Acute Myeloid LeukemiaPhase 2/3ALFA1401NCT02473146
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin+Cytarabine vs Idarubicin+Cytarabine in Elderly Patients With AML.Mylofrance 4
A Phase 2/3 study testing Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Versailles Hospital at 21 sites in France.
Trial summary
Purpose : The main objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of the addition of repeated doses of low doses (3mg/m2) of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) in addition with standard doses of Ara-C in previously untreated patients aged 60 to 80 years with de novo acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) and non… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 60 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- What is being tested?
- Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO)
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 225 participants
- Where
- 21 sitesFrance
- Study dates
- 18 Nov 2015to 7 Sep 2023
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 60 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients with a morphologically proven diagnosis AML and both the following criteria:
- Age ≥ 60 years and < 80 years.
- Not previously treated for their disease.
- With favourable or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. (Patients with urgent clinical need to begin treatment might be included before cytogenetic results, when necessary if they do not respond to Hydroxyurea. Patients might be included if the cytogenetic results are not expected in a time limit < 5 days after AML diagnosis).
- Fit to receive intensive chemotherapy
- Cardiac function determined by radionucleide or echography within normal limits.
- Signed informed consent
Who cannot join
- M3-AML
- Presence of adverse cytogenetics (according to European LeukemiaNet recommendation.) (17) defined as one of the following abnormalities: -5/5q-, -7, t(6;9), t(v;11q23) excluding t(9;11), inv(3)(q21;q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), complex karyotype (3+ abnormalities)
- Secondary AML following treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
- AML following previously known myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic syndrome.
- ECOG performance status (PS) 0 to 3
- Serum creatinin level > or = 2.5N; AST and ALT level > or = 2.5N; total bilirubin level > or = 2N
Trial locations and contacts
21 sites in 1 country.
21 sites in 1 country
France21 sites
C.H.U d'Amiens - Hôpital Sud
Amiens
Hôpital V. Dupouy
Argenteuil
CH Avicenne
Bobigny
CHU Caen
Caen
HIA Percy
Clamart, 92140
Hopital Henri Mondor
Créteil
CHU Dijon
Dijon
CH Dunkerque
Dunkirk
CH Versailles
Le Chesnay, 78157
Hôpital Huriez, CHU de Lille
Lille
CHU Limoges
Limoges
Hôpital de la Conception
Marseille, 13005
Centre Antoine Lacassagne
Nice, 06100
CHU d'Orléans
Orléans, 45100
Hopital Necker
Paris
Hopital St Louis
Paris
Hôpital Saint Antoine
Paris
CHU Lyon Sud
Pierre-Bénite
Centre H Becquerel
Rouen
Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, 42270
IGR
Villejuif
About this study
Official title: Etude Exploratoire randomisée Comparant le Traitement Par Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin /Cytarabine au Traitement Standard Par Idarubicine/Cytarabinechez Les Sujets âgés de 60 à 80 Ans et présentant Une LAM et un Caryotype Non défavorable
Purpose : The main objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of the addition of repeated doses of low doses (3mg/m2) of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) in addition with standard doses of Ara-C in previously untreated patients aged 60 to 80 years with de novo acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) and non adverse cytogenetics. The main end point for efficacy is 2 years-event free survival. The secondary efficacy endpoints are CR/Cri rates, cumulative incidence of relapse and overall survival. The secondary endpoints for safety are early death rate (before day 30 and 60), grade 3 to 5 adverse events and severe adverse events, cardiac toxicity and quality of life. Additional secondary endpoints are treatment by covariate interactions with respect to biological characteristics present at diagnosis (CD33 positivity, cytogenetic, molecular abnormalities) or after treatment (Minimal residual disease levels). This study is an exploratory study. Patients will be allocated at inclusion with a 2/1 ratio either to receive treatment with GO and cytarabine or Idarubicin and cytarabine in a 3+7 regimen similar to the "backbone" ALFA 1200 scheme used concurrently by the ALFA group as treatment of AML patients aged >60 years.
