Small Bowel ObstructionNoNGTNCT02530086
Prospective Study of Non-operative Management of SBO Without Nasogastric Tube Placement
A study testing Nasogastric tube placement and No Nasogastric tube use in people with Small Bowel Obstruction, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
A prospective randomized trial comparing non-operative management of small bowel obstruction due to adhesions with or without a naso-gastric tube (NGT). Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Small Bowel Obstruction
- What is being tested?
- Nasogastric tube placement and No Nasogastric tube use
- Type of treatment
- Surgery or procedure
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 0 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Aug 2015to 5 Apr 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- All adult patients over 18 years of age who meet the following criteria will be recruited if identified:
- Admitted to a general surgery service with a presumptive diagnosis of adhesive SBO with or without a history of abdominal surgery. Have had no abdominal surgery in the 30 days prior to enrollment.
- Present from home or a long term care facility.
- CT scan of the abdomen performed within 36 hours of admission consistent with small bowel obstruction and without evidence the obstruction is due to an incarcerated hernia, malignancy or volvulus.
- Planned attempt at non-operative management by the attending surgeon.
- Have the capacity to provide informed consent for themselves.
Who cannot join
- Patient is deemed to need operative intervention at the time of presentation
- Pregnancy
- Contra-indication to NGT insertion
- Presence of a gastric feeding tube or dependent on tube feeding or parenteral nutrition on admission.
- Inability of the patient to protect their airway should emesis occur (as judged by the attending surgeon).
- Intractable emesis on admission.
- Abdominal surgery within 30 days prior to admission.
- Patients transferred from an inpatient status at another acute care hospital will be excluded.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Yale New Haven Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510
About this study
A prospective randomized trial comparing non-operative management of small bowel obstruction due to adhesions with or without a naso-gastric tube (NGT).
Read the detailed description
The study will be conducted in a prospective randomized design using the patient population admitted to any of the general surgery services at Yale New Haven Hospital and presenting with the presumed diagnosis of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) to Yale New Haven Hospital. All patients will be at least 30 days from any prior abdominal operative procedure. Diagnosis of SBO will be by CT scan of the abdomen thereby excluding patients with obstruction due to incarcerated hernias and minimizing the possibility the obstruction is due to malignancy, volvulus or other cause. All patients selected for non-operative management by the attending physician will be eligible for randomization to either the "Nasogastric Tube Decompression" or "No Decompression" groups. Eligible patients will be within 6 hours of hospital admission and not have had a naso-gastric tube (NGT) placed. Patients who have a NGT placed by emergency physicians prior to consultation to the emergency general surgery will be excluded. Patients who require NGT placement prior to being approached for enrollment or prior to randomization will, if agreeable, be enrolled in a prospective observational group of patients that will have the same data elements collected.
Study Procedures:
Randomization:
Once consent from the patient or his/her surrogate has been obtained, eligible patients will be randomized to either the "Nasogastric Tube Decompression" or the "No Decompression" group. Sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes will be maintained in the locked office of the surgical critical care fellow in the surgical intensive care unit. The grouping assignment within these envelopes will be generated from computerized random number tables. Patients randomized to nasogastric decompression will have a NGT placed within one hour of randomization.
Patient Management:
If patients in the "No Decompression" group develop recurrent or intractable emesis unresponsive to anti-emetic medication or are deemed unsafe to be trialed with anti-emetic medication due to a change in mental status by the attending physician they will have an NGT placed and they will be followed as a third group of patients that failed management without NGT decompression. Recurrent and/or intractable emesis will be defined as two or more episodes of emesis of at least 50cc within a twelve hour period or a single large volume emesis of 300cc or more.
For these patients NGT placement will not be mandatory however if patients do develop this volume of emesis NGT placement will be considered consistent with the protocol. Change in mental status will be loosely defined as the deterioration of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to less than 14, however this will remain at the discretion of the attending physician. For patients that have failure of NGT placement they will be managed at the discretion of the attending surgeon but analyzed using an intention to treat methodology.
All other standard care for patients with SBO including intravenous fluids, correction of electrolytes and management of chronic medical problems will be at the discretion of the attending surgeon. All patients will be monitored daily with clinical examination for the development of complications (vomiting, worsening abdominal pain, abnormal vital signs, leukocytosis, fevers). Patients' subjective comfort levels will also be assessed daily in each group using a visual analog scale. Pain will be managed will be with IV morphine unless an allergy is present or develops in which case an alternative narcotic will be used based on the decision of the treating physician. Improvement will be followed by return of bowel function, improving abdominal pain and resolution of symptoms. The time taken to resolution of symptoms in each group will be followed, as well as the relative number of patients improving and deteriorating. All care decisions beyond the initial NGT placement, choice of anti-emetic and choice of analgesic will be at the discretion of the attending surgeon. These decisions may include but are not limited to NGT placement and removal, laboratory testing, imaging (Abdominal X-rays and/or CT scan), diet advancement, and need for operative intervention.
