Obstructive Sleep ApneaBiPAPRescueNCT02522442
Auto Bilevel Adherence Following a Poor Initial Encounter With Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP)
A study testing CPAP and Auto BiLevel in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea, run by Philips Respironics at 3 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The primary objective outcome is the proportion of participants compliant (at least four hours of use per night for all nights) in the Auto Bilevel group compared to the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) group after 90 days of treatment during the investigation. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- What is being tested?
- CPAP and Auto BiLevel
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 51 participants
- Where
- 3 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2007to Jan 2009
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 75 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Age 21-75
- New Diagnosis of OSA with a baseline respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ≥ 15 events/hr of sleep determined by either full night or split night PSG
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
- Able to follow study procedures
- Sub-optimal PSG titration with at least 3 hours of attempted PAP titration (defined below): and deemed by their physician as a titration failure
- Sub-optimal PSG titration: at least one of the following:
Show all 10Show fewer
- Poor sleep efficiency during titration period (sleep efficiency ≤ 70%) (participants may be on sleep medications as per standard lab CPAP protocol ) or;
- Frequent arousals based on three seconds of alpha frequency on EEG (non periodic limb movement (PLM)-related) of 20 or greater per hour during the titration portion of the study or;
- CPAP titration aborted due to participant's request (due to intolerance), or
- Persistent sleep disruption despite therapeutic CPAP therapy and in the judgment of the reviewing physician, suggesting a low probability to CPAP adherence
Who cannot join
- Participation in another interventional research study within the last 30 days
- Major uncontrolled medical or psychiatric condition such as congestive heart failure, neuromuscular disease, renal failure etc.
- Prior CPAP or Bi-Level PAP use (within last 2 years)
- Chronic respiratory failure or insufficiency, moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (FEV1 < 60%), or any known condition of an elevation of arterial carbon dioxide levels while awake
- Surgery of the upper airway, nose, sinus, or middle ear within the previous 90 days
- Presence of an untreated, diagnosable, non-OSA related sleep disorder (e.g. restless legs syndrome, insomnia, etc.)
Show all 14Show fewer
- Periodic Limb movement arousal index of 10 or greater.
- Refusal to consider further interventions to standard CPAP to optimize positive pressure therapy (e.g. different mask than what was used in lab)
- PAP therapy otherwise medically complicated or contraindicated such as those with a difficult to size or adjust interface (mask) resulting in facial pain, skin irritation or trauma, or excessive air leaks
- Shift workers or people experiencing jet lag
- Known history of alcohol and or drug abuse
- Diagnosis of Complex Sleep Apnea, (appears to be classic obstructive or mixed sleep apnea, but exhibits disruptive central apneas and periodic breathing on CPAP) 11, 12 or persistent central apnea during diagnostic PSG.
- Diagnosis of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
- Chronic Hypnotic use (nightly use for three months or less)
Trial locations and contacts
3 sites in 1 country.
United States3 sites
Brigham and Women's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, 02115
Mayo Clinics
Rochester, Minnesota, 55905
Clayton Sleep Institute
St Louis, Missouri, 63143
About this study
Official title: Phase IV Study of Bi-Level Positive Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)Compared to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy
The primary objective outcome is the proportion of participants compliant (at least four hours of use per night for all nights) in the Auto Bilevel group compared to the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) group after 90 days of treatment during the investigation. Proportion will be calculated using the cumulative number of hours on therapy divided by the total number of days of the investigation for each participant. The mean and standard deviation of these mean therapy hours will then be calculated for each arm of the investigation. Participants with compliance of at least four hours will be classified as "compliant" and those with less than four hours will be classified as "non-compliant". The null hypothesis will be rejected if the mean of the primary objective outcome for all participants in the BiPAP® Auto with Bi-Flex® therapy (auto Bilevel) arm is significantly greater than that for all participants in the CPAP therapy arm
Read the detailed description
Initial Screening
It is preferred that participant's are recruited the morning after their failed clinical CPAP titration in the lab. Participants are able to be enrolled within ninety days following this failure if circumstances preclude approach and consent the morning after titration failure. Participants will be asked to wear the Actiwatch for approximately seven days prior to the clinical titration polysomnogram (PSG; and again for seven days prior to their final visit .) Actiwatch is worn on the participant's wrist to assess sleep continuity. Participants will be asked to press the "Marker button" on the Actiwatch when they get in bed each night to have a documented time mark when the device is downloaded. Participants will also be asked to fill in the sleep diary (provided by sleep clinic) during the seven days (14 days total; 7 at the beginning of the study and 7 days prior to the 90 Day visit) they use the Actiwatch.
