AzTrials
AzTrials

PainPhase 4VATS ExparelNCT02499159

Pain Management in Response to Exparel vs. Standard Bupivicaine

A Phase 4 study testing Liposomal Bupivicaine and 0.25% standard bupivicaine in people with Pain, run by Inova Health Care Services at 2 sites in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This study is looking to evaluate the efficacy of liposomal bupivicaine (Exparel) on decreasing the amount of consumed pain medications. Patients will be randomly selected to received either Exparel or standard bupivicaine injection during surgery. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pain
What is being tested?
Liposomal Bupivicaine and 0.25% standard bupivicaine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
100 participants
Where
2 sitesUnited States
Study dates
Dec 2014to Jul 2017
Phase
Phase 4
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • All patients over 18 years of age
  • Isolated thoracoscopic procedure for therapeutic or diagnostic purposes

Who cannot join

  • Previous ipsilateral thoracic surgery
  • Need for operative pleurectomy or pleurodesis
  • Chronic use of pain medication -narcotics or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), sedatives, or hypnotics
  • Allergies to bupivacaine or other local anesthetics, narcotics, NSAIDs or acetaminophen
  • Liver dysfunction (INR > 1.5, albumin < 2.8g/dl, bilirubin > 2mg/dl)
  • Renal dysfunction (eGFR < 60ml/min/1.73m2)
Show all 13Show fewer
  • History of peptic ulcerative disease
  • Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) requiring continuous oxygen supplementation
  • Inability to consent
  • Pregnancy
  • Need for conversion from a Video-Assisted Thoracic Surgery procedure to a thoracotomy
  • Patient is discharged from the hospital with a chest tube in place
  • Patient fails to comply with post-operative instructions

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

United States2 sites
  • Cardiac, Vascular, and Thoracic Surgery Associates

    Falls Church, Virginia, 22042

  • Inova Fairfax Hospital

    Falls Church, Virginia, 22042

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Controlled Trial of the Effectiveness of Liposomal Bupivacaine (Exparel) When Compared to Local Injection of Bupivacaine After Thoracoscopy

This study is looking to evaluate the efficacy of liposomal bupivicaine (Exparel) on decreasing the amount of consumed pain medications.

Patients will be randomly selected to received either Exparel or standard bupivicaine injection during surgery. Patients will be followed up to assess pain levels using a visual pain scale, and to assess how much pain medication was consumed.

Read the detailed description

Exparel is a formulation of liposomal bupivacaine that is reported to allow local anesthesia for up to 72 hours post injection.

It is the investigators' aim to follow their prior study with a randomized trial to compare local infiltration of liposomal bupivacaine at the conclusion of each procedure with injections of standard .25% bupivacaine.

Patients in group A will receive, at the end of the surgical procedure, injections of liposomal bupivacaine (Exparel) (266 mg, 20 mL, diluted at surgeon's discretion) into the thoracoscopic port incision sites and around the intercostal nerves serving that space.

Patients in group B will receive, at the end of the surgical procedure, injections of standard .25% bupivacaine into the thoracoscopic port incision sites and around the intercostal nerves serving that space.

Conditions
Pain
Being tested
Liposomal Bupivicaine, 0.25% standard bupivicaine
Keywords
Exparel, Thoracoscopy, Bupivicaine, Liposomal
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Liposomal BupivicaineDrug

    Also called Exparel

    266 mg, 20 mL total, diluted at surgeon's discretion, delivered by 22 gauge needle.

  • 0.25% standard bupivicaineDrug

    Also called Bupivicaine

    standard 0.25% bupivacaine, 20 mL total, delivered by 22 gauge needle.

Study groups in NCT02499159
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ExparelExperimentalLiposomal Bupivicaine (Exparel) - 266 mg, 20 mL total, diluted at surgeon's discretion, Two doses of 10 mL each, into two separate incisions, delivered via 22 gauge needle.
Receives: Drug: Liposomal Bupivicaine
0.25% standard bupivicaineActive comparatorBupivicaine - 0.25%, 20 mL total. Two doses of 10 mL each, into two separate incisions, delivered via 22 gauge needle.
Receives: Drug: 0.25% standard bupivicaine

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Overall Amounts of Pain Medications Consumed Through Post-operative Day 7

    Using questionnaires, patients are asked if they took Dilaudid, Tylenol, Motrin, or other opioids and if so, how many tablets.

