Multiple Organ FailurePhase 4FENTANYL06NCT02587273
The Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl in Intensive Care Patients
A Phase 4 study testing Fentanyl in people with Multiple Organ Failure and Critical Care, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
Trial summary
This study is part of a project intended to develop guidelines to optimise the dosing of fentanyl in intensive care patients. This study will focus on determining: Whether the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl change during the ICU stay. To what extent / the degree of change in fentanyl pharmacokinetics in ICU patients. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Multiple Organ Failure, Critical Care, Intensive Care
- What is being tested?
- Fentanyl
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 150 participants
- Where
- 1 siteNorway
- Study dates
- Oct 2015to Nov 2017
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 80 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Consecutive patients admitted to the ICU at Oslo University Hospital - Ullevål, in whom mechanical ventilation for > 72 hrs. is expected
- Aged 18 - 80 years, both inclusive
- Serum beta-HCG negative if female of childbearing potential, aged 18 - 45 years (both inclusive)
Who cannot join
- Tracheally intubated > 12 hrs. before admittance to the ICU
- Known hypersensitivity to fentanyl or other opioids
- Post partum < 6 weeks and/or lactating
- Informed consent not received
- Any reason why, in the opinion of the investigator and/or the treating physicians, the patient should not participate in the study
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Norway1 site, 1 recruiting
- Recruiting
Oslo University Hospital, Ullevål
Oslo, Oslo, 0424
Lill-Kristin K Kjaervik, MD, 45223523, lilkje@gmail.com
Tom Heier, Professor, 92238520, tom.heier@medisin.uio.no
About this study
This study is part of a project intended to develop guidelines to optimise the dosing of fentanyl in intensive care patients.
This study will focus on determining:
- Whether the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl change during the ICU stay.
- To what extent / the degree of change in fentanyl pharmacokinetics in ICU patients.
- Which factors (e.g. physiological variables) that cause such a change.
- Based on simulations, determine context-sensitive half-times of fentanyl in ICU patients.
Read the detailed description
Background:
Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for treatment involving mechanical ventilation will be in need of sedation and analgesia in order to relieve pain and discomfort from necessary therapeutic procedures (1-7). The opioid fentanyl is frequently used as part of these sedation regimens(1-7).
The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of fentanyl after long-term administration in ICU patients has not been studied extensively. In a study in children (fentanyl infusion time 7-144 hrs.), increased volume of distribution was found when compared to data obtained after short-term use (9). The volume of distribution of alfentanil was increased when compared with data obtained after short-term use in a study of adult ICU patients sedated with propofol and alfentanil (a rapid-onset opioid) for 24 hrs. post-operatively (10). A similar increase in distribution volume of another opioid, sufentanil, was found in adult ICU patients (average sufentanil infusion time 12 days)(11).
Experience obtained during clinical anaesthesia suggests that the duration of action in fentanyl is significantly prolonged after long-term intravenous infusions (12-13). This property of fentanyl seems to be caused by a combination of factors. Since fentanyl has a large volume of distribution there will be a continuous return of the drug from peripheral tissues, and the concentration of fentanyl in plasma will be maintained in a clinically active range for some time after a fentanyl infusion has been terminated (9). Fentanyl also potentiates the sedative effects of e.g. propofol and midazolam which contributes to a further protraction of the wake-up time (14-15).
In ICU patients these undesirable effects of fentanyl will probably be amplified as a result of major changes in volume of distribution and administration of fentanyl infusions for extensive periods of time (weeks). The investigators believe that knowledge of the PK of fentanyl in this population will be valuable to help designing optimised infusion regimens of fentanyl in the clinical setting of the ICU.
Study Objective:
The main study objective is to determine wether the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl change during the ICU stay, and the extent of this change. The investigators will try to unveil which factors (e.g physiological variables) that cause such change, and based on simulations, determine context-sensitive half-times of fentanyl in ICU patients. As a result of this study the investigators aim to develop an infusion pump program to predict fentanyl plasma concentrations, and the recovery time of fentanyl effect (time to plasma concentration 1 ng/ml). Furthermore the investigators intend to test if the fentanyl infusion pump program predicts fentanyl plasma concentrations in a separate group of ICU patients.
