AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart FailureAHFRSNCT02437058

Validity of Scales to Assess Severity in Acute Heart Failure

An observational study of Heart Failure, run by Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The scales measuring the severity of acute decompensate heart failure (ADHF) in emergency departments have not achieved an adequate discriminative ability for decision making. Objectives: 1) Identify baseline variables, and evolutionary variables that may provide a good predictive ability of the model.2) Create and… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Heart Failure
What is being tested?
preidictive model
How many people
1,854 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Jan 2011to May 2015
How long will I take part?
3 Months
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Patients with symptoms of acute decompensated heart failure who attended the emergency departments of 3 hospitals belonging to the Basque National Health Service

Who may be able to join

  • They were diagnosed as heart failure) HF is defined, clinically, as a syndrome in which patients have typical symptoms (e.g.breathlessness, ankle swelling, and fatigue) and signs (e.g. elevated jugular venous pressure, pulmonary crackles, and displaced apex beat) resulting from an abnormality of cardiac structure or function.(8) We included the following presentation of acute heart failure (AHF) at ED: acute decompensated heart failure, hypertensive acute heart failure, pulmonary oedema, cardiogenic shock, and high output failure. (9;10)

Who cannot join

  • Patients whose main diagnosis in the ER is different than acute heart failure and those not wishing to participate in the study or signing the informed consent.

About this study

Official title: Validition of Scales for the Assessment of Sverity in Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

The scales measuring the severity of acute decompensate heart failure (ADHF) in emergency departments have not achieved an adequate discriminative ability for decision making. Objectives: 1) Identify baseline variables, and evolutionary variables that may provide a good predictive ability of the model.2) Create and validate clinical predictive rules of mortality during admission/a week after ED visit in those discharged from ED, 30 and 60 days after ED visit as well as identify predicitive factors of short-term readmission (90 days)Design: Prospective cohort study. The sociodemographics and clinical variables will be collected from emergency medical records to identify predictors. Outcome variables and evolution of variables will be collected from hospital medical records / ambulatory during admission and up to 90 days after the episode of ADHF. Baseline predictors and evolutionary variables will be identified through logistic regression models using 60% of the final sample. The models that best fit will be applied in 40% of the sample to assess the predictive validity of this scale.

Conditions
Heart Failure
Being tested
preidictive model
Medical subject headings
Heart Failure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • preidictive modelOther

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Poor evolution

    Measured: 3 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. readmission

    Measured: 3 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2011
  3. Primary completionApr 2013
  4. Study completionMay 2015

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
1,854 participants (actual)
Target duration
3 Months
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02437058
Sponsor's protocol ID
2011111045
Acronym
AHFRS
Status last verified
Jul 2020
First submitted
5 May 2015
Last updated
13 Jul 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Garcia-Gutierrez S, Quintana JM, Anton-Ladislao A, Gallardo MS, Pulido E, Rilo I, Zubillaga E, Morillas M, Onaindia JJ, Murga N, Palenzuela R, Ruiz JG; AHFRS Group. Creation and validation of the acute heart failure risk score: AHFRS. Intern Emerg Med. 2017 Dec;12(8):1197-1206. doi: 10.1007/s11739-016-1541-4. Epub 2016 Oct 11.

    PubMed 27730492

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Heart Failure, run by Hospital Galdakao-Usansolo.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Poor evolution (time frame: 3 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02437058, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in