AzTrials
AzTrials

Heart Defects, CongenitalNCT02498626

Mixed Venous Oxygen Saturation From Central Venous Line, Venous Side of Heart Lung Machine and the Pulmonary Artery

An observational study of Heart Defects, Congenital, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study was designed to examine if venous saturations from the central venous line and from the venous side of the heart lung machine are interchangeable or not with mixed venous saturation from the pulmonary artery in children undergoing open heart surgery for correction of various congenital heart defects. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 1 year to 15 years
Conditions the study is for
Heart Defects, Congenital
What is being tested?
venous saturations
How many people
40 participants
Where
1 siteEgypt
Study dates
Jul 2009to Jan 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 1 year to 15 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child

Study population: cardiac surgery for children with congenital heart defects

Who may be able to join

  • Children in the age from 1-15 years undergoing correction for congenital heart defects with cardiopulmonary bypass

Who cannot join

  • Any chest renal or hepatic problems

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Egypt1 site
  • Faculty of Medicine

    Asyut, Asyut Governorate

Other trials in Egypt

About this study

Official title: Are Venous Saturations From the Central Venous Line, Venous Side of the Heart Lung Machine Interchangeable or Not With Mixed Venous Saturation From the Pulmonary Artery in Children Undergoing Open Heart Surgery?

This study was designed to examine if venous saturations from the central venous line and from the venous side of the heart lung machine are interchangeable or not with mixed venous saturation from the pulmonary artery in children undergoing open heart surgery for correction of various congenital heart defects.

Read the detailed description

Forty children aged from 1-15 years undergoing correction for different congenital heart procedures with cardiopulmonary bypass [CPB] were included in this study. Simultaneous samples were taken from the central venous line, pulmonary artery, and from venous side of the heart lung machine. Samples were taken after 10 minutes on full CPB and at the end of surgery before end of CPB. Bland and Altman plots were used to study the agreement between venous saturations.

Being tested
venous saturations
Keywords
mixed venous saturation, open heart surgery, children
Medical subject headings
Heart Defects, Congenital

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • venous saturationsOther

    Samples of venous saturations from the central venous line (CVP), from venous side of the heart lung machine and from the pulmonary artery were taken at 10 min after being on CPB and after correction of the cardiac defects.

Study groups in NCT02498626
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
venous saturationsvenous saturations from the central venous line, venous side of the heart lung machine and from the pulmonary artery
Receives: Other: venous saturations

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Bland and Altman Analysis was used to plot the difference in mixed oxygen saturation

    The agreement between these samples from the central venous line, venous side of the heart lung machine and from the pulmonary artery were done using bland and Altman Analysis

    Measured: intraoperative

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2009
  3. Primary completionJan 2016
  4. Study completionJan 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case only
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
40 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02498626
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB000087110
Status last verified
Feb 2016
First submitted
24 Jun 2015
Last updated
10 May 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Heart Defects, Congenital, run by Assiut University at 1 site in Egypt.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 May 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Egypt. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Bland and Altman Analysis was used to plot the difference in mixed oxygen saturation (time frame: intraoperative). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 May 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in