AzTrials
AzTrials

Facet Joint SyndromeNCT02580383

Multifidus Muscle Twitch on the Prognosis of Lumbar Medial Branch RF

An observational study of Facet Joint Syndrome, run by Severance Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The investigators collected data and chart from the patients who were diagnosed facet joint syndrome and underwent lumbar RF medial branch neurotomy between January 2009 and June 2014. RF was performed using sensory stimulation and multifidus twitching to confirm the position of RF needle. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any age
Conditions the study is for
Facet Joint Syndrome
What is being tested?
Radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar medial branch
Type of treatment
Surgery or procedure
How many people
68 participants
Where
1 siteSouth Korea
Study dates
Sep 2015to Jun 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: The patients who had lumbar back pain in Gangnam Severance hospital, Seoul, Republic of Korea.

Who may be able to join

  • All the patients who were diagnosed facet joint syndrome and underwent lumbar RF medial branch neurotomy between January 2009 and June 2014.

Who cannot join

  • absence of 12-month follow-up data, the patients who underwent RF medial branch neurotomy on bilateral side or the patients who underwent surgery or other interventional procedures that might affect pain derived from lumbar facet joint during the follow-up period

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

South Korea1 site
  • Gangnam Severance Hospital

    Seoul, Gangnam-gu, 135-720

Other trials in South Korea

About this study

Official title: Effect of the Multifidus Muscle Twitch on the Long Term Effect of Radiofrequency Lumbar Medial Branch Neurotomy

The investigators collected data and chart from the patients who were diagnosed facet joint syndrome and underwent lumbar RF medial branch neurotomy between January 2009 and June 2014.

RF was performed using sensory stimulation and multifidus twitching to confirm the position of RF needle. The patients wil be grouped according to the adequacy of RF needle position while performing RF medial branch neurotomy ('complete' when all needles were placed adequately, 'partial' when one of the needles for a facet joint medial branch was placed inadequately, 'none' when there were both needles positioned inadequately for a facet joint) The relationship between the long term effect of RF neurotomy (longer than 6 months) and the groups will be analyzed.

Read the detailed description

Facet joint syndrome has been described as a common cause of lumbar back pain. To achieve prolonged therapeutic effect in patients with lumbar facet joint syndrome, radiofrequency (RF) medial branch neurotomy is commonly performed. When performing RF neurotomy, needle placement in correct position is very important. For this reason, identification of sensory stimulation and multifidus muscle twitching by using the electrode have been commonly performed. However, there were no previous reports regarding relationship between prognosis of RF neurotomy and multifidus muscle twitching in combination of sensory stimulation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of multifidus twitching when sensory stimulation was achieved while performing RF needle neurotomy in patients with lumbar facet syndrome.

The investigators have collected data and chart from the patients who were diagnosed facet joint syndrome and underwent lumbar RF medial branch neurotomy between January 2009 and June 2014.

RF was performed using sensory stimulation and multifidus twitching to confirm the position of RF needle. When numeric pain intensity score decreased less than half of the initial pain score, the procedure was regarded as effective and the duration was followed and recorded for each patients.

When multifidus twitching was observed in a voltage less than 1.0 to 2.0 times of the sensory stimulation (≤ 0.5V), the positioning of the RF needle will be regarded as adequate. The most appropriate cutoff value will be determined by univariate analysis. The patients will be grouped according to the adequacy of RF needle position while performing RF medial branch neurotomy ('complete' when all needles were placed adequately, 'partial' when one of the needles for a facet joint medial branch was placed inadequately, 'none' when there were both needles positioned inadequately for a facet joint) The relationship between the long term effect of RF neurotomy (longer than 6 months) and the groups will be analyzed.

Being tested
Radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar medial branch
Keywords
Radiofrequency ablation, RF-MB, Lumbar RF, Facet joint syndrome, Multifidus twitching, Sensory stimulation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar medial branchProcedure or surgery

    Also called Lumbar RF neurotomy

    In above L5, The RF needle was placed to contact with bone as close as possible to the course of the target nerve in parallel. For L5 dorsal rami ablation, the needle was positioned in the groove between the S1 articular process and sacral ala. At each level, the electrodes were adjusted to optimize sensory stimulation at a frequency of 50 Hz and maximize multifidus contraction at 2 Hz. A 75 second 80°C lesion was made using an RF generator.

Study groups in NCT02580383
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Group noneAccording to the adequacy of RF needle position while performing radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar medial branch. When both needles were positioned inadequately for a facet joint.
Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar medial branch
Group partialAccording to the adequacy of RF needle position while performing radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar medial branch. when one of the needles for a facet joint medial branch was placed inadequately.
Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar medial branch
Group completeAccording to the adequacy of RF needle position while performing radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar medial branch. When all needles were placed adequately.'
Receives: Procedure: Radiofrequency neurotomy of lumbar medial branch

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Long term effective duration

    Duration of pain score less than half of initial pain score

    Measured: 1 years

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted20 Oct 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startSep 2015
  3. Primary completionJun 2016
  4. Study completionJun 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Case-control
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
68 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02580383
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-0385-001
Status last verified
Jun 2016
First submitted
18 Oct 2015
Last updated
23 Jun 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes

Publications

  • Cohen SP, Strassels SA, Kurihara C, Griffith SR, Goff B, Guthmiller K, Hoang HT, Morlando B, Nguyen C. Establishing an optimal "cutoff" threshold for diagnostic lumbar facet blocks: a prospective correlational study. Clin J Pain. 2013 May;29(5):382-91. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31825f53bf.

    PubMed 23023310
  • Cohen SP, Strassels SA, Kurihara C, Lesnick IK, Hanling SR, Griffith SR, Buckenmaier CC 3rd, Nguyen C. Does sensory stimulation threshold affect lumbar facet radiofrequency denervation outcomes? A prospective clinical correlational study. Anesth Analg. 2011 Nov;113(5):1233-41. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31822dd379. Epub 2011 Sep 14.

    PubMed 21918166

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Facet Joint Syndrome, run by Severance Hospital at 1 site in South Korea.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 23 Jun 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in South Korea. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Long term effective duration (time frame: 1 years). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02580383, which also lists 2 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 23 Jun 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in