Primary objective. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of two doses of Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) during induction and one dose of GO during first consolidation in combination with Cytarabine in elderly patients with AML in the non adverse cytogenetics-risk group.
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Being tested
- Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO)
- Keywords
- AML, untreated, 60-80 years old, favorable and intermediate karyotype
- Medical subject headings
- Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO)Drug
Also called Mylotarg
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mylotarg Arm | Experimental | After randomization patients in the experimental arm are assigned to receive chemotherapy with:
Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin 3 mg/m2 (maximum dose: 5 mg) per IV, 60mn on Day 1 and 4 Cytarabine 200 mg/m2 per CIV over 24h on Day 1 to 7 Receives: Drug: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) |
| Control Arm | No intervention | After randomization patients in the control arm are assigned to receive chemotherapy with Idarubicin 12mg/m2 per IV, 30mn on Day 1,2,3 Cytarabine 200 mg/m2 per CIV over 24h on Day 1 to 7 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
EFS (defined as the time from randomization to the date of assessment of response if CR or Cri had not been achieved, relapse or death)
Endoint for the primary objective of efficacy is EFS defined as the time from randomization to the date of assessment of response if CR or Cri had not been achieved, relapse or death.
Measured: 5 years
Secondary outcomes (2)
Composite measure for Efficacy assessed by CR/Cri rates, cumulative incidence of relapse, overall survival.
Measured: 5 years
Composite measure for safety
- incidence of early deaths < day 30 and day 60,
- grade 3 to 5 adverse events and all serious adverse events during induction and consolidation treatment
- cardiac toxicity evaluated on cardiac ejection function evaluation by echocardiography or isotopic measure.
- Quality of life measured by questionaries' EORTC QLQ-C30 repeated at diagnosis, after induction treatment, after the two consolidations and 3 months after the end of treatment.
End points for treatment-by-covariate interactions are
- at diagnosis: percentage of CD33 positivity on blast cells, measured with a standardized method, cytogenetics and most relevant molecular markers (FLT3, MLL, CEBPa, NPM1, DNMT3a.,
- after induction and end of treatment: minimal residual disease determined by WT1 and/or NPM1 transcripts levels.
Measured: 5 years
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted16 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study start18 Nov 2015
- Primary completion26 Feb 2021
- Study completion7 Sep 2023
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Acute Myeloid LeukemiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 225 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Versailles Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Ms Juliette LAMBERT, Versailles Hospital
- Investigators
- Juliette LAMBERT, MD, Principal investigator, Versailles HospitalSylvie CASTAIGNE, MD, Principal investigator, Versailles Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02473146
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2014-001395-65
- Other IDs
- 2014
- Acronym
- ALFA1401
- Status last verified
- Feb 2024
- First submitted
- 29 Apr 2015
- Last updated
- 2 Feb 2024
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 2 Feb 2024. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Etude Exploratoire randomisée Comparant le Traitement Par Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin /Cytarabine au Traitement Standard Par Idarubicine/Cytarabinechez Les Sujets âgés de 60 à 80 Ans et présentant Une LAM et un Caryotype Non défavorable
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02473146
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ALFA1401 / 2014-001395-65
- Conditions
- Acute Myeloid Leukemia
- Keywords
- AML, untreated, 60-80 years old, favorable and intermediate karyotype
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 225 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Versailles HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 18 Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 26 Feb 2021 (actual)
- Study completion
- 7 Sep 2023 (actual)
- First posted
- 16 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose : The main objective of this study is to assess the efficacy and tolerance of the addition of repeated doses of low doses (3mg/m2) of Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin (GO) in addition with standard doses of Ara-C in previously untreated patients aged 60 to 80 years with de novo acute myeloblastic leukemia (AML) and non adverse cytogenetics. The main end point for efficacy is 2 years-event free survival. The secondary efficacy endpoints are CR/Cri rates, cumulative incidence of relapse and overall survival. The secondary endpoints for safety are early death rate (before day 30 and 60), grade 3 to 5 adverse events and severe adverse events, cardiac toxicity and quality of life. Additional secondary endpoints are treatment by covariate interactions with respect to biological characteristics present at diagnosis (CD33 positivity, cytogenetic, molecular abnormalities) or after treatment (Minimal residual disease levels). This study is an exploratory study. Patients will be allocated at inclusion with a 2/1 ratio either to receive treatment with GO and cytarabine or Idarubicin and cytarabine in a 3+7 regimen similar to the "backbone" ALFA 1200 scheme used concurrently by the ALFA group as treatment of AML patients aged >60 years.