Should a patient chose to withdraw from the study at any point after randomization management of the NGT will then also come within the purview of the attending physician. This may include placement of a NGT if the patient had been randomized to the no NGT arm or removal even if in the NGT was placed as part of the protocol.
Primary Outcomes:
- Hospital length of stay
Secondary Outcomes
- Pain level, as measured by the visual analog scale and documented by the treating nurse. The maximum and mean score for each day will be recorded. Pain will also be assessed by the amount of used.
- Duration of NGT use in hours.
- The number of abdominal and chest imaging tests prior to discharge or operation whichever comes first.
- Conditions
- Small Bowel Obstruction
- Being tested
- Nasogastric tube placement, No Nasogastric tube use
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Nasogastric tube placementProcedure or surgery
Placement of a Nasogastric tube
No Nasogastric tube useProcedure or surgery
No placement of a Nasogastric tube
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placement of a Nasogastric tube | Active comparator | Placement of a Nasogastric tube Receives: Procedure: Nasogastric tube placement |
| No placement of a Nasogastric tube | Experimental | No placement of a Nasogastric tube Receives: Procedure: No Nasogastric tube use |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Hospital length of stay
Total hospital length of stay.
Measured: 30 days
Secondary outcomes (3)
Pain measured on a visual analogue scale
Pain will be measured daily using a visual analog scale and milligrams of morphine used.
Measured: 30 days
Duration of nasogastric decompression
Measured: 30 days
Number of radiographic studies ordered
Measured: 30 days
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted20 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Study startAug 2015
- Primary completion5 Apr 2017
- Study completion5 Apr 2017
Why it stopped: Study was closed due to lack of personnel for recruitment/enrollment purposes.
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Other trials for Small Bowel ObstructionStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Yale UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Yale University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Kevin M Schuster, MD, MPH, Principal investigator, Yale University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02530086
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 1504015652
- Acronym
- NoNGT
- Status last verified
- Apr 2017
- First submitted
- 17 Aug 2015
- Last updated
- 7 Apr 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 7 Apr 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Prospective Study of Non-operative Management of SBO Without Nasogastric Tube Placement
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02530086
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- NoNGT / 1504015652
- Conditions
- Small Bowel Obstruction
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- WithdrawnReason stopped: Study was closed due to lack of personnel for recruitment/enrollment purposes.
- Enrolment
- 0 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Yale UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Aug 2015
- Primary completion
- 5 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 5 Apr 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 20 Aug 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
A prospective randomized trial comparing non-operative management of small bowel obstruction due to adhesions with or without a naso-gastric tube (NGT).
Detailed description
The study will be conducted in a prospective randomized design using the patient population admitted to any of the general surgery services at Yale New Haven Hospital and presenting with the presumed diagnosis of adhesive small bowel obstruction (SBO) to Yale New Haven Hospital. All patients will be at least 30 days from any prior abdominal operative procedure. Diagnosis of SBO will be by CT scan of the abdomen thereby excluding patients with obstruction due to incarcerated hernias and minimizing the possibility the obstruction is due to malignancy, volvulus or other cause. All patients selected for non-operative management by the attending physician will be eligible for randomization to either the "Nasogastric Tube Decompression" or "No Decompression" groups. Eligible patients will be within 6 hours of hospital admission and not have had a naso-gastric tube (NGT) placed. Patients who have a NGT placed by emergency physicians prior to consultation to the emergency general surgery will be excluded. Patients who require NGT placement prior to being approached for enrollment or prior to randomization will, if agreeable, be enrolled in a prospective observational group of patients that will have the same data elements collected.
Study Procedures:
Randomization:
Once consent from the patient or his/her surrogate has been obtained, eligible patients will be randomized to either the "Nasogastric Tube Decompression" or the "No Decompression" group. Sequentially numbered opaque sealed envelopes will be maintained in the locked office of the surgical critical care fellow in the surgical intensive care unit. The grouping assignment within these envelopes will be generated from computerized random number tables. Patients randomized to nasogastric decompression will have a NGT placed within one hour of randomization.