Study Procedures:
In this study there will not be administration of an investigational product per study protocol. The dosage and administration of fentanyl will be according to the ICUs established procedures and the treating physician's judgment of what is appropriate for the patient. In the ICUs of Oslo University Hospital fentanyl is administered intravenously as a continuous infusion on an infusion pump System or if needed as single bolus doses given by a handheld syringe. By routine ICUs in Oslo University Hospital usually dose the fentanyl infusion as 0,5 - 6 μg/kg/hrs, where kg is a calculation of the patients Ideal Body Weight. The fentanyl used is from marketed stock in the ICUs and is delivered by the hospital pharmacy. All medication is labelled with information and stored according to local regulations. Participants will be recruited from surgical, neurosurgical and medical ICUs.
On study days the investigator will screen the patients admitted to the ICU during the last 24 hrs. If patients are eligible for the study due to the selection criteria, they will be included in a chronological order.
Each subject must give his/hers informed consent. The gravity of the clinical situation for ICU patients may preclude informed consent before inclusion in the study. In that case, the patient's relatives (or legal representative) will receive information about the study, and will be provided the opportunity to express their opinion. If the patient´s relatives (or legal representative) are against participation, the patient will not be included.
Daily sedation cessation and spontaneous awakening trials are implemented as standard treatment regimens in the ICU's of Oslo University Hospital. In this study the investigators intend to collect blood samples over a sedation cessation period, when no fentanyl is to be administered to the patient. If the participants needs opioid analgesia during this period, alternative opioid painkillers will be given.
The first blood sample will be collected right before administration of fentanyl is to be temporarily stopped. During the following hours repeated samples will be collected. The samples will be collected randomly within a time block containing consecutive time points. Each participant will accordingly contribute samples from the entire collection time period. Fentanyl will again be given as prescribed by the treating physician when the sedation cessation period has ended.
Samples will be spinned and stored on ice in a biobank for later analysis at The Dept. of Clinical Pharmacology, St.Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
If participants in the study undergo treatment with continuous veno venous haemodialysis (CVVHD), investigators want to assess whether haemodialysis influences the degree of change in fentanyl PK. Haemodialysis is thought to have minimal effect upon the clearance of fentanyl, since fentanyl is mostly cleared by non-renal mechanisms. In addition fentanyl has high molecular weight, high protein binding capacity, low water solubility and an abundant volume of distribution that make it less likely dialyzable (16-17). There will be collected blood samples from the prefilter and postfilter line of the hemodialysis machine to asses if the dialysis filter might absorb fentanyl and remove drug from the circulation. The sampling times will follow the predefined block-sampling regimen of the arterial blood tests. Investigators also plan to calculate dialysis clearance of fentanyl in a subset of 10 patients.
Fentanyl is primarily metabolized in the liver by the Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymatic route (18-19). A study of genetic markers and polymorphism in the genes coding for these enzymes could possibly explain some of the variation in fentanyl PK in the ICU population (20-21). There will be collected a blood sample for later DNA processing to search for relevant genetic markers and polymorphisms in Cytochrome P450 enzymes.
The main metabolite of fentanyl is norfentanyl (18-19). Concentration of norfentanyl in the daily arterial blood samples will be quantified to make it possible to calculate the metabolic ratio of fentanyl/norfentanyl. The metabolic ratio will indicate to which extent each participant metabolizes fentanyl without having to take the plasma concentrations into account.
Norfentanyl is eliminated by the kidneys(18-19). There will be taken daily samples of urine to determine the urine concentrations of this metabolite.
To further asses possible covariates of fentanyl PK, patient demographics, medical history, co-morbidity, data descriptive of the population, concomitant medication and daily registrations of organ function parameters will be recorded for each patient during the study period.
Assessments and blood sampling will continue as long as the patient needs artificial ventilation and are treated with significant amounts of fentanyl.