Randomization/Therapy Initiated (Visit #1)
Participants will be randomized and scheduled for a BiPAP® Auto with Bi-Flex® titration or CPAP titration night in the lab. General therapy titration guidelines are documented in Appendix I \& II (see Appendix I \& II at end of document). Heart Rate Variability (HRV) will be assessed at both the diagnostic portion and titration portion of the research PSG. During the diagnostic portion of the research PSG, HRV needs to be assessed for ten minutes while the participant is awake. At the end of the titration portion of the research PSG, the HRV needs to be assessed for ten consecutive minutes while the participant is awake.
Enrolled participants will then complete a questionnaire to assess functional outcomes of sleep quality (FOSQ), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for mask comfort and satisfaction with therapy, Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), attitudes toward use measurement, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS; see Appendix III for description of measurements).
Participants will be set up with their respective machines after titration or within ten days (10 +/- 2) days of titration and will take these devices home for the next three months. Thus, total participation in the trial will be on average 3-4 months. All positive airway pressure machines will include a programmed SmartCard to monitor objectively compliance. Participants randomized to standard CPAP therapy will receive a SmartCard programmed to provide CPAP at their prescribed pressure. Both the participant and the sleep health staff administering the questionnaires and psychomotor vigilance task, will be blinded to the therapy the SmartCard is programmed to provide. Participants randomized to novel therapy will receive a SmartCard programmed to provide BiPAP® Auto with Bi-Flex®. The SmartCard programming will be done by an unblinded study staff member. The settings for the novel therapy will be:
- Min Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) = 4 cmH2O for prescribed CPAP ≤ 10 cmH2O (use 6 cmH2O for prescribed CPAP > 10 cmH2O)
- Max Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure (IPAP) = 25 cm H2O
- Min Pressure Support (PS) = 2 cm H2O (cannot be adjusted)
- MaxPS = 8 cm H2O
- Bi-Flex setting of 3
The SmartCard is inserted into the device to provide the programmed therapy. Both the participant and CPAP therapist will be blinded to the therapy the SmartCard is programmed to provide. The other supplies necessary to use the therapy at home will also be provided to the participant (i.e. mask, tubing, humidifier, etc.).
The CPAP therapist will also provide the training necessary to use the device at home and provide a number to call in case the participant encounters any difficulty using the device at home.
Standardized Counseling to Optimize Adherence to Therapy
Counseling to optimize adherence to CPAP therapy will consist of:
- The clinician will discuss complaints regarding CPAP therapy to identify potential contributors to poor adherence to therapy. The standardized counseling to optimize adherence includes the following measures to address patient complaints and concerns: Interface
- Assure current mask is properly applied and headgear is properly adjusted.
- Persistent mask leaks or mask discomfort, skin trauma, or skin irritation will be addressed first by verifying mask and headgear adjustment and mask sizing. An alternate mask can be used if the problems cannot be addressed by fit or adjustment interventions.
- If mouth leaks are the primary concern and a nasal mask is being used, then a nasal/oral mask will be considered or a chin strap will be offered in combination with nasal mask use. Therapy Side Effects
- All patients will have initially been placed on a CPAP device with heated humidification. For continued oro-pharyngeal dryness, nasal dryness, nasal congestion, or rhinitis, humidification will be increased. Saline nasal sprays, steroids, or decongestants can be prescribed, if needed.
- Dyspnea on CPAP or claustrophobia will be addressed with counseling as needed.
- Note: Reducing the prescribed pressure to improve adherence will not be considered at this time.
- A standardized description of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and its risks will be reviewed with the participant, as well as the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Fact Sheet Drowsy Driving (see Appendix III).
- A standardized description of the evidence regarding the benefits of positive pressure therapy to treat OSA will be reviewed with the participant.
Participants will be instructed to use the device as much as possible while they are sleeping and to also make sure they allow an adequate opportunity to sleep each night.
- Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- Being tested
- CPAP, Auto BiLevel
- Medical subject headings
- Sleep Apnea, Obstructive
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
CPAPDevice
Continuous positive airway pressure
Auto BiLevelDevice
Auto Bilevel positive airway pressure with Flex
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Auto BiLevel Group | Experimental | Auto Bilevel; auto-titrating bilevel positive airway pressure device with pressure flexing used as experimental treatment for obstructive sleep apnea Receives: Device: Auto BiLevel |
| CPAP Group | Active comparator | CPAP; continuous positive airway pressure used as comparator treatment for obstructive sleep apnea Receives: Device: CPAP |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group Measured by Average Nightly Use.
Compliance was compared between the AutoBiLevel Group and the CPAP group by measuring the average use per night over the study period.
Measured: 90 days
Percentage of Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group
Percentage of Group Compliance was compared between AutoBiLevel Group and the CPAP group by measuring proportion of adherent users over the treatment period. Patients with compliance of at least four hours will be classified as "compliant" and those with less than four hours will be classified as "non-compliant". The % of compliant patients will be calculated using the cumulative number of hours on therapy divided by the total number of days of the investigation for each subject.
Measured: 90 days
Secondary outcomes (3)
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
The Epworth Sleepiness Scale is an 8 item questionnaire that measures the general level of daytime sleepiness. Participants were asked what the chance is they would doze off or fall asleep during different routine daytime situations. The survey answers questions on a scale of 0 to 3- 0 being no chance and 3 being a high chance of dozing. The lowest score possible is a 0 and the highest score possible is a 24.
Measured: Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Fatigue Severity Scale
The Fatigue Severity Scale is a 9-item scale which measures the severity of fatigue and its effect on a person's activities and lifestyle in patients with a variety of disorders. Participants answer questions on a scale of 1-7, 1 being Strongly Disagree and 7 being Strongly Agree. The scores can range from 9-63. The higher the score the higher the fatigue.
Measured: Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Quality
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Quality consists of 30 questions related to the effects of fatigue on daily activities, the instrument was designed to evaluate the respondent's quality of life as it relates to disorders of excessive sleepiness. Five domains of day-to-day life are examined: activity levels, vigilance, intimacy and sexual relationships, productivity, and social outcomes. The participants answer on a scale of 0-4: 0 -I don't do this activity for other reasons,1-Yes, extreme, 2-Yes, moderate, 3-Yes, a little, 4-No. Scores can range 0-120, the lower the score the more tired or sleepy the participant is.
Measured: Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2007
- Primary completionJan 2009
- Study completionJan 2009
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Obstructive Sleep ApneaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Philips Respironics
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Eric Powell, Ph.D., Principal investigator, Philips Respironics
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02522442
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ABF-2007-MCT-03
- Acronym
- BiPAPRescue
- Status last verified
- Apr 2019
- First submitted
- 18 Jul 2011
- Last updated
- 26 Apr 2019
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Powell ED, Gay PC, Ojile JM, Litinski M, Malhotra A. A pilot study assessing adherence to auto-bilevel following a poor initial encounter with CPAP. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Feb 15;8(1):43-7. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1658.
PubMed 22334808
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 26 Apr 2019. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Phase IV Study of Bi-Level Positive Positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP)Compared to Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) Therapy
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02522442
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- BiPAPRescue / ABF-2007-MCT-03
- Conditions
- Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 51 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Philips RespironicsIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Collaborators
- Mayo Clinic, Brigham and Women's Hospital
- Study start
- Aug 2007
- Primary completion
- Jan 2009 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2009 (actual)
- First posted
- 13 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 26 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary objective outcome is the proportion of participants compliant (at least four hours of use per night for all nights) in the Auto Bilevel group compared to the continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) group after 90 days of treatment during the investigation. Proportion will be calculated using the cumulative number of hours on therapy divided by the total number of days of the investigation for each participant. The mean and standard deviation of these mean therapy hours will then be calculated for each arm of the investigation. Participants with compliance of at least four hours will be classified as "compliant" and those with less than four hours will be classified as "non-compliant". The null hypothesis will be rejected if the mean of the primary objective outcome for all participants in the BiPAP® Auto with Bi-Flex® therapy (auto Bilevel) arm is significantly greater than that for all participants in the CPAP therapy arm
Detailed description
Initial Screening
It is preferred that participant's are recruited the morning after their failed clinical CPAP titration in the lab. Participants are able to be enrolled within ninety days following this failure if circumstances preclude approach and consent the morning after titration failure. Participants will be asked to wear the Actiwatch for approximately seven days prior to the clinical titration polysomnogram (PSG; and again for seven days prior to their final visit .) Actiwatch is worn on the participant's wrist to assess sleep continuity. Participants will be asked to press the "Marker button" on the Actiwatch when they get in bed each night to have a documented time mark when the device is downloaded. Participants will also be asked to fill in the sleep diary (provided by sleep clinic) during the seven days (14 days total; 7 at the beginning of the study and 7 days prior to the 90 Day visit) they use the Actiwatch.
