Lumbar Disc HerniationNCT02572622
Comparison of Different Treatment Methods in Lumbal Disc Herniation Treatment
A study testing non -surgical spinal decompression therapy, deep friction massage, and electrotherapy in people with Lumbar Disc Herniation, run by Hacettepe University.
Trial summary
The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of three different treatment methods which consists spinal decompression, deep friction massage and exercise. The patients were separated three groups Group one received non-surgical spinal decompression therapy, group two received non-surgical spinal… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 25 to 65 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- What is being tested?
- non -surgical spinal decompression therapy, deep friction massage, and electrotherapy
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 30 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Feb 2014to Jun 2015
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 25 to 65 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- clinical diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation without strengthening loss
Who cannot join
- clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis
- have scoliosis and spondylolisthesis
- any surgery related spine
- any neurological diseases causes sensory loss
About this study
Official title: Lumbal Disk Herniasyonunda Farklı Tedavi Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması
The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of three different treatment methods which consists spinal decompression, deep friction massage and exercise. The patients were separated three groups Group one received non-surgical spinal decompression therapy, group two received non-surgical spinal decompression, lumbar stabilization exercises and manual therapy, group three received manual therapy and lumbar stabilization exercises. All groups completed 15 sessions of therapy. In each session, pain severity was assessed with numeric analog scale, straight leg raise test applied and the degree of the hip flexion where the patient reported pain were recorded, respectively. Static, dynamic muscle strength-endurance tests were applied before the treatment sessions started, after the treatment sessions ended, six weeks after and three months after the study. Oswestry Disability Scale (ODI), Back Performance Scale (BPS), Lanss Neuropathic pain Questionnaire, Fear-Avoidance-Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and McGill Pain Questionnaire were applied before the treatment sessions started, after the treatment sessions ended and three months after the study. Gradient of disc height and thickness of the herniation were assessed segmentally with magnetic resonance imagination (MRI) before the study and three months after the study.
- Conditions
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- Being tested
- non -surgical spinal decompression therapy, deep friction massage,, electrotherapy, exercise
- Keywords
- exercise, deep friction massage, spinal decompression, non-surgical spinal decompression
- Medical subject headings
- Intervertebral Disc Displacement, Motor Activity
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
non -surgical spinal decompression therapyOther
it is a kind of traction therapy, it has an special traction design which can provide intermittent traction as to herniation levels.
deep friction massage,Other
deep friction massage is a kind of massage targeting deep muscles for decreasing pain and increasing function
electrotherapyOther
electrotherapy is consist of hot pack, ultrasound and TENS. electrotherapy agents were help decreasing pain, increasing metabolism of tissues.
exerciseOther
special lumbar stabilization exercises were applied in advanced protocol.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| spinal decompression group | Experimental | only 15 sessions of spinal decompression therapy were applied. Receives: Other: non -surgical spinal decompression therapy |
| combine group | Experimental | 10 patients participated in this group. for two weeks electrotherapy, deep friction massage and traction and last two weeks electrotherapy and exercise totally 15 session of treatment were applied. Receives: Other: non -surgical spinal decompression therapy; Other: deep friction massage,; Other: electrotherapy; Other: exercise |
| exercise group | Experimental | 10 patients participated in this group. for two weeks electrotherapy, deep friction massage and last two weeks electrotherapy and exercise totally 15 session of treatment were applied whi Receives: Other: deep friction massage,; Other: electrotherapy; Other: exercise |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
magnetic resonance imaging changes
changes recorded in micrometrical measurements.
Measured: change from baseline in disc height and size of herniation at 3 months.
Secondary outcomes (6)
disability
Oswestry Disability Index used to assess the changes in function and disability levels. Scores range from 0 to 100. scores between 0 and 20 described as "minimal disability", scores between 21and 40 described as "moderate disability",scores between 41and 60 described as "severe disability",scores between 61 and 80 described as "crippled" and scores between 81 and 100 described as " bed bounded"
Measured: up to 3 months.
performance
back performance scale used to assess the changes in performance. Scores range from 0 to 15. The lower scores described good performance and higher scores described bad performance.
Measured: up to 3 months.
pain
McGill Pain Questionnaire used to asses the changes in pain levels. scores range from 0 to 78. The higher the pain score the greater the pain.
Measured: up to 3 months.
straight leg raise test for mobility
Therapist raised patient's leg passively and the pain felt by the patient measured with goniometer and the angle recorded.
Measured: up to 3 months
neuropathic pain
The Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptom and Signs (LANSS) Pain Scale used to assess neuropathic pain. Scores range from 0 to 24. scores higher from 12 described neuropathic pain.
