Low Back PainPhase 1/2NCT02478307
Coping Skills Training for Living With Chronic Low Back Pain
A Phase 1/2 study testing Cognitive Therapy, Mindfulness Meditation and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in people with Low Back Pain, run by The University of Queensland at 1 site in Australia.
Trial summary
Up to 80% of Australians experience back pain and 10% have significant disability as a result. There is a critical need for the development and evaluation of innovative treatments that have the capacity to target the multidimensional nature of chronic low back pain. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Cognitive Therapy, Mindfulness Meditation and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 69 participants
- Where
- 1 siteAustralia
- Study dates
- May 2015to 30 Jun 2018
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- ≥18 years of age
- Chronic pain of the low back (≥3 months) that is the primary source of reported pain
- Average pain intensity of ≥4 on a 10-point scale
- If currently taking analgesic or psychotropic medications, they must have been stabilised for ≥4 weeks prior to this study
- Be able to read, speak and understand English
- Be able to attend a weekly 2-hour therapy session for 8 concurrent weeks
Who cannot join
- Cognitive impairment, uncontrolled psychotic symptoms or current elevated suicidal ideation as this may interfere with group-delivered therapy (as evidenced by the 6-item screener)
- Chronic pain due to malignancy
- History of a medical condition that could produce an abnormal EEG and interfere with the tests of the effects of treatment on EEG (e.g., epilepsy, history of traumatic brain injury)
- Currently receiving other psychosocial pain treatment
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Mechanisms of Mindfulness Meditation, Cognitive Therapy, and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Low Back Pain
Up to 80% of Australians experience back pain and 10% have significant disability as a result. There is a critical need for the development and evaluation of innovative treatments that have the capacity to target the multidimensional nature of chronic low back pain. This study will compare the effects and mechanisms of Mindfulness Meditation, Cognitive Therapy, and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for chronic low back pain. Results will ultimately lead to streamlined interventions designed to efficiently maximise benefit.
Read the detailed description
Up to 80% of Australians experience back pain and 10% have significant disability as a result. This translates into substantial economic cost with far reaching psychological, emotional and social implications. Unfortunately, the treatment options for chronic low back pain (CLBP) are limited and typical medical/pharmacological approaches entail potentially serious side-effects (e.g., opioid addiction). There is a critical need for the development and evaluation of innovative interventions that have the capacity to target the multidimensional nature of CLBP.
Research indicates that psychosocial interventions for CLBP are viable treatment approaches that entail few (if any) deleterious side effects and can have benefit beyond pain reduction. Cognitive Therapy (CT) and Mindfulness Meditation (MM) have both been found to be feasible and effective for CLBP. A promising recently developed treatment that combines aspects of CT and MM is Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT). MBCT has been successfully applied to problems such as depression and headache; however, this approach has not been investigated for CLBP.
Thus, the current study is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to examine the effects and mechanisms (i.e., how and for whom do these treatments work) of CT, MM, and MBCT for CLBP. Brain state data (electroencephalogram (EEG)) as well as self-report data will be examined to investigate the potential unique and shared mechanisms underlying treatment effects. Furthering the field's understanding of these treatments and their mechanisms will lead to the development of streamlined interventions designed to efficiently maximise benefit for individuals with CLBP, and that optimise relief from suffering.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Cognitive Therapy, Mindfulness Meditation, Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy
- Keywords
- chronic low back pain, mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, efficacy, mechanisms, coping
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cognitive TherapyOther
Mindfulness MeditationOther
Mindfulness-Based Cognitive TherapyOther
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Therapy | Active comparator | Eight, 2-hours sessions of group delivered cognitive therapy. Receives: Other: Cognitive Therapy |
| Mindfulness Meditation | Active comparator | Eight, 2-hours sessions of group delivered mindfulness meditation. Receives: Other: Mindfulness Meditation |
| Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy | Active comparator | Eight, 2-hours sessions of group delivered mindfulness-based cognitive therapy Receives: Other: Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Pain interference PROMIS scale
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in pain interference is assessed via the PROMIS scale
Measured: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Secondary outcomes (8)
Pain intensity assessed via the numerical rating scale (NRS)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in pain intensity is assessed via the numerical rating scale (NRS)
Measured: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Pain catastrophizing assessed via the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in pain catastrophizing is assessed via the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Measured: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Mindfulness assessed via the FFMQ
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in mindfulness is assessed via the FFMQ
Measured: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Pain acceptance assessed via the CPAQ
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in pain acceptance is assessed via the CPAQ
Measured: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Psychological functioning PROMIS scale
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in psychological functioning is assessed via the PROMIS scale
Measured: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Emotional functioning PROMIS scale
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in emotional functioning is assessed via the PROMIS scale
Measured: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Physical functioning PROMIS scale
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in physical functioning is assessed via the PROMIS scale
Measured: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands assessed via EEG
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in brain state data is assessed via EEG
Measured: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted23 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2015
- Primary completion30 Jun 2018
- Study completion30 Jun 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Participant
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- The University of Queensland
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Washington, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Rush University Medical Center
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Dr Melissa Day, The University of Queensland
- Investigators
- Melissa Day, MA(Clin), PhD, Principal investigator, The University of Queensland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02478307
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UQueensland
- Status last verified
- May 2019
- First submitted
- 9 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 20 May 2019
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Day MA, Matthews N, Newman A, Mattingley JB, Jensen MP. An evaluation of the behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation system (BIS-BAS) model of pain. Rehabil Psychol. 2019 Aug;64(3):279-287. doi: 10.1037/rep0000274. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
PubMed 30920244
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 20 May 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Mechanisms of Mindfulness Meditation, Cognitive Therapy, and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02478307
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UQueensland
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- chronic low back pain, mindfulness meditation, cognitive therapy, mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, efficacy, mechanisms, coping
- Phase
- Phase 1/2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 69 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- The University of QueenslandUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of Washington, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Rush University Medical Center
- Study start
- May 2015
- Primary completion
- 30 Jun 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 30 Jun 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 23 Jun 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Up to 80% of Australians experience back pain and 10% have significant disability as a result. There is a critical need for the development and evaluation of innovative treatments that have the capacity to target the multidimensional nature of chronic low back pain. This study will compare the effects and mechanisms of Mindfulness Meditation, Cognitive Therapy, and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy for chronic low back pain. Results will ultimately lead to streamlined interventions designed to efficiently maximise benefit.