- Conditions
- Multiple Organ Failure, Critical Care, Intensive Care
- Being tested
- Fentanyl
- Keywords
- Critical care, Intensive Care, Fentanyl, Pharmacokinetics, Multiple Organ Failure
- Medical subject headings
- Multiple Organ Failure
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
FentanylDrug
Also called Fentanyl Citrate
In this study there will be no administration of an investigational product per study protocol. The dosage of fentanyl will be according to the ICU's established procedures and the treating physician's judgment. The specific dose of fentanyl given to each patient will differ extensively. By routine, the ICU's in our hospital usually dose the fentanyl infusion as 0,5 - 6 μg/kg/hrs (kg = Ideal Body Weight). The intervention in this study will be a per protocol cessation in administration of fentanyl over a 6 hours period. Arterial blood samples, urine samples, pre and post filter samples and samples from dialysate will be collected during this 6 hours. If the patient needs opioid analgesia during the period, alternative opioid analgesia will be given.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Fentanyl | Other | This is a pharmacokinetics study with a single arm. All participants will will undergo the intervention described under the intervention section Receives: Drug: Fentanyl |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Concentration versus time of fentanyl in plasma
Randomly collected time points within a time block of 7 consecutive time points post stop in daily fentanyl administration. Time blocks: Block1:0, 2,15, 45,120, 240, 360 min. Block2: 0, 4, 20, 60, 150, 270, 360 min. Block3: 0, 8, 25, 75, 180, 300, 360 min. Block4: 0, 10, 30, 90, 210, 330, 360 min.
Measured: Daily samples during a time frame of 360 min. as long as the participant needs artificial ventilation and fentanyl.
Secondary outcomes (5)
Concentrations of fentanyl and norfentanyl in urine
Daily Sample from urine collected over 0 - 360 min. post stop in fentanyl administration.
Measured: 1 daily sample as long as the participant needs artificial ventilation and are treated with fentanyl.
Concentration versus time of fentanyl in plasma from sample pre-dialysis filter line
Samples are collected at the same timepoints as the samples from the arterial line described in outcome 1.
Measured: Daily samples during a time frame of 360 min. as long as the participant receives CVVH, artificial ventilation and fentanyl.
Concentration versus time of fentanyl in plasma from sample at post-dialysis filter line
Samples are collected at the same timepoints as the samples from the arterial line described in outcome 1.
Measured: Daily samples during a time frame of 360 min. as long as the participant receives CVVH, artificial ventilation and fentanyl.
Concentration of fentanyl in dialysate
Sample from dialysate collected over 0 - 360 min. post stop in fentanyl administration.
Measured: 1 daily sample from dialysate in 10 participants receiving CVVH, artificial ventilation and are treated with fentanyl.
Concentration versus time of norfentanyl in plasma
Samples are collected in time blocks from the arterial line described in outcome 1.
Measured: Daily samples during a time frame of 360 min. as long as the participant needs artificial ventilation and fentanyl.
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted27 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Study startOct 2015
- Primary completionSep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completionNov 2017 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (23)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Multiple Organ FailureStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Oslo University HospitalThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University Hospital
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tom Heier, Professor, Principal investigator, Dept. of Anaesthesia, Oslo University Hospital
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02587273
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- FENTANYL06. Version 8
- Other IDs
- 2006-000885-35
- Acronym
- FENTANYL06
- Status last verified
- Oct 2015
- First submitted
- 3 Jun 2015
- Last updated
- 29 Oct 2015
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
Publications
Liu LL, Gropper MA. Postoperative analgesia and sedation in the adult intensive care unit: a guide to drug selection. Drugs. 2003;63(8):755-67. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363080-00003.
PubMed 12662124Wagner BK, O'Hara DA. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sedatives and analgesics in the treatment of agitated critically ill patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Dec;33(6):426-53. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733060-00003.
PubMed 9435992Gehlbach BK, Kress JP. Sedation in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Aug;8(4):290-8. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200208000-00004.
PubMed 12386488Hogarth DK, Hall J. Management of sedation in mechanically ventilated patients. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Feb;10(1):40-6. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200402000-00007.
PubMed 15166848Patel SB, Kress JP. Sedation and analgesia in the mechanically ventilated patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar 1;185(5):486-97. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201102-0273CI. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
PubMed 22016443Puntillo KA, Arai S, Cohen NH, Gropper MA, Neuhaus J, Paul SM, Miaskowski C. Symptoms experienced by intensive care unit patients at high risk of dying. Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2155-60. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f267ee.
