysis of patients receiving conventional-dose chemotherapy in Medical Research Council UK multiple myeloma trials. Blood. 2006 Sep 15;108(6):2013-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-03-008953. Epub 2006 May 25.
- Background: PubMed 22058209Morgan GJ, Davies FE, Gregory WM, Bell SE, Szubert AJ, Navarro Coy N, Cook G, Feyler S, Johnson PR, Rudin C, Drayson MT, Owen RG, Ross FM, Russell NH, Jackson GH, Child JA; National Cancer Research Institute Haematological Oncology Clinical Studies Group. Cyclophosphamide, thalidomide, and dexamethasone as induction therapy for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients destined for autologous stem-cell transplantation: MRC Myeloma IX randomized trial results. Haematologica. 2012 Mar;97(3):442-50. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2011.043372. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
- Background: PubMed 16275935Augustson BM, Begum G, Dunn JA, Barth NJ, Davies F, Morgan G, Behrens J, Smith A, Child JA, Drayson MT. Early mortality after diagnosis of multiple myeloma: analysis of patients entered onto the United kingdom Medical Research Council trials between 1980 and 2002--Medical Research Council Adult Leukaemia Working Party. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 20;23(36):9219-26. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.03.2086. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
- Background: PubMed 8547129Torra R, Blade J, Cases A, Lopez-Pedret J, Montserrat E, Rozman C, Revert L. Patients with multiple myeloma requiring long-term dialysis: presenting features, response to therapy, and outcome in a series of 20 cases. Br J Haematol. 1995 Dec;91(4):854-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2141.1995.tb05400.x.
- Background: PubMed 17488666Kastritis E, Anagnostopoulos A, Roussou M, Gika D, Matsouka C, Barmparousi D, Grapsa I, Psimenou E, Bamias A, Dimopoulos MA. Reversibility of renal failure in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients treated with high dose dexamethasone-containing regimens and the impact of novel agents. Haematologica. 2007 Apr;92(4):546-9. doi: 10.3324/haematol.10759.
- Background: PubMed 11007053Knudsen LM, Hjorth M, Hippe E. Renal failure in multiple myeloma: reversibility and impact on the prognosis. Nordic Myeloma Study Group. Eur J Haematol. 2000 Sep;65(3):175-81. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0609.2000.90221.x.
- Cancer Research UK - Myeloma StatisticsLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Multiple Myeloma
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Study of YKST02 in Adults With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)
RecruitingPhase 2
Engaging T-cells to Eliminate MRD in Newly Diagnosed Myeloma Optimizing Response With Talquetmab and Teclistamab (ROTATE)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 3
A Phase III Study of Eque-cel in Subjects With Len-refractory RRMM (FUMANBA-03)
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Testing AZD5363 as a Potential Targeted Treatment in Cancers With AKT Genetic Changes (MATCH-Subprotocol Y)
Advanced Lymphoma, Advanced Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Karthik Ramasamy principal investigator
National Health Service, United Kingdom
9 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Bortezomib, Thalidomide and Bendamustine in people with Multiple Myeloma and Chronic Kidney Disease, run by Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust at 9 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 11 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Jan 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 9 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 27 Jan 2022). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With >50% Reduction From Baseline in Serum Free Light Chain (time frame: End of week 6 (after receiving two cycles of therapy)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02424851, which also lists 26 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Jan 2022.