Randomization/Therapy Initiated (Visit #1)
Participants will be randomized and scheduled for a BiPAP® Auto with Bi-Flex® titration or CPAP titration night in the lab. General therapy titration guidelines are documented in Appendix I \& II (see Appendix I \& II at end of document). Heart Rate Variability (HRV) will be assessed at both the diagnostic portion and titration portion of the research PSG. During the diagnostic portion of the research PSG, HRV needs to be assessed for ten minutes while the participant is awake. At the end of the titration portion of the research PSG, the HRV needs to be assessed for ten consecutive minutes while the participant is awake.
Enrolled participants will then complete a questionnaire to assess functional outcomes of sleep quality (FOSQ), Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for mask comfort and satisfaction with therapy, Psychomotor Vigilance Task (PVT), attitudes toward use measurement, and Fatigue Severity Scale (FSS; see Appendix III for description of measurements).
Participants will be set up with their respective machines after titration or within ten days (10 +/- 2) days of titration and will take these devices home for the next three months. Thus, total participation in the trial will be on average 3-4 months. All positive airway pressure machines will include a programmed SmartCard to monitor objectively compliance. Participants randomized to standard CPAP therapy will receive a SmartCard programmed to provide CPAP at their prescribed pressure. Both the participant and the sleep health staff administering the questionnaires and psychomotor vigilance task, will be blinded to the therapy the SmartCard is programmed to provide. Participants randomized to novel therapy will receive a SmartCard programmed to provide BiPAP® Auto with Bi-Flex®. The SmartCard programming will be done by an unblinded study staff member. The settings for the novel therapy will be:
- Min Expiratory Positive Airway Pressure (EPAP) = 4 cmH2O for prescribed CPAP ≤ 10 cmH2O (use 6 cmH2O for prescribed CPAP > 10 cmH2O)
- Max Inspiratory Positive Airway Pressure (IPAP) = 25 cm H2O
- Min Pressure Support (PS) = 2 cm H2O (cannot be adjusted)
- MaxPS = 8 cm H2O
- Bi-Flex setting of 3
The SmartCard is inserted into the device to provide the programmed therapy. Both the participant and CPAP therapist will be blinded to the therapy the SmartCard is programmed to provide. The other supplies necessary to use the therapy at home will also be provided to the participant (i.e. mask, tubing, humidifier, etc.).
The CPAP therapist will also provide the training necessary to use the device at home and provide a number to call in case the participant encounters any difficulty using the device at home.
Standardized Counseling to Optimize Adherence to Therapy
Counseling to optimize adherence to CPAP therapy will consist of:
- The clinician will discuss complaints regarding CPAP therapy to identify potential contributors to poor adherence to therapy. The standardized counseling to optimize adherence includes the following measures to address patient complaints and concerns: Interface
- Assure current mask is properly applied and headgear is properly adjusted.
- Persistent mask leaks or mask discomfort, skin trauma, or skin irritation will be addressed first by verifying mask and headgear adjustment and mask sizing. An alternate mask can be used if the problems cannot be addressed by fit or adjustment interventions.
- If mouth leaks are the primary concern and a nasal mask is being used, then a nasal/oral mask will be considered or a chin strap will be offered in combination with nasal mask use. Therapy Side Effects
- All patients will have initially been placed on a CPAP device with heated humidification. For continued oro-pharyngeal dryness, nasal dryness, nasal congestion, or rhinitis, humidification will be increased. Saline nasal sprays, steroids, or decongestants can be prescribed, if needed.
