Oral HealthPhase 2NCT02525458
Quaternary Ammonium Methacryloxy Silicate-containing Acrylic Resin
A Phase 2 study testing QAMS-containing PMMA and QAMS-free PMMA in people with Oral Health, run by Frank Tay, BDSc (Hons), PhD at 1 site in China.
Trial summary
One of the major challenges in orthodontic treatment is long-term stability. Because removable retainers are worn for at least one year, bacteria and fungi may accumulate on the retainers in the form of multi-species plaque biofilms. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 60 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Oral Health
- What is being tested?
- QAMS-containing PMMA and QAMS-free PMMA
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 32 participants
- Where
- 1 siteChina
- Study dates
- Jul 2015to Jan 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 60 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Healthy individual with no history or presence of a systemic disease
- Absence of active caries or periodontal disease with pocket depths deeper than 4 mm
Who cannot join
- Extensive gag reflex that precludes taking of an intraoral alginate impression
- Presence of cleft palate that precludes the wearing of a Hawley retainer
- Have been using an antimicrobial mouthwash prior to enrolment in the study
- Have been taking antibiotics against infectious diseases in the half year preceding the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
China1 site
School and Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University
Wuhan, Hubei, 430000
About this study
Official title: Antimicrobial Activity of a Quaternary Ammonium Methacryloxy Silicate-containing Acrylic Resin: A Randomized Clinical Trial
One of the major challenges in orthodontic treatment is long-term stability. Because removable retainers are worn for at least one year, bacteria and fungi may accumulate on the retainers in the form of multi-species plaque biofilms. This may result in increased incidence of proximal dental caries or oral candida infection. Thus, incorporation of antimicrobial activity in orthodontic acrylic resin to achieve plaque biofilm reduction is highly desirable. An antimicrobial and antifungal quaternary ammonium methacryloxy silicate molecule (QAMS) has been synthesized by sol-gel reaction and incorporated into orthodontic acrylic resin. The QAMS-copolymerized acrylic resin demonstrated contact-killing properties against single-species biofilms in previous in vitro studies and has received US FDA 510(K) clearance for marketing. The objective of the present randomized clinical trial is to determine the in vivo antimicrobial efficacy of the QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic by using removable retainers that are worn by recruited subjects to create 48-hour multi-species plaque biofilms. The null hypothesis tested is that there is no difference in the antimicrobial activities between QAMS-free and QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic resin on oral biofilms grown in vivo in human subjects.
Read the detailed description
There is increasing demand for orthodontic care worldwide. In the United States, approximately one-fifth of the adolescents and teenagers, and up to 1% of young adults are receiving some form of the orthodontic treatment. One of the major challenges in orthodontic treatment is long-term stability; removable and fixed retainers are required to stabilise the aligned dentition and prevent post-treatment relapse. Most removable retainers are constructed of polymethyl methacrylates (PMMA), which are held by metal clasps around the posterior teeth. Because removable retainers are worn in a moist intraoral environment with fluctuating pH for at least one year, bacteria and fungi may accumulate on or within the retainers in the form of multi-species plaque biofilms that act as reservoirs of these microorganisms. This may result in increased incidence of proximal dental caries or oral candidiasis. Moreover, other opportunistic pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus have been identified from orthodontic retainers, which may potentially lead to local or systemic infection, particularly in orthodontic patients with complicated medical disorders. For adult patients, oral microorganisms derived from removable acrylic appliances have been implicated in bacteria endocarditis, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and gastrointestinal infection. Production of volatile odoriferous compounds by colonized microorganisms also contributes to halitosis, which affects a person's communication and psychological well-being.
Microbial plaque biofilm accumulation on removable orthodontic appliances and retainers is usually controlled by mechanical and chemical means. Despite their effectiveness, these procedures demand stringent patient compliance, which may not be readily achievable in those with restricted dexterity. Hence, incorporation of antimicrobial activity in orthodontic acrylic resin to achieve plaque biofilm reduction is highly desirable. Conventional PMMA-based antimicrobial approaches are based on leaching of antimicrobial agents of small molecular mass (e.g. chlorhexidine) into the intraoral environment, application of an antimicrobial coating on the surface of the material or incorporation of antibacterial silver nanoparticles into the PMMA resin. Antimicrobial polymers are rapidly becoming a new class of biomaterials that can be functionalized and tethered to materials and kill microbes without releasing the biocides. For methacrylates, anionic and phosphated PMMA polymers have been created that can copolymerize with PMMA to create acrylic resins with permanent, non-leaching antimicrobial properties.