    Measured: Assessed daily for 7 days post-procedure

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Scores on a Analog Pain Scale (7 Days)

    Using questionnaires, patients are asked what their pain level is based on a scale from 0-10, 10 being the absolute worst pain and 0 being no pain.

    Measured: Assessed at day 7 post-procedure

  2. Scores on an Analog Pain Scale (30 Days)

    Using questionnaires, patients are asked what their pain level is based on a scale from 0-10, 10 being the absolute worst pain and 0 being no pain.

    Measured: Assessed at 30 days post-procedure

  3. Number of Patients With Paresthesias (Postoperatively at 7 Days)

    Patients are asked if they have experienced a pricking or tingling sensation caused by potential pressure or damage to peripheral nerves since the procedure.

    Measured: Assessed at day 7 post-procedure

  4. Proportion of Patients With Paresthesias (Postoperatively at 30 Days)

    Patients are asked if they have experienced a pricking or tingling sensation caused by potential pressure or damage to peripheral nerves

    Measured: Assessed at day 30 post-procedure

  5. Hospital Length of Stay

    Median length of stay in days until discharge.

    Measured: From end of procedure until discharge, usually 0-2 days.

  6. Return to Baseline Activity

    Using surveys, patients are asked if they have been able to return to baseline activity levels.

    Measured: Assessed at 30 days post-procedure

  7. Return to Work

    Using surveys, patients are asked if they have been able to return to work.

    Measured: Assessed at 30 days post-procedure

  8. Days Until Return to Work

    Using surveys, the number of days to return to work was assessed for patients who were able to return to work.

    Measured: Assessed at 30 days post-procedure

  9. Overall Hospital Cost

    Overall hospital cost of patient procedure and stay will be assessed.

    Measured: Total cost assessed from patient registration until discharge to home (usually 0-2 days).

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted16 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startDec 2014
  3. Primary completionJul 2017
  4. Study completionJul 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
100 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02499159
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-1656
Acronym
VATS Exparel
Status last verified
Jan 2021
First submitted
8 Jul 2015
Last updated
16 Feb 2021
Data monitoring committee
No

Publications

  • Whitson BA, Groth SS, Duval SJ, Swanson SJ, Maddaus MA. Surgery for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review of the video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery versus thoracotomy approaches to lobectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008 Dec;86(6):2008-16; discussion 2016-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2008.07.009.

    PubMed 19022040
  • Allen MS, Halgren L, Nichols FC 3rd, Cassivi SD, Harmsen WS, Wigle DA, Shen KR, Deschamps C. A randomized controlled trial of bupivacaine through intracostal catheters for pain management after thoracotomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Sep;88(3):903-10. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.04.139.

    PubMed 19699918
  • Chan VW, Chung F, Cheng DC, Seyone C, Chung A, Kirby TJ. Analgesic and pulmonary effects of continuous intercostal nerve block following thoracotomy. Can J Anaesth. 1991 Sep;38(6):733-9. doi: 10.1007/BF03008451.

    PubMed 1914056
  • Debreceni G, Molnar Z, Szelig L, Molnar TF. Continuous epidural or intercostal analgesia following thoracotomy: a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2003 Oct;47(9):1091-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2003.00208.x.

    PubMed 12969101
  • Kaiser AM, Zollinger A, De Lorenzi D, Largiader F, Weder W. Prospective, randomized comparison of extrapleural versus epidural analgesia for postthoracotomy pain. Ann Thorac Surg. 1998 Aug;66(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(98)00448-2.

    PubMed 9725371
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Practice guidelines for acute pain management in the perioperative setting: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Acute Pain Management. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jun;100(6):1573-81. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200406000-00033. No abstract available.

    PubMed 15166580

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 4 study testing Liposomal Bupivicaine and 0.25% standard bupivicaine in people with Pain, run by Inova Health Care Services at 2 sites in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 16 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 6 Sep 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Overall Amounts of Pain Medications Consumed Through Post-operative Day 7 (time frame: Assessed daily for 7 days post-procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02499159, which also lists 6 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 16 Feb 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in