AzTrials
AzTrials

PainLRPDNCT02531711

Chronic Lumbosacral Radiculopathy: Impact of an Analgesic Dietary Intervention on Pain & Function

A study testing Diet A and Diet B in people with Pain, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this proposed research is to assess the preliminary efficacy of dietary interventions that change dietary fats in improving clinical outcomes related to lumbar radicular pain. After a two-week baseline, consented participants are randomized to one of two diets. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Pain
What is being tested?
Diet A and Diet B
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
44 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Sep 2015to 30 Dec 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • MRI-verified lumbosacral radiculopathy associated with herniated disc, spinal stenosis, or post-surgical fibrosis
  • Pain reaching to the knee for at least 12 weeks
  • Willing to complete daily diary for 20 weeks, as evidenced by completion of ≥12 of the first 14 days
  • Possessing a mobile device (smart phone, tablet, laptop) capable of accessing the application and website
  • Able to attend dietitian counseling sessions in Chapel Hill, NC
  • Under care of a physician for LR
  • Able to read and communicate in English

Who cannot join

  • Psychosis or severe depression, anxiety, substance abuse disorder
  • History of specific food allergies that would prevent adherence to study diet
  • Aversion to eating fish
  • Currently taking fish oil or other supplements that contain fatty acids under investigation
  • Pregnancy or anticipated pregnancy
  • Active treatment for a major medical illness, such as malignancy, autoimmune, immune deficiency disorder
Show all 10Show fewer
  • History of vasculitis, intracranial mass, clotting disorder (including medication-induced, e.g., warfarin)
  • Cognitive dysfunction preventing informed consent
  • Pending personal injury litigation, including worker's compensation
  • Chronic long-term disability related to lumbosacral injury/symptoms

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

    Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27599-7200

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this proposed research is to assess the preliminary efficacy of dietary interventions that change dietary fats in improving clinical outcomes related to lumbar radicular pain. After a two-week baseline, consented participants are randomized to one of two diets. Key foods consistent with the diet are provided for 12 weeks along with extensive dietary counseling and support from the study-provided materials. Participants are encouraged to follow the assigned diet for another 6 weeks without provision of food.

Participants complete questionnaires at baseline, randomization, and after 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 18 weeks on the diet. They provide blood samples at randomization (2 weeks) and after 12 and 18 weeks on the diet.

Read the detailed description

Lumbar radiculopathy is a fairly common pain syndrome which may result in chronic, severe disability. There are few successful treatment options for patients with persistent lumbosacral radicular pain (LRP) that does not respond to conventional approaches. A fundamental biologic mechanism of chronic LRP, as well as other chronic pain syndromes, may involve failure of inflammation-resolution, an active process driven by lipid mediators derived from fatty acids (resolvins, protectins, maresins). The investigators' preliminary studies indicate that dietary modifications, specifically increasing some dietary fatty acids, while reducing others, result in large, statistically significant and clinically relevant improvement in headache frequency, intensity, and other clinical outcomes in community dwelling persons with chronic headaches.

The proposed trial represents a promising approach to treatment of a disabling condition, lumbar radiculopathy. The previous headache trial by the investigators' interdisciplinary UNC/NIH team demonstrated that specific dietary manipulations can produce marked biochemical changes and have a major positive clinical impact. This project promises to enhance the generalizability of the investigators' approach by expanding from chronic headaches to another common chronic pain condition, and also by using a more cost-effective intervention. Because dietary modification is a relatively safe and low-cost health-improvement strategy, the long-term outcome of this research may be to empower individuals to take a more active role in their own health through dietary changes that reduce dependence on medical treatments, while providing significant clinical benefits.

Baseline Phase. Medical records will be obtained for the participant's history and physical examination (performed by referring physician at the Spine Center). The baseline visit will consist of review of inclusion/exclusion criteria and the components of the study prior to consenting. Those who wish to sign the consents will complete baseline assessment instruments that measure lumbosacral radiculopathy characteristics and their impact on quality-of-life. Through electronic diaries, participants will provide daily data on pain intensity, duration, function, sleep quality, and medication use over a 2-week baseline phase. Participants who are compliant with all aspects of data collection, and who experience daily radicular pain, will be eligible for study intervention participation.

Randomization. At the end of the 2-week baseline phase, participants who qualify will be randomized (computer-generated variable permuted block) to: 1) the High n-3, Low n-6 Diet (Analgesic Diet); or 2) the Control Diet. Blood will be collected for baseline biomarker assessment prior to beginning study diets.

Post Randomization. After randomization, participants will attend an initial, in-depth dietary counseling session administered by the registered dietitian. Participants will be asked to provide a dietary history and will receive detailed instruction in the specific dietary intervention per group assignment. Participants in each group will attend a total of 3 in-person follow-up sessions with the dietitian, for review of their dietary experiences, to receive encouragement, to clarify issues, and to have questions answered. At each visit, the dietitian will obtain a dietary history and assessment, provide tailored counseling, and record data for evaluation of participant variability in order to guide future sessions. Participants will have a visit with the dietitian at randomization, two weeks later, 4 weeks after that, and 6 weeks after that (at the end of the intervention). In addition, individuals will participate in brief (15-20 minute) check-in telephone calls with the dietitian every 2-3 weeks. Participants will have contact with the research assistant twice weekly to encourage diary completion and to invite adverse event reporting.

