Body WeightNCT02455674
Using Mean Ages on Clothing Size Labels in Revised Advanced Pediatric Life Support Formulas for Weight Estimation
An observational study of Body Weight, run by Antalya Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
Weight calculation based on age could be performed according to APLS (Advanced Pediatric Life Support) guideline recommendations in children requiring emergency treatment and intervention in the field or during resuscitation with no active weight and height measurements. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 1 year to 12 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Body Weight
- How many people
- 1,094 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- Dec 2014to Jan 2015
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 1 year to 12 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child
Study population: Data of children, aged between 1 to 12 years, were consecutively collected. Patients were divided into two groups as under the age of 6 (age <6) and over 6 years of age (age≥6).
Who may be able to join
- All patients between 1-12 years of age who presented to the emergency department and agreed to participate in the study were consecutively included in the study
Who cannot join
- Age under 1 years and over 12.99 years
- No weighing in ED
- No clothing size label information
- Refused to participate
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Turkey (Türkiye)1 site
Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Department of Emergency
Antalya, 07100
About this study
Official title: Weight Estimation of A Child With Unknown Age and Height: Using Mean Ages on Clothing Size Labels in Revised APLS Formulas for Weight Estimation. A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study
Weight calculation based on age could be performed according to APLS (Advanced Pediatric Life Support) guideline recommendations in children requiring emergency treatment and intervention in the field or during resuscitation with no active weight and height measurements. The aim of the study is to investigate the suitability of weight calculation using mean ages on clothing size labels (ACL) to the actual weight in real emergencies with no known actual age of the patient (AA).
Read the detailed description
Weight calculation based on age could be performed according to APLS guideline recommendations in children requiring emergency treatment and intervention in the field or during resuscitation with no active weight and height measurements. Age formulas require only knowledge of the actual age of the child and widely used all over the world with being catchy. However, situations in which one has to intervene a child without having any patient data, including information on children's ages, especially in the field or during resuscitation are not uncommon. The objective of this study is to investigate the availability of age information contained in clothing size labels of children in weight calculation according to APLS recommendations. Usability of labels can protect victims from overdose and underdose problems in cases where the actual age is unknown and the measurements cannot be done
- Conditions
- Body Weight
- Keywords
- weight estimation, emergency, child
- Medical subject headings
- Body Weight, Emergencies
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Age under 6 years | All children 1 to 6 years Used formula for weight calculation: Children 1-5 years: Weight (kg) = (2 × age in years) + 8 | |
| Age over 6 years | All children 6 to 12 years Used formula for weight calculation: Children 6-12 years: Weight (kg) = (3 × age in years) + 7 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Correlation of children's actual age and age information on clothing size labels.
Measured: 6 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted28 May 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2014
- Primary completionJan 2015
- Study completionJan 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (19)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Body WeightStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Enrolment
- 1,094 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Antalya Training and Research Hospital
- Sponsor type
- Other government
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Can K Akyol, MD, Study director, Antalya Training and Research Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02455674
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- AntalyaTRH003
- Status last verified
- May 2015
- First submitted
- 21 May 2015
- Last updated
- 28 May 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Young TP, Washington O, Flanery A, Guptill M, Reibling ET, Brown L, Barcega B. Comparison of the finger counting method, the Broselow tape and common weight estimation formulae in Filipino children after Typhoon Haiyan. Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Jun;27(3):239-44. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12382. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
PubMed 25818595Graves L, Chayen G, Peat J, O'Leary F. A comparison of actual to estimated weights in Australian children attending a tertiary children's' hospital, using the original and updated APLS, Luscombe and Owens, Best Guess formulae and the Broselow tape. Resuscitation. 2014 Mar;85(3):392-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.11.024. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
PubMed 24321321Sanghera N, Chan PY, Khaki ZF, Planner C, Lee KK, Cranswick NE, Wong IC. Interventions of hospital pharmacists in improving drug therapy in children: a systematic literature review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(11):1031-47. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629110-00003.
PubMed 17061909Wells M, Coovadia A, Kramer E, Goldstein L. The PAWPER tape: A new concept tape-based device that increases the accuracy of weight estimation in children through the inclusion of a modifier based on body habitus. Resuscitation. 2013 Feb;84(2):227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.05.028. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
PubMed 22796544Argall JA, Wright N, Mackway-Jones K, Jackson R. A comparison of two commonly used methods of weight estimation. Arch Dis Child. 2003 Sep;88(9):789-90. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.9.789. No abstract available.
