AzTrials
AzTrials

Opioid DependencePhase 3OT-RCTNCT02502175

Comparing Opium Tincture (OT) With Methadone for Medication-assisted Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder

A Phase 3 study testing opium and methadone in people with Opioid Dependence, run by University of British Columbia at 4 sites in Iran.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with opioid use disorder seeking medication-assisted treatment will be recruited. Each participant will be allocated to one of the two study groups with the equal chance of receiving either opium tincture (OT) or methadone. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Opioid Dependence
What is being tested?
opium and methadone
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
204 participants
Where
4 sitesIran
Study dates
22 Jun 2017to 8 Mar 2018
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Opioid dependence as confirmed by DSM V diagnostic criteria
  • Willingness and ability to adhere to study protocol and follow-up schedule as determined through the pre-randomization period
  • Provide written informed consent.
  • Females of childbearing capacity must agree to use an acceptable method of birth control approved by the study investigator throughout the study.

Who cannot join

  • Active participant in another treatment program for opioid dependence within 14 days before inclusion in the study
  • Severe hepatic impairment (decompensated liver disease), a contraindication for methadone and its potential to precipitate hepatic encephalopathy.
  • Hypersensitivity to methadone syrup or other ingredients in the formulation
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe chronic respiratory disease
  • Head injury and raised intracranial pressure: Respiratory depressant effects (with CO2 retention and secondary elevation of CSF pressure) may be markedly exaggerated in the presence of head injury, or a preexisting increase in intracranial pressure. May produce effects that obscure the clinical course in participants with head injuries.
  • Biliary tract disease: may cause constriction of sphincter of Oddi.
  • Monoamine oxidase inhibitors use within 14 days of the study

Trial locations and contacts

4 sites in 1 country.

Iran4 sites
  • Tavalodi Digar

    Isfahan

  • Dodange Substance use disorder treatment center

    Moḩammadābād, Mazandaran

  • Kian substance use treatment center

    Sari, Mazandaran

  • Rooz-e-No substance use treatment center

    Shiraz

Other trials in Iran

About this study

Official title: Comparing Opium Tincture (OT) and Methadone for Medication-assisted Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder: A Randomized Double-blind Controlled Clinical Trial

Patients with opioid use disorder seeking medication-assisted treatment will be recruited. Each participant will be allocated to one of the two study groups with the equal chance of receiving either opium tincture (OT) or methadone. Participants, clinical and research staff will not be aware of the medication that each patient receives. This study aims to test whether OT is as equally effective as methadone at retaining participants with opioid use disorder in medication-assisted treatment.

Read the detailed description

Purpose:

To compare the efficacy and safety of opium tincture (OT) with methadone syrup for medication-assisted treatment of individuals with opioid use disorder.

Justification:

Currently, methadone is the gold standard for medication-assisted treatment of opioid use disorder. Opium tincture could be a potential alternative treatment for this condition, and a promising solution to address the following issues:

  1. Alternative treatment option As no single treatment is effective for all individuals with opioid use disorder, sufficiently diverse treatment options should be available. Currently, treatment options for opioid use disorder are not always effective.
  2. Avoidance of overdose with methadone: The long-acting nature of methadone, its narrow therapeutic window, its high potency and associated lack of standard conversion ratio from and to other drugs, could result in fatal overdose. In contrast, OT has a shorter half-life and lower potency compared to methadone, which can account for a lower incidence of fatal overdose, especially in patients at higher risk of overdose with currently prescribed medications. Thus, OT could be an added treatment option to currently available treatments such as Buprenorphine/ Naloxone for medication-assisted treatment of patients with higher risk of overdose.
  3. Prolonged QT syndrome of methadone: Medication-assisted treatment with methadone can cause serious, potentially fatal adverse effects on the cardiac electrical conduction system leading to a prolonged QT interval and predisposing patients to arrhythmias. As such, cardiac conduction co-morbidity is a (relative) contraindication for the use of methadone as a medication-assisted treatment. Thus, OT could be an added treatment option to current available treatments such as buprenorphine or levomethadone for medication-assisted treatment of patients with cardiac conduction defects.
  4. Opium dependence as the dominant pattern of substance use To date, studies on medication-assisted treatment of opioid use disorder have mostly been carried out on populations in which heroin is the predominant substance of use and there is comparatively fewer data on patients with opium use disorder. Opium tincture could be the treatment of choice in geographic areas with higher prevalence of dependence on opium as the predominant pattern of substance use, such as Iran and some other Asian countries.
  5. Traditional medicine and cultural acceptance: Being a traditional herbal remedy for pain, OT appears to be a more culturally acceptable alternative to methadone in some parts of Southeast Asia.
  6. Cost-effectiveness: Possible cost effectiveness of OT for treatment of opioid use disorder can make it a potential treatment of choice if its efficacy and safety profile could be demonstrated through this RCT.

