AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasopharyngeal NeoplasmsNCT02456506

Hyperfractionated Intensity-modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) Versus Conventional Fraction IMRT for Patients With Loco-regionally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

A study testing Hyperfractionated IMRT and Conventional Fraction IMRT in people with Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms and Mortality, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study evaluates the hyperfractionated IMRT in the treatment of patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Half of participants will receive hyperfractionated IMRT, while the other half will receive conventional fraction IMRT. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years
What is being tested?
Hyperfractionated IMRT and Conventional Fraction IMRT
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
142 participants
Where
1 siteChina
Study dates
Jun 2015to Mar 2023
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • histologically approved WHO III patients received radical radiotherapy initially before recurrence (irradiation dosage > 66 Gy).
  • the interval time between initial treatment and relapse more than 1 year. recurrent Tumor stage2-4(rT2-4) Node stage0-2(rN0-2) Metastasis stage0(rM0) (rT2-4N0-2M0), overall stage II-IVa according to 2009 American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC/UICC) Tumor, Node, and Metastasis (TNM) staging system.
  • a Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score more than 70.

Who cannot join

  • a history of previous or synchronous malignant tumors. recurrent Node stage3(rN3), recurrent Metastasis stage1(rM1) according to 2009 AJCC/UICC TNM staging system.
  • positive surgical margin after neck dissection. patients suffered with severe mental illness. severe diseases of the lung and cardiovascular system. severe hepatic and renal dysfunction.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

China1 site
  • Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center

    Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510060

Other trials in China

About this study

Official title: Multiple Centre, Randomised, Controlled Trial of Hyperfractionated IMRT and Conventional Fraction IMRT for Patients With Loco-regionally Recurrent Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma.

This study evaluates the hyperfractionated IMRT in the treatment of patients with locally recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Half of participants will receive hyperfractionated IMRT, while the other half will receive conventional fraction IMRT.

Read the detailed description

Local recurrence is one of the most challenging issues faced with nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. 8.4% to 10.9% of the patients developed recurrent diseases at the primary or/and regional site after definitive radiotherapy. Although some patients with limited recurrent lesions underwent surgery, the main treatment for these recurrent NPC patients was still re-irradiation.

Multiple retrospective and prospective studies have reported: under the condition of conventional fraction IMRT with the total dose of 60 gray (Gy) (division 27 times, once a day, every 2.2Gy), you can get a better local tumor control rate and survival outcome. However, the patients still underwent some severe late complications including nasopharyngeal necrosis, nasopharyngeal bleeding, temporal lobe necrosis, with the incidence rates of 28.8%, 18.6%, 20.3%, respectively. Approximately 50% of recurrent NPC patients died of these severe late complications, significantly compromising the overall survival rate of the patients. Previous studies showed that hyperfractionated radiotherapy could reduce severe late complication rates significantly, without affecting the local control rate. Indeed, we found that under the condition of equal irradiation time and tumor equivalent dosage between hyperfractionated IMRT (total dose of 65Gy, division 54 times, twice a day, once 1.2Gy, irradiation interval of 6-8 hours) and conventional fraction IMRT (total dose of 60Gy, division 27 times, once a day, every 2.2Gy), the normal late responding tissues equivalent dosage( EQD2) significantly decreased compared with conventional fraction IMRT. Therefore, the use of hyperfractionated IMRT is expected to decrease severe late complications rates, thereby improving the quality of life and overall survival of patients.

Being tested
Hyperfractionated IMRT, Conventional Fraction IMRT
Medical subject headings
Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Hyperfractionated IMRTRadiation

  • Conventional Fraction IMRTRadiation

Study groups in NCT02456506
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Hyperfractionated IMRT GroupExperimentalIMRT (total dose of 65Gy, division 54 times, twice a day, once 1.2Gy, irradiation interval of 6-8 hours)
Receives: Radiation: Hyperfractionated IMRT
Conventional Fraction IMRT GroupActive comparatorIMRT (total dose of 60Gy, division 27 times, once a day, every 2.2Gy)
Receives: Radiation: Conventional Fraction IMRT

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall survival rate

    Measured: 3 year

  2. Severe late complications rate

    Measured: 2 year

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Quality of life questionnaire

    Measured: 2 year

  2. Loco-regional relapse free survival rate

    Measured: 3 year

  3. Distant metastasis free survival rate

    Measured: 3 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 May 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2022 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2023 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
142 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02456506
Sponsor's protocol ID
SYSU5010
Status last verified
Mar 2020
First submitted
25 May 2015
Last updated
24 Mar 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Cummings BJ. Benefits of accelerated hyperfractionation for head and neck cancer. Acta Oncol. 1999;38(2):131-6. doi: 10.1080/028418699431528.

    PubMed 10227432
  • Jereczek-Fossa BA, Morra A, DeBraud F, Alterio D, Mazzetta C, Rocca A, Catalano G, Bianchi L, Pasetti M, Chiesa F, Bruschini R, Orecchia R. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy in locally advanced nasopharyngeal cancer. An analysis of 43 consecutive patients. Strahlenther Onkol. 2004 Jul;180(7):425-33. doi: 10.1007/s00066-004-1202-9.

    PubMed 15241530
  • Jian JJ, Cheng SH, Tsai SY, Yen KC, Chu NM, Chan KY, Tan TD, Cheng JC, Lin YC, Leu SY, Hsieh CI, Tsou MH, Lin CY, Huang AT. Improvement of local control of T3 and T4 nasopharyngeal carcinoma by hyperfractionated radiotherapy and concomitant chemotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002 Jun 1;53(2):344-52. doi: 10.1016/s0360-3016(02)02709-8.

    PubMed 12023138
  • Toita T, Ogawa K, Kamata M, Kojya S, Itokazu T, Kakinohana Y, Iraha S, Yoshinaga M, Zukeran Y, Sawada S. Hyperfractionated radiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal cancer: report of seven cases. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 1999 Mar;29(3):160-3. doi: 10.1093/jjco/29.3.160.

    PubMed 10225700
  • You R, Liu YP, Xie YL, Lin C, Duan CY, Chen DP, Pan Y, Qi B, Zou X, Guo L, Cao JY, Zhang YN, Wang ZQ, Liu YL, Ouyang YF, Wen K, Yang Q, Xie RQ, Li HF, Duan XT, Ding X, Peng L, Chen SY, Liang JL, Feng ZK, Xia TL, Xie RL, Jiang R, Gu CM, Liu RZ, Sun R, Yang X, Liu LZ, Ling L, Liu Q, Ng WT, Hua YJ, Huang PY, Chen MY. Hyperfractionation compared with standard fractionation in intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with locally advanced recurrent nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2023 Mar 18;401(10380):917-927. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)00269-6. Epub 2023 Feb 23.

    PubMed 36842439

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Hyperfractionated IMRT and Conventional Fraction IMRT in people with Nasopharyngeal Neoplasms and Mortality, run by Sun Yat-sen University at 1 site in China.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Mar 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall survival rate (time frame: 3 year). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02456506, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Mar 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in