- Dyspnea on CPAP or claustrophobia will be addressed with counseling as needed.
- Note: Reducing the prescribed pressure to improve adherence will not be considered at this time.
- A standardized description of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and its risks will be reviewed with the participant, as well as the American Academy of Sleep Medicine Fact Sheet Drowsy Driving (see Appendix III).
- A standardized description of the evidence regarding the benefits of positive pressure therapy to treat OSA will be reviewed with the participant.
Participants will be instructed to use the device as much as possible while they are sleeping and to also make sure they allow an adequate opportunity to sleep each night.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Diagnosis
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Auto BiLevel Group | Experimental | Device: Auto BiLevelAuto Bilevel; auto-titrating bilevel positive airway pressure device with pressure flexing used as experimental treatment for obstructive sleep apnea |
| CPAP Group | Active comparator | Device: CPAPCPAP; continuous positive airway pressure used as comparator treatment for obstructive sleep apnea |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 75 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (10 listed)
- Age 21-75
- New Diagnosis of OSA with a baseline respiratory disturbance index (RDI) ≥ 15 events/hr of sleep determined by either full night or split night PSG
- Able and willing to provide written informed consent
- Able to follow study procedures
- Sub-optimal PSG titration with at least 3 hours of attempted PAP titration (defined below): and deemed by their physician as a titration failure
Key exclusion criteria (14 listed)
- Participation in another interventional research study within the last 30 days
- Major uncontrolled medical or psychiatric condition such as congestive heart failure, neuromuscular disease, renal failure etc.
- Prior CPAP or Bi-Level PAP use (within last 2 years)
- Chronic respiratory failure or insufficiency, moderate Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) (FEV1 < 60%), or any known condition of an elevation of arterial carbon dioxide levels while awake
- Surgery of the upper airway, nose, sinus, or middle ear within the previous 90 days
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| CPAPContinuous positive airway pressure | Device | CPAP Group |
| Auto BiLevelAuto Bilevel positive airway pressure with Flex | Device | Auto BiLevel Group |
Primary outcome
Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group Measured by Average Nightly Use.
Time frame: 90 days
Compliance was compared between the AutoBiLevel Group and the CPAP group by measuring the average use per night over the study period.
Percentage of Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group
Time frame: 90 days
Percentage of Group Compliance was compared between AutoBiLevel Group and the CPAP group by measuring proportion of adherent users over the treatment period. Patients with compliance of at least four hours will be classified as "compliant" and those with less than four hours will be classified as "non-compliant". The % of compliant patients will be calculated using the cumulative number of hours on therapy divided by the total number of days of the investigation for each subject.
3 secondary outcomes
Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Fatigue Severity Scale
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Functional Outcomes of Sleep Quality
Time frame: Assessed at Baseline, Day 30 and Day 90
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 26 Apr 2019.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Results publication: PubMed 22334808Powell ED, Gay PC, Ojile JM, Litinski M, Malhotra A. A pilot study assessing adherence to auto-bilevel following a poor initial encounter with CPAP. J Clin Sleep Med. 2012 Feb 15;8(1):43-7. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.1658.
Related trials for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Not yet recruitingPhase 2
Oxytocin for Respiratory Compromise and Hypoventilation Induced by Drugs
Obesity & Overweight, Respiratory Depression
Not yet recruiting
Effect of High-flow Nasal Cannula Oxygenation on the Incidence of Hypoxemia During Painless Gastrointestinal Endoscopy in Patients at High Risk for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome in High-altitude Regions
Hypoxemia, Gastric Cancer (Diagnosis)
RecruitingObservational study
Development of a Wearable Point of Care Monitoring Device for Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Pediatric Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Enrolling by invitation
Myofunctional Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Recruiting
Physical Activity, Sleep Quality, and Respiratory Function in Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Obstructive Sleep Apnea, Sleep Quality
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Eric Powell, Ph.D. principal investigator
Philips Respironics
3 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing CPAP and Auto BiLevel in people with Obstructive Sleep Apnea, run by Philips Respironics at 3 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 10 inclusion and 14 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 26 Apr 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 3 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 26 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Group Compliance of the Auto Bilevel Group Compared to the CPAP Group Measured by Average Nightly Use. (time frame: 90 days). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02522442, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 26 Apr 2019.