AzTrials
AzTrials

Neurodevelopmental DisorderPhase 3DEGANCT02559102

Dexmedetomidine Sedation Versus General Anaesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Surgery in Infants

A Phase 3 study testing Dexmedetomidine sedation, General sevoflurane anaesthesia and Caudal anaesthesia in people with Neurodevelopmental Disorder and Bilateral Inguinal Hernia, run by KK Women's and Children's Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal anaesthesia, and general sevoflurane anaesthesia with caudal anaesthesia for inguinal herniotomies in neonates and infants below 3 months of age. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 34 to 54 weeksHealthy volunteers can take part
What is being tested?
Dexmedetomidine sedation, General sevoflurane anaesthesia and Caudal anaesthesia
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
104 participants
Where
1 siteSingapore
Study dates
Jul 2015to 31 Jan 2021
Phase
Phase 3
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 34 to 54 weeks
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child

Who may be able to join

  • Infants below 3 months of age ( corrected age 54 weeks) presenting for elective inguinal hernia repair in KKH.

Who cannot join

  • History of prematurity younger than 28 weeks gestation,
  • Requirement for CPAP greater than 6 cmH20 at time of surgery
  • Significant cardiac pathology or cardiac conduction defects
  • Unusually large hernia sacs
  • Any contraindication for caudal anesthesia
  • Surgeon refusal on account of anticipated prolonged or difficult surgery.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Singapore1 site
  • KK Women's and Children's Hospital

    Singapore, 229899

Other trials in Singapore

About this study

Official title: Dexmedetomidine Sedation Versus General Anaesthesia for Inguinal Hernia Surgery on Peri-operative Outcomes and Neurocognitive Development in Infants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This is a prospective randomized controlled trial comparing dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal anaesthesia, and general sevoflurane anaesthesia with caudal anaesthesia for inguinal herniotomies in neonates and infants below 3 months of age.

The investigators will compare the efficacy and adverse events associated with each of these techniques and neurodevelopmental outcomes of the infants in each group at 6 months and 2 years of age.

Read the detailed description

Several epidemiologic studies have suggested that children exposed to general anaesthesia (GA) in early childhood may be at increased risk of subsequent learning disabilities and behavioural problems. Animal studies have shown that exposure to GA agents during critical neuro-developmental windows induces neuronal apoptosis. All commonly used anaesthetic agents induce neurotoxicity with the exception of dexmedetomidine, a highly specific alpha-2 agonist which has been shown to be neuroprotective.

GA is the current standard of care for inguinal hernia repair in infants at KKH. The investigators recently demonstrated that dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block is a feasible alternative for inguinal hernia repair in infants below 3 months of age. This prospective randomized controlled trial will compare the early and long-term outcomes of infants following inguinal hernia surgery using dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block versus GA with caudal block.

This study aims:

  1. To compare the neurodevelopment at 6 months and 2years, of infants randomized to dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block with those randomized to GA with caudal block for inguinal hernia surgery before 3 months of age.
  2. To compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine sedation with caudal block versus GA with caudal block for inguinal hernia surgery, in terms of duration of anaesthesia, duration of surgery and surgeon's satisfaction with intraoperative conditions.
Being tested
Dexmedetomidine sedation, General sevoflurane anaesthesia, Caudal anaesthesia, Inguinal hernia surgery
Keywords
Dexmedetomidine sedation, General anaesthesia, Neurodevelopment, Infants, Neonates
Medical subject headings
Neurodevelopmental Disorders

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Dexmedetomidine sedationDrug

    Also called Dex

    Patients receive dexmedetomidine sedation

  • General sevoflurane anaesthesiaDrug

    Also called Gas

    Patients receive general sevoflurane anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation

  • Caudal anaesthesiaProcedure or surgery

    Also called Caudal

    single shot caudal anaesthesia

  • Inguinal hernia surgeryProcedure or surgery

    Also called Inguinal herniotomy

    Infant inguinal hernia repair.

Study groups in NCT02559102
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Dex GroupExperimentalIntravenous dexmedetomidine sedation prior to single shot caudal anaesthesia and maintenance infusion of dexmedetomidine during bilateral inguinal hernia surgery.
Receives: Drug: Dexmedetomidine sedation; Procedure: Caudal anaesthesia; Procedure: Inguinal hernia surgery
GA GroupActive comparatorGeneral sevoflurane anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation and single shot caudal anaesthesia for inguinal hernia surgery. This is currently the standard anaesthetic technique for bilateral inguinal hernia surgery in neonates and infants in KKH.
Receives: Drug: General sevoflurane anaesthesia; Procedure: Caudal anaesthesia; Procedure: Inguinal hernia surgery

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Deferred Imitation scores at 6 months

    Deferred imitation, test of declarative memory. Infants are assessed when first shown the "target" actions (DF1) and again on how well they reproduce the actions (DF2).

    Measured: 6 months

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Bayley scores at 2 years

    Bayleys scales of Infant Development version III

    Measured: 2 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted24 Sep 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJul 2015
  3. Primary completion20 Jul 2020
  4. Study completion31 Jan 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
104 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02559102
Sponsor's protocol ID
SHF/CTG055/2014
Acronym
DEGA
Status last verified
Mar 2017
First submitted
4 Aug 2015
Last updated
21 Feb 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Jevtovic-Todorovic V, Hartman RE, Izumi Y, Benshoff ND, Dikranian K, Zorumski CF, Olney JW, Wozniak DF. Early exposure to common anesthetic agents causes widespread neurodegeneration in the developing rat brain and persistent learning deficits. J Neurosci. 2003 Feb 1;23(3):876-82. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-03-00876.2003.

    PubMed 12574416
  • Sanders RD, Sun P, Patel S, Li M, Maze M, Ma D. Dexmedetomidine provides cortical neuroprotection: impact on anaesthetic-induced neuroapoptosis in the rat developing brain. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2010 Jul;54(6):710-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2009.02177.x. Epub 2009 Dec 9.

    PubMed 20003127
  • Mahmoud M, Mason KP. Dexmedetomidine: review, update, and future considerations of paediatric perioperative and periprocedural applications and limitations. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Aug;115(2):171-82. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev226.

    PubMed 26170346
  • Bong CL, Tan J, Lim S, Low Y, Sim SW, Rajadurai VS, Khoo PC, Allen J, Meaney M, Koh WP. Randomised controlled trial of dexmedetomidine sedation vs general anaesthesia for inguinal hernia surgery on perioperative outcomes in infants. Br J Anaesth. 2019 May;122(5):662-670. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2018.12.027. Epub 2019 Mar 7.

    PubMed 30916007

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 3 study testing Dexmedetomidine sedation, General sevoflurane anaesthesia and Caudal anaesthesia in people with Neurodevelopmental Disorder and Bilateral Inguinal Hernia, run by KK Women's and Children's Hospital at 1 site in Singapore.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Feb 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Singapore. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this phase mean?

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Deferred Imitation scores at 6 months (time frame: 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02559102, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Feb 2021; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in