AzTrials
AzTrials

Blood PressureVALPARAISONCT02529735

Study on Pressure Values Measured on Three Alternative Sites of the Lower Limbs Compared to the Arm

A study testing efficiency study in people with Blood Pressure, run by Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien at 8 sites in France.

Available

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Non-invasive measurement of blood pressure is an instrument governed nursing routine care. The use of an automated oscillometric cuff is a common technique and validated if this is done on the arm with a suitable cuff, positioned opposite the brachial artery and up to the right atrium (the brachial site) . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Blood Pressure
What is being tested?
efficiency study
How many people
Not given
Where
8 sitesFrance
Study dates
Start not givento not given
Phase
Expanded access
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Adults aged 18 and over, without upper age limit
  • Recipient of a social protection scheme or entitled
  • Signature of informed consent

Who cannot join

  • During Pregnancy
  • known disease
  • current treatment
  • cardiovascular history
  • Skin lesions in relation to the measurement sites
  • Special anatomically incompatible with blood pressure measurements
Show all 9Show fewer
  • No one opposing the use of their data
  • Participation in a trial Ongoing clinical
  • Person who participated in the study

Trial locations and contacts

8 sites in 1 country.

Elodie Henry, CRU manager contact

+33161693730

elodie.henry@chsf.fr

8 sites in 1 country

France8 sites
  • Sud Francilien Nursing School

    Corbeil-Essonnes, 91100

    Elisabeth Hermes, RN, +33161696615, elisabeth.hermes@chsf.fr

    Available
  • Perray-Vaucluse Nursing School

    Épinay-sur-Orge, 91360

    Christine Kaci, RN, +33169254446, c.kaci@gpspv.fr

    Available
  • Nursing Scool Barthelemy Durand

    Étampes, 91150

    Nathalie Lecoq, RN, +33169925148, nathalie.lecoq@eps-etampes.fr

    Available
  • SSSM of Essonne SDIS91

    Évry, 91000

    Frédéric Bonnet, RN, +33178054600, fbonnet@sdis91.fr

    Available
  • Nursing School of Longjumeau

    Longjumeau, 91160

    Nadine Ankri, RN, +33164543281, n.ankri@gh-nord-essonne.fr

    Available
  • Nursing School Tenon

    Paris, 75020

    Nathalie Thevenot, RN, +33143799200, nathalie.thevenot@aphp.fr

    Available
  • Nursing School Rambouillet

    Rambouillet, 78120

    Evelyne Berdagué, RN, +33134837759, e.berdague@chrambouillet.fr

    Available
  • Nursing School Foch

    Suresnes, 92151

    Marie-Ange Saget, RN, +33146252185, ma.saget@hopital-foch.com

    Available

Other trials in France

About this study

Official title: Etude Prospective Observationnelle Multicentrique Sur Volontaires Sains Des VALeurs de Pression Artérielle mesurées Sur Trois Sites alteRnAtIfS Des Membres inférieurs cOmparées au Site de référence

Non-invasive measurement of blood pressure is an instrument governed nursing routine care. The use of an automated oscillometric cuff is a common technique and validated if this is done on the arm with a suitable cuff, positioned opposite the brachial artery and up to the right atrium (the brachial site) . If cons-indication to use the brachial site, measurements are frequently performed at the ankle, calf or thigh. Among the blood pressure values measured on the 3 sites of the lower limb (thigh, calf or ankle), it may be a specific property of which the observed values are closest to the reference values (brachial).

The objective of this study is to measure the non-invasive blood pressure values at three sites of the lower limb, to compare the reference value to determine which alternative site should be preferred when the reference measurement is not feasible .

Read more

We want to determine the alternative site to obtain values as close as the measured values of the reference site. The three study sites are the thigh, calf and ankle. The reference site recommended for monitoring non-invasive blood pressureis the arm.

It is also assessing the impact of certain parameters on the primary endpoint:

  • Physiological parameters: gender, weight, height, age, systolic blood pressure reference, listed measures.
  • A parameter related to measurement: discomfort felt when the blood pressure outlet.
  • Exposure setting: smoking.
Read the detailed description

Primary Outcome: The difference in systolic blood pressure, diastolic and mean simultaneously measured in the arm and each of the three sites in the lower limb.

Secondary endpoints: The difference in systolic blood pressure, diastolic and mean simultaneously measured in the arm and each of the three sites in the lower limb in the following subgroups:

  • Male / Female
  • BMI <25 / BMI> 25
  • Size < 160 cm / size [160-169] cm / size [170-180] cm / size [181-190] cm / size ≥ 191 cm
  • Age <25 years / age ≥ 25 years
  • Systolic Blood Pressure value (SAP) the reference site <100 mmHg / 100 mmHg and ≥ NOT value of the reference site <140 mmHg / ≥ 140 mmHg
  • Visual Analog Scale of discomfort ≤ 4/10 /> 4/10
  • Hemibody studied Right / Left
  • Smoking / No Smoking

Discomfort level depending on the measurement site of blood pressure in the general population.

