Stem Cell TransplantationPhase 2NCT02512679
Related Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) for Genetic Diseases of Blood Cells
A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1, Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2 and Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3 in people with Stem Cell Transplantation and Bone Marrow Transplantation, run by Children's Hospital Los Angeles.
Trial summary
Many genetic diseases of lymphohematopoietic cells (such as sickle cell anemia, thalassemia, Diamond-Blackfan anemia, Combined Immune Deficiency (CID), Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, chronic granulomatous disease, X-linked lymphoproliferative disease, and metabolic diseases affecting hematopoiesis) are sublethal diseases… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 3 months and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Stem Cell Transplantation, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation
- What is being tested?
- Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1, Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2 and Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Feb 2007to Feb 2014
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 3 months and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All patients with lethal or sublethal genetic lymphohematological disease (such as Hemaphagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) / Familial Erythrophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (FEL), Hurler's Syndrome, Hunter's Syndrome, Kostmann's Syndrome, Blackfan-Diamond Anemia, Chronic granulomatous Disease (CGD), Red Cell Aplasia, CID, Sickle Cell Anemia, Thalassemia, Adreno-leukodystrophy, metachromatic leukodystrophy, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome, X-Linked Lymphoproliferative Disease (XLD), Metabolic diseases affecting hematopoiesis, but not limited to), who are candidates for allogeneic transplantation for their disease and have a histocompatible sibling or related donor, ages 0 to 21 years, will be candidates for this study protocol. The suitable related donor is a 10/10 or 9/10 allele Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) match with the patient. All patients who have previously had serious life- threatening events due to disease process may be included in the study. Patients must have adequate physical function and vital organ function to tolerate transplant procedure, as measured by:
- Cardiac: Shortening fraction >26% or left ventricular ejection fraction at rest must be > 40%.
- Hepatic: Bilirubin, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 3x upper limit of normal (as per local laboratory) for age (with the exception of isolated hyperbilirubinemia due to Gilbert's syndrome).
- Renal: Serum creatinine < 2x upper limit of normal for age or if serum creatinine elevated beyond normal range patient must have creatinine Clearance or Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >50% lower limit of normal for age.
- Pulmonary: Forced expiratory volume (FEV)1, Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), and Diffusing Lung Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (corrected for Hgb) > 50% predicted. For patients where pulse oximetry is performed, O2 saturation > 92%
- Evaluation of iron status in patients who have received more than 12 red cell transfusions. Measurements of serum ferritin levels and MRI of the liver and heart tissue will evaluate the iron stores. If high iron load is identified in these organs further evaluation will be done to determine the suitability as transplant recipient. Should these studies indicate that chelation is necessary the following should apply: That the treating hematologist will provide the specific chelation type and timing. Evaluation of organ iron load will be part of the HSCT work-up and if high iron load is identified then the BMT team will work with the hematologist attending in developing a plan for the patient.
Who cannot join
- Karnofsky performance status < 70%, or Lansky < 40% for patients < 16 years old.
- Uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infections (currently taking medication yet clinical symptoms progress).
- Seropositivity for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Acute active hepatitis.
- Diagnosis of end-organ dysfunction that precludes the ability to tolerate the transplant procedure.
- Patients with a diagnosis of Fanconi Anemia are excluded.
About this study
Official title: Protocol for Related Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) for Treatment of Symptomatic Genetic Lymphohematological Diseases
Many genetic diseases of lymphohematopoietic cells (such as sickle cell anemia, thalassemia, Diamond-Blackfan anemia, Combined Immune Deficiency (CID), Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, chronic granulomatous disease, X-linked lymphoproliferative disease, and metabolic diseases affecting hematopoiesis) are sublethal diseases caused by mutations that adversely affect the development or function of different types of blood cells. Although pathophysiologically diverse, these genetic diseases share a similar clinical course of significant progressive morbidity, overall poor quality of life, and ultimate death from complications of the disease or its palliative treatment. Supportive care for these diseases includes chronic transfusion, iron chelation, and surgery (splenectomy or cholecystectomy) for the hemoglobinopathies; prophylactic antibiotics, intravenous immunoglobulin, and immunomodulator therapies for the immune deficiencies; and enzyme replacement injections and dietary restriction for some of the metabolic diseases. The suboptimal results of such supportive care measures have led to efforts to implement more aggressive therapeutic interventions to cure these lymphohematopoietic diseases. The most logical strategies for cure of these diseases have been either replacement of the patient's own hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with those derived from a normal donor allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), or to genetically modify the patient's own stem cells to replace the defective gene (gene therapy).
