Colon PolypsNCT02516748
Real-time Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging
An observational study of Colon Polyps, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
Trial summary
Accurate optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps could allow a "resect and discard" strategy with surveillance intervals determined based on the results of the optical biopsy. The investigators perform education to characterize the histology of diminutive and small colorectal polyps by using narrow band imaging (NBI). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Colon Polyps
- What is being tested?
- Feedback
- Type of treatment
- Lifestyle or therapy programme
- How many people
- 3,268 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSouth Korea
- Study dates
- Aug 2015to Oct 2016
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Customers who received colonoscopy for screening and surveillance of colorectal neoplasia in Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center from October 2015 to September 2016.
Who may be able to join
- Customers who received screening and surveillance colonoscopy in Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center from October 2015 to September 2016.
Who cannot join
- Age <18 years
- Customers who refused to offer their health check up data
- History of inflammatory bowel disease
- History of familial adenomatous polyposis
- Customers who received Incomplete colonoscopy
- History of previous colorectal resection
- Incomplete data collection on optical diagnosis
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
South Korea1 site
Healthcare System Gangnam Center, Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul
About this study
Official title: Prospective Study of Real-time Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging: Gangnam-ReaDi Study
Accurate optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps could allow a "resect and discard" strategy with surveillance intervals determined based on the results of the optical biopsy. The investigators perform education to characterize the histology of diminutive and small colorectal polyps by using narrow band imaging (NBI). After education program, the investigators prospectively evaluate real-time optical biopsy analysis of polyps with NBI by 15 gastroenterologists at a medical check up center.
Read the detailed description
This study is an extension of quality assurance program in Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center. This study is composed of four periods.
First, a computer based education program on the accuracy of predicting polyp histology with NBI (NICE and WASP classification) will be performed by 15 endoscopists (less experienced in NBI) during Septepber 2015.
In the second period from October 2015 till Deceber 2015, 1st phase real- time optical diagnosis for diminutive and small colorectal polyps will be activated. All endoscopists will have weekly feedback on their accuracy of optical diagnosis for polyps, and discuss the NBI findings that mismatched by histologic diagnosis all together per one month.
Third, the result of 1st phase real-time optical diagnosis will be analyzed from January 2016 till April 2016. In this period, endoscopists with low accuracy of 1st phase real-time optical diagnosis will be re-educated.
The last period from May 2016 till September 2016, 2nd phase real-time optical diagnosis for polyps will be activated. Performance will be evaluated by comparing optically predicted diagnosis with actual histologic diagnosis. Cumulative sum analysis will be used to determine the learning curve for each endoscopist. Negative predictive value for the prediction of nonneoplastic polyp and concordance of surveillance intervals for diminutive polyps diagnosed optically with high confidence will also be measured.
- Conditions
- Colon Polyps
- Being tested
- Feedback
- Keywords
- optical diagnosis, narrow band image
- Medical subject headings
- Colonic Polyps
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FeedbackBehavioural
Also called Behavior change intervention
Less experienced endoscopists in optical diagnosis will receive feedbacks about their own accuracy of optical diagnosis.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Concordance rate between optical diagnosis and histologic diagnosis for polyps <10 mm in real-time colonoscopy
Measured: 12 month
Secondary outcomes (6)
Concordance rate in surveillance intervals of follow-up colonoscopy between optical diagnosis and histological diagnosis for polyps assessed with high confidence
Measured: 12 months
Negative predictive value for neoplastic polyps in rectosigmoid polyps 5mm or smaller with assessed high confidence
Negative predictive value for neoplastic polyps defined as: number of hyperplastic polyps assessed by histologic diagnosis / number of hyperplastic polyps assessed by optical diagnosis
Measured: 12 months
The learning curve of accuracy of optical diagnosis
Measured: 12 months
The maintance of accuracy of optical diagnosis
Measured: 12 months
Adenoma detection rate
Measured: 24 month
Serrated lesion detection rate
Measured: 24 month
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2015
- Primary completionSep 2016
- Study completionOct 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (7)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Colon PolypsStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Seoul National University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 3,268 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Su Jin Chung, Seoul National University Hospital
- Investigators
- Su Jin Chung, M.D., Ph.D., Principal investigator, Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research, Healthcare System, Seoul National University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02516748
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- H-1505-019-670
- Status last verified
- Dec 2017
- First submitted
- 30 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 15 Dec 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- Individual data sharing
- Undecided
Publications
McGill SK, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP, Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T. Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics. Gut. 2013 Dec;62(12):1704-13. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303965. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
PubMed 23300139Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK. A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Oct;8(10):865-9, 869.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.05.018. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
PubMed 20621680Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N, Vance M, Guenther T, Saunders BP. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Dec;10(12):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70329-8. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
PubMed 19910250IJspeert JE, Bastiaansen BA, van Leerdam ME, Meijer GA, van Eeden S, Sanduleanu S, Schoon EJ, Bisseling TM, Spaander MC, van Lelyveld N, Bargeman M, Wang J, Dekker E; Dutch Workgroup serrAted polypS & Polyposis (WASP). Development and validation of the WASP classification system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Gut. 2016 Jun;65(6):963-70. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308411. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
PubMed 25753029Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Saunders BP, Ponchon T, Soetikno R, Rex DK. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):599-607.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 15.