PubMed 20711069Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gelinas C, Dasta JF, Davidson JE, Devlin JW, Kress JP, Joffe AM, Coursin DB, Herr DL, Tung A, Robinson BR, Fontaine DK, Ramsay MA, Riker RR, Sessler CN, Pun B, Skrobik Y, Jaeschke R; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):263-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
PubMed 23269131Fukuda K. Intravenous opioid anesthetics. In Anesthesia, 6th Ed (ed Miller RD), Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 379-437
Katz R, Kelly HW. Pharmacokinetics of continuous infusions of fentanyl in critically ill children. Crit Care Med. 1993 Jul;21(7):995-1000. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199307000-00012.
PubMed 8319480Frenkel C, Schuttler J, Ihmsen H, Heye H, Rommelsheim K. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol/alfentanil infusions for sedation in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 1995 Dec;21(12):981-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01700659.
PubMed 8750122Ethuin F, Boudaoud S, Leblanc I, Troje C, Marie O, Levron JC, Le Moing JP, Assoune P, Eurin B, Jacob L. Pharmacokinetics of long-term sufentanil infusion for sedation in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Nov;29(11):1916-20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1920-y. Epub 2003 Aug 16.
PubMed 12923616Hughes MA, Glass PS, Jacobs JR. Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs. Anesthesiology. 1992 Mar;76(3):334-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199203000-00003.
PubMed 1539843Shafer SL, Varvel JR. Pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and rational opioid selection. Anesthesiology. 1991 Jan;74(1):53-63. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199101000-00010.
PubMed 1824743Vuyk J, Mertens MJ, Olofsen E, Burm AG, Bovill JG. Propofol anesthesia and rational opioid selection: determination of optimal EC50-EC95 propofol-opioid concentrations that assure adequate anesthesia and a rapid return of consciousness. Anesthesiology. 1997 Dec;87(6):1549-62. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00033. No abstract available.
PubMed 9416739Ourahma S, Marchetti F, Clergue F, Levron JC, Le Moing JP, Viars P. [Peroperative perfusion of fentanyl or sufentanil: plasma concentrations and postoperative respiratory changes]. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim. 1993;12(4):357-64. doi: 10.1016/s0750-7658(05)80101-7. French.
PubMed 8273922
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 29 Oct 2015. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Pharmacokinetics of Fentanyl in Intensive Care Patients
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02587273
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- FENTANYL06 / FENTANYL06. Version 8
- Conditions
- Multiple Organ Failure, Critical Care, Intensive Care
- Keywords
- Critical care, Intensive Care, Fentanyl, Pharmacokinetics, Multiple Organ Failure
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Unknown status
- Enrolment
- 150 participants (estimated)
- Lead sponsor
- Oslo University HospitalUniversity, hospital or other
- Collaborators
- University of California
- Study start
- Oct 2015
- Primary completion
- Sep 2017 (estimated)
- Study completion
- Nov 2017 (estimated)
- First posted
- 27 Oct 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study is part of a project intended to develop guidelines to optimise the dosing of fentanyl in intensive care patients.
This study will focus on determining:
- Whether the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl change during the ICU stay.
- To what extent / the degree of change in fentanyl pharmacokinetics in ICU patients.
- Which factors (e.g. physiological variables) that cause such a change.
- Based on simulations, determine context-sensitive half-times of fentanyl in ICU patients.
Detailed description
Background:
Patients admitted to the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) for treatment involving mechanical ventilation will be in need of sedation and analgesia in order to relieve pain and discomfort from necessary therapeutic procedures (1-7). The opioid fentanyl is frequently used as part of these sedation regimens(1-7).
The pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of fentanyl after long-term administration in ICU patients has not been studied extensively. In a study in children (fentanyl infusion time 7-144 hrs.), increased volume of distribution was found when compared to data obtained after short-term use (9). The volume of distribution of alfentanil was increased when compared with data obtained after short-term use in a study of adult ICU patients sedated with propofol and alfentanil (a rapid-onset opioid) for 24 hrs. post-operatively (10). A similar increase in distribution volume of another opioid, sufentanil, was found in adult ICU patients (average sufentanil infusion time 12 days)(11).