Read the detailed description
The present study is to evaluate de-escalation of the cyclophosphamide (CY) dose in an innovative conditioning regimen with fludarabine and alemtuzumab as additional agents to achieve immunoablation, in combination with Busulfan (BU) to achieve myeloablation. Replacement of at least part of the cyclophosphamide dose by fludarabine in the conditioning regimen would be expected to maintain immunosuppression (and, therefore, engraftment) while reducing transplant-related complications (mucositis, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, hemorrhagic cystitis, mucositis, and possibly GVHD), thereby improving disease-free survival rates. Similarly, the potential benefits of alemtuzumab in the proposed conditioning regimen are increased rates of hematopoietic engraftment with less toxicity than that observed with cyclophosphamide, ultimately resulting in improved immune function and enhanced quality of life (12,13). A fludarabine/alemtuzumab-based, less intensive conditioning regimen with adequate immunosuppressive activity could conceivably allow more successful engraftment of stem cells from related donors in patients with genetic lymphohematological diseases, as well as lower rates of transplant-related mortality.
Regimen-related toxicity is also believed to be a major contributing factor to GVHD (14). Therefore, conditioning regimens that cause less tissue injury may also lead to reduced GVHD. In the present study, the use of alemtuzumab in the conditioning regimen may be an added benefit, as this antibody causes T-cell depletion, thus, the risk of GVHD may also be reduced (15). The overall goal of the study is to improve the therapeutic index of HSCT by decreasing and, if possible, eliminating cyclophosphamide as a component of the pre-transplant conditioning for patients with genetic diseases of lymphohematopoiesis. The investigation will explore the risks and benefits of the proposed novel-conditioning regimen using a decreased dose of cyclophosphamide and additional immunosuppression with fludarabine and alemtuzumab to prevent graft rejection and recurrence of disease. The investigators will evaluate this regimen's impact on conditioning-related morbidity and mortality, and measure the success of the transplant procedure by engraftment and disease-free survival. If this regimen is able to successfully permit engraftment and reduce regimen-related toxicity, the next phase of treatment will test a further dose de-escalation for cyclophosphamide. It is anticipated that there will be four dose levels of cyclophosphamide in the overall study: 1) 105 mg/kg; 2) 70 mg/kg; 3) 35 mg/kg; and then finally, 4) 0 mg/kg. This study design was chosen to minimize study risks possibly associated with substitution of fludarabine and alemtuzumab for CY as immunoablation. The present protocol represents Level 1 in the study design; an amended protocol will be prepared prior to further de-escalation of the cyclophosphamide dose.
- Conditions
- Stem Cell Transplantation, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic Transplantation, Genetic Diseases, Thalassemia
- Being tested
- Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1, Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2, Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3, Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 4
- Keywords
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Pediatrics,, stem cell transplantation, bone marrow transplantation, Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic Transplantation, pediatrics, Combined Immune Deficiency, Chronic Granulomatous disease
- Medical subject headings
- Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Thalassemia, Anemia, Diamond-Blackfan, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome, Granulomatous Disease, Chronic, Lymphoproliferative Disorders, Metabolic Diseases
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1Drug
Also called Cytoxan
given by IV at a total dose of 105 mg/kg, to be divided into three doses of one 35 mg/kg dose per day, for 3 days on the first level. After ten patients the de-escalation will begin if the stopping rule is not met.
Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2Drug
Also called Cytoxan
Level 2 will be 70mg/kg in 2 divided given once a day for 2 days;
Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3Drug
Also called Cytoxan
Level 3 will be 35mg/kg as a one-time dose.
Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 4Drug
Also called Cytoxan
Level 4 will be no cytoxan.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1 | Other | Cyclophosphamide given by Intravenous (IV) at a total dose of 105 mg/kg, to be divided into three doses of one 35 mg/kg dose per day, for 3 days on the first level.
Drug to be given in combination of Busulfan, Campath and Fludarabine Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1 |
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2 | Other | Cyclophosphamide given by intravenous (IV) at a total dose of 70 mg/kg (divided in two doses) given once a day for two days in combination with Busulfan, Campath and Fludarabine. Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2 |
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3 | Other | Cyclophosphamide given by intravenous (IV) at total does of 35 mg/kg as a one time dose in combination with Busulfan, Fludarabine and Campath Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3 |
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 4 | Other | No cyclophosphamide given with Busulfan, Fludarabine and Campath Receives: Drug: Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 4 |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Number of Participants With Neutrophil Engraftment (=/>500 Cells/uL) and Platelet Engraftment (>20K Cell/uL) at 30 Days
Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) =/>500;(recovery of white cell count - self sustain platelet above 20,000 per cubic milimeter (20K) - evaluation by Chimerism Study (STR or FISH) at day +30
Measured: 30 days
Number of Participants With Disease Recurrence at 1 Year Post-transplant
assess rate of disease recurrence ("late relapse") due to autologous recovery of recipient hematopoiesis at one year post-HSCT.
Measured: 1 year
Number of Participants Who Developed Severe Mucositis, Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD), Toxicity of the Kidney, Liver, or Gastrointestinal (GI) Tract up to 1 Year Post-transplant
Assessment of conditioning regimen related toxicity was evaluated and documented with daily assessment during hospitalization and post-transplant follow-up up to one year. None of the subjects developed VOD necessitating any therapeutic intervention, severe mucositis, or toxicity of the Kidney, Liver or Gastrointestinal.
Measured: 1 year
Secondary outcomes (2)
Number of Participants Who Developed Graft-Versus-Host-Disease (GVHD) as Determined by the Glucksberg Scale
Clinical evaluation on a daily basis during hospitalization and at each post transplant clinical visit, up to one year, to determine incidence of acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease using Glucksberg grading scale. Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) develops within the first three months after transplantation and appears as a skin rash, often accompanied by hyperbilirubenemia, abnormal liver enzymes and gastrointestinal symptoms, as diarrhea, nausea and vomiting. Level of aGVHD is graded from 1-4. Chronic GVHD, typically a late complication of Blood and Marrow Transplantation (BMT) characterized by skin changes, sometimes sclerotic changes, with joint contractures, liver function abnormality, gastrointestinal symptoms and sometime other organ involvement such as eyes, lungs, and obliterative bronchiolitis (OB). Chronic GVHD is graded as absent, limited, or extensive.
Measured: 1 yr
Number of Participants Who Were Disease Progression-Free and Death-Free at 1 Year Post-transplant
Evaluation for engraftment, correction of the disease, transplant related complications and event-free survival and overall survival of the subjects post-transplant was undertaken by standard measures and evaluation of disease with disease-specific testing.
