AzTrials
AzTrials

Stenosis CervixDUDANCT02500966

How to Avoid Cervical Stenosis After LEEP in High Grade Cervical Dysplasia?

A study testing DUDA device and LEEP in people with Stenosis Cervix, run by Barretos Cancer Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Cervical stenosis may occur in up to 19% after conization. It is a cause of infertility and amenorrhea. This study will test a new device named DUDA Device ("Dispositivo Uterino para dilatar canal endocervical") placed just after the conization, in order to evaluate the safety, efficacy and quality of life. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 65 years, women only
Conditions the study is for
Stenosis Cervix
What is being tested?
DUDA device and LEEP
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
265 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Aug 2015to 7 Jan 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 65 years
  • Women only
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • High Grade Cervical Dysplasia, Grades 2 and 3, in the biopsy cervical
  • Patient eligible for conization
  • Patient must consent for the appropriate surgery
  • Patient must have Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) performance status of 0, 1
  • Patients must have signed an approved informed consent and authorization permitting release of personal health information

Who cannot join

  • Pregnancy
  • Previous conization
  • limited comprehension of the study
  • the risk of the American Society of Anesthesiologists, III or IV
  • HIV or immunodepression
  • Patients with a history of the invasive malignancies

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Brazil1 site
  • Barretos Cancer Hospital

    Barretos, São Paulo, 14784400

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: A Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety, Efficacy and Quality of Life of a New Device to Prevent Cervical Stenosis After LEEP in High Grade Cervical Dysplasia

Cervical stenosis may occur in up to 19% after conization. It is a cause of infertility and amenorrhea. This study will test a new device named DUDA Device ("Dispositivo Uterino para dilatar canal endocervical") placed just after the conization, in order to evaluate the safety, efficacy and quality of life.

Read the detailed description

This device has the potential to improve outcomes by means of a significant stenosis reduction and maintain patency of the endocervical canal to view the squamo-columnar junction (SCJ) of the cervix during follow-up of this patient.

Conditions
Stenosis Cervix
Being tested
DUDA device, LEEP
Keywords
Cervical Intraepithelial Neoplasia, stenosis, cervix, medical device, inventories, Uterine Cervix, Intrauterine Devices, intrauterine, conization, loop electrosurgical excision
Medical subject headings
Uterine Cervical Dysplasia, Constriction, Pathologic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • DUDA deviceDevice

    Insertion DUDA device

  • LEEPProcedure or surgery

    Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure

Study groups in NCT02500966
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DUDA deviceExperimentalThe number of patients to be recruited in this arm will be 145. Note: The first twenty-five patients who will be included in the study will be allocated in the intervention arm to safety analysis (phase 1); after that all eligible candidates will be randomized 1:1 (phase 2). Procedure: Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) followed by implantation of the device called DUDA (plastic device developed in barretos cancer hospital that will be placed after conization. It has 2.5 cm in length and 5mm in diameter and remains within the endocervical canal for 30 days and is set at 4 points with nonabsorbable sutures in the ectocervix.)
Receives: Device: DUDA device; Procedure: LEEP
Control groupActive comparatorThe number of patients to be recruited in this arm will be 120. Procedure: Loop Electrosurgical Excision Procedure (LEEP) without DUDA device
Receives: Procedure: LEEP

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Safety (two adverse events Grade 3 or 4 (CTCAE v. 4.0) or a single adverse event Grade 5)

    The main safety events to be considered in this analysis are vaginal bleeding and uterine infection. The device is considered unsafe and consequently disrupted the study if a two adverse events Grade 3 or 4 (CTCAE v. 4.0) or a single adverse event Grade 5 related to the procedure/device happens during the phase 1.

    Measured: 3 months

  2. Cervical stenosis

    Stenosis of the endocervical canal (early and late) will be assessed by clinical information and physical examination at each visit to the hospital after surgery. The participant will be asked about the menstrual flow and dysmenorrhea during history taking. On physical examination, after the visualization of the cervix through the speculum examination, the doctor will check the channel permeability introducing a hysterometer through it. The difficulty of introducing the hysterometer 2.5mm the channel will be scored according to the following scale:

    Possible passage of hysterometer? () No difficulty () Little difficult, however possible passage of hysterometer () Unable to pass

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Pain Scales

    The quality of life will be evaluated through questionnaires by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy - Cervix Cancer (FACT-Cx) and the universal pain assessment tools that include international scale and pain visual analogue (EVA), numerical visual pain scale (EVN) and faces pain scales (EF).

    Measured: 6 months

  2. Complications

    It will be evaluated during the following returns and described as any event related directly to the use of DUDA device as metrorrhagia and uterine infection.

    Measured: 30 days

  3. View of the squamo-columnar junction (SCJ) of the cervix

    It will be assessed during the examination of colposcopy

    Measured: 6 months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted17 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2015
  3. Primary completionJun 2018
  4. Study completion7 Jan 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
265 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02500966
Sponsor's protocol ID
BarretosCH - DUDA
Acronym
DUDA
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
15 Jul 2015
Last updated
18 Jan 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing DUDA device and LEEP in people with Stenosis Cervix, run by Barretos Cancer Hospital at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jan 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Safety (two adverse events Grade 3 or 4 (CTCAE v. 4.0) or a single adverse event Grade 5) (time frame: 3 months). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jan 2020.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in