PubMed 12937099Kelly AM, Nguyen K, Krieser D. Validation of the Luscombe weight formula for estimating children's weight. Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Feb;23(1):59-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01351.x. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
PubMed 21134132Luscombe MD, Owens BD, Burke D. Weight estimation in paediatrics: a comparison of the APLS formula and the formula 'Weight=3(age)+7'. Emerg Med J. 2011 Jul;28(7):590-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.087288. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
PubMed 20659877Thompson MT, Reading MJ, Acworth JP. Best Guess method for age-based weight estimation in paediatric emergencies: validation and comparison with current methods. Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Dec;19(6):535-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01031.x.
PubMed 18021106van Furth R, Braat AG, Leijh PC, Klein F. Opsonic activity and composition of five intramuscular gammaglobulin preparations. J Infect. 1986 Nov;13(3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(86)91256-9.
PubMed 2432132Sinha M, Lezine MW, Frechette A, Foster KN. Weighing the pediatric patient during trauma resuscitation and its concordance with estimated weight using Broselow Luten Emergency Tape. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jun;28(6):544-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318258ac2e.
PubMed 22653453Lim CA, Kaufman BJ, O'Connor J Jr, Cunningham SJ. Accuracy of weight estimates in pediatric patients by prehospital Emergency Medical Services personnel. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;31(7):1108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 May 21.
PubMed 23706580Elgie LD, Williams AR. Using age on clothes size label to estimate weight in emergency paediatric patients. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;19(5):338-40. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328355abc2.
PubMed 22914117Krieser D, Nguyen K, Kerr D, Jolley D, Clooney M, Kelly AM. Parental weight estimation of their child's weight is more accurate than other weight estimation methods for determining children's weight in an emergency department? Emerg Med J. 2007 Nov;24(11):756-9. doi: 10.1136/emj.2007.047993.
PubMed 17954827Leffler S, Hayes M. Analysis of parental estimates of children's weights in the ED. Ann Emerg Med. 1997 Aug;30(2):167-70. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(97)70137-9.
PubMed 9250640Rosenberg M, Greenberger S, Rawal A, Latimer-Pierson J, Thundiyil J. Comparison of Broselow tape measurements versus physician estimations of pediatric weights. Am J Emerg Med. 2011 Jun;29(5):482-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2009.12.002. Epub 2010 Apr 2.
PubMed 20825816
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 28 May 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Weight Estimation of A Child With Unknown Age and Height: Using Mean Ages on Clothing Size Labels in Revised APLS Formulas for Weight Estimation. A Prospective Cross-Sectional Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02455674
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- AntalyaTRH003
- Conditions
- Body Weight
- Keywords
- weight estimation, emergency, child
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 1,094 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Antalya Training and Research HospitalOther government
- Study start
- Dec 2014
- Primary completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 28 May 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Weight calculation based on age could be performed according to APLS (Advanced Pediatric Life Support) guideline recommendations in children requiring emergency treatment and intervention in the field or during resuscitation with no active weight and height measurements. The aim of the study is to investigate the suitability of weight calculation using mean ages on clothing size labels (ACL) to the actual weight in real emergencies with no known actual age of the patient (AA).
Detailed description
Weight calculation based on age could be performed according to APLS guideline recommendations in children requiring emergency treatment and intervention in the field or during resuscitation with no active weight and height measurements. Age formulas require only knowledge of the actual age of the child and widely used all over the world with being catchy. However, situations in which one has to intervene a child without having any patient data, including information on children's ages, especially in the field or during resuscitation are not uncommon. The objective of this study is to investigate the availability of age information contained in clothing size labels of children in weight calculation according to APLS recommendations. Usability of labels can protect victims from overdose and underdose problems in cases where the actual age is unknown and the measurements cannot be done
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Cross-sectional
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Age under 6 years | – | –All children 1 to 6 years Used formula for weight calculation: Children 1-5 years: Weight (kg) = (2 × age in years) + 8 |
| Age over 6 years | – | –All children 6 to 12 years Used formula for weight calculation: Children 6-12 years: Weight (kg) = (3 × age in years) + 7 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 1 year to 12 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child
- Study population
- Data of children, aged between 1 to 12 years, were consecutively collected. Patients were divided into two groups as under the age of 6 (age <6) and over 6 years of age (age≥6).
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- All patients between 1-12 years of age who presented to the emergency department and agreed to participate in the study were consecutively included in the study
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Age under 1 years and over 12.99 years
- No weighing in ED
- No clothing size label information
- Refused to participate
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Primary outcome
Correlation of children's actual age and age information on clothing size labels.
Time frame: 6 weeks
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 28 May 2015.
