AzTrials
AzTrials

Cognitive ImpairmentNCT02598050

Preoperative Cognitive Screening in Older Surgical Patients Utility for Predicting Morbidity

An observational study of Cognitive Impairment, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this work is to determine whether preoperative cognitive screening of patients over the age of 65 can be used as predictor of postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lower extremity surgical procedures. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 65 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Cognitive Impairment
How many people
250 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
1 Feb 2016to 31 Dec 2017
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 65 years and older
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Older adult

Study population: This project is designed as a prospective, single-center observational study. The cohort will consist of 250 consenting subjects ≥ 65 years of age who present to the BWH Weiner Center for Preoperative Evaluation (CPE) prior to elective lower extremity joint replacement surgery. Eligibility criteria include: patients ≥ 65 years of age with an ASA physical status of I-IV presenting for elective joint replacement. Exclusion criteria will include planned ICU admission postoperatively, uncorrected vision or hearing impairment (unable to see pictures or read or hear instructions); limited use of the dominant hand (limited ability to draw); and or inability to speak, read, or understand English.

Who may be able to join

  • consenting patients ≥ 65 years of age
  • undergoing upcoming elective lower joint replacement surgery

Who cannot join

  • planned ICU admission postoperatively
  • uncorrected vision or hearing impairment
  • limited use of the dominant hand
  • inability to speak, read, or understand English

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Weiner Center for Preoperative Evaluation

    Boston, Massachusetts, 02115

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: NIH Explanatory/Developmental Research Grant Program: Preoperative Cognitive Screening in Older Surgical Patients: Feasibility and Utility for Predicting Morbidity

The purpose of this work is to determine whether preoperative cognitive screening of patients over the age of 65 can be used as predictor of postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing lower extremity surgical procedures. This work is important as it may aid patients, families and physicians about the appropriateness of the surgical procedure and in providing resources to patients who are at the highest risk of adverse outcomes.

Read the detailed description

The overriding hypothesis is that preoperative cognitive impairment is a risk factor for poor surgical outcomes in seniors and that preoperative screening is superior to standard or systematic clinical processes for identifying at-risk patients. The first objective is to assess the marginal benefit of structured preoperative cognitive screening relative to standard or systematic preoperative evaluation for identifying seniors with likely cognitive impairment. The second objective is to determine whether preoperative cognitive impairment predicts postoperative outcome. This project is designed as a prospective, single-center observational study. The cohort will consist of 250 consenting subjects ≥ 65 years of age who present to the BWH Weiner Center for Preoperative Evaluation (CPE) prior to elective lower extremity joint replacement surgery. These surgeries are selected because they are common in this age group, associated with significant morbidity, and along with dementia are considered a priority area (bone and joint conditions) by AHRQ. These ages are chosen as significant clinical data demonstrate increased cognitive impairment in community dwelling elders. Eligibility criteria include: patients ≥ 65 years of age with an ASA physical status of I-IV presenting for elective joint replacement. Exclusion criteria will include planned ICU admission postoperatively, uncorrected vision or hearing impairment (unable to see pictures or read or hear instructions); limited use of the dominant hand (limited ability to draw); and or inability to speak, read, or understand English. Study staff will use the CPE computerized scheduling system, which is updated continuously in real time and captures relevant information such as age and procedure, to identify potential subjects. When patients check in with the receptionist in the CPE for their appointment they will be notified that they (and their surrogate) may be eligible to participate in a study in the CPE involving patients over the age of 65. The receptionist will then provide them with a brochure about the study that includes information about the purpose of the study, the risks to the patient, and the potential benefits to society. The patient will then be asked if they are willing to speak with one of the study investigators and only those patients that agree to speak with a study investigator will be approached. Patients with known cognitive impairment will be included in the study to determine whether this information is included in the preoperative evaluation form. They will sign their own consent if they are capable and going to sign their surgical procedure consent. In the event that the patient is not capable of signing their own consent a surrogate will be asked to provide consent with assent from the patient. In our prior studies with similar patient populations less than 1% had documented cognitive impairment. The staff member will then describe the goals and risks of the study in a quiet room in the PATC and ask the patient (and their surrogate where appropriate) if they choose to participate. After all questions have been answered and the patient has the opportunity to read the consent form, written consent will be obtained by one of the study investigators. After obtaining consent, study staff will gain information about the patient's age and years of education. Study staff will administer standard instruments to assess health and functional status (basic and instrumental activities of daily living [ADLs and IADLs, respectively, and the WHODAS]). The World Health Organization Disability Scale 2.0 (WHODAS) is an alternative to the SF36 to measure physical health and disability.

In addition, patients will be asked if they've had a fall within the last 6 months, whether they've been evaluated for a change in memory or thinking, who accompanied them to their appointment, their employment status, and their living situation (alone, institutionalized, living with family members) in a patient survey. The study staff will also administer the MiniCog, a simple cognitive screening tool that takes just 2-4 min to complete and has little or no education, language, or race bias. In addition, the Animal Fluency Test will be administered, which is a short cognitive screen that takes one minute to complete. Other measures of cognitive impairment will be obtained by study staff through: documentation on the patient's standard preoperative form, patient or informant report of diagnosis or evaluation for cognitive impairment or memory concerns, and systematic medical record review.

