Gastrointestinal DysfunctionPhase 4NCT02486328
The Effect of Different Sedation Regimes on Cognitive Function in Lower Gastrointestinal System Endoscopy
A Phase 4 study testing Midazolam, Meperidine and Remifentanil in people with Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Alteration of Cognitive Function, run by Ufuk University.
Trial summary
There are different sedation regimes for lower gastrointestinal system endoscopy which can be administered by anesthesiologists and non-anesthesiologists. This study aims to compare the effects of propofol/remifentanil combination and midazolam/meperidine combination on early cognitive function following lower… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Gastrointestinal Dysfunction, Alteration of Cognitive Function
- What is being tested?
- Midazolam, Meperidine and Remifentanil
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 103 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- May 2015to Jun 2015
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Patients between 18-65 years of age (ASA I-III risk groups), scheduled for elective colonoscopy
Who cannot join
- Patient refusal
- Mini mental test (MMT) score<26
- Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS ) score >10
- Advanced cardiopulmonary or psychiatric disease
- Chronic alcohol abuse
- Morbid obesity
- Known allergy to study drugs
About this study
Official title: The Effect of Different Sedation Regimes Administered by Anesthesiologists or Endoscopists on Cognitive Functions in Lower Gastrointestinal System Endoscopy
There are different sedation regimes for lower gastrointestinal system endoscopy which can be administered by anesthesiologists and non-anesthesiologists. This study aims to compare the effects of propofol/remifentanil combination and midazolam/meperidine combination on early cognitive function following lower gastrointestinal system endoscopies.
Read the detailed description
Sedation for lower gastrointestinal system endoscopies can be administered by anesthesiologists or endoscopists and cognitive dysfunction after this procedure has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different sedation regimes applied by anesthesiologists or endoscopists on early cognitive dysfunction. Following ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 100 patients were randomly divided into two groups. In Group MM where drug regime was solely determined by endoscopists, 2 mg midazolam and 20mg meperidine was given intravenously and additional 1-2mg midazolam and 20mg meperidine (wtih a maximum total of 5 mg midazolam and 50 mg meperidine) was given when facial pain scale (FPS) was greater than 3. In Group RP where drug regime was solely determined by anesthesiologists, 100 mcg/kg/min propofol infusion and 1 mcg/kg remifentanil bolus was administered and additional 0,5 mcg/kg remifentanil bolus was given when FPS was greater than 3. Bispectral index (BIS) and hemodynamic monitorization was carried out throughout the procedure and BIS 60-80 with FPS<3 was targeted. The time to Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAAS) score to reach 3 was measured after the procedure and Trieger Dot Test (TDT) and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) was repeated at 5th, 15th and 30th minutes.
- Being tested
- Midazolam, Meperidine, Remifentanil, Propofol
- Keywords
- Cognitive dysfunction, Colonoscopy, Sedation
- Medical subject headings
- Cognitive Dysfunction
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
MidazolamDrug
Also called Versed
Dosage adjustment
MeperidineDrug
Also called Demerol
Dosage adjustment
RemifentanilDrug
Also called Ultiva
Dosage adjustment
PropofolDrug
Also called Diprivan
Dosage adjustment
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Group MM | Other | 2 mg midazolam and 20mg meperidine given intravenously and additional 1-2mg midazolam and 20mg meperidine (wtih a maximum total of 5 mg midazolam and 50 mg meperidine) given when FPS greater than 3 Receives: Drug: Midazolam; Drug: Meperidine |
| Group RP | Other | 100 mcg/kg/min propofol infusion and 1 mcg/kg remifentanil bolus administered and additional 0,5 mcg/kg remifentanil bolus given when FPS greater than 3 Receives: Drug: Remifentanil; Drug: Propofol |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Cognitive Function
As measured by Trieger Dot Test. The test does not have an upper limit; the time taken to complete the test is added to the number of dots missed by the patient and a result is obtained. The lowest score possible is 0. Higher values represent worse outcomes.