Cationic polymers containing quaternary ammonium and phosphonium groups possess contact-killing antimicrobial activities. An antimicrobial and antifungal cationic quaternary ammonium methacryloxy silicate molecule (QAMS) has been synthesized by sol-gel reaction between a tetraalkoxysilane and two trialkoxysilanes. Containing a methacryloxy functional group and a long C-18 carbon chain, the QAMS molecule is soluble in MMA monomer and has been incorporated into PMMA orthodontic acrylic resin. The QAMS-copolymerised acrylic resin demonstrated improved fracture toughness without adversely affecting flexural modulus and strength of the orthodontic acrylic. In previous in vitro studies, orthodontic acrylic resins containing 4-6% QAMS were found to possess in vitro immediate diffusional as well as contact-killing antimicrobial properties when tested with Streptococcus mutans, Actinomyces naeslundii and Candida albicans. To investigate the antimicrobial durability of the QAMS-containing acrylic resin, specimens were aged in water for 3 months prior to evaluation of their antimicrobial activities. Even after 3 months of water-ageing wherein any residual effects of diffusional kill would have been completely eliminated, the QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic resin still possessed antimicrobial activities against single-species biofilms generated from the three microbes. Antimicrobial polymers designed for biomedical applications should also be minimally cytotoxic to host tissues. In a previous study, the viability of an odontoblast-like cell line derived from mouse dental papilla was examined by exposing these cells to QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic resin. Results of the cell viability assays indicated that the QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic resin is relatively non-cytotoxic. The QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic has received 510(K) clearance for marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nevertheless, clinical trials are lacking that demonstrate the in vivo antimicrobial potential of QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic on multi-species biofilms.
Although various multi-species oral biofilm models have been developed and have contributed to the understanding of intraoral microbial adhesion and biofilm formation, these models have drawbacks in that they are unlikely to replicate the variability and in vivo dynamics of plaque biofilms. Apart from differences in structural characteristics between in vitro and in vivo biofilms, the presence of host defenses such as antimicrobial peptides derived from saliva, is seldom take into account in in vitro multi-species biofilm models. More than 600 microbial species have been identified in the human oral microflora, of which approximately 280 species have been isolated in culture. Thus, plaque biofilm profiles are unique among individuals, being modulated by different environmental factors as well as variable quorum sensing signals derived from adjacent microorganisms. These confounding factors may temper the efficacy of antimicrobial polymers in vivo. Accordingly, the objective of the present randomised clinical trial was to determine the in vivo antimicrobial efficacy of the FDA-approved QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic by using custom-made removable Hawley retainers that were worn intraorally by recruited subjects to create 48-hour multi-species plaque biofilms. Because of the anticipated high variability in the microbial composition of individual plaque biofilms, a split-mouth design was utilised to reduce inter-subject variability, with procedures taken to minimize unwanted carry-across effects. The null hypothesis tested was that there is no difference in the antimicrobial activities between QAMS-free and QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic resin on oral biofilms grown in vivo in human subjects.