Measured: up to 3 months.
fear avoidance beliefs
FABQ used to assess fear related attitudes of the patients. Scores range from 0 to 42 . Higher points described high fear avoidance beliefs.
Measured: up to 3 months.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted9 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startFeb 2014
- Primary completionJun 2015
- Study completionJun 2015
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (8)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Lumbar Disc HerniationStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Hacettepe UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Aynur Demirel, Hacettepe University
- Investigators
- aynur demirel, PhD, Principal investigator, Hacettepe University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02572622
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- HacettepeUN
- Status last verified
- Feb 2016
- First submitted
- 15 Jul 2015
- Last updated
- 24 Feb 2016
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Apfel CC, Cakmakkaya OS, Martin W, Richmond C, Macario A, George E, Schaefer M, Pergolizzi JV. Restoration of disk height through non-surgical spinal decompression is associated with decreased discogenic low back pain: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jul 8;11:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-155.
PubMed 20615252Daniel DM. Non-surgical spinal decompression therapy: does the scientific literature support efficacy claims made in the advertising media? Chiropr Osteopat. 2007 May 18;15:7. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-15-7.
PubMed 17511872Lundon K, Bolton K. Structure and function of the lumbar intervertebral disk in health, aging, and pathologic conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 Jun;31(6):291-303; discussion 304-6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.6.291.
PubMed 11411624Ozturk B, Gunduz OH, Ozoran K, Bostanoglu S. Effect of continuous lumbar traction on the size of herniated disc material in lumbar disc herniation. Rheumatol Int. 2006 May;26(7):622-6. doi: 10.1007/s00296-005-0035-x. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
PubMed 16249899Choi J, Lee S, Hwangbo G. Influences of spinal decompression therapy and general traction therapy on the pain, disability, and straight leg raising of patients with intervertebral disc herniation. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Feb;27(2):481-3. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.481. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
PubMed 25729196Liddle SD, Baxter GD, Gracey JH. Exercise and chronic low back pain: what works? Pain. 2004 Jan;107(1-2):176-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.017.
PubMed 14715404Schoenfeld AJ, Weiner BK. Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Evidence-based practice. Int J Gen Med. 2010 Jul 21;3:209-14. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s12270.
PubMed 20689695Meszaros TF, Olson R, Kulig K, Creighton D, Czarnecki E. Effect of 10%, 30%, and 60% body weight traction on the straight leg raise test of symptomatic patients with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000 Oct;30(10):595-601. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.10.595.
PubMed 11041196
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Feb 2016. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Lumbal Disk Herniasyonunda Farklı Tedavi Yöntemlerinin Karşılaştırılması
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02572622
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- HacettepeUN
- Conditions
- Lumbar Disc Herniation
- Keywords
- exercise, deep friction massage, spinal decompression, non-surgical spinal decompression
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 30 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Hacettepe UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Feb 2014
- Primary completion
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jun 2015 (actual)
- First posted
- 9 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The aim of this study is to determine the effectiveness of three different treatment methods which consists spinal decompression, deep friction massage and exercise. The patients were separated three groups Group one received non-surgical spinal decompression therapy, group two received non-surgical spinal decompression, lumbar stabilization exercises and manual therapy, group three received manual therapy and lumbar stabilization exercises. All groups completed 15 sessions of therapy. In each session, pain severity was assessed with numeric analog scale, straight leg raise test applied and the degree of the hip flexion where the patient reported pain were recorded, respectively. Static, dynamic muscle strength-endurance tests were applied before the treatment sessions started, after the treatment sessions ended, six weeks after and three months after the study. Oswestry Disability Scale (ODI), Back Performance Scale (BPS), Lanss Neuropathic pain Questionnaire, Fear-Avoidance-Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ) and McGill Pain Questionnaire were applied before the treatment sessions started, after the treatment sessions ended and three months after the study. Gradient of disc height and thickness of the herniation were assessed segmentally with magnetic resonance imagination (MRI) before the study and three months after the study.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| spinal decompression group | Experimental | Other: non -surgical spinal decompression therapyonly 15 sessions of spinal decompression therapy were applied. |
| combine group | Experimental | Other: non -surgical spinal decompression therapy, Other: deep friction massage,, Other: electrotherapy, Other: exercise10 patients participated in this group. for two weeks electrotherapy, deep friction massage and traction and last two weeks electrotherapy and exercise totally 15 session of treatment were applied. |
| exercise group | Experimental | Other: deep friction massage,, Other: electrotherapy, Other: exercise10 patients participated in this group. for two weeks electrotherapy, deep friction massage and last two weeks electrotherapy and exercise totally 15 session of treatment were applied whi |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 25 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- clinical diagnosis of lumbar disc herniation without strengthening loss
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- clinical diagnosis of osteoporosis
- have scoliosis and spondylolisthesis
- any surgery related spine
- any neurological diseases causes sensory loss
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| non -surgical spinal decompression therapyit is a kind of traction therapy, it has an special traction design which can provide intermittent traction as to herniation levels. | Other | combine group, spinal decompression group |
| deep friction massage,deep friction massage is a kind of massage targeting deep muscles for decreasing pain and increasing function | Other | combine group, exercise group |
| electrotherapyelectrotherapy is consist of hot pack, ultrasound and TENS. electrotherapy agents were help decreasing pain, increasing metabolism of tissues. | Other | combine group, exercise group |
| exercisespecial lumbar stabilization exercises were applied in advanced protocol. | Other | combine group, exercise group |
Primary outcome
magnetic resonance imaging changes
Time frame: change from baseline in disc height and size of herniation at 3 months.
