AzTrials
AzTrials

OsteoporosisNCT02520362

Denosumab Safety Assessment in Multiple Observational Databases

An observational study of Osteoporosis, run by Amgen.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective open-cohort study with annual assessment and reporting of descriptive findings from 5 secondary data sources, US Medicare, Optum Research Database (formerly United HealthCare), Scandinavian national health registry databases, including data from Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 30 to 99 years
Conditions the study is for
Osteoporosis
What is being tested?
denosumab and bisphosphonate
How many people
517,991 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
31 May 2010to 21 Jul 2023
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 30 to 99 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: The main and sub-study populations will be identified based on the following inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients in Medicare and Optum Research Database (formerly United HealthCare), will need to have appropriate plan coverage to be included in any of the following populations. Appropriate plan coverage for the Optum Research Database (formerly United HealthCare) refers to both pharmacy and medical plan coverage. Appropriate plan coverage for the US Medicare database refers to enrollment in traditional fee-for-service Medicare (Medicare Parts A and B coverage and not in a Medicare Advantage plan), plus Part D. The requirement of 12-months of continuous enrollment is not relevant for Scandinavian national registries because all citizens are enrolled in the universal health coverage from birth to death unless they move out of the country.

Who may be able to join

  • Men ≥ 65 years old in the Medicare database or ≥ 30 years old in andthe Optum Research Database (formerly United HealthCare)United Healthcare who receive at least one denosumab 60 mg injection will be included. All men need to be continuously enrolled for at least 12 months prior to start of follow-up. A diagnosis code of osteoporosis or osteoporotic fracture would not be required because it is known that male osteoporosis is under-diagnosed. The exclusion of patients with cancer or Paget disease (as described in the Exclusion Criteria Section) will ensure that patients treated with Prolia is for osteoporosis but not for other indications. The index date is defined as the date when a patient first satisfies all inclusion criteria.

Who cannot join

  • Men with a diagnosis of malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) or treatment with chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or radiation therapy for cancer up to 12 months before the index date will be excluded.
  • Men with Paget's disease during the 12-month period prior to the index date will also be excluded.
  • Inclusion criteria for Men and Women Who Receive Prolia With Glucocorticoid Exd Exposure • Men and women identified from Medicare or Optum Research Database who are ≥65 years old (or ≥30 years old in Optum) on or before receiving at least 1 denosumab 60 mg injection or fill after approval date of Prolia for treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (18 May 2018) will be included. This includes both new and prevalent users of denosumab. The index date is defined as the date of the first denosumab administration on or after the approval date fulfilling both the database specific age, 12-month enrollment criteria, and has received a 90-day average daily dose equivalent ≥7.5 mg of prednisone at any time during the previous 12 months.
  • Exclusion Criteria for Men and Women Who Receive Prolia With Glucocorticoid Exposure
  • Men and women with a diagnosis of malignancy (excluding non-melanoma skin cancer) or treatment with chemotherapy, hormonal therapy or radiation therapy for cancer up to 12 months before the index date will be excluded. Men and women with Paget's disease during the 12-month period prior to the index date will also be excluded. The exclusion of subjects with cancer or Paget's disease will ensure that subjects included in the substudy are receiving denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis, and not for other indications.

About this study

Official title: Denosumab Global Safety Assessment Among Women With Postmenopausal Osteoporosis (PMO), Men With Osteoporosis, and Men and Women Who Receive Prolia With Glucocorticoid Exposure in Multiple Observational Databases