- Conditions
- Oral Health
- Being tested
- QAMS-containing PMMA, QAMS-free PMMA
- Keywords
- antimicrobial, biofilms, acrylic resin, polymethyl methacrylate, confocal laser scanning microscopy, split-mouth design, quaternary ammonium methacryloxy silicate
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
QAMS-containing PMMADevice
Wear retainer with QMAS-containing PMMA on one side of retainer
QAMS-free PMMADevice
Wear retainer with QMAS-free PMMA on other side of retainer
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| QAMS-containing PMMA | Experimental | PMMA containing 5% QAMS Receives: Device: QAMS-containing PMMA |
| QAMS-free PMMA | Placebo comparator | PMMA containing 0% QAMS Receives: Device: QAMS-free PMMA |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Biofilm killing efficacy within the biovolume (3D) and biomass (2D) of multi-species biofilms measured by confocal laser scanning microscopy and image analysis
Percentage kill of microorganisms ranging from 0% (no kill) to 100% (complete eradication of microorganisms within biofilm)
Measured: 48 hours
Secondary outcomes (1)
Redness, inflammation, ulceration or swelling of oral mucosa
Adverse effects in the form of redness, inflammation, ulceration or swelling of oral mucosa
Measured: 48 hours
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted17 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJul 2015
- Primary completionOct 2015
- Study completionJan 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (32)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Oral HealthStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Frank Tay, BDSc (Hons), PhD
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wuhan University, Washington University School of Medicine, Air Force Military Medical University, China, Tongji Hospital, Augusta University
- Responsible party
- Sponsor-investigator, Frank Tay, BDSc (Hons), PhD, Kimmerling Holdings Group, LLC
- Investigators
- Siying Liu, PhD, Study director, School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02525458
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- QAMS-2015
- Status last verified
- Aug 2016
- First submitted
- 9 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 30 Aug 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Okunseri C, Pajewski NM, McGinley EL, Hoffmann RG. Racial/ethnic disparities in self-reported pediatric orthodontic visits in the United States. J Public Health Dent. 2007 Fall;67(4):217-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00032.x.
PubMed 18087992Whitesides J, Pajewski NM, Bradley TG, Iacopino AM, Okunseri C. Socio-demographics of adult orthodontic visits in the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):489.e9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.016.
PubMed 18405809Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Orthodontic retention: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2006 Sep;33(3):205-12. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021624.
PubMed 16926314Pathak AK, Sharma DS. Biofilm associated microorganisms on removable oral orthodontic appliances in children in the mixed dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):335-9. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.3.92230h6256v8697t.
PubMed 23855182Batoni G, Pardini M, Giannotti A, Ota F, Giuca MR, Gabriele M, Campa M, Senesi S. Effect of removable orthodontic appliances on oral colonisation by mutans streptococci in children. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001 Dec;109(6):388-92. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00089.x.
PubMed 11767275Addy M, Shaw WC, Hansford P, Hopkins M. The effect of orthodontic appliances on the distribution of Candida and plaque in adolescents. Br J Orthod. 1982 Jul;9(3):158-63. doi: 10.1179/bjo.9.3.158.
PubMed 6954991Bjerklin K, Garskog B, Ronnerman A. Proximal caries increment in connection with orthodontic treatment with removable appliances. Br J Orthod. 1983 Jan;10(1):21-4. doi: 10.1179/bjo.10.1.21.
PubMed 6573195Hibino K, Wong RW, Hagg U, Samaranayake LP. The effects of orthodontic appliances on Candida in the human mouth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Sep;19(5):301-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.00988.x. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
PubMed 19486368Chang CS, Al-Awadi S, Ready D, Noar J. An assessment of the effectiveness of mechanical and chemical cleaning of Essix orthodontic retainer. J Orthod. 2014 Jun;41(2):110-7. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000088. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
PubMed 24536071Patel A, Burden DJ, Sandler J. Medical disorders and orthodontics. J Orthod. 2009 Dec;36 Suppl:1-21. doi: 10.1179/14653120723346.
PubMed 19934236Coulthwaite L, Verran J. Potential pathogenic aspects of denture plaque. Br J Biomed Sci. 2007;64(4):180-9. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2007.11732784.
PubMed 18236742Verran J. Malodour in denture wearers: an ill-defined problem. Oral Dis. 2005;11 Suppl 1:24-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01083.x.
PubMed 15752093Vento-Zahra E, De Wever B, Decelis S, Mallia K, Camilleri S. Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to test the efficacy of nitradine tablets in maxillary removable orthodontic appliance patients. Quintessence Int. 2011 Jan;42(1):37-43.
PubMed 21206932Fathi H, Martiny H, Jost-Brinkmann PG. Efficacy of cleaning tablets for removable orthodontic appliances: an in vivo pilot study. J Orofac Orthop. 2015 Mar;76(2):143-51. doi: 10.1007/s00056-014-0277-x. English, German.
PubMed 25746845Kenawy el-R, Worley SD, Broughton R. The chemistry and applications of antimicrobial polymers: a state-of-the-art review. Biomacromolecules. 2007 May;8(5):1359-84. doi: 10.1021/bm061150q. Epub 2007 Apr 11.