Experience obtained during clinical anaesthesia suggests that the duration of action in fentanyl is significantly prolonged after long-term intravenous infusions (12-13). This property of fentanyl seems to be caused by a combination of factors. Since fentanyl has a large volume of distribution there will be a continuous return of the drug from peripheral tissues, and the concentration of fentanyl in plasma will be maintained in a clinically active range for some time after a fentanyl infusion has been terminated (9). Fentanyl also potentiates the sedative effects of e.g. propofol and midazolam which contributes to a further protraction of the wake-up time (14-15).
In ICU patients these undesirable effects of fentanyl will probably be amplified as a result of major changes in volume of distribution and administration of fentanyl infusions for extensive periods of time (weeks). The investigators believe that knowledge of the PK of fentanyl in this population will be valuable to help designing optimised infusion regimens of fentanyl in the clinical setting of the ICU.
Study Objective:
The main study objective is to determine wether the pharmacokinetics of fentanyl change during the ICU stay, and the extent of this change. The investigators will try to unveil which factors (e.g physiological variables) that cause such change, and based on simulations, determine context-sensitive half-times of fentanyl in ICU patients. As a result of this study the investigators aim to develop an infusion pump program to predict fentanyl plasma concentrations, and the recovery time of fentanyl effect (time to plasma concentration 1 ng/ml). Furthermore the investigators intend to test if the fentanyl infusion pump program predicts fentanyl plasma concentrations in a separate group of ICU patients.
Study Procedures:
In this study there will not be administration of an investigational product per study protocol. The dosage and administration of fentanyl will be according to the ICUs established procedures and the treating physician's judgment of what is appropriate for the patient. In the ICUs of Oslo University Hospital fentanyl is administered intravenously as a continuous infusion on an infusion pump System or if needed as single bolus doses given by a handheld syringe. By routine ICUs in Oslo University Hospital usually dose the fentanyl infusion as 0,5 - 6 μg/kg/hrs, where kg is a calculation of the patients Ideal Body Weight. The fentanyl used is from marketed stock in the ICUs and is delivered by the hospital pharmacy. All medication is labelled with information and stored according to local regulations. Participants will be recruited from surgical, neurosurgical and medical ICUs.
On study days the investigator will screen the patients admitted to the ICU during the last 24 hrs. If patients are eligible for the study due to the selection criteria, they will be included in a chronological order.
Each subject must give his/hers informed consent. The gravity of the clinical situation for ICU patients may preclude informed consent before inclusion in the study. In that case, the patient's relatives (or legal representative) will receive information about the study, and will be provided the opportunity to express their opinion. If the patient´s relatives (or legal representative) are against participation, the patient will not be included.
Daily sedation cessation and spontaneous awakening trials are implemented as standard treatment regimens in the ICU's of Oslo University Hospital. In this study the investigators intend to collect blood samples over a sedation cessation period, when no fentanyl is to be administered to the patient. If the participants needs opioid analgesia during this period, alternative opioid painkillers will be given.
The first blood sample will be collected right before administration of fentanyl is to be temporarily stopped. During the following hours repeated samples will be collected. The samples will be collected randomly within a time block containing consecutive time points. Each participant will accordingly contribute samples from the entire collection time period. Fentanyl will again be given as prescribed by the treating physician when the sedation cessation period has ended.
Samples will be spinned and stored on ice in a biobank for later analysis at The Dept. of Clinical Pharmacology, St.Olavs Hospital, Trondheim, Norway.
If participants in the study undergo treatment with continuous veno venous haemodialysis (CVVHD), investigators want to assess whether haemodialysis influences the degree of change in fentanyl PK. Haemodialysis is thought to have minimal effect upon the clearance of fentanyl, since fentanyl is mostly cleared by non-renal mechanisms. In addition fentanyl has high molecular weight, high protein binding capacity, low water solubility and an abundant volume of distribution that make it less likely dialyzable (16-17). There will be collected blood samples from the prefilter and postfilter line of the hemodialysis machine to asses if the dialysis filter might absorb fentanyl and remove drug from the circulation. The sampling times will follow the predefined block-sampling regimen of the arterial blood tests. Investigators also plan to calculate dialysis clearance of fentanyl in a subset of 10 patients.
Fentanyl is primarily metabolized in the liver by the Cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) enzymatic route (18-19). A study of genetic markers and polymorphism in the genes coding for these enzymes could possibly explain some of the variation in fentanyl PK in the ICU population (20-21). There will be collected a blood sample for later DNA processing to search for relevant genetic markers and polymorphisms in Cytochrome P450 enzymes.