This is a prospective open-cohort study with annual assessment and reporting of descriptive findings from 5 secondary data sources, US Medicare, Optum Research Database (formerly United HealthCare), Scandinavian national health registry databases, including data from Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. The study period will include up to 10 years in each data system depending on data availability. Descriptive statistics will be used to characterize cohorts with respect to patient characteristics and utilization patterns. Person-year adjusted AESI incidence rates will be calculated among postmenopausal women, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and exposure cohorts with a final comparative safety analysis. Subsequent sub-studies using US data systems were added to describe men with osteoporosis treated with Prolia and men and women who receive Prolia with glucocorticoid exposure.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective open-cohort study with annual assessment and reporting of descriptive findings from 5 secondary data sources, US Medicare,Optum Research Database (formerly United HealthCare), Scandinavian national health registry databases, including data from Denmark, Sweden, and Norway. The study period will include up to 10 years in each data system depending on data availability. Descriptive statistics will be used to characterize exposure cohorts with respect to patient characteristics, clinical features, and AESI risk factors. Person-year adjusted AESI incidence rates will be calculated among postmenopausal women, postmenopausal women with osteoporosis, and exposure cohorts. Exploratory analyses comparing incidence rates of AESI in women with PMO adjusting for potential confounders will also be conducted. Descriptive statistics will be used to characterize denosumab utilisation patterns in patients who receive denosumab for PMO and in subjects who receive Prolia therapy for unapproved indications. Subsequent substudies using US data systems were added to describe men with osteoporosis treated with Prolia and men and women who receive Prolia with glucocorticoid exposure.

Conditions
Osteoporosis
Being tested
denosumab, bisphosphonate
Medical subject headings
Osteoporosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • denosumabDrug

    subcutaneous injection

  • bisphosphonateDrug

    The assessment of bisphosphonates includes branded oral bisphosphonates (eg, alendronate [Fosamax®], risedronate [Actonel®], ibandronate [Boniva®/Bonviva®] oral); generic bisphosphonates, including alendronate, neridodronate, and olpadronate; intravenous bisphosphonates including ibandronate IV, and zoledronate [Reclast®/Aclasta®].

Study groups in NCT02520362
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Postmenopausal WomenPostmenopausal Women
Women with post menopausal osteoporosisWomen with post menopausal osteoporosis
Receives: Drug: denosumab; Drug: bisphosphonate
Prolia for unapproved indicationsPatients who receive Prolia for unapproved indications
Receives: Drug: denosumab
Men with osteoporosisMen with osteoporosis treated with denosumab
Receives: Drug: denosumab
Men and women who receive Prolia with Glucocorticoid exposureDrug: denosumab subcutaneous injection

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Incidence rates of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

    Incidence rates of AESI (per 100,000 Person-years) will be assessed in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis (PMO) and by exposure cohort (denosumab or bisphosphonates)

    Measured: Up to 10 years

  2. Characteristics and Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) risk factors

    Describe characteristics, clinical features, and AESI risk factors in women with PMO exposed to denosumab, women with PMO exposed to bisphosphonates, and all women with PMO.

    Measured: Up to 10 years

  3. Compare the incidence of the Adverse Events of Special Interests

    Compare the incidence of the AESI in women with PMO exposed to denosumab to that in women with PMO exposed to bisphosphonates.

    Measured: Up to 10 years

  4. Describe incidence rates of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI)

    Describe incidence rates of AESI in postmenopausal women.

    Measured: Up to 10 years

  5. Describe denosumab utilization patterns

    Describe denosumab utilization patterns in patients who receive denosumab therapy for treatment of PMO.

    Measured: Up to 10 years

  6. Describe Prolia utilization patterns

    Describe Prolia utilization patterns in patients who receive Prolia therapy for unapproved indications (indication, dosage, frequency).

    Measured: Up to 10 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted11 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start31 May 2010
  3. Primary completion21 Jul 2023
  4. Study completion21 Jul 2023

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
517,991 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02520362
Sponsor's protocol ID
20090522
Status last verified
Oct 2024
First submitted
7 May 2015
Last updated
4 Nov 2024
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request

Publications

  • Xue F, Ma H, Stehman-Breen C, Haller C, Katz L, Wagman RB, Critchlow CW; Denosumab Global Safety Assessment Team. Design and methods of a postmarketing pharmacoepidemiology study assessing long-term safety of Prolia(R) (denosumab) for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2013 Oct;22(10):1107-14. doi: 10.1002/pds.3477. Epub 2013 Jul 15.

    PubMed 23857864

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Osteoporosis, run by Amgen.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Nov 2024. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Incidence rates of Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI) (time frame: Up to 10 years). The study lists 6 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02520362, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Nov 2024.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT02520362 | AzTrials