PubMed 17425365
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 30 Aug 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Antimicrobial Activity of a Quaternary Ammonium Methacryloxy Silicate-containing Acrylic Resin: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02525458
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- QAMS-2015
- Conditions
- Oral Health
- Keywords
- antimicrobial, biofilms, acrylic resin, polymethyl methacrylate, confocal laser scanning microscopy, split-mouth design, quaternary ammonium methacryloxy silicate
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 32 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Frank Tay, BDSc (Hons), PhDUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- Wuhan University, Washington University School of Medicine, Air Force Military Medical University, China, Tongji Hospital, Augusta University
- Study start
- Jul 2015
- Primary completion
- Oct 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jan 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 17 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
One of the major challenges in orthodontic treatment is long-term stability. Because removable retainers are worn for at least one year, bacteria and fungi may accumulate on the retainers in the form of multi-species plaque biofilms. This may result in increased incidence of proximal dental caries or oral candida infection. Thus, incorporation of antimicrobial activity in orthodontic acrylic resin to achieve plaque biofilm reduction is highly desirable. An antimicrobial and antifungal quaternary ammonium methacryloxy silicate molecule (QAMS) has been synthesized by sol-gel reaction and incorporated into orthodontic acrylic resin. The QAMS-copolymerized acrylic resin demonstrated contact-killing properties against single-species biofilms in previous in vitro studies and has received US FDA 510(K) clearance for marketing. The objective of the present randomized clinical trial is to determine the in vivo antimicrobial efficacy of the QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic by using removable retainers that are worn by recruited subjects to create 48-hour multi-species plaque biofilms. The null hypothesis tested is that there is no difference in the antimicrobial activities between QAMS-free and QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic resin on oral biofilms grown in vivo in human subjects.
Detailed description
There is increasing demand for orthodontic care worldwide. In the United States, approximately one-fifth of the adolescents and teenagers, and up to 1% of young adults are receiving some form of the orthodontic treatment. One of the major challenges in orthodontic treatment is long-term stability; removable and fixed retainers are required to stabilise the aligned dentition and prevent post-treatment relapse. Most removable retainers are constructed of polymethyl methacrylates (PMMA), which are held by metal clasps around the posterior teeth. Because removable retainers are worn in a moist intraoral environment with fluctuating pH for at least one year, bacteria and fungi may accumulate on or within the retainers in the form of multi-species plaque biofilms that act as reservoirs of these microorganisms. This may result in increased incidence of proximal dental caries or oral candidiasis. Moreover, other opportunistic pathogens such as methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus have been identified from orthodontic retainers, which may potentially lead to local or systemic infection, particularly in orthodontic patients with complicated medical disorders. For adult patients, oral microorganisms derived from removable acrylic appliances have been implicated in bacteria endocarditis, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and gastrointestinal infection. Production of volatile odoriferous compounds by colonized microorganisms also contributes to halitosis, which affects a person's communication and psychological well-being.
Microbial plaque biofilm accumulation on removable orthodontic appliances and retainers is usually controlled by mechanical and chemical means. Despite their effectiveness, these procedures demand stringent patient compliance, which may not be readily achievable in those with restricted dexterity. Hence, incorporation of antimicrobial activity in orthodontic acrylic resin to achieve plaque biofilm reduction is highly desirable. Conventional PMMA-based antimicrobial approaches are based on leaching of antimicrobial agents of small molecular mass (e.g. chlorhexidine) into the intraoral environment, application of an antimicrobial coating on the surface of the material or incorporation of antibacterial silver nanoparticles into the PMMA resin. Antimicrobial polymers are rapidly becoming a new class of biomaterials that can be functionalized and tethered to materials and kill microbes without releasing the biocides. For methacrylates, anionic and phosphated PMMA polymers have been created that can copolymerize with PMMA to create acrylic resins with permanent, non-leaching antimicrobial properties.