Measured: 1 yr
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2007
- Primary completionSep 2013
- Study completionFeb 2014
Why it stopped: Optimal dose obtained for engraftment and minimizing toxicity
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Stem Cell TransplantationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Children's Hospital Los AngelesThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital Los Angeles
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Neena Kapoor, M.D., Children's Hospital Los Angeles
- Investigators
- Neena Kapoor, M.D., Principal investigator, Children's Hospital Los Angeles
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02512679
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CCI-06-00177
- Status last verified
- Jan 2017
- First submitted
- 21 May 2015
- Last updated
- 27 Feb 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Tranplant data is reported to CIBMTR and is available to the other investigators
Publications
Mahadeo KM, Weinberg KI, Abdel-Azim H, Miklos DB, Killen R, Kohn D, Crooks GM, Shah AJ, Kharbanda S, Agarwal R, Kapoor N. A reduced-toxicity regimen is associated with durable engraftment and clinical cure of nonmalignant genetic diseases among children undergoing blood and marrow transplantation with an HLA-matched related donor. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Mar;21(3):440-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
PubMed 25459642
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 27 Feb 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Protocol for Related Donor Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation (HSCT) for Treatment of Symptomatic Genetic Lymphohematological Diseases
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02512679
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CCI-06-00177
- Conditions
- Stem Cell Transplantation, Bone Marrow Transplantation, Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic Transplantation, Genetic Diseases, Thalassemia
- Keywords
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation Pediatrics,, stem cell transplantation, bone marrow transplantation, Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Transplantation, Allogeneic Transplantation, pediatrics, Combined Immune Deficiency, Chronic Granulomatous disease
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Optimal dose obtained for engraftment and minimizing toxicity
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Children's Hospital Los AngelesUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital
- Study start
- Feb 2007
- Primary completion
- Sep 2013 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2014 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Jul 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 17 Jun 2016
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Many genetic diseases of lymphohematopoietic cells (such as sickle cell anemia, thalassemia, Diamond-Blackfan anemia, Combined Immune Deficiency (CID), Wiskott-Aldrich syndrome, chronic granulomatous disease, X-linked lymphoproliferative disease, and metabolic diseases affecting hematopoiesis) are sublethal diseases caused by mutations that adversely affect the development or function of different types of blood cells. Although pathophysiologically diverse, these genetic diseases share a similar clinical course of significant progressive morbidity, overall poor quality of life, and ultimate death from complications of the disease or its palliative treatment. Supportive care for these diseases includes chronic transfusion, iron chelation, and surgery (splenectomy or cholecystectomy) for the hemoglobinopathies; prophylactic antibiotics, intravenous immunoglobulin, and immunomodulator therapies for the immune deficiencies; and enzyme replacement injections and dietary restriction for some of the metabolic diseases. The suboptimal results of such supportive care measures have led to efforts to implement more aggressive therapeutic interventions to cure these lymphohematopoietic diseases. The most logical strategies for cure of these diseases have been either replacement of the patient's own hematopoietic stem cells (HSC) with those derived from a normal donor allogeneic bone marrow transplant (BMT) or hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT), or to genetically modify the patient's own stem cells to replace the defective gene (gene therapy).
Detailed description
The present study is to evaluate de-escalation of the cyclophosphamide (CY) dose in an innovative conditioning regimen with fludarabine and alemtuzumab as additional agents to achieve immunoablation, in combination with Busulfan (BU) to achieve myeloablation. Replacement of at least part of the cyclophosphamide dose by fludarabine in the conditioning regimen would be expected to maintain immunosuppression (and, therefore, engraftment) while reducing transplant-related complications (mucositis, hepatotoxicity, cardiotoxicity, pulmonary toxicity, hemorrhagic cystitis, mucositis, and possibly GVHD), thereby improving disease-free survival rates. Similarly, the potential benefits of alemtuzumab in the proposed conditioning regimen are increased rates of hematopoietic engraftment with less toxicity than that observed with cyclophosphamide, ultimately resulting in improved immune function and enhanced quality of life (12,13). A fludarabine/alemtuzumab-based, less intensive conditioning regimen with adequate immunosuppressive activity could conceivably allow more successful engraftment of stem cells from related donors in patients with genetic lymphohematological diseases, as well as lower rates of transplant-related mortality.