Research methods:

  1. Recruitment strategy: Following methods will be used to recruit participants: 1) Brochures and flyers will be distributed in community outreach, general and mental hospitals, NGO-run communities, colleges and universities, drop-in centers and specialized clinics for treatment of participants with HIV and hepatitis C 2) Posters (same content as a brochures and flyers) of the study will be stuck in the billboard of bus/subway, local stores, hospitals, NGO-run communities, colleges and universities, as well as any specialized health-care center for psychiatry or addiction treatments 3) there are NGO-run communities for treating patients with opioid use disorder in Sari, Isfahan, and Shiraz. Investigators will use the initial contact letter to recruit from new patients attending these communities for receiving treatment.
  2. Randomization and blinding: Randomized to methadone or OT treatment arms will be carried out in a 1:1 allocation ratio using stratified randomization block technique with block sizes of 2. Age and gender distribution of the population with opioid-dependence in Iran is the basis for stratification on sex (F/M ratio = 1/9) and age (younger than 30/ 30-49/ 50 and older ~ 1: 2: 2). The investigators, treatment team (except pharmacist), assessors, and patients will only be aware of the randomization code for each participant, but not the treatment allocation label or randomization tables. Methadone syrup is made similar to OT in terms of smell, color, and taste using an essence.
  3. Sample size: The sample size was calculated using a fixed margin (95%-95%) approach based on the FDA guidelines for non-inferiority clinical trials (Food and Drug Administration, 2016). For the active control effect, a pooled 95% CI for retention ratio of methadone to placebo of 4.44 [3.26, 6.04] was considered (Mattick et al., 2009). The lower bound i.e., 3.26 was considered as M1, with calculated treatment effect of 2.26. M2 equal to 1.25 (11% of M1) was chosen as a conservative non-inferiority margin. Retention rate for participants in medication-assisted treatment with methadone was assumed to be 77.7% at 3 months based on a comprehensive systematic review (Feelemyer et al., 2014). Based on formula by Zhong, 2009, and assuming a power of 90% and Type I error set at 5%, the total sample size was initially calculated to be 240 participants, 120 in each group. Due to financial constraints, recruitment was set to stop at 200 given that it still provides a power more than 80% (a sample size of 174 provides a power of 80%).
  4. Statistical analysis plan: Retention in treatment will be compared between two groups using confidence interval procedure. Secondary outcomes will be compared between two groups using appropriate regression methods.
Being tested
opium, methadone
Keywords
Opium tincture, opium, methadone, opioid dependence, opiate dependence, clinical trial, Iran
Medical subject headings
Opioid-Related Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • opiumDrug

    Also called tincture of opium, laudanum, Opium tincture

    Opium tincture (10mg/ml), manufactured by Daroupakhsh.co, Tehran, Iran.

  • methadoneDrug

    Methadone (5mg/ml), manufactured by Daroupakhsh.co, Tehran, Iran.