PubMed 22609383Bae JH, Lee C, Kang HY, Kwak MS, Doo EY, Seo JY, Song JH, Yang SY, Yang JI, Lim SH, Yim JY, Lim JH, Chung GE, Chung SJ, Jin EH, Park B, Kim JS. Improved Real-Time Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Following a Comprehensive Training Program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Nov;17(12):2479-2488.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
PubMed 30772588Vleugels JLA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Hazewinkel Y, Wanders LK, Fockens P, Dekker E; DISCOUNT study group. Effects of Training and Feedback on Accuracy of Predicting Rectosigmoid Neoplastic Lesions and Selection of Surveillance Intervals by Endoscopists Performing Optical Diagnosis of Diminutive Polyps. Gastroenterology. 2018 May;154(6):1682-1693.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.063. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
PubMed 29425923
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 15 Dec 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Study of Real-time Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Using Narrow-Band Imaging: Gangnam-ReaDi Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02516748
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- H-1505-019-670
- Conditions
- Colon Polyps
- Keywords
- optical diagnosis, narrow band image
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 3,268 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Seoul National University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Sep 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- Oct 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 6 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Accurate optical diagnosis of colorectal polyps could allow a "resect and discard" strategy with surveillance intervals determined based on the results of the optical biopsy. The investigators perform education to characterize the histology of diminutive and small colorectal polyps by using narrow band imaging (NBI). After education program, the investigators prospectively evaluate real-time optical biopsy analysis of polyps with NBI by 15 gastroenterologists at a medical check up center.
Detailed description
This study is an extension of quality assurance program in Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center. This study is composed of four periods.
First, a computer based education program on the accuracy of predicting polyp histology with NBI (NICE and WASP classification) will be performed by 15 endoscopists (less experienced in NBI) during Septepber 2015.
In the second period from October 2015 till Deceber 2015, 1st phase real- time optical diagnosis for diminutive and small colorectal polyps will be activated. All endoscopists will have weekly feedback on their accuracy of optical diagnosis for polyps, and discuss the NBI findings that mismatched by histologic diagnosis all together per one month.
Third, the result of 1st phase real-time optical diagnosis will be analyzed from January 2016 till April 2016. In this period, endoscopists with low accuracy of 1st phase real-time optical diagnosis will be re-educated.
The last period from May 2016 till September 2016, 2nd phase real-time optical diagnosis for polyps will be activated. Performance will be evaluated by comparing optically predicted diagnosis with actual histologic diagnosis. Cumulative sum analysis will be used to determine the learning curve for each endoscopist. Negative predictive value for the prediction of nonneoplastic polyp and concordance of surveillance intervals for diminutive polyps diagnosed optically with high confidence will also be measured.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Customers who received colonoscopy for screening and surveillance of colorectal neoplasia in Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center from October 2015 to September 2016.
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Customers who received screening and surveillance colonoscopy in Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center from October 2015 to September 2016.
Key exclusion criteria (7 listed)
- Age <18 years
- Customers who refused to offer their health check up data
- History of inflammatory bowel disease
- History of familial adenomatous polyposis
- Customers who received Incomplete colonoscopy
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FeedbackAlso: Behavior change interventionLess experienced endoscopists in optical diagnosis will receive feedbacks about their own accuracy of optical diagnosis. | Behavioural | – |
Primary outcome
Concordance rate between optical diagnosis and histologic diagnosis for polyps <10 mm in real-time colonoscopy
Time frame: 12 month
6 secondary outcomes
Concordance rate in surveillance intervals of follow-up colonoscopy between optical diagnosis and histological diagnosis for polyps assessed with high confidence
Time frame: 12 months
Negative predictive value for neoplastic polyps in rectosigmoid polyps 5mm or smaller with assessed high confidence
Time frame: 12 months
The learning curve of accuracy of optical diagnosis
Time frame: 12 months
The maintance of accuracy of optical diagnosis
Time frame: 12 months
Adenoma detection rate
Time frame: 24 month
Serrated lesion detection rate
Time frame: 24 month
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 15 Dec 2017.