Regimen-related toxicity is also believed to be a major contributing factor to GVHD (14). Therefore, conditioning regimens that cause less tissue injury may also lead to reduced GVHD. In the present study, the use of alemtuzumab in the conditioning regimen may be an added benefit, as this antibody causes T-cell depletion, thus, the risk of GVHD may also be reduced (15). The overall goal of the study is to improve the therapeutic index of HSCT by decreasing and, if possible, eliminating cyclophosphamide as a component of the pre-transplant conditioning for patients with genetic diseases of lymphohematopoiesis. The investigation will explore the risks and benefits of the proposed novel-conditioning regimen using a decreased dose of cyclophosphamide and additional immunosuppression with fludarabine and alemtuzumab to prevent graft rejection and recurrence of disease. The investigators will evaluate this regimen's impact on conditioning-related morbidity and mortality, and measure the success of the transplant procedure by engraftment and disease-free survival. If this regimen is able to successfully permit engraftment and reduce regimen-related toxicity, the next phase of treatment will test a further dose de-escalation for cyclophosphamide. It is anticipated that there will be four dose levels of cyclophosphamide in the overall study: 1) 105 mg/kg; 2) 70 mg/kg; 3) 35 mg/kg; and then finally, 4) 0 mg/kg. This study design was chosen to minimize study risks possibly associated with substitution of fludarabine and alemtuzumab for CY as immunoablation. The present protocol represents Level 1 in the study design; an amended protocol will be prepared prior to further de-escalation of the cyclophosphamide dose.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Non-randomised
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1 | Other | Drug: Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1Cyclophosphamide given by Intravenous (IV) at a total dose of 105 mg/kg, to be divided into three doses of one 35 mg/kg dose per day, for 3 days on the first level. Drug to be given in combination of Busulfan, Campath and Fludarabine |
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2 | Other | Drug: Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2Cyclophosphamide given by intravenous (IV) at a total dose of 70 mg/kg (divided in two doses) given once a day for two days in combination with Busulfan, Campath and Fludarabine. |
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3 | Other | Drug: Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3Cyclophosphamide given by intravenous (IV) at total does of 35 mg/kg as a one time dose in combination with Busulfan, Fludarabine and Campath |
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 4 | Other | Drug: Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 4No cyclophosphamide given with Busulfan, Fludarabine and Campath |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 3 months and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- All patients with lethal or sublethal genetic lymphohematological disease (such as Hemaphagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) / Familial Erythrophagocytic Lymphohistiocytosis (FEL), Hurler's Syndrome, Hunter's Syndrome, Kostmann's Syndrome, Blackfan-Diamond Anemia, Chronic granulomatous Disease (CGD), Red Cell Aplasia, CID, Sickle Cell Anemia, Thalassemia, Adreno-leukodystrophy, metachromatic leukodystrophy, Wiskott-Aldrich Syndrome, X-Linked Lymphoproliferative Disease (XLD), Metabolic diseases affecting hematopoiesis, but not limited to), who are candidates for allogeneic transplantation for their disease and have a histocompatible sibling or related donor, ages 0 to 21 years, will be candidates for this study protocol. The suitable related donor is a 10/10 or 9/10 allele Human Leukocyte Antigen (HLA) match with the patient. All patients who have previously had serious life- threatening events due to disease process may be included in the study. Patients must have adequate physical function and vital organ function to tolerate transplant procedure, as measured by:
- Cardiac: Shortening fraction >26% or left ventricular ejection fraction at rest must be > 40%.
- Hepatic: Bilirubin, Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) and Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) < 3x upper limit of normal (as per local laboratory) for age (with the exception of isolated hyperbilirubinemia due to Gilbert's syndrome).
- Renal: Serum creatinine < 2x upper limit of normal for age or if serum creatinine elevated beyond normal range patient must have creatinine Clearance or Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) >50% lower limit of normal for age.
- Pulmonary: Forced expiratory volume (FEV)1, Forced Vital Capacity (FVC), and Diffusing Lung Capacity for Carbon Monoxide (DLCO) (corrected for Hgb) > 50% predicted. For patients where pulse oximetry is performed, O2 saturation > 92%
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Karnofsky performance status < 70%, or Lansky < 40% for patients < 16 years old.
- Uncontrolled bacterial, viral, or fungal infections (currently taking medication yet clinical symptoms progress).