Study groups in NCT02502175
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
OpiumExperimentalpatient-centered flexible dosing in line with the national protocol published by Iranian Ministry of Health for maintenance treatment of opioid dependent population
Receives: Drug: opium
methadoneActive comparatorpatient-centered flexible dosing in line with the national protocol published by Iranian Ministry of Health for maintenance treatment of opioid dependent population
Receives: Drug: methadone

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Retention in treatment

    percent of participants retained in the treatment

    Measured: three months

Secondary outcomes (11)
  1. Craving

    Visual analogue scale (0-10 scale)

    Measured: Day 1-3/ Twice daily | Day 4-14/ Once daily | Day 15-28/ Three times a week | Day 29-84/ Once weekly

  2. Withdrawal symptoms

    Subjective Opioid Withdrawal Scale (SOWS) Questionnaire

    Measured: Day 1-3/ Twice daily | Day 4-14/ Once daily | Day 15-28/ Three times a week | Day 29-84/ Once weekly

  3. Physical health

    Opiate Treatment Index (OTI)-Health section Questionnaire

    Measured: Baseline, month 1, 2 and 3

  4. Mental health

    Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL90-R) Questionnaire

    Measured: Baseline, month 1, 2 and 3

  5. Cognitive function

    Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MOCA) Questionnaire

    Measured: Baseline, month 1, 2 and 3

  6. Severity of substance use problem

    Addiction Severity Index-5th (ASI-5th) Questionnaire

    Measured: Baseline, month 1, 2 and 3

  7. Quality of life score from World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF Questionnaire

    World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQoL-BREF) Questionnaire

    Measured: Baseline, month 1, 2 and 3

  8. Client Satisfaction

    Treatment Perception Questionnaire (TPQ)

    Measured: month 3

  9. Abstinence

    Use of illicit opioids: Self-report / Use of amphetamines, methamphetamines, benzodiazepines: Self-report AND urine toxicology

    Measured: Baseline, month 1, 2 and 3

  10. Adverse events

    Spontaneous reports AND checklist included in the Case Report Form (CRF), physical examination and lab data

    Measured: Day 1-3/ Twice daily | Day 4-14/ Once daily | Day 15-28/ Three times a week | Day 29-84/ Once weekly

  11. Cost-effectiveness

    Cost per Quality-adjusted life-month (QALM) and Quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is calculated using Substance Abuse Services Cost Analysis Program (SASCAP).

    Measured: three months

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Jul 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start22 Jun 2017
  3. Primary completion8 Mar 2018
  4. Study completion8 Mar 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Quadruple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
204 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02502175
Sponsor's protocol ID
H15-00220
Acronym
OT-RCT
Status last verified
Jul 2019
First submitted
13 Jul 2015
Last updated
12 Jul 2019
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Nikoo M, Kianpoor K, Nikoo N, Javidanbardan S, Kazemi A, Choi F, Vogel M, Gholami A, Tavakoli S, Wong JSH, Moazen-Zadeh E, Givaki R, Jazani M, Mohammadian F, Moghaddam NM, Schutz C, Jang K, Akhondzadeh S, Krausz M. Opium tincture versus methadone for opioid agonist treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Addiction. 2023 Feb;118(2):284-294. doi: 10.1111/add.16030. Epub 2022 Sep 7.

    PubMed 35971297
  • Nikoo M, Moazen-Zadeh E, Nikoo N, Javidanbardan S, Kazemi A, Choi F, Vogel M, Gholami A, Tavakoli S, Givaki R, Jazani M, Mohammadian F, Markazi Moghaddam N, Goudarzi N, Schutz C, Jang K, Akhondzadeh S, Krausz M. Comparing opium tincture and methadone for medication-assisted treatment of patients with opioid use disorder: Protocol for a multicenter parallel group noninferiority double-blind randomized controlled trial. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2019 Mar;28(1):e1768. doi: 10.1002/mpr.1768. Epub 2019 Feb 4.

    PubMed 30714249

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing opium and methadone in people with Opioid Dependence, run by University of British Columbia at 4 sites in Iran.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Jul 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 4 sites in Iran. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Retention in treatment (time frame: three months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02502175, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Jul 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in