AzTrials
AzTrials

Nasopharyngeal CarcinomaNCT02597426

Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Post IMRT

An observational study of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a type of head and neck cancer. The last three decades of research in head and neck radiation oncology have largely focused on improvements in survival, which have mostly come at the cost of long term toxicity for surviving patients. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
How many people
108 participants
Where
1 siteCanada
Study dates
Jun 2015to Dec 2027
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
Not yet: the study is under way

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who are disease free more than four years after definitive management with radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy who were treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT)

Who may be able to join

  • All patients with a previous diagnosis of NPC treated with curative intent who are alive and disease free with a minimum of four years of follow up following completion of treatment
  • Received treatment with IMRT
  • Age 18 or above, no upper limit
  • Ability to comply with the protocol

Who cannot join

  • History of recurrent nasopharyngeal disease
  • A history of any physical, psychological or social condition which would impair with the ability of the patient to cooperate in this study
  • Unable to provide consent

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Canada1 site
  • University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: A Comprehensive Prospective Cross Sectional Study on the Late Effects of Radical Chemoradiotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Patients Treated in the Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy Era

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a type of head and neck cancer. The last three decades of research in head and neck radiation oncology have largely focused on improvements in survival, which have mostly come at the cost of long term toxicity for surviving patients.

This is an observational study that is being done to learn about the long-term symptoms and side effects that survivors of nasopharyngeal cancer may have following radiation treatment. This study will include assessment of patient report outcomes, physician-graded adverse events, neurocognitive assessment and endocrine and hearing testing

Read the detailed description

This study is designed to provide comprehensive cross sectional information on the late toxicities following radical chemoradiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma in patients who are disease free with a minimum of four years follow-up and who were treated with contemporary radiotherapy techniques (IMRT). This is an observational cross-sectional study which will aim to define the late effects in this population, investigating both well known toxicities identified from studies using earlier radiotherapy techniques (2D and 3D radiotherapy) as well as toxicities which have not been well defined in the current literature and which may be under-recognized and under treated (pituitary function and neurocognitive outcomes).

This study will assess survivors at a single time point four years after completion of their treatment who are disease free. This comprehensive review will include demographic data, clinical assessment, biochemical assessment of hormonal (pituitary and thyroid) function, patient reported outcomes, and quality of life and neurocognitive questionnaires. This study will attempt to comprehensively review these toxicities in a contemporary patient group with modern radiotherapy techniques in an attempt to bridge the gap between current recommended follow up protocols and the actual challenges faced by long term survivors. Some of these factors will be correlated with radiation doses received by the patient to inform on radiation dose thresholds for appropriate toxicities (hypothalamic-pituitary, thyroid, temporal lobe necrosis, neurocognitive performance). Patients will be offered follow-up, if required with appropriate personnel if appropriate, including neuropsychology, endocrinology and otoloryngology.

Keywords
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy, Post treatment
Medical subject headings
Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

Study groups in NCT02597426
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
PatientNasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who are disease free more than four years after definitive management with radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy who were treated with Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT), study will involve Collection of demographic data, endocrine assessment (Pituitary and Thyroid), Patient reported outcomes (Quality of Life Questionnaire), neurocognitive assessment (Behavioral rating scale) and audiology assessment (Assessment of hearing)
Caregiver/Family memberCaregivers for patients who consent to participate. Study will involve Frontal Systems Behavior Scale- FrSBe (behavioral rating scale)

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Evaluation of late toxicities( will be measured using CTCAE v 4.0 criteria)

    • Clinical toxicities will be grade according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.03 (CTCAE v4.03), a well known toxicity grading scale from 0 (asymptomatic) to 5 (death).

    Measured: 1 Year

  2. Serum Biochemical Tests for Endocrine Function (fT4, TSH)

    • A single blood test (at same time as the pituitary assessment) will include free thyroxine (fT4; units pmol/L), Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH; units mIU/L),
    • Biochemical serum deficiencies in morning testing will be scored individually according to CTCAEv4.03

    Measured: 1 Year

  3. Quality of Life Questionnaires: Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT-G, FACT-HN)

    • Quality of life as measured by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Head \& Neck (FACT-HN) and FACIT-Fatigue ranking individual items from 0= not at all to 4 = very much.
    • An overall score is reported on the sum of individual items. The FACT-HN consists of the FACT-G (which consists of 27 questions from physical, social, emotional and functional domains) and a 12-item specific head and neck module. A maximum score for the FACT-HN of 144 reflects the best possible quality of life.

    Measured: 1 Year

  4. Quality of Life Questionnaires: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACT-Fatigue)

    A 13-item specific questionnaire scored using individual items from 0= not at all to 4 = very much collated for a total score.

