Myelodysplastic SyndromesPhase 2/3NCT02598661
Study to Evaluate Imetelstat (GRN163L) in Participants With International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)
A Phase 2/3 study testing Imetelstat Sodium in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Geron Corporation at 126 sites in 17 countries.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) that is relapsed/refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment in Phase 2 study and to compare the efficacy, in… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- What is being tested?
- Imetelstat Sodium
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 289 participants
- Where
- 126 sitesin 17 countries
- Study dates
- 12 Jan 2016to 13 Oct 2026
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Man or woman greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria confirmed by bone marrow aspirate and biopsy within 12 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) (Phase 2) or randomization (Phase 3). In Ventricular Repolarization Substudy, diagnosis of MDS or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) according to WHO criteria confirmed by bone marrow aspirate and biopsy within 12 weeks prior to C1D1
- International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low Risk or intermediate-1 risk MDS
- Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent, defined as requiring at least 4 RBC units transfused over an 8-week period during the 16 weeks prior to Study Entry; pre-transfusion hemoglobin (Hb) should be less than or equal to (≤) 9.0 gram per deciliter (g/dL) to count towards the 4 units total
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2
Who cannot join
- Participant has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to imetelstat sodium or its excipients
- Participant has received an investigational drug or used an invasive investigational medical device within 30 days prior to Study Entry or is currently enrolled in an investigational study
- Prior treatment with imetelstat sodium
- Have received corticosteroids greater than (>) 30 milligram per day (mg/day) prednisone or equivalent, or growth factor treatment within 4 weeks prior to study entry
- Has received an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or any chemotherapy, immunomodulatory, or immunosuppressive therapy within 4 weeks prior to study entry (8 weeks for long-acting ESAs)
- Phase 3: a) Prior treatment with a hypomethylating agent (example [eg], azacitidine, decitabine); b) Prior treatment with lenalidomide
Show all 24Show fewer
- Additional Exclusion Criteria for the Ventricular Repolarization Substudy:
- Concurrent therapy with medications known to prolong the QT interval and have been associated with Torsade de pointes arrhythmia (TdP)
- Cardiac function abnormalities on screening ECG as follows:
- Resting heart rate outside of 50 to 100 beats per minute
- QT interval by Fridericia's correction method (QTcF) >470 millisecond (msec) (or QTcF >490 msec in the presence of a right bundle branch block or ventricular conduction delay [QRS >119 msec]), determined by central assessment based on the average value of a triplicate set of ECGs
- Diagnosed or suspected congenital long QT syndrome
- Family history of sudden unexpected death from cardiac-related causes if indicative of a pathogenic mutation of cardiac ion channels
- Family history of congenital long QT syndrome
- History of Mobitz II second degree or third degree heart block
- Implantable pacemaker or automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator
- Complete left bundle branch block
- Chronic or persistent atrial arrhythmia including atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter
- History or presence of clinically relevant heart rhythm disturbances including atrial, junctional, re-entry, and ventricular tachycardia
- Unusual T-wave morphology (i.e., bifid T-wave) likely to interfere with QT measurements
- History or evidence for any of the following: severe or unstable angina, myocardial infarction, symptomatic congestive heart failure, arterial or venous thromboembolic events (example, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attacks) within 12 months prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II to IV heart disease
- Presence of uncontrolled hypertension (persistent systolic blood pressure [BP] ≥160 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥100 mmHg). Participants with a history of hypertension are permitted, provided that BP is controlled to within these limits by anti-hypertensive treatment
- Any skin condition likely to interfere with electrocardiographic electrode placement or adhesion
- History of thoracic surgery likely to cause abnormality of the electrical conduction through thoracic tissues
Trial locations and contacts
126 sites in 17 countries.
126 sites in 17 countries
United States22 sites
University of New Mexico Cancer Center
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131
CBCC Global Research, Inc.
Bakersfield, California, 93309
St. Agnes Healthcare, Inc
Baltimore, Maryland, 21229
Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders
Bethesda, Maryland, 20817
UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center
Birmingham, Alabama, 35294
Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195
The Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center
Columbus, Ohio, 43210
Texas Oncology/Methodist Charlton Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75237
Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390
Franciscan Health
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237-8601
UCLA Ronald Regan Medical Center
Los Angeles, California, 90095
Vanderbilt University Medical - Hematology-Oncology
Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6307
Yale-New Haven Hospital (YNHH) - Smilow Cancer Hospital
New Haven, Connecticut, 06510-3220
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Program for the Protection of Human Subjects
New York, New York, 10029
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032
Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital
New York, New York, 10065
BRCR Medical Center
Plantation, Florida, 33326
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC)
Seattle, Washington, 98109-1024
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110
University of South Florida (USF) - H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center
Tampa, Florida, 33612
Acrc/Arizona Clinical Research, Inc.