The main metabolite of fentanyl is norfentanyl (18-19). Concentration of norfentanyl in the daily arterial blood samples will be quantified to make it possible to calculate the metabolic ratio of fentanyl/norfentanyl. The metabolic ratio will indicate to which extent each participant metabolizes fentanyl without having to take the plasma concentrations into account.
Norfentanyl is eliminated by the kidneys(18-19). There will be taken daily samples of urine to determine the urine concentrations of this metabolite.
To further asses possible covariates of fentanyl PK, patient demographics, medical history, co-morbidity, data descriptive of the population, concomitant medication and daily registrations of organ function parameters will be recorded for each patient during the study period.
Assessments and blood sampling will continue as long as the patient needs artificial ventilation and are treated with significant amounts of fentanyl.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Fentanyl | Other | Drug: FentanylThis is a pharmacokinetics study with a single arm. All participants will will undergo the intervention described under the intervention section |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 80 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Consecutive patients admitted to the ICU at Oslo University Hospital - Ullevål, in whom mechanical ventilation for > 72 hrs. is expected
- Aged 18 - 80 years, both inclusive
- Serum beta-HCG negative if female of childbearing potential, aged 18 - 45 years (both inclusive)
Key exclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Tracheally intubated > 12 hrs. before admittance to the ICU
- Known hypersensitivity to fentanyl or other opioids
- Post partum < 6 weeks and/or lactating
- Informed consent not received
- Any reason why, in the opinion of the investigator and/or the treating physicians, the patient should not participate in the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| FentanylAlso: Fentanyl CitrateIn this study there will be no administration of an investigational product per study protocol. The dosage of fentanyl will be according to the ICU's established procedures and the treating physician's judgment. The specific dose of fentanyl given to each patient will differ extensively. By routine, the ICU's in our hospital usually dose the fentanyl infusion as 0,5 - 6 μg/kg/hrs (kg = Ideal Body Weight). The intervention in this study will be a per protocol cessation in administration of fentanyl over a 6 hours period. Arterial blood samples, urine samples, pre and post filter samples and samples from dialysate will be collected during this 6 hours. If the patient needs opioid analgesia during the period, alternative opioid analgesia will be given. | Drug | Fentanyl |
Primary outcome
Concentration versus time of fentanyl in plasma
Time frame: Daily samples during a time frame of 360 min. as long as the participant needs artificial ventilation and fentanyl.
Randomly collected time points within a time block of 7 consecutive time points post stop in daily fentanyl administration. Time blocks: Block1:0, 2,15, 45,120, 240, 360 min. Block2: 0, 4, 20, 60, 150, 270, 360 min. Block3: 0, 8, 25, 75, 180, 300, 360 min. Block4: 0, 10, 30, 90, 210, 330, 360 min.
5 secondary outcomes
Concentrations of fentanyl and norfentanyl in urine
Time frame: 1 daily sample as long as the participant needs artificial ventilation and are treated with fentanyl.
Concentration versus time of fentanyl in plasma from sample pre-dialysis filter line
Time frame: Daily samples during a time frame of 360 min. as long as the participant receives CVVH, artificial ventilation and fentanyl.
Concentration versus time of fentanyl in plasma from sample at post-dialysis filter line
Time frame: Daily samples during a time frame of 360 min. as long as the participant receives CVVH, artificial ventilation and fentanyl.
Concentration of fentanyl in dialysate
Time frame: 1 daily sample from dialysate in 10 participants receiving CVVH, artificial ventilation and are treated with fentanyl.
Concentration versus time of norfentanyl in plasma
Time frame: Daily samples during a time frame of 360 min. as long as the participant needs artificial ventilation and fentanyl.
Results and safety
Results are not available in the source record.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 29 Oct 2015.
- Background: PubMed 12662124Liu LL, Gropper MA. Postoperative analgesia and sedation in the adult intensive care unit: a guide to drug selection. Drugs. 2003;63(8):755-67. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363080-00003.
- Background: PubMed 9435992Wagner BK, O'Hara DA. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of sedatives and analgesics in the treatment of agitated critically ill patients. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1997 Dec;33(6):426-53. doi: 10.2165/00003088-199733060-00003.