Patient Management:
If patients in the "No Decompression" group develop recurrent or intractable emesis unresponsive to anti-emetic medication or are deemed unsafe to be trialed with anti-emetic medication due to a change in mental status by the attending physician they will have an NGT placed and they will be followed as a third group of patients that failed management without NGT decompression. Recurrent and/or intractable emesis will be defined as two or more episodes of emesis of at least 50cc within a twelve hour period or a single large volume emesis of 300cc or more.
For these patients NGT placement will not be mandatory however if patients do develop this volume of emesis NGT placement will be considered consistent with the protocol. Change in mental status will be loosely defined as the deterioration of the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) to less than 14, however this will remain at the discretion of the attending physician. For patients that have failure of NGT placement they will be managed at the discretion of the attending surgeon but analyzed using an intention to treat methodology.
All other standard care for patients with SBO including intravenous fluids, correction of electrolytes and management of chronic medical problems will be at the discretion of the attending surgeon. All patients will be monitored daily with clinical examination for the development of complications (vomiting, worsening abdominal pain, abnormal vital signs, leukocytosis, fevers). Patients' subjective comfort levels will also be assessed daily in each group using a visual analog scale. Pain will be managed will be with IV morphine unless an allergy is present or develops in which case an alternative narcotic will be used based on the decision of the treating physician. Improvement will be followed by return of bowel function, improving abdominal pain and resolution of symptoms. The time taken to resolution of symptoms in each group will be followed, as well as the relative number of patients improving and deteriorating. All care decisions beyond the initial NGT placement, choice of anti-emetic and choice of analgesic will be at the discretion of the attending surgeon. These decisions may include but are not limited to NGT placement and removal, laboratory testing, imaging (Abdominal X-rays and/or CT scan), diet advancement, and need for operative intervention.
Should a patient chose to withdraw from the study at any point after randomization management of the NGT will then also come within the purview of the attending physician. This may include placement of a NGT if the patient had been randomized to the no NGT arm or removal even if in the NGT was placed as part of the protocol.
Primary Outcomes:
- Hospital length of stay
Secondary Outcomes
- Pain level, as measured by the visual analog scale and documented by the treating nurse. The maximum and mean score for each day will be recorded. Pain will also be assessed by the amount of used.
- Duration of NGT use in hours.
- The number of abdominal and chest imaging tests prior to discharge or operation whichever comes first.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placement of a Nasogastric tube | Active comparator | Procedure: Nasogastric tube placementPlacement of a Nasogastric tube |
| No placement of a Nasogastric tube | Experimental | Procedure: No Nasogastric tube useNo placement of a Nasogastric tube |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (6 listed)
- All adult patients over 18 years of age who meet the following criteria will be recruited if identified:
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- Patient is deemed to need operative intervention at the time of presentation
- Pregnancy
- Contra-indication to NGT insertion
- Presence of a gastric feeding tube or dependent on tube feeding or parenteral nutrition on admission.
- Inability of the patient to protect their airway should emesis occur (as judged by the attending surgeon).
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Nasogastric tube placementPlacement of a Nasogastric tube | Procedure or surgery | Placement of a Nasogastric tube |
| No Nasogastric tube useNo placement of a Nasogastric tube | Procedure or surgery | No placement of a Nasogastric tube |
Primary outcome
Hospital length of stay
Time frame: 30 days
Total hospital length of stay.
3 secondary outcomes
Pain measured on a visual analogue scale
Time frame: 30 days
Duration of nasogastric decompression
Time frame: 30 days
Number of radiographic studies ordered
Time frame: 30 days
Results and safety
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 7 Apr 2017.
Related trials for Small Bowel Obstruction
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intestinal Obstruction Surgery. Acute Abdominal Pathology. №9:05/05/2026
Small Bowel Adhesion, Obstruction Bowel
RecruitingObservational study
Rare Disease Patient Registry & Natural History Study - Coordination of Rare Diseases at Sanford
Rare Disorders, Undiagnosed Disorders
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Management of Non Emergency Adhesive Small Bowel Obstruction:
SBO - Small Bowel Obstruction
RecruitingObservational study
Indiana University Gastrointestinal Motility Diagnosis Registry
Eosinophilic Esophagitis, Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Recruiting
The Effect of Nasogastric Tube Placement on Complications in Patients With Small Bowel Obstruction - the SBO-TUBE Trial
Small Bowel Obstruction, Intestinal Obstruction and Ileus
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Kevin M Schuster, MD, MPH principal investigator
Yale University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Nasogastric tube placement and No Nasogastric tube use in people with Small Bowel Obstruction, run by Yale University at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 6 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: withdrawn, as of the sponsor's last update on 7 Apr 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study was withdrawn before enrolling participants, so there are no results.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Hospital length of stay (time frame: 30 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 7 Apr 2017.