    Measured: 1 Years

  5. Quality of Life Questionnaires: Utilities Assessment (EuroQoL - EQ-5D)

    A standardized self-reported utility instrument consisting of 5 discrete, 3-level items, and a visual analog scale

    Measured: 1 YEAR

  6. Quality of Life Questionnaires: Symptom Burden of Treatment (MD Anderson Symptom Inventory-Head Neck)

    • A patient-reported outcome instrument consisting of 28 items, 19 related to common and severe symptoms experienced by cancer patients and 9 specific to head and neck, rated from 0=not present to 10=as bad as you can imagine

    Measured: 1 YEAR

  7. Quality of Life Questionnaires: Assessment of Depression and Anxiety (Hospital and Anxiety Depression Score)

    A 14 question item scale (7 Anxiety and 7 depression) score 0-3 (each item is individually written) for individual anxiety and depressions scores from 0-21 with validated cut-off points

    Measured: 1 YEAR

  8. Assessment of Frontal Lobe Behavior (Frontal Systems Behaviour Scale)

    A validated self-rating scale designed to measure the three frontal systems behavioral syndromes: apathy, disinhibition, and executive dysfunction. A 46-item questionnaire rated pre- and post treatment is scored 1=almost never to 5= almost always. Summary scores are calculated and converted to t-scores.

    Measured: 1 YEAR

  9. Cognitive Assessment (Montreal Cognitive Assessment - MoCA)

    A short cognitive assessment testing several cognitive domains - visuospatial, naming, memory, attention, language, abstraction, delayed recall and orientation. A maximum score is 30.

    Measured: 1 YEAR

Secondary outcomes (13)
  1. Association of Radiation Dose with Temporal Lobe Necrosis

    Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs; quantitative radiation dose data delivered to specific organs) will be calculated from initial radiotherapy plans to review association between dose received by the temporal lobe and risk of temporal lobe necrosis.

    Measured: 1 Year

  2. Association of Radiation Dose with Hearing Loss

    Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs; quantitative radiation dose data delivered to specific organs) will be calculated from initial radiotherapy plans to review association between dose received by the cochlear and vestibulocochlear nerve and risk of hearing loss

    Measured: 1 Year

  3. Association of Radiation Dose with Cognitive Impairment

    Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs; quantitative radiation dose data delivered to specific organs) will be calculated from initial radiotherapy plans to review association between dose received by the temporal lobe, brain and hippocampus and risk of neurocognitive impairment.

    Measured: 1 Year

  4. Association of Radiation Dose with Pituitary Dysfunction

    Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs; quantitative radiation dose data delivered to specific organs) will be calculated from initial radiotherapy plans to review association between dose received by the pituitary and risk of hypopituitarism

    Measured: 1 Year

  5. Association of Radiation Dose with Hypothyroidism

    Dose Volume Histograms (DVHs; quantitative radiation dose data delivered to specific organs) will be calculated from initial radiotherapy plans to review association between dose received by the thyroid gland and risk of hypothyroidism

    Measured: 1 Year

  6. Association between dysphagia and quality of life

    Correlation between dysphagia and FACT-HN score and EQ-D5

    Measured: 1 Year

  7. Association between hearing and quality of life

    Correlation between dysphagia and and FACT-HN score and EQ-D5

    Measured: 1 Year

  8. Association between hearing and quality of life

    Correlation between degree of hearing loss (on audiology) and FACT-HN score and EQ-D5

    Measured: 1Year

  9. Association between cranial neuropathy and quality of life

    Correlation between degree of cranial neuropathy and FACT-HN score and EQ-D5

    Measured: 1Year

  10. Association between neurocognitive score (MoCA) and quality of life

    Correlation between Montreal Cognitive Assessment Score and FACT-HN score and EQ-D5

    Measured: 1 Year

  11. Association between frontal functioning and quality of life

    Correlation between FrSBE (Frontal Systems Behaviour) and FACT-HN score and EQ-D5

    Measured: 1 Year

  12. Association between pituitary function and quality of life

    Correlation between pituitary function and FACT-HN score and EQ-D5

    Measured: 1 Year

  13. Association between thyroid function and quality of life

    Correlation between thyrrhoid function and FACT-HN score and EQ-D5

    Measured: 1 Year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2015
  3. Primary completionDec 2027 (estimated)
  4. Study completionDec 2027 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrolment
108 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02597426
Sponsor's protocol ID
15-9063
Status last verified
Mar 2026
First submitted
18 Aug 2015
Last updated
4 Mar 2026
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma, run by University Health Network, Toronto at 1 site in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 4 inclusion and 3 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 4 Mar 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

This study is still under way. Results are not available in the source record yet.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Evaluation of late toxicities( will be measured using CTCAE v 4.0 criteria) (time frame: 1 Year). The study lists 9 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 4 Mar 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in