AzTrials
AzTrials

Major Depressive DisordersE-comparedNCT02449447

Blended Depression Therapy: Cognitive Behaviour Therapy Face-to-face and Via Internet

A study testing Cognitive behavioral therapy and Treatment as usual in people with Major Depressive Disorders, run by Linkoeping University at 1 site in Sweden.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

To asses the clinical effectiveness of blended cognitive behavior therapy (CBT): face-to-face and internet-based treatment for adults with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in primary care compared to treatment as usual. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
Conditions the study is for
Major Depressive Disorders
What is being tested?
Cognitive behavioral therapy and Treatment as usual
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
150 participants
Where
1 siteSweden
Study dates
Feb 2015to Jun 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • depressive symptoms according to DSM-IV
  • have access to a computer with internet connection
  • have good knowledge of the Swedish language

Who cannot join

  • recent (during last 6 weeks) change in psychiatric medication
  • presently in any other psychological treatment
  • severe depression
  • suicidal ideation

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Sweden1 site
  • Department of Behavioral Sciences and Learning, Linköping University

    Linköping, Östergötland County, 58183

Other trials in Sweden

About this study

Official title: European Comparative Effectiveness Research on Internet-based Depression in Sweden (E-compared) Treatment). A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Blended Internet and Face-to-face CBT Against Treatment as Usual

To asses the clinical effectiveness of blended cognitive behavior therapy (CBT): face-to-face and internet-based treatment for adults with Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) in primary care compared to treatment as usual.

Read the detailed description

The study is part of a EU-project. Participants are recruited via regular routes from primary care settings. Following the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.) participants will be randomly allocated to either blended treatment for 10 sessions/weeks or to treatment as usual. We will include 150 participants in total.

Keywords
Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Blended treatment, Cognitive behavior Therapy (CBT), Face-to-face, internet-based treatment
Medical subject headings
Depressive Disorder, Major

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02449447
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Blended treatmentExperimental10 weeks of four face-to-face Cognitive behavioral therapy sessions and internet-based CBT as a complement and support to the four sessions.
Receives: Behavioral: Cognitive behavioral therapy
Treatment as usualActive comparatorUsual course of antidepressants and management in primary care (e.g medication and supportive counselling).
Receives: Other: Treatment as usual

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS

    Symptoms of depression measured by the QIDS. The QIDS is a questionnaire that screens for depressive symptoms and assesses depression severity.

    Measured: Change from baseline in symptoms of depression. Time Frame: 0, 3, 6 and 12 months

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L)

    Quality of life will be assessed with the EQ-5D-5L (EuroQol). The EQ-5D-5L is a self-report questionnaire which measures health related quality of life.

    Measured: Time Frame: 0, 3, 6 and 12 months

  2. Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)

    Patient's satisfaction with the treatment is assessed with Client Satisfaction Questionnaire (CSQ-8)

    Measured: Time Frame: 3 months (post treatment)

  3. Credibility and Expectancy Questionnaire (CEQ)

    Patients' expectancy of treatment will be assessed with the credibility and expectancy questionnaire (CEQ)

    Measured: Time Frame: 3 months (post treatment)

  4. System Usability Scale (SUS)

    Satisfaction with the internet platform will be evaluated with the system usability scale (SUS)

    Measured: Time Frame: 3 months (post treatment)

  5. Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)

    The PHQ-9 is a nine-item mood module that can be used to screen and to diagnose patients with depressive disorders.

    Measured: Time Frame: 0, 3, 6 and 12 months

  6. Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-SF)

    The therapeutic alliance between therapists and patient will be assessed with the short version of the Working Alliance Inventory (WAI-SF).

    Measured: Time Frame: 0 months ( three weeks after started treatment)

  7. Trimbos and iMTA questionnaire on Costs associated with Psychiatric illness (TIC-P)

    Health service uptake and production loss due to illness will be measured with the Trimbos and iMTA Questionnaires on Costs Associated with Psychiatric Illness (TiC-P)

    Measured: Time Frame: 0, 3, 6 and 12 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startFeb 2015
  3. Primary completionJun 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
150 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02449447
Sponsor's protocol ID
E-compared
Acronym
E-compared
Status last verified
Sep 2017
First submitted
30 Mar 2015
Last updated
20 Sep 2017
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Doukani A, Quartagno M, Sera F, Free C, Kakuma R, Riper H, Kleiboer A, Cerga-Pashoja A, van Schaik A, Botella C, Berger T, Chevreul K, Matynia M, Krieger T, Hazo JB, Draisma S, Titzler I, Topooco N, Mathiasen K, Vernmark K, Urech A, Maj A, Andersson G, Berking M, Banos RM, Araya R. Comparison of the Working Alliance in Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Treatment as Usual for Depression in Europe: Secondary Data Analysis of the E-COMPARED Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2024 May 31;26:e47515. doi: 10.2196/47515.

    PubMed 38819882
  • van Genugten CR, Schuurmans J, Hoogendoorn AW, Araya R, Andersson G, Banos R, Botella C, Cerga Pashoja A, Cieslak R, Ebert DD, Garcia-Palacios A, Hazo JB, Herrero R, Holtzmann J, Kemmeren L, Kleiboer A, Krieger T, Smoktunowicz E, Titzler I, Topooco N, Urech A, Smit JH, Riper H. Examining the Theoretical Framework of Behavioral Activation for Major Depressive Disorder: Smartphone-Based Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Dec 6;8(12):e32007. doi: 10.2196/32007.

    PubMed 34874888
  • Vernmark K, Hesser H, Topooco N, Berger T, Riper H, Luuk L, Backlund L, Carlbring P, Andersson G. Working alliance as a predictor of change in depression during blended cognitive behaviour therapy. Cogn Behav Ther. 2019 Jul;48(4):285-299. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2018.1533577. Epub 2018 Oct 29.

    PubMed 30372653
  • Kleiboer A, Smit J, Bosmans J, Ruwaard J, Andersson G, Topooco N, Berger T, Krieger T, Botella C, Banos R, Chevreul K, Araya R, Cerga-Pashoja A, Cieslak R, Rogala A, Vis C, Draisma S, van Schaik A, Kemmeren L, Ebert D, Berking M, Funk B, Cuijpers P, Riper H. European COMPARative Effectiveness research on blended Depression treatment versus treatment-as-usual (E-COMPARED): study protocol for a randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial in eight European countries. Trials. 2016 Aug 3;17(1):387. doi: 10.1186/s13063-016-1511-1.

    PubMed 27488181

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Cognitive behavioral therapy and Treatment as usual in people with Major Depressive Disorders, run by Linkoeping University at 1 site in Sweden.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 Sep 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Sweden. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (QIDS (time frame: Change from baseline in symptoms of depression. Time Frame: 0, 3, 6 and 12 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02449447, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 Sep 2017; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 30 Oct 2026.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in