AzTrials
AzTrials

Inflammatory Bowel DiseaseNCT02543021

Virtual Chromoendoscopy for Colitis Surveillance: A Feasibility Study

A study testing Virtual chromoendoscopy and Conventional chromoendoscopy in people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Patients with colitis require regular 'surveillance' colonoscopy as their risk of developing colon cancer is at least 2.5 times that of the general population. However, cancer in colitis develops as flat lesions called dysplasia, that can be easily missed at routine colonoscopy. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 to 75 years
Conditions the study is for
Inflammatory Bowel Disease
What is being tested?
Virtual chromoendoscopy and Conventional chromoendoscopy
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
60 participants
Where
1 siteUnited Kingdom
Study dates
1 Nov 2015to 1 Feb 2018
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 to 75 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Any patient eligible for colitis surveillance colonoscopy by British Society of Gastroenterology guidelines:
  • Ulcerative pan-proctocolitis or Crohn's colitis of 8 or more years duration
  • With or without co-diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis

Who cannot join

  • Inability to provide informed
  • Written consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United Kingdom1 site
  • King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

    London, SE5 9RS

Other trials in United Kingdom

About this study

Official title: A Study to Assess the Feasibility and Patient Acceptability of a Randomised, Crossover Design to Compare Virtual vs Conventional Chromoendoscopy for the Detection of Dysplasia in Colitis

Patients with colitis require regular 'surveillance' colonoscopy as their risk of developing colon cancer is at least 2.5 times that of the general population. However, cancer in colitis develops as flat lesions called dysplasia, that can be easily missed at routine colonoscopy. As a result NICE guidelines for colitis surveillance recommend the use of a technique called chromoendoscopy (CE) in which a water-soluble blue dye is sprayed through the colonoscope to coat and highlight the lining of the bowel, making dysplasia easier to see. Although CE is accepted as best practice for surveillance it is time-consuming, technically difficult and requires expertise to interpret the appearances. For these reasons, its use is not widespread and the vast majority of patients still receive the inferior 'routine' colonoscopy without CE.

New technology means that the video image obtained during colonoscopy can be digitally enhanced and coloured at the press of a button - termed virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE). This could make surveillance colonoscopy shorter, more comfortable and cleaner (resulting in a more 'dignified' experience) as well as cheaper and less technically difficult.

Read more

The main objectives to be explored in this feasibility study (and the larger trial) were informed by a PPI meeting, which placed the ability to detect dysplasia at equal importance with the participant's experience of the procedure in terms of speed, comfort and dignity.

This is primarily a feasibility study to assess patient experience, recruitment and retention rates to the investigators' specified trial design, to support the development of a larger crossover trial to compare VCE to CE during surveillance colonoscopy for colitis.

Read the detailed description

In the recruitment period, 60 patients will be approached when they are invited to attend for scheduled surveillance colonoscopy. Eligible patients (18-75 yrs) who agree to participate will be randomised to undergo CE or VCE as the first procedure. Data will be captured by an Observer using a bespoke Access-based program.

The site and number of any biopsy samples taken will be recorded alongside the Endoscopist's prediction, based on visual appearance, of whether they think the area biopsied is actually dysplasia.

After an agreed interval (no more than 8 weeks, usually 3-6), participants will undergo a second colonoscopy with the second technique, performed by an Endoscopist blinded to the results of the first test, and data captured as before. For each procedure, a questionnaire assessing immediate patient experience will be administered in the Endoscopy department, after the participant has recovered from the procedure. Participants will also be given a second questionnaire assessing their overall experience to take home and complete 48 hours after the procedure, which will be returned by post.

Being tested
Virtual chromoendoscopy, Conventional chromoendoscopy
Keywords
Colitis, Dysplasia, Chromoendoscopy
Medical subject headings
Inflammatory Bowel Diseases, Colitis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Virtual chromoendoscopyDevice

    Also called Fujinon Intelligent Color Enhancement (FICE)

    Digital / virtual chromoendoscopy with FICE

  • Conventional chromoendoscopyProcedure or surgery

    Also called Indigo carmine dye spray

    Conventional chromoendoscopy with indigo carmine dye spray

Study groups in NCT02543021
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Conventional chromoendoscopyActive comparatorPatients will undergo colitis surveillance colonoscopy with indigo carmine chromoendoscopy (dye spray)
Receives: Procedure: Conventional chromoendoscopy
Virtual chromoendoscopyExperimentalPatients will undergo colitis surveillance colonoscopy with FICE(TM) virtual chromoendoscopy
Receives: Device: Virtual chromoendoscopy

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Patient adherence to study design - success of recruitment (minimum recruitment of 75%) and retention of patients (minimum target of 75%)

    The investigators are evaluating the success of recruitment to the study design with a target minimum recruitment of 75%; The investigators will also evaluate retention of patients within the crossover study design with a minimum target of 75%

    Measured: 2 years

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Patient experience assessed by validated questionnaire

    Patient experience of the procedure in both arms will be compared (intra-individual) by validated questionnaire

    Measured: 2 years

  2. Procedure time

    The time taken for each procedure will be compared (average)

    Measured: 2 years

  3. Miss rate for dysplasia

    The miss rate of each technique will be compared

    Measured: 2 years

  4. Prediction of histology

    The ability of conventional vs virtual chromoendoscopy will be compared to predict eventual histology of targeted biopsies (from which a sensitivity and specificity will be calculated)

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted7 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Nov 2015
  3. Primary completion1 Nov 2017
  4. Study completion1 Feb 2018

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Diagnosis
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Crossover
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
60 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02543021
Sponsor's protocol ID
113398
Status last verified
Aug 2018
First submitted
4 Sep 2015
Last updated
31 Aug 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: Patient level data will not be shared. Cohort results will form publication/output

Publications

  • Pavlidis P, Joshi D, El Sherif Y, Warner B, Gulati S, Alexander J, Cross G, Dew T, Arqoub HA, Devlin J, Heneghan M, Dubois P, Bjarnason I, Powell N, Hayee B. Faecal calprotectin is a surrogate marker of biliary inflammation in primary sclerosing cholangitis associated inflammatory bowel disease. Frontline Gastroenterol. 2022 Mar 18;13(6):497-502. doi: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-102053. eCollection 2022.

    PubMed 36250171

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Virtual chromoendoscopy and Conventional chromoendoscopy in people with Inflammatory Bowel Disease, run by King's College Hospital NHS Trust at 1 site in United Kingdom.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 2 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 31 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Patient adherence to study design - success of recruitment (minimum recruitment of 75%) and retention of patients (minimum target of 75%) (time frame: 2 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02543021, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 31 Aug 2018.

Free account

Keep searching with a free account

You’ve used your 3 free searches for this session. Log in or create a free AzTrials account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in
Clinical Trial NCT02543021 | AzTrials