- Background: PubMed 25818595Young TP, Washington O, Flanery A, Guptill M, Reibling ET, Brown L, Barcega B. Comparison of the finger counting method, the Broselow tape and common weight estimation formulae in Filipino children after Typhoon Haiyan. Emerg Med Australas. 2015 Jun;27(3):239-44. doi: 10.1111/1742-6723.12382. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
- Background: PubMed 24321321Graves L, Chayen G, Peat J, O'Leary F. A comparison of actual to estimated weights in Australian children attending a tertiary children's' hospital, using the original and updated APLS, Luscombe and Owens, Best Guess formulae and the Broselow tape. Resuscitation. 2014 Mar;85(3):392-6. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2013.11.024. Epub 2013 Dec 7.
- Background: PubMed 17061909Sanghera N, Chan PY, Khaki ZF, Planner C, Lee KK, Cranswick NE, Wong IC. Interventions of hospital pharmacists in improving drug therapy in children: a systematic literature review. Drug Saf. 2006;29(11):1031-47. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629110-00003.
- Background: PubMed 22796544Wells M, Coovadia A, Kramer E, Goldstein L. The PAWPER tape: A new concept tape-based device that increases the accuracy of weight estimation in children through the inclusion of a modifier based on body habitus. Resuscitation. 2013 Feb;84(2):227-32. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.05.028. Epub 2012 Jul 13.
- Background: PubMed 12937099Argall JA, Wright N, Mackway-Jones K, Jackson R. A comparison of two commonly used methods of weight estimation. Arch Dis Child. 2003 Sep;88(9):789-90. doi: 10.1136/adc.88.9.789. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 21134132Kelly AM, Nguyen K, Krieser D. Validation of the Luscombe weight formula for estimating children's weight. Emerg Med Australas. 2011 Feb;23(1):59-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2010.01351.x. Epub 2010 Dec 6.
- Background: PubMed 20659877Luscombe MD, Owens BD, Burke D. Weight estimation in paediatrics: a comparison of the APLS formula and the formula 'Weight=3(age)+7'. Emerg Med J. 2011 Jul;28(7):590-3. doi: 10.1136/emj.2009.087288. Epub 2010 Jul 20.
- Background: PubMed 18021106Thompson MT, Reading MJ, Acworth JP. Best Guess method for age-based weight estimation in paediatric emergencies: validation and comparison with current methods. Emerg Med Australas. 2007 Dec;19(6):535-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01031.x.
- Background: PubMed 2432132van Furth R, Braat AG, Leijh PC, Klein F. Opsonic activity and composition of five intramuscular gammaglobulin preparations. J Infect. 1986 Nov;13(3):269-75. doi: 10.1016/s0163-4453(86)91256-9.
- Background: PubMed 22653453Sinha M, Lezine MW, Frechette A, Foster KN. Weighing the pediatric patient during trauma resuscitation and its concordance with estimated weight using Broselow Luten Emergency Tape. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012 Jun;28(6):544-7. doi: 10.1097/PEC.0b013e318258ac2e.
- Background: PubMed 23706580Lim CA, Kaufman BJ, O'Connor J Jr, Cunningham SJ. Accuracy of weight estimates in pediatric patients by prehospital Emergency Medical Services personnel. Am J Emerg Med. 2013 Jul;31(7):1108-12. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2013.04.018. Epub 2013 May 21.
- Background: PubMed 22914117Elgie LD, Williams AR. Using age on clothes size label to estimate weight in emergency paediatric patients. Eur J Emerg Med. 2012 Oct;19(5):338-40. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e328355abc2.
Related trials for Body Weight
Not yet recruiting
Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation Combined With Lifestyle Intervention for Visceral Fat Reduction in Adults With Overweight or Obesity
Overweight, Obesity
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Assessing the Impact of Perceptions of Unpredictability on Objective Measures of Food Consumption and Metabolism
Healthy Volunteer, Obestity
Not yet recruitingPhase 1/2
Tocilizumab Combined With First-Line Chemo-Immunotherapy in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, Cancer-Associated Weight Loss
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
ELEVATE-LIVER: A Study to Test Whether Survodutide Helps Improve Heart Structure and Function in People With Overweight or Obesity and Fatty Liver Disease
Obesity, Metabolic Dysfunction-associated Steatotic Liver Disease
Recruiting
Dry Weight Reduction Intervention Via Extra Ultrafiltration
Fluid Accumulation, Blood Pressure Management
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Can K Akyol, MD study director
Antalya Training and Research Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Body Weight, run by Antalya Training and Research Hospital at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 28 May 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Correlation of children's actual age and age information on clothing size labels. (time frame: 6 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02455674, which also lists 19 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 28 May 2015.