AzTrials
AzTrials

SchizophreniaNCT02435784

The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) in First Episode Psychosis Patients in Hong Kong

A study testing The Two-Way Communication Checklist and Treatment as usual in people with Schizophrenia and Communication, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) is a communication tool developed by van Os et al. (2002). It aims to provide an opportunity for patients to voice their needs and problem to minimize the discrepancy and miscommunication between patient and professional carer. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 15 to 64 years
Conditions the study is for
Schizophrenia, Communication
What is being tested?
The Two-Way Communication Checklist and Treatment as usual
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 siteHong Kong
Study dates
May 2015to Aug 2015
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 15 to 64 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients will be included if they meet the following criteria:
  • attended the EASY service;
  • were diagnosed with schizophrenia ,schizoaffective disorder or schizophreniform disorder according to ICD-10;
  • were age between 15-64;
  • were able to complete the informed consent.

Who cannot join

  • Patients will be excluded if they meet the following criteria:
  • had history of substance misuse;
  • had history of intellectual disability;
  • were non- Chinese speaking patients
  • had violent risk
  • had suicidal risk

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Hong Kong1 site
  • EASY Clinic, Queen Mary Hospital

    Hong Kong

Other trials in Hong Kong

About this study

Official title: The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) in First Episode Psychosis Patients in Hong Kong: an Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial

The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) is a communication tool developed by van Os et al. (2002). It aims to provide an opportunity for patients to voice their needs and problem to minimize the discrepancy and miscommunication between patient and professional carer. In this randomized controlled trial, the investigators aim to examine whether using 2-COM checklist would lead to improvement in first episode psychosis patient's overall satisfaction, change in treatment option in clinicians and consultation time.

Read the detailed description

Communication is at the heart of psychiatric practice. Good communication has positive impact on treatment, treatment satisfaction and treatment adherence. However, different characteristics of psychosis barricade the communication between clinicians and patients. Consequently, the divergent views of needs of care between patients and clinicians may be established due to miscommunication. Such divergence may barricade the planning and the outcome of treatment.

In Hong Kong, the core psychiatric services as well as early intervention for first episode psychosis patients are provided by psychiatric outpatient clinics. Mental health services in Hong Kong are overwhelmed by large demands of the services and inadequate mental health care workforce such as low psychiatrists-to-population ratio and psychiatric nurse-to-population ratio. The large demands of services and inadequate mental health care workforce restrained the services' quality. In some busy psychiatric outpatient clinic, a clinician needs to consult 30 patients in a 3-hour session. Hui et al. (2008) study showed that the mean consultation time in one of the general psychiatric outpatient clinic in Hong Kong is 5.8 minutes.

To sum up, a cost-effectiveness instrument is in need for the early intervention psychiatric outpatient clinic in Hong Kong. The instrument has to reduce the needs' divergence, communication between clinicians and patients, and enhance the patients' involvement of clinical decision-making in the rushed psychiatric consultation. The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) may satisfy the demand.

Being tested
The Two-Way Communication Checklist, Treatment as usual
Keywords
2-COM
Medical subject headings
Schizophrenia, Communication

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • The Two-Way Communication ChecklistOther

    Also called 2-COM

    The Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) is a communication tool developed by Van Os et al. (2002). It aims to provide an opportunity for patients to voice their needs and problem to minimize the discrepancy and miscommunication between patient and professional carer. 2-COM questionnaire was designed to give patients while they are waiting for consultation. Patients can either tick yes or no in the questionnaire to decide which the perceived problems are and which needs they want to discuss with the clinician. During the consultation, the ticked items would be discussed.

  • Treatment as usualOther

    Also called TAU

    Patients will attend a psychiatric consultation as usual.

Study groups in NCT02435784
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
2-COM groupActive comparatorPatients will use the Two-Way Communication Checklist (2-COM) once in a psychiatric consultation.
Receives: Other: The Two-Way Communication Checklist
TAU groupPlacebo comparatorTreatment as usual (TAU) group.
Receives: Other: Treatment as usual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Satisfaction level (patient satisfaction questionnaire)

    A patient satisfaction questionnaire as used in Hui et al. (2008) was adopted in this study. This was a self-administered questionnaire rated on a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very satisfactory to 5 = very unsatisfactory). The questionnaire consisted of 2 parts. Part A has 6 items concerning the perceived attitude of the clinician (subscale score range, 6-30). Part B has 11 items concerning communication with the clinician (subscale score range, 11-55). The higher score indicates the higher satisfaction.

    Measured: within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation

Secondary outcomes (2)
  1. Change of treatment (checklist)

    A checklist that measured change in treatment was adopted. This checklist included 4 items which will be rated on a dichotomous selection (yes/no) by clinician. The 4 items are related to the change of medication, providing information about treatment, involvement of other members of the care team and professional support services.

    Measured: within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation

  2. Consultation time

    The consultation time will be counted between patients' entering and leaving the consultation room by a stopwatch.

    Measured: From the time of patients' entering the consultation room till leaving the consultation room in a psychiatric consultation, up to 5 hours

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startMay 2015
  3. Primary completionAug 2015
  4. Study completionAug 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
84 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02435784
Sponsor's protocol ID
UW 15-170
Status last verified
Sep 2015
First submitted
22 Apr 2015
Last updated
22 Sep 2015
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Lam MM, Pearson V, Ng RM, Chiu CP, Law CW, Chen EY. What does recovery from psychosis mean? Perceptions of young first-episode patients. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011 Nov;57(6):580-7. doi: 10.1177/0020764010374418. Epub 2010 Jul 5.

    PubMed 20603266
  • Hui, C. L. M., Wong, G. H. Y., Lam, C. Y. K., Chow, P. P. L. & Chen, E. Y. H. (2008). Patients-clinician communication and needs identification for outpatients with schizophrenia in Hong Kong: role of the 2-COM instrument. Hong Kong Journal of Psychiatry, 18(2), 69-74.

  • Chan KK, Mak WW. The mediating role of self-stigma and unmet needs on the recovery of people with schizophrenia living in the community. Qual Life Res. 2014 Nov;23(9):2559-68. doi: 10.1007/s11136-014-0695-7. Epub 2014 Apr 23.

    PubMed 24756436
  • Wong GH, Hui CL, Wong DY, Tang JY, Chang WC, Chan SK, Lee EH, Xu JQ, Lin JJ, Lai DC, Tam W, Kok J, Chung DW, Hung SF, Chen EY. Developments in early intervention for psychosis in Hong Kong. East Asian Arch Psychiatry. 2012 Sep;22(3):100-4.

    PubMed 23019282

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing The Two-Way Communication Checklist and Treatment as usual in people with Schizophrenia and Communication, run by The University of Hong Kong at 1 site in Hong Kong.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 22 Sep 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Hong Kong. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Satisfaction level (patient satisfaction questionnaire) (time frame: within 30 minutes after a psychiatric consultation). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02435784, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 22 Sep 2015.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT02435784 | AzTrials