Cationic polymers containing quaternary ammonium and phosphonium groups possess contact-killing antimicrobial activities. An antimicrobial and antifungal cationic quaternary ammonium methacryloxy silicate molecule (QAMS) has been synthesized by sol-gel reaction between a tetraalkoxysilane and two trialkoxysilanes. Containing a methacryloxy functional group and a long C-18 carbon chain, the QAMS molecule is soluble in MMA monomer and has been incorporated into PMMA orthodontic acrylic resin. The QAMS-copolymerised acrylic resin demonstrated improved fracture toughness without adversely affecting flexural modulus and strength of the orthodontic acrylic. In previous in vitro studies, orthodontic acrylic resins containing 4-6% QAMS were found to possess in vitro immediate diffusional as well as contact-killing antimicrobial properties when tested with Streptococcus mutans, Actinomyces naeslundii and Candida albicans. To investigate the antimicrobial durability of the QAMS-containing acrylic resin, specimens were aged in water for 3 months prior to evaluation of their antimicrobial activities. Even after 3 months of water-ageing wherein any residual effects of diffusional kill would have been completely eliminated, the QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic resin still possessed antimicrobial activities against single-species biofilms generated from the three microbes. Antimicrobial polymers designed for biomedical applications should also be minimally cytotoxic to host tissues. In a previous study, the viability of an odontoblast-like cell line derived from mouse dental papilla was examined by exposing these cells to QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic resin. Results of the cell viability assays indicated that the QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic resin is relatively non-cytotoxic. The QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic has received 510(K) clearance for marketing by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Nevertheless, clinical trials are lacking that demonstrate the in vivo antimicrobial potential of QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic on multi-species biofilms.
Although various multi-species oral biofilm models have been developed and have contributed to the understanding of intraoral microbial adhesion and biofilm formation, these models have drawbacks in that they are unlikely to replicate the variability and in vivo dynamics of plaque biofilms. Apart from differences in structural characteristics between in vitro and in vivo biofilms, the presence of host defenses such as antimicrobial peptides derived from saliva, is seldom take into account in in vitro multi-species biofilm models. More than 600 microbial species have been identified in the human oral microflora, of which approximately 280 species have been isolated in culture. Thus, plaque biofilm profiles are unique among individuals, being modulated by different environmental factors as well as variable quorum sensing signals derived from adjacent microorganisms. These confounding factors may temper the efficacy of antimicrobial polymers in vivo. Accordingly, the objective of the present randomised clinical trial was to determine the in vivo antimicrobial efficacy of the FDA-approved QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic by using custom-made removable Hawley retainers that were worn intraorally by recruited subjects to create 48-hour multi-species plaque biofilms. Because of the anticipated high variability in the microbial composition of individual plaque biofilms, a split-mouth design was utilised to reduce inter-subject variability, with procedures taken to minimize unwanted carry-across effects. The null hypothesis tested was that there is no difference in the antimicrobial activities between QAMS-free and QAMS-containing orthodontic acrylic resin on oral biofilms grown in vivo in human subjects.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Crossover
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, care provider, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| QAMS-containing PMMA | Experimental | Device: QAMS-containing PMMAPMMA containing 5% QAMS |
| QAMS-free PMMA | Placebo comparator | Device: QAMS-free PMMAPMMA containing 0% QAMS |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 60 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Healthy individual with no history or presence of a systemic disease
- Absence of active caries or periodontal disease with pocket depths deeper than 4 mm
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Extensive gag reflex that precludes taking of an intraoral alginate impression
- Presence of cleft palate that precludes the wearing of a Hawley retainer
- Have been using an antimicrobial mouthwash prior to enrolment in the study
- Have been taking antibiotics against infectious diseases in the half year preceding the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| QAMS-containing PMMAWear retainer with QMAS-containing PMMA on one side of retainer | Device | QAMS-containing PMMA |
| QAMS-free PMMAWear retainer with QMAS-free PMMA on other side of retainer | Device | QAMS-free PMMA |
Primary outcome
Biofilm killing efficacy within the biovolume (3D) and biomass (2D) of multi-species biofilms measured by confocal laser scanning microscopy and image analysis
Time frame: 48 hours
Percentage kill of microorganisms ranging from 0% (no kill) to 100% (complete eradication of microorganisms within biofilm)
1 secondary outcome
Redness, inflammation, ulceration or swelling of oral mucosa
Time frame: 48 hours
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 30 Aug 2016.
- Background: PubMed 18087992Okunseri C, Pajewski NM, McGinley EL, Hoffmann RG. Racial/ethnic disparities in self-reported pediatric orthodontic visits in the United States. J Public Health Dent. 2007 Fall;67(4):217-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-7325.2007.00032.x.