Measured: Baseline and 5, 15, 30 minutes after the procedure
Change in Cognitive Function
As measured by Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Scale range 0-9. No cut-off value. Higher results represent better outcomes
Measured: Baseline and 5, 15, 30 minutes after the procedure
Secondary outcomes (4)
Change in Visual Analogue Scale Scores From the Baseline
Pain as measured by Visual Analogue Scale. Range 1-10. No cut-off value, Higher results represent worse outcomes
Measured: Baseline and 5, 15, 30 minutes after the procedure
Heart Rate
Heart rate as measured in beats per minute
Measured: Baseline and 1,2,3,5,10,15 and 20 minutes
Mean Arterial Pressure
mean arterial blood pressure as measured in mmHg
Measured: Baseline and 1,2,3,5,10,15 and 20 minutes
Peripheral Oxygen Saturation
peripheral oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximeter. Units are percentages, Scale range 0-100.
Measured: Baseline and 1,2,3,5,10,15 and 20 minutes
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startMay 2015
- Primary completionJun 2015
- Study completionJun 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (3)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Gastrointestinal DysfunctionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Ufuk University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Perihan Ekmekçi, Ufuk University
- Investigators
- Perihan Ekmekçi, Assoc Prof, Principal investigator, Ufuk University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02486328
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- UfukU
- Status last verified
- Aug 2020
- First submitted
- 24 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 3 Sep 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Cohen LB, Dubovsky AN, Aisenberg J, Miller KM. Propofol for endoscopic sedation: A protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Nov;58(5):725-32. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02010-8.
PubMed 14595310Ferreira AO, Cravo M. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Where are we at in 2014? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb 16;7(2):102-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.102.
PubMed 25685266Padmanabhan U, Leslie K, Eer AS, Maruff P, Silbert BS. Early cognitive impairment after sedation for colonoscopy: the effect of adding midazolam and/or fentanyl to propofol. Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1448-55. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a6ad31. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
PubMed 19617584
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 Sep 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Effect of Different Sedation Regimes Administered by Anesthesiologists or Endoscopists on Cognitive Functions in Lower Gastrointestinal System Endoscopy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02486328
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- UfukU
- Keywords
- Cognitive dysfunction, Colonoscopy, Sedation
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 103 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Ufuk UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- May 2015
- Primary completion
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Sep 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
There are different sedation regimes for lower gastrointestinal system endoscopy which can be administered by anesthesiologists and non-anesthesiologists. This study aims to compare the effects of propofol/remifentanil combination and midazolam/meperidine combination on early cognitive function following lower gastrointestinal system endoscopies.
Detailed description
Sedation for lower gastrointestinal system endoscopies can be administered by anesthesiologists or endoscopists and cognitive dysfunction after this procedure has not been fully investigated. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of different sedation regimes applied by anesthesiologists or endoscopists on early cognitive dysfunction. Following ethics committee approval and written informed consent, 100 patients were randomly divided into two groups. In Group MM where drug regime was solely determined by endoscopists, 2 mg midazolam and 20mg meperidine was given intravenously and additional 1-2mg midazolam and 20mg meperidine (wtih a maximum total of 5 mg midazolam and 50 mg meperidine) was given when facial pain scale (FPS) was greater than 3. In Group RP where drug regime was solely determined by anesthesiologists, 100 mcg/kg/min propofol infusion and 1 mcg/kg remifentanil bolus was administered and additional 0,5 mcg/kg remifentanil bolus was given when FPS was greater than 3. Bispectral index (BIS) and hemodynamic monitorization was carried out throughout the procedure and BIS 60-80 with FPS<3 was targeted. The time to Observer Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale (OAAS) score to reach 3 was measured after the procedure and Trieger Dot Test (TDT) and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) was repeated at 5th, 15th and 30th minutes.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Group MM | Other | Drug: Midazolam, Drug: Meperidine2 mg midazolam and 20mg meperidine given intravenously and additional 1-2mg midazolam and 20mg meperidine (wtih a maximum total of 5 mg midazolam and 50 mg meperidine) given when FPS greater than 3 |