During their routine preoperative blood draw the phlebotomist will be provided with three heparinized blood tube labeled with only the patient's study ID number that will be returned to the investigative team and processed within 30 minutes of the blood draw. Briefly, half of the sample would be spun down and plasma harvested and stored at -80 degrees C and when an adequate sample size obtained used to measure inflammatory cytokines by ELISA. The remainder of the sample will be divided into 1-ml aliquots and incubated at 37°C for 15 min with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (control), 100 ng/ml interleukin (IL)-6, 100 ng/ml IL-10, or a combination of 100 ng/mlIL-2 and 2 ng/ml granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor, or 1g/ml lipopolysaccharide. Blood samples will be resuspended in 1.4 ml stabilizing buffer and incubated for 10 min at room temperature for fixation in PFA, cooled to 4C, and stored at 80C until further processing for flow cytometry to determine the immune response of the white blood cells to a ex-vivo immune challenge and whether these correlate with Mini-Cog score or the development of delirium.

Each enrolled patient will receive a business card listing the investigators' contact information and be advised to expect a follow up telephone call 6 months and 1 year after surgery to verify data elements and reassess functional outcome. Delirium will be assessed prospectively once per day on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3 by a trained study team member using the Confusion Assessment Method [CAM]. Delirium is most common on postoperative days 1-3 and the CAM is a well-validated measure of delirium in surgical patients. For functional status, the WHODAS will be administered 6-12 months postoperatively either by personnel in the surgeon's office as part of routine follow up or by study staff or by telephone. Investigators will also collect information on secondary outcomes including duration of PATC visit, presence of an advanced directive, whether they had surgical procedure, time to PACU discharge, discharge to place other than home (rehabilitation, skilled nursing facility), hospital length of stay (LOS), in hospital complications, perioperative variables including drugs administered, BIS, estimated blood loss, blood transfusions, fluid administered, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, 30-day reoperation or readmission rate, and 30-day and 1-year mortality. These outcomes are recorded in the medical record, the BWH Balanced Scorecard, an electronic database of all hospitalized patients that tabulates 31 elements of the hospital event, or the BWH Research Patient Database Enhanced Query. Data will also be confirmed by a follow up telephone interview. Thirty day and 1 year mortality will be recorded.

Being tested
No Interventions as this is a observational study
Keywords
postoperative health outcomes, older surgical patients
Medical subject headings
Cognitive Dysfunction

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No Interventions as this is a observational studyOther

Study groups in NCT02598050
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
older surgical patientsPatients 65 years of age and older having lower extremity joint replacement surgery.
Receives: Other: No Interventions as this is a observational study

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. CAM Score Postoperative Day 1-3

    patient score on the Confusion Assessment Method and comprehensive chart review up to 1, 2, or 3 days after surgery

    Measured: Up to 3 days after surgery

Secondary outcomes (7)
  1. Number of newly diagnosed health complications

    Newly diagnosed health complications up to 30 days after the surgical procedure including: Myocardial Infarction, CHF, Cardiac Arrest, Arrythmia, Pneumonia, PE, Reintubation, Stroke, Delirium, Coma>24h, deep wound infection,Superficial wound infection, Sepsis, Renal Failure, UTI, Reoperation, DVT, ICU admission,

    Measured: up to 30 days after surgical procedure

  2. Discharge location (Home vs. other than home) on the day of patient discharge from hospital

    day discharged to home or other than home

    Measured: up to 30 days after the surgical procedure.

  3. Number of days between surgical procedure and day of discharge

    number of days patient stayed in hospital following surgical procedure

    Measured: up to 30 days after surgical procedure

  4. 30 day mortality

    patient mortality 30 days after surgical procedure

    Measured: 30 days after surgical procedure

  5. 30 day re-operation or readmission

    patient readmission to the hospital or reoperation 30 days after surgical procedure

    Measured: 30 days after surgical procedure

  6. 1 year mortality

    patient mortality 1 year after surgical procedure

    Measured: 1 year after surgical procedure

  7. Functional health outcome

    functional health outcome measured with the SF36 6 months to 1 year following the patient's surgical procedure

    Measured: 6 months-1 year after surgical procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start1 Feb 2016
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2017
  4. Study completion31 Dec 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
250 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02598050
Sponsor's protocol ID
2014P002400
Status last verified
Apr 2021
First submitted
30 Sep 2015
Last updated
15 Apr 2021
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
Undecided

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Cognitive Impairment, run by Brigham and Women's Hospital at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 15 Apr 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

CAM Score Postoperative Day 1-3 (time frame: Up to 3 days after surgery). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 15 Apr 2021.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in