- Background: PubMed 18405809Whitesides J, Pajewski NM, Bradley TG, Iacopino AM, Okunseri C. Socio-demographics of adult orthodontic visits in the United States. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008 Apr;133(4):489.e9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.08.016.
- Background: PubMed 16926314Littlewood SJ, Millett DT, Doubleday B, Bearn DR, Worthington HV. Orthodontic retention: a systematic review. J Orthod. 2006 Sep;33(3):205-12. doi: 10.1179/146531205225021624.
- Background: PubMed 23855182Pathak AK, Sharma DS. Biofilm associated microorganisms on removable oral orthodontic appliances in children in the mixed dentition. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2013 Spring;37(3):335-9. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.37.3.92230h6256v8697t.
- Background: PubMed 11767275Batoni G, Pardini M, Giannotti A, Ota F, Giuca MR, Gabriele M, Campa M, Senesi S. Effect of removable orthodontic appliances on oral colonisation by mutans streptococci in children. Eur J Oral Sci. 2001 Dec;109(6):388-92. doi: 10.1034/j.1600-0722.2001.00089.x.
- Background: PubMed 6954991Addy M, Shaw WC, Hansford P, Hopkins M. The effect of orthodontic appliances on the distribution of Candida and plaque in adolescents. Br J Orthod. 1982 Jul;9(3):158-63. doi: 10.1179/bjo.9.3.158.
- Background: PubMed 6573195Bjerklin K, Garskog B, Ronnerman A. Proximal caries increment in connection with orthodontic treatment with removable appliances. Br J Orthod. 1983 Jan;10(1):21-4. doi: 10.1179/bjo.10.1.21.
- Background: PubMed 19486368Hibino K, Wong RW, Hagg U, Samaranayake LP. The effects of orthodontic appliances on Candida in the human mouth. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2009 Sep;19(5):301-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2009.00988.x. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
- Background: PubMed 24536071Chang CS, Al-Awadi S, Ready D, Noar J. An assessment of the effectiveness of mechanical and chemical cleaning of Essix orthodontic retainer. J Orthod. 2014 Jun;41(2):110-7. doi: 10.1179/1465313313Y.0000000088. Epub 2014 Feb 17.
- Background: PubMed 19934236Patel A, Burden DJ, Sandler J. Medical disorders and orthodontics. J Orthod. 2009 Dec;36 Suppl:1-21. doi: 10.1179/14653120723346.
- Background: PubMed 18236742Coulthwaite L, Verran J. Potential pathogenic aspects of denture plaque. Br J Biomed Sci. 2007;64(4):180-9. doi: 10.1080/09674845.2007.11732784.
- Background: PubMed 15752093Verran J. Malodour in denture wearers: an ill-defined problem. Oral Dis. 2005;11 Suppl 1:24-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1601-0825.2005.01083.x.
- Statistical Brief #368. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.Link provided by the sponsor.
- 25\. U. S. Food and Drug Administration. 510(k) premarket notificationLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Oral Health
Not yet recruiting
Effectiveness of Personalized Digital Oral Health Intervention in Patients With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Oral Hygiene in Patients With Fixed Orthodontic Appliances
Not yet recruitingPhase 3
Periodontal Disease and Small Vulnerable Newborns in Rural Nepal: A Community-based Trial
Preterm Birth, Low Birth Weight
Not yet recruiting
The AYA Oncology Self-care Movement
Acute Lymphobkastic Leukemia, Medication Adherence
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Russian Version of OHIP-EDENT-19 for Adults With Complete Tooth Loss
Edentulism
Not yet recruiting
Manus AI-Assisted Orthodontic Education and Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Oral Health-Related Quality of Life
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Siying Liu, PhD study director
School & Hospital of Stomatology, Wuhan University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2 study testing QAMS-containing PMMA and QAMS-free PMMA in people with Oral Health, run by Frank Tay, BDSc (Hons), PhD at 1 site in China.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 30 Aug 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in China. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Biofilm killing efficacy within the biovolume (3D) and biomass (2D) of multi-species biofilms measured by confocal laser scanning microscopy and image analysis (time frame: 48 hours). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02525458, which also lists 32 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 30 Aug 2016.