AzTrials
AzTrials

Pulmonary EmbolismPEGeDNCT02483442

D-dimer Testing Tailored to Clinical Pretest Probability in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism

An observational study of Pulmonary Embolism, run by McMaster University at 9 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prospective, multicentre, cohort study assessing a diagnostic management strategy for suspected Pulmonary Embolism with independent central adjudication of outcomes Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pulmonary Embolism
How many people
2,038 participants
Where
9 sitesCanada
Study dates
11 Dec 2015to 24 Sep 2019
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Male or female patients (either outpatients or inpatients) with clinically suspected Pulmonary Embolism.

Who may be able to join

  • Patients (either outpatients or inpatients) with clinically suspected Pulmonary Embolism.

Who cannot join

  • Age less than 18 years.
  • Treated with full-dose anticoagulation for ≥ 24 hours before D-dimer was measured.
  • Major surgery (general or spinal anesthesia) in the past 21 days.
  • Result of the D-dimer assay that will be used to manage the patient in the study is known before Clinical Pretest Probability was done.
  • Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram or Ventilation Perfusion Scan was performed:
  • before Clinical Pretest Probability was documented, or
Show all 14Show fewer
  • in a patient with Low Clinical Pretest Probability and a D-dimer level <1,000 ug/L (or equivalent), or
  • in a patient with Moderate Clinical Pretest Probability and a D-dimer level <500 ug/L (or equivalent).
  • Computed Tomography of the chest with contrast will be performed for another reason (e.g. to assess for malignant disease or aortic dissection), and would be performed even if Pulmonary Embolism is excluded by Clinical Pretest Probability and D-dimer testing.
  • Ongoing need for anticoagulant therapy.
  • Life expectancy less than 3 months.
  • Geographic inaccessibility which precludes follow-up.
  • Known pregnancy.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.

Trial locations and contacts

9 sites in 1 country.

9 sites in 1 country

Canada9 sites
  • University of Alberta Hospital

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G2V2

  • HHS- Hamilton General Hospital

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8L2X2

  • St Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 4A6

  • HHS - McMaster University Medical Centre

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8S 4K1

  • Juravinski Hospital

    Hamilton, Ontario

  • London Health Sciences

    London, Ontario, N6A5W9

  • Jewish General Hospital

    Montreal

  • Ottawa Hospital - General Campus

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1H8L6

  • Sherbrooke University Hospital

    Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1H5N4

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: D-dimer Testing,Tailored to Clinical Pretest Probability to Reduce the Use of CT Pulmonary Angiography in Suspected Pulmonary Embolism: A Management Study (The Pulmonary Embolism Graduated D-dimer [PEGeD] Study)

Prospective, multicentre, cohort study assessing a diagnostic management strategy for suspected Pulmonary Embolism with independent central adjudication of outcomes

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, multi-centre, cohort study that will assess a new diagnostic management strategy for suspected Pulmonary Embolism (inpatients and outpatients). The new diagnostic strategy is designed to reduce the use of imaging tests for Pulmonary Embolism, particularly Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiogram, by excluding Pulmonary Embolism with combinations of Clinical Pretest Probability and D-dimer results in a higher proportion of patients. The safety of this management strategy will be established by demonstrating a very low rate of proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism during 90 days of follow-up in patients who had anticoagulant therapy withheld in response to negative diagnostic testing. Diagnostic test utilization will be assessed. All clinical outcomes will be adjudicated by a central independent adjudication committee that will be blind to initial D-dimer measurements and patient management.

Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Embolism

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02483442
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
No CT Pulmonary AngiographyLow Clinical Pretest Probability with D-dimer < 1000 ug/L and Moderate Clinical Pretest Probability with D-dimer < 500ug/L
CT Pulmonary Angiography RequiredLow Clinical Pretest Probability with D-dimer > or = 1000ug/L and Moderate Clinical Pretest Probability with D-dimer > or = 500 ug/L and High Clinical Pretest Probability

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Number of patients with confirmed symptomatic proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism

    Proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis includes thrombosis confined to the calf vein trifurcation but not isolated more distal Deep Vein Thrombosis. Pulmonary Embolism does not include isolated sub-segmental abnormalities on Computed Tomography Pulmonary Angiography.

    Measured: 90 Days (+ or - 7days)

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Number of patients with bleeding

    Major and minor bleeding

    Measured: 90 days (+ or - 7days)

  2. Number of patient Deaths

    All deaths and cause specific deaths

    Measured: 90 days (+ or - 7days)

  3. Number of patients with Venous Thromboembolism

    Venous Thromboembolism, including events that do not satisfy the primary outcome (e.g. isolated distal Deep Vein Thrombosis or subsegmental Pulmonary Embolism) but that are confirmed by the adjudication committee.

    Measured: 90 days (+ or - 7days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted29 Jun 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start11 Dec 2015
  3. Primary completion7 Feb 2019
  4. Study completion24 Sep 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
2,038 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02483442
Sponsor's protocol ID
OCOG-2014-PEGeD
Acronym
PEGeD
Status last verified
Feb 2023
First submitted
18 Jun 2015
Last updated
6 Feb 2023
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Kearon C, de Wit K, Parpia S, Schulman S, Afilalo M, Hirsch A, Spencer FA, Sharma S, D'Aragon F, Deshaies JF, Le Gal G, Lazo-Langner A, Wu C, Rudd-Scott L, Bates SM, Julian JA; PEGeD Study Investigators. Diagnosis of Pulmonary Embolism with d-Dimer Adjusted to Clinical Probability. N Engl J Med. 2019 Nov 28;381(22):2125-2134. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1909159.

    PubMed 31774957

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Pulmonary Embolism, run by McMaster University at 9 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 6 Feb 2023. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 9 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Number of patients with confirmed symptomatic proximal Deep Vein Thrombosis or Pulmonary Embolism (time frame: 90 Days (+ or - 7days)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02483442, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 6 Feb 2023.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in