During the 12-week intervention phase (weeks 2-14), participants will be provided with essential foods to enable them to follow diet recommendations, including study oils, salad dressings, and unprepared protein sources (meat, beans, fish). For the remainder of their meals, participants will choose food products consistent with their assigned diet. At the conclusion of the post-intervention phase (Week 20, Diet week 18), participants will complete on-line questionnaires and provide blood samples. The purpose of this post-intervention phase is: 1) to obtain pilot data on the ability of participants to continue to achieve nutrient intake targets without counseling and food provision; and 2) to obtain pilot data on the post-intervention trajectory of biochemical and clinical outcomes.

Throughout the 12-week active intervention and the 6-week post-intervention phases, participants will have access to detailed intervention materials. Diet education materials include the diet guidelines, allowed food list, how to read food labels, grocery shopping guides for 9 local grocery stores, dining out guide, 7-day meal plan and 75 recipes with the ability for the dietitian to add more.

Food Supply. Participants will visit the dietitian 3 times during the 12-week active intervention to obtain specific food items with targeted nutrient compositions. Food items will include: cooking oils, salad dressings, mayonnaise, portable dressing packets, unprepared frozen food items, and key ingredients for home preparation of meals and snacks. All foods have been specifically selected to ensure that participants meet specific nutrient intake targets. Prior nutrient analyses of more than 80 relevant food items was performed as part of the investigators' previous dietary intervention study in participants with chronic daily headache, by the National Institutes of Health-National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism Section of Nutritional Neurosciences (SNN). The SNN has agreed to provide further nutrient analysis as needed for the proposed study.

Assessments. Throughout the 2-week baseline, the 12-week active intervention, and 6-week post-intervention phases, all participants will record pain intensity, pain interference, medication use, activity, and stress using a daily pain diary accessed by mobile device.

Blood samples will be collected during three visits at the end of the baseline phase (Week 2, Diet week 0) and then at study Weeks 14 and 20 (at the end of the active intervention and at the end of the post-intervention period) for nutritional and metabolic biomarker measurement. At each sample collection visit (and after 6 weeks on the diet), participants will also complete the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and NIH PROMIS-29 battery (physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, satisfaction with social role, pain interference, pain intensity). Every 6 weeks, participants will also be asked about their use of other modalities for pain control, including physical therapy, spinal manipulation, epidural corticosteroid injections, acupuncture, and yoga.

Interventions. All participants will receive: 1) tailored dietitian-administered counseling consistent with the group assignment; 2) access to intervention-specific informational materials and daily outcome assessments; and 3) critical food items with precisely quantified fatty acid composition, selected to meet nutrient intake targets specific for each of the assignment groups.

Random Allocation. At the first intervention visit, At Week 2, the research dietitian will enter the participant's assigned ID into an online computer program that will determine assignment to one of the two diets. Using a random number sequence to generate a permuted block of 2-4, the program ensures equal numbers of participants in each arm. The program documents treatment assignment in an un-editable form including a date stamp.

Masking. The research staff, masked to treatment assignment, will schedule all study-related visits in the Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTRC) or other appropriate site in the University of North Carolina (UNC) Healthcare system or medical school. Only the dietitian will, of necessity, be unmasked. All investigators and laboratory personnel will be masked to dietary assignment. Masking will be maintained in the random allocation procedure. The research dietitian will not indicate to participants which diets are considered to be treatment diets vs. the control diet.

Conditions
Pain
Being tested
Diet A, Diet B
Keywords
Lumbosacral, radicular
Medical subject headings
Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Diet AOther

    Experimental analgesic dietary intervention

  • Diet BOther

    Healthy comparator diet

Study groups in NCT02531711
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Diet AExperimentalDietary intervention: Dietary fats are adjusted. Key study foods and oils are provided for 12 weeks. Participants learn which foods to eat and which to avoid.
Receives: Other: Diet A
Diet BActive comparatorDietary intervention: This diet also adjusts dietary fats, and provides key study foods and oils for 12 weeks.
Receives: Other: Diet B

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Oswestry Disability Index--Primary clinical outcome

    Measure of pain-specific quality of life

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. 17-Hydroxy Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA)--Primary biochemical outcome

    Metabolite related to dietary fatty acid intakes implicated in pain reductions

    Measured: 12 weeks

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Pain intensity

    Average weekly pain intensity, measured in daily diary

    Measured: 12 weeks

  2. Physical activity

    Average weekly steps per day, measured by pedometer (Fitbit)

    Measured: 12 weeks

  3. Sleep efficiency

    Measured by percent of time asleep out of total time in bed (Fitbit)

    Measured: 12 weeks

  4. Sleep quantity

    Measured by average weekly hours of sleep (Fitbit)

    Measured: 12 weeks

  5. Self-reported health

    PROMIS-29: includes physical function, social functioning, psychological distress, sleep quality, and fatigue

    Measured: 12 weeks

  6. Red blood cell fatty acids

    Measures adherence to dietary recommendations

    Measured: Measured at Week 2 and after 6 and 12 weeks on the diet

  7. Borkovec and Nau scale

    Measures credibility and expectation of benefit

    Measured: Measured at Week 2

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Aug 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2015
  3. Primary completion30 Dec 2019
  4. Study completion30 Dec 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
44 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02531711
Sponsor's protocol ID
14-2321
Acronym
LRPD
Status last verified
Oct 2020
First submitted
8 Jun 2015
Last updated
8 Oct 2020
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Yes: Deidentified data will be shared with investigators at NIH.

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Diet A and Diet B in people with Pain, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 7 inclusion and 10 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 8 Oct 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Oswestry Disability Index--Primary clinical outcome (time frame: 12 weeks). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 8 Oct 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in