  • Discomfort level for each measurement of blood pressure site in each of the following subgroups:
  • Male / Female - BMI <25 / BMI> 25
  • size <160 cm / size [160-169] cm / size [170 -180] cm / size [181-190] cm / size ≥ 191 cm - Age <25 / age ≥ 25 years
  • blood pressure value (SAP) reference site <100 mmHg / 100 mmHg and ≥ NOT Value reference site <140 mmHg / ≥ 140 mmHg
  • hemibody studied Right / Left
  • Smoking / No Smoking

Methodology:

Experimental design:

This is an observational study, prospective, multicenter, comparative on healthy volunteers, each individual is his own witness. Reports of non-invasive blood pressure values of 3 different sites of the lower limbs, compared to a reference value. For each individual, the side which will be carried out blood pressure measurements will be drawn. After 5 minutes rest in the supine position, it will be realized the measurement of blood pressure non-invasively systolic, mean and diastolic 2 automated oscillometric measuring devices identical and calibrated simultaneously the arm and thigh ipsilateral / arm and calf ipsilateral / arm and the ipsilateral ankle.

Each measurement is repeated once after 1 minute.

Statistical analysis:

Systolic, mean and diastolic pressures are analyzed separately, and expressed by their average with standard deviation and 95% confidence intervals. The concordance of BP measurements between the arm and each of three sites in the lower limb was analyzed by the method Bland and Altman, calculating the average difference, its approval limits, as well as the confidence interval 95 % upper and lower limits of approval subject to a Gaussian distribution of the difference between the measurements.

The search for the best AP measurement site to the lower member is made by comparing the differences between each of the three sites and the reference site, for a global test (variance analysis or test Friedmann according to the distribution of differences), then by comparisons with 2-2 adjusting the p-value.

The chosen site is one for which this difference is significantly weaker. All tests are conducted bilaterally with a risk of first species set at 5%. In an earlier study, the largest variance found regarding the difference in systolic BP between calf and arm.

Based on the most pessimistic scenario (s = 12.76) to highlight a difference of 5 mm Hg with an alpha risk of 5% and a power of 90% and taking into account the multiple comparisons considered, 176 patients necessary.

Total duration of study: 27 months Period of inclusion: 24 months Duration of participation for voluntary: 30 minutes Number of participating centers: 8 centers

Conditions
Blood Pressure
Being tested
efficiency study
Keywords
blood pressure, alternative measure

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • efficiency studyOther

    Blood pressure values measured for comparative lower limb and arm

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Aug 2015 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Expanded access
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02529735
Sponsor's protocol ID
CHSFrancilien
Acronym
VALPARAISO
Status last verified
Oct 2019
First submitted
19 Aug 2015
Last updated
21 Oct 2019
Results posted
No

Publications

  • Chatterjee A, DePriest K, Blair R, Bowton D, Chin R. Results of a survey of blood pressure monitoring by intensivists in critically ill patients: a preliminary study. Crit Care Med. 2010 Dec;38(12):2335-8. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181fa057f.

    PubMed 20890190
  • Block FE, Schulte GT. Ankle blood pressure measurement, an acceptable alternative to arm measurements. Int J Clin Monit Comput. 1996 Aug;13(3):167-71. doi: 10.1023/a:1016997232542.

    PubMed 8912031
  • Sanghera S, North A, Abernethy S, Wrench I. Arm and ankle blood pressure during caesarean section. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2006 Jan;15(1):24-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijoa.2005.04.016. Epub 2005 Oct 26.

    PubMed 16256340
  • Moore C, Dobson A, Kinagi M, Dillon B. Comparison of blood pressure measured at the arm, ankle and calf. Anaesthesia. 2008 Dec;63(12):1327-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2008.05633.x.

    PubMed 19032301
  • Lakhal K, Macq C, Ehrmann S, Boulain T, Capdevila X. Noninvasive monitoring of blood pressure in the critically ill: reliability according to the cuff site (arm, thigh, or ankle). Crit Care Med. 2012 Apr;40(4):1207-13. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31823dae42.

    PubMed 22425818

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing efficiency study in people with Blood Pressure, run by Centre Hospitalier Sud Francilien at 8 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 9 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Oct 2019. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 8 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Elodie Henry, CRU manager (+33161693730, elodie.henry@chsf.fr), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02529735, which also lists 5 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Oct 2019.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in