changes recorded in micrometrical measurements.
6 secondary outcomes
disability
Time frame: up to 3 months.
performance
Time frame: up to 3 months.
pain
Time frame: up to 3 months.
straight leg raise test for mobility
Time frame: up to 3 months
neuropathic pain
Time frame: up to 3 months.
fear avoidance beliefs
Time frame: up to 3 months.
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Feb 2016.
- Background: PubMed 20615252Apfel CC, Cakmakkaya OS, Martin W, Richmond C, Macario A, George E, Schaefer M, Pergolizzi JV. Restoration of disk height through non-surgical spinal decompression is associated with decreased discogenic low back pain: a retrospective cohort study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010 Jul 8;11:155. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-11-155.
- Background: PubMed 17511872Daniel DM. Non-surgical spinal decompression therapy: does the scientific literature support efficacy claims made in the advertising media? Chiropr Osteopat. 2007 May 18;15:7. doi: 10.1186/1746-1340-15-7.
- Background: PubMed 11411624Lundon K, Bolton K. Structure and function of the lumbar intervertebral disk in health, aging, and pathologic conditions. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2001 Jun;31(6):291-303; discussion 304-6. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2001.31.6.291.
- Background: PubMed 16249899Ozturk B, Gunduz OH, Ozoran K, Bostanoglu S. Effect of continuous lumbar traction on the size of herniated disc material in lumbar disc herniation. Rheumatol Int. 2006 May;26(7):622-6. doi: 10.1007/s00296-005-0035-x. Epub 2005 Oct 25.
- Background: PubMed 25729196Choi J, Lee S, Hwangbo G. Influences of spinal decompression therapy and general traction therapy on the pain, disability, and straight leg raising of patients with intervertebral disc herniation. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015 Feb;27(2):481-3. doi: 10.1589/jpts.27.481. Epub 2015 Feb 17.
- Background: PubMed 14715404Liddle SD, Baxter GD, Gracey JH. Exercise and chronic low back pain: what works? Pain. 2004 Jan;107(1-2):176-90. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2003.10.017.
- Background: PubMed 20689695Schoenfeld AJ, Weiner BK. Treatment of lumbar disc herniation: Evidence-based practice. Int J Gen Med. 2010 Jul 21;3:209-14. doi: 10.2147/ijgm.s12270.
- Background: PubMed 11041196Meszaros TF, Olson R, Kulig K, Creighton D, Czarnecki E. Effect of 10%, 30%, and 60% body weight traction on the straight leg raise test of symptomatic patients with low back pain. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2000 Oct;30(10):595-601. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2000.30.10.595.
Related trials for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Not yet recruiting
Cortical Surface Functional Changes After Lever Positioning Manipulation for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Spinal Mobilization With and Without Clinical Pilates in Patients With Lumbar Disc Herniationc Herniation
Disc Herniation
Enrolling by invitationObservational study
Intradiscal Ozone/Oxygen Injection for Treatment of Contained Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation
Not yet recruiting
Selective Nerve Root Block Versus Sham to Reduce Surgery for Lumbar Disc Herniation
Lumbar Disc Herniation, Lumbar Radiculopathy
Not yet recruiting
H-Reflex-Guided Direction-Sensitive Exercise Versus Standard Extension Exercise for Functional Recovery in Patients With Lumbar Disc Prolapse
Lumber Disc Prolapse
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
aynur demirel, PhD principal investigator
Hacettepe University
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing non -surgical spinal decompression therapy, deep friction massage, and electrotherapy in people with Lumbar Disc Herniation, run by Hacettepe University.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Feb 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
magnetic resonance imaging changes (time frame: change from baseline in disc height and size of herniation at 3 months.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02572622, which also lists 8 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Feb 2016.