Primary objective. The primary objective is to assess the efficacy of two doses of Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) during induction and one dose of GO during first consolidation in combination with Cytarabine in elderly patients with AML in the non adverse cytogenetics-risk group.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mylotarg Arm | Experimental | Drug: Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO)After randomization patients in the experimental arm are assigned to receive chemotherapy with: Gemtuzumab Ozogamicin 3 mg/m2 (maximum dose: 5 mg) per IV, 60mn on Day 1 and 4 Cytarabine 200 mg/m2 per CIV over 24h on Day 1 to 7 |
| Control Arm | No intervention | –After randomization patients in the control arm are assigned to receive chemotherapy with Idarubicin 12mg/m2 per IV, 30mn on Day 1,2,3 Cytarabine 200 mg/m2 per CIV over 24h on Day 1 to 7 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 60 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patients with a morphologically proven diagnosis AML and both the following criteria:
- Age ≥ 60 years and < 80 years.
- Not previously treated for their disease.
- With favourable or intermediate-risk cytogenetics. (Patients with urgent clinical need to begin treatment might be included before cytogenetic results, when necessary if they do not respond to Hydroxyurea. Patients might be included if the cytogenetic results are not expected in a time limit < 5 days after AML diagnosis).
- Fit to receive intensive chemotherapy
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- M3-AML
- Presence of adverse cytogenetics (according to European LeukemiaNet recommendation.) (17) defined as one of the following abnormalities: -5/5q-, -7, t(6;9), t(v;11q23) excluding t(9;11), inv(3)(q21;q26.2) or t(3;3)(q21;q26.2), complex karyotype (3+ abnormalities)
- Secondary AML following treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy.
- AML following previously known myeloproliferative or myelodysplastic syndrome.
- ECOG performance status (PS) 0 to 3
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO)Also: Mylotarg | Drug | Mylotarg Arm |
Primary outcome
EFS (defined as the time from randomization to the date of assessment of response if CR or Cri had not been achieved, relapse or death)
Time frame: 5 years
Endoint for the primary objective of efficacy is EFS defined as the time from randomization to the date of assessment of response if CR or Cri had not been achieved, relapse or death.
2 secondary outcomes
Composite measure for Efficacy assessed by CR/Cri rates, cumulative incidence of relapse, overall survival.
Time frame: 5 years
Composite measure for safety
Time frame: 5 years
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 2 Feb 2024.
Related trials for Acute Myeloid Leukemia
RecruitingPhase 1
A Study of CHM-029 in Participants With NPM1 Mutated, KMT2A or NUP98 Rearranged AML
AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia)
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Venetoclax and CLAG-M for the Treatment of Acute Myeloid Leukemia and High-Grade Myeloid Neoplasms
Acute Biphenotypic Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Juliette LAMBERT, MD principal investigator
Versailles Hospital
Sylvie CASTAIGNE, MD principal investigator
Versailles Hospital
21 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Gemtuzumab ozogamicin (GO) in people with Acute Myeloid Leukemia, run by Versailles Hospital at 21 sites in France.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Feb 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 21 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
EFS (defined as the time from randomization to the date of assessment of response if CR or Cri had not been achieved, relapse or death) (time frame: 5 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Feb 2024.