- Background: PubMed 12386488Gehlbach BK, Kress JP. Sedation in the intensive care unit. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2002 Aug;8(4):290-8. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200208000-00004.
- Background: PubMed 15166848Hogarth DK, Hall J. Management of sedation in mechanically ventilated patients. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2004 Feb;10(1):40-6. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200402000-00007.
- Background: PubMed 22016443Patel SB, Kress JP. Sedation and analgesia in the mechanically ventilated patient. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar 1;185(5):486-97. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201102-0273CI. Epub 2011 Oct 20.
- Background: PubMed 20711069Puntillo KA, Arai S, Cohen NH, Gropper MA, Neuhaus J, Paul SM, Miaskowski C. Symptoms experienced by intensive care unit patients at high risk of dying. Crit Care Med. 2010 Nov;38(11):2155-60. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181f267ee.
- Background: PubMed 23269131Barr J, Fraser GL, Puntillo K, Ely EW, Gelinas C, Dasta JF, Davidson JE, Devlin JW, Kress JP, Joffe AM, Coursin DB, Herr DL, Tung A, Robinson BR, Fontaine DK, Ramsay MA, Riker RR, Sessler CN, Pun B, Skrobik Y, Jaeschke R; American College of Critical Care Medicine. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in adult patients in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2013 Jan;41(1):263-306. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182783b72.
- BackgroundFukuda K. Intravenous opioid anesthetics. In Anesthesia, 6th Ed (ed Miller RD), Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 379-437
- Background: PubMed 8319480Katz R, Kelly HW. Pharmacokinetics of continuous infusions of fentanyl in critically ill children. Crit Care Med. 1993 Jul;21(7):995-1000. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199307000-00012.
- Background: PubMed 8750122Frenkel C, Schuttler J, Ihmsen H, Heye H, Rommelsheim K. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of propofol/alfentanil infusions for sedation in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 1995 Dec;21(12):981-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01700659.
- Background: PubMed 12923616Ethuin F, Boudaoud S, Leblanc I, Troje C, Marie O, Levron JC, Le Moing JP, Assoune P, Eurin B, Jacob L. Pharmacokinetics of long-term sufentanil infusion for sedation in ICU patients. Intensive Care Med. 2003 Nov;29(11):1916-20. doi: 10.1007/s00134-003-1920-y. Epub 2003 Aug 16.
- Background: PubMed 1539843Hughes MA, Glass PS, Jacobs JR. Context-sensitive half-time in multicompartment pharmacokinetic models for intravenous anesthetic drugs. Anesthesiology. 1992 Mar;76(3):334-41. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199203000-00003.
Related trials for Multiple Organ Failure
RecruitingObservational study
Metabolic and Functional Study of γδ T Cells in Critically Ill Patients
Sepsis, Critical Illness
Recruiting
Neutrophil and Monocyte Deactivation Via the SeLective CytopheretIc Device - A Randomized Clinical Trial in Acute Kidney Injury
Acute Kidney Injury
Active, not recruiting
Evaluating the Utility of RELiZORB™ for Treating Feeding Intolerance in Critically Ill Adults With Multi-Organ Failure
Multi Organ Failure, Exocrine Pancreatic Insufficiency
Not yet recruitingObservational study
pSOFA Score in Predicting Mortality in Pediatric Intensive Care
Critical Illness, Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome
Not yet recruitingObservational study
Prognostic Value of Stress Hyperglycemia Ratio in Critically Ill Patients
Critical Illness, Hyperglycemia
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tom Heier, Professor principal investigator
Dept. of Anaesthesia, Oslo University Hospital
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 4 study testing Fentanyl in people with Multiple Organ Failure and Critical Care, run by Oslo University Hospital at 1 site in Norway.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 5 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 29 Oct 2015. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Norway. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 4 studies take place after a treatment is approved, to learn more about its long-term benefits and risks in everyday use.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Results are not available in the source record.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
Contact Lill-Kristin K Kjaervik, MD (45223523, lilkje@gmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Concentration versus time of fentanyl in plasma (time frame: Daily samples during a time frame of 360 min. as long as the participant needs artificial ventilation and fentanyl.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02587273, which also lists 23 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 29 Oct 2015.