- Background: PubMed 23300139McGill SK, Evangelou E, Ioannidis JP, Soetikno RM, Kaltenbach T. Narrow band imaging to differentiate neoplastic and non-neoplastic colorectal polyps in real time: a meta-analysis of diagnostic operating characteristics. Gut. 2013 Dec;62(12):1704-13. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2012-303965. Epub 2013 Jan 7.
- Background: PubMed 20621680Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Rex DK. A resect and discard strategy would improve cost-effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010 Oct;8(10):865-9, 869.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2010.05.018. Epub 2010 Jun 1.
- Background: PubMed 19910250Ignjatovic A, East JE, Suzuki N, Vance M, Guenther T, Saunders BP. Optical diagnosis of small colorectal polyps at routine colonoscopy (Detect InSpect ChAracterise Resect and Discard; DISCARD trial): a prospective cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2009 Dec;10(12):1171-8. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70329-8. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
- Background: PubMed 25753029IJspeert JE, Bastiaansen BA, van Leerdam ME, Meijer GA, van Eeden S, Sanduleanu S, Schoon EJ, Bisseling TM, Spaander MC, van Lelyveld N, Bargeman M, Wang J, Dekker E; Dutch Workgroup serrAted polypS & Polyposis (WASP). Development and validation of the WASP classification system for optical diagnosis of adenomas, hyperplastic polyps and sessile serrated adenomas/polyps. Gut. 2016 Jun;65(6):963-70. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2014-308411. Epub 2015 Mar 9.
- Background: PubMed 22609383Hewett DG, Kaltenbach T, Sano Y, Tanaka S, Saunders BP, Ponchon T, Soetikno R, Rex DK. Validation of a simple classification system for endoscopic diagnosis of small colorectal polyps using narrow-band imaging. Gastroenterology. 2012 Sep;143(3):599-607.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2012.05.006. Epub 2012 May 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 30772588Bae JH, Lee C, Kang HY, Kwak MS, Doo EY, Seo JY, Song JH, Yang SY, Yang JI, Lim SH, Yim JY, Lim JH, Chung GE, Chung SJ, Jin EH, Park B, Kim JS. Improved Real-Time Optical Diagnosis of Colorectal Polyps Following a Comprehensive Training Program. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2019 Nov;17(12):2479-2488.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.02.019. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 29425923Vleugels JLA, Dijkgraaf MGW, Hazewinkel Y, Wanders LK, Fockens P, Dekker E; DISCOUNT study group. Effects of Training and Feedback on Accuracy of Predicting Rectosigmoid Neoplastic Lesions and Selection of Surveillance Intervals by Endoscopists Performing Optical Diagnosis of Diminutive Polyps. Gastroenterology. 2018 May;154(6):1682-1693.e1. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.063. Epub 2018 Feb 6.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Undecided
Related trials for Colon Polyps
Recruiting
Five or Ten Year Colonoscopy for 1-2 Non-Advanced Adenomatous Polyps
Adenocarcinoma of the Colon, Adenocarcinoma of the Rectum
Recruiting
Artificial Intelligence to Implement Cost-saving Strategies for Colonoscopy Screening Based on in Vivo Prediction of Polyp Histology
Colonic Neoplasms
RecruitingObservational study
KLF4 Epigenetic Modulation
KLF4 Methylation, Epigenetic
RecruitingObservational study
Malignant Polyp Registry
Malignant Colorectal Polyp, Colorectal Cancer
Active, not recruiting
Virtual Incision Robotically Assisted Surgical Device Use in Minimally Invasive Colectomy
Colon Cancer, Colon Polyp
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Su Jin Chung, M.D., Ph.D. principal investigator
Department of Internal Medicine and Healthcare Research, Healthcare System, Seoul National University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Colon Polyps, run by Seoul National University Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Dec 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Concordance rate between optical diagnosis and histologic diagnosis for polyps <10 mm in real-time colonoscopy (time frame: 12 month). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02516748, which also lists 7 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Dec 2017.