| Group RP | Other | Drug: Remifentanil, Drug: Propofol100 mcg/kg/min propofol infusion and 1 mcg/kg remifentanil bolus administered and additional 0,5 mcg/kg remifentanil bolus given when FPS greater than 3 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Patients between 18-65 years of age (ASA I-III risk groups), scheduled for elective colonoscopy
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Patient refusal
- Mini mental test (MMT) score<26
- Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS ) score >10
- Advanced cardiopulmonary or psychiatric disease
- Chronic alcohol abuse
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| MidazolamAlso: VersedDosage adjustment | Drug | Group MM |
| MeperidineAlso: DemerolDosage adjustment | Drug | Group MM |
| RemifentanilAlso: UltivaDosage adjustment | Drug | Group RP |
| PropofolAlso: DiprivanDosage adjustment | Drug | Group RP |
Primary outcome
Change in Cognitive Function
Time frame: Baseline and 5, 15, 30 minutes after the procedure
As measured by Trieger Dot Test. The test does not have an upper limit; the time taken to complete the test is added to the number of dots missed by the patient and a result is obtained. The lowest score possible is 0. Higher values represent worse outcomes.
Change in Cognitive Function
Time frame: Baseline and 5, 15, 30 minutes after the procedure
As measured by Digit Symbol Substitution Test. Scale range 0-9. No cut-off value. Higher results represent better outcomes
4 secondary outcomes
Change in Visual Analogue Scale Scores From the Baseline
Time frame: Baseline and 5, 15, 30 minutes after the procedure
Heart Rate
Time frame: Baseline and 1,2,3,5,10,15 and 20 minutes
Mean Arterial Pressure
Time frame: Baseline and 1,2,3,5,10,15 and 20 minutes
Peripheral Oxygen Saturation
Time frame: Baseline and 1,2,3,5,10,15 and 20 minutes
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 Sep 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 14595310Cohen LB, Dubovsky AN, Aisenberg J, Miller KM. Propofol for endoscopic sedation: A protocol for safe and effective administration by the gastroenterologist. Gastrointest Endosc. 2003 Nov;58(5):725-32. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(03)02010-8.
- Results publication: PubMed 25685266Ferreira AO, Cravo M. Sedation in gastrointestinal endoscopy: Where are we at in 2014? World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Feb 16;7(2):102-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i2.102.
- Results publication: PubMed 19617584Padmanabhan U, Leslie K, Eer AS, Maruff P, Silbert BS. Early cognitive impairment after sedation for colonoscopy: the effect of adding midazolam and/or fentanyl to propofol. Anesth Analg. 2009 Nov;109(5):1448-55. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a6ad31. Epub 2009 Jul 17.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Gastrointestinal Dysfunction
Recruiting
Trial to Evaluate Fecobionics in Fecal Incontinence (FI) (NORMAL and ABNORMAL-FI)
Normal Subjects, Fecal Incontinence
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Vascular Health and Function in Cystic Fibrosis
Cystic Fibrosis, Endothelial Dysfunction
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prevalence and Development of Liver Dysfunction in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Active, not recruitingObservational study
Assessment of the Prevalence of Steatotic Liver Disease Associated With Metabolic Dysfunction in Patients With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia
RecruitingPhase 3
LIVERAGE™: A Study to Test Whether Survodutide Helps People With a Liver Disease Called NASH/MASH Who Have Moderate or Advanced Liver Fibrosis
Metabolic Dysfunction Associated Steatohepatitis (MASH), Liver Fibrosis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Perihan Ekmekçi, Assoc Prof principal investigator
Ufuk University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Midazolam, Meperidine and Remifentanil in people with Gastrointestinal Dysfunction and Alteration of Cognitive Function, run by Ufuk University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Sep 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Sep 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Cognitive Function (time frame: Baseline and 5, 15, 30 minutes after the procedure). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02486328, which also lists 3 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Sep 2020.