Detailed description
Up to 80% of Australians experience back pain and 10% have significant disability as a result. This translates into substantial economic cost with far reaching psychological, emotional and social implications. Unfortunately, the treatment options for chronic low back pain (CLBP) are limited and typical medical/pharmacological approaches entail potentially serious side-effects (e.g., opioid addiction). There is a critical need for the development and evaluation of innovative interventions that have the capacity to target the multidimensional nature of CLBP.
Research indicates that psychosocial interventions for CLBP are viable treatment approaches that entail few (if any) deleterious side effects and can have benefit beyond pain reduction. Cognitive Therapy (CT) and Mindfulness Meditation (MM) have both been found to be feasible and effective for CLBP. A promising recently developed treatment that combines aspects of CT and MM is Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT). MBCT has been successfully applied to problems such as depression and headache; however, this approach has not been investigated for CLBP.
Thus, the current study is a randomised controlled trial (RCT) designed to examine the effects and mechanisms (i.e., how and for whom do these treatments work) of CT, MM, and MBCT for CLBP. Brain state data (electroencephalogram (EEG)) as well as self-report data will be examined to investigate the potential unique and shared mechanisms underlying treatment effects. Furthering the field's understanding of these treatments and their mechanisms will lead to the development of streamlined interventions designed to efficiently maximise benefit for individuals with CLBP, and that optimise relief from suffering.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (participant)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Therapy | Active comparator | Other: Cognitive TherapyEight, 2-hours sessions of group delivered cognitive therapy. |
| Mindfulness Meditation | Active comparator | Other: Mindfulness MeditationEight, 2-hours sessions of group delivered mindfulness meditation. |
| Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy | Active comparator | Other: Mindfulness-Based Cognitive TherapyEight, 2-hours sessions of group delivered mindfulness-based cognitive therapy |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- ≥18 years of age
- Chronic pain of the low back (≥3 months) that is the primary source of reported pain
- Average pain intensity of ≥4 on a 10-point scale
- If currently taking analgesic or psychotropic medications, they must have been stabilised for ≥4 weeks prior to this study
- Be able to read, speak and understand English
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Cognitive impairment, uncontrolled psychotic symptoms or current elevated suicidal ideation as this may interfere with group-delivered therapy (as evidenced by the 6-item screener)
- Chronic pain due to malignancy
- History of a medical condition that could produce an abnormal EEG and interfere with the tests of the effects of treatment on EEG (e.g., epilepsy, history of traumatic brain injury)
- Currently receiving other psychosocial pain treatment
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Therapy | Other | Cognitive Therapy |
| Mindfulness Meditation | Other | Mindfulness Meditation |
| Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy | Other | Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy |
Primary outcome
Pain interference PROMIS scale
Time frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Participants are assessed pre-treatment and then following the 8-week treatment (post-treatment); change in pain interference is assessed via the PROMIS scale
8 secondary outcomes
Pain intensity assessed via the numerical rating scale (NRS)
Time frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Pain catastrophizing assessed via the Pain Catastrophizing Scale
Time frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Mindfulness assessed via the FFMQ
Time frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Pain acceptance assessed via the CPAQ
Time frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Psychological functioning PROMIS scale
Time frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Emotional functioning PROMIS scale
Time frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Physical functioning PROMIS scale
Time frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Delta, theta, alpha, beta, and gamma bands assessed via EEG
Time frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 20 May 2019.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30920244Day MA, Matthews N, Newman A, Mattingley JB, Jensen MP. An evaluation of the behavioral inhibition and behavioral activation system (BIS-BAS) model of pain. Rehabil Psychol. 2019 Aug;64(3):279-287. doi: 10.1037/rep0000274. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Melissa Day, MA(Clin), PhD principal investigator
The University of Queensland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 1/2 study testing Cognitive Therapy, Mindfulness Meditation and Mindfulness-Based Cognitive Therapy in people with Low Back Pain, run by The University of Queensland at 1 site in Australia.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 20 May 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Australia. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 1 studies test a treatment in a small group of people for the first time or in a new way, mainly to check safety and find the right dose.
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Pain interference PROMIS scale (time frame: pre to post-treatment (at least 8 weeks)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02478307, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 20 May 2019.