- Seropositivity for the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV).
- Acute active hepatitis.
- Diagnosis of end-organ dysfunction that precludes the ability to tolerate the transplant procedure.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1Also: Cytoxangiven by IV at a total dose of 105 mg/kg, to be divided into three doses of one 35 mg/kg dose per day, for 3 days on the first level. After ten patients the de-escalation will begin if the stopping rule is not met. | Drug | Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1 |
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2Also: CytoxanLevel 2 will be 70mg/kg in 2 divided given once a day for 2 days; | Drug | Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2 |
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3Also: CytoxanLevel 3 will be 35mg/kg as a one-time dose. | Drug | Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3 |
| Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 4Also: CytoxanLevel 4 will be no cytoxan. | Drug | Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 4 |
Primary outcome
Number of Participants With Neutrophil Engraftment (=/>500 Cells/uL) and Platelet Engraftment (>20K Cell/uL) at 30 Days
Time frame: 30 days
Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) =/>500;(recovery of white cell count - self sustain platelet above 20,000 per cubic milimeter (20K) - evaluation by Chimerism Study (STR or FISH) at day +30
Number of Participants With Disease Recurrence at 1 Year Post-transplant
Time frame: 1 year
assess rate of disease recurrence ("late relapse") due to autologous recovery of recipient hematopoiesis at one year post-HSCT.
Number of Participants Who Developed Severe Mucositis, Veno-occlusive Disease (VOD), Toxicity of the Kidney, Liver, or Gastrointestinal (GI) Tract up to 1 Year Post-transplant
Time frame: 1 year
Assessment of conditioning regimen related toxicity was evaluated and documented with daily assessment during hospitalization and post-transplant follow-up up to one year. None of the subjects developed VOD necessitating any therapeutic intervention, severe mucositis, or toxicity of the Kidney, Liver or Gastrointestinal.
2 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants Who Developed Graft-Versus-Host-Disease (GVHD) as Determined by the Glucksberg Scale
Time frame: 1 yr
Number of Participants Who Were Disease Progression-Free and Death-Free at 1 Year Post-transplant
Time frame: 1 yr
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 27 Feb 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 25459642Mahadeo KM, Weinberg KI, Abdel-Azim H, Miklos DB, Killen R, Kohn D, Crooks GM, Shah AJ, Kharbanda S, Agarwal R, Kapoor N. A reduced-toxicity regimen is associated with durable engraftment and clinical cure of nonmalignant genetic diseases among children undergoing blood and marrow transplantation with an HLA-matched related donor. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2015 Mar;21(3):440-4. doi: 10.1016/j.bbmt.2014.11.005. Epub 2014 Nov 13.
- Reduced-toxicity regimen for related HSCT transplantsLink provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Tranplant data is reported to CIBMTR and is available to the other investigators
Related trials for Stem Cell Transplantation
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prevalence and Development of Liver Dysfunction in Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
A Window of Opportunity Trial to Learn if Linvoseltamab is Safe and Well Tolerated, and How Well it Works in Adult Participants With Recently Diagnosed Multiple Myeloma Who Have Not Already Received Treatment
Multiple Myeloma
RecruitingEarly Phase 1
HMCT/CT2401: Abatacept GVHD Prophylaxis Following Omidubicel HCT
Hematologic Malignancy
RecruitingObservational study
Improved Methods of Cell Selection for Bone Marrow Transplant Alternatives
Graft-Versus-Host Disease, Graft-versus-leukemia
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Neena Kapoor, M.D. principal investigator
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 1, Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 2 and Cyclophosphamide Dose Level 3 in people with Stem Cell Transplantation and Bone Marrow Transplantation, run by Children's Hospital Los Angeles.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 27 Feb 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 17 Jun 2016). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Number of Participants With Neutrophil Engraftment (=/>500 Cells/uL) and Platelet Engraftment (>20K Cell/uL) at 30 Days (time frame: 30 days). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02512679, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 27 Feb 2017.