Tucson, Arizona, 85715
Prairie lakes Healthcare system, Inc
Watertown, South Dakota, 57201
Spain11 sites
Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol
Badalona, 08916
Hospital de Cruces
Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903
Hosp. Univ. Vall D Hebron
Barcelona, 08035
H.U.Pta.del Mar
Cadiz, Cádiz, 11009
Hosp. Gral. Univ. Gregorio Maranon
Madrid, 28007
Hosp. Univ. La Paz
Madrid, 28046
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222
Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Salamanca
Salamanca, 37007
Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme
Seville, Sevilla, 41014
Hospital Universitario Doctor
Valencia, Valencia, 46017
Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe
Valencia, 46026
France10 sites
Centre Hospitalier Universitai
Angers, 49100
CHU de Grenoble - Hôpital Albe
La Tronche, Isère, 38700
CH Le Mans - HAEMATOLOGY
Le Mans, Sarthe, 72037
CHRU de Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez - Maladies du Sang
Lille, 59037
CHU de Limoges, Hopital Dupuytren
Limoges, Haute-Vienne, 87042
Hopital de l'Archet
Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, 6202
CHU - Hôpital Saint Louis - H
Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75010
CHU de Poitiers
Poitiers, Vienne, 86021
CHU Tours
Tours, Centre-Val de Loire, 37044
CHRU Nancy Brabois
Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, 54511
Italy10 sites
AOU Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I G.M. Lancisi G. Salesi
Ancona, 60020
AOU di Bologna Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi
Bologna, 40138
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi di Firenze
Florence, 50134
A.O. Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda
Milan, Lombardy, 20162
Grande Ospedale Metropolitano 'Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli' Reggio Calabria
Reggio Calabria, 89124
Irccs Crob
Rionero in Vulture, Potenza, 85028
A.O. Universitaria Policlinico Tor Vergata
Roma, Roma, 00133
AO S. Andrea, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza
Roma, 189
Istituto Clinico Humanitas Rozzano, IRCCS
Rozzano, Milano, 20089
Ospedale di Circolo, PO Varese
Varese, 21100
Israel9 sites
Ha'Emek Medical Center
Afula, Northern District, 1834111
Carmel MC
Haifa, 3436212
The Edith Wolfson Medical Center
H̱olon, Central District, 58100
Hadassah Medical Organization
Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 9112001
Meir Medical Center
Kfar Saba, Central District, 44281
Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital
Petah Tikva, 4941492
Kaplan Medical Center
Rehovot, Hagalil Saint, 7610001
Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center
Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, 49372
The Chaim Sheba Medical Center
Tel HaShomer, Tel Aviv, 5265601
Belgium8 sites
ZAS Middelheim
Antwerp, Antwerpen, 2020
ZAS Cadix
Antwerp, Antwerpen, 2030
AZ Klina
Brasschaat, 2930
AZ Sint-Jan Burgge-Oostende
Bruges, West-Vlaanderen, 8000
Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent
Ghent, 9000
Az Groeninge
Kortrijk, West-Vlaanderen, 8500
UZ Leuven - Campus Gasthuisberg
Leuven, 3000
GZA Ziekenhuizen - Campus Sint
Wilrijk, Antwerpen, 2610
Germany8 sites
Studienzentrum für Hämatologie, Onkologie,Diabetologie, Endoskopie und Fußambulanz
Aschaffenburg, 63739
University Hospital Bonn
Bonn, 53127
Fachärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis mit Schwerpunkt
Dresden, Saxony, 1307
Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carcus Dresden
Dresden, 01307
Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
Düsseldorf, 40225
University Hospital Freiburg
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79106
University Hospital Leipzig
Leipzig, Saxony, 4107
Johannes Gutenberg Universität
Mainz, 55131
South Korea8 sites
Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital
Hwasun, Jeollanam-do, 58128
Gachon University Gil Medical Center - oncology
Incheon, Incheon Gwang'Yeogsi, 21565
Pusan National University Hospital - Hematology and Oncology
Seogu, Incheon, 42941
Seoul National University Hospital
Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, 03080
Asan Medical Center
Seoul, 05505
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351
The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital
Seoul, 06591
Severance Hospital, Yonsei Uni
Seoul, 3722
Russia7 sites
Emergency Hospital of Dzerzhinsk
Dzerzhinsk, 606019
City Clinical Hospital
Moscow, 129301
Nizhniy Novgorod Region Clinical Hospital
Nizhny Novgorod, 603126
Ryazan Regional Clinical Hospital
Ryazan, 390039
FGU-Russian Research Institut
Saint Petersburg, 191024
Clinics of Samarskiy GMU
Samara, Volga, 443079
Oncologic Dispensary No.2
Sochi, 354057
Canada6 sites
Tom Baker Cancer Centre
Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2
University of Alberta Hospital - Hematology Research
Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2R3
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 8L6
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5
Princess Margaret Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2L7
Poland5 sites
SPZOZ MSWiA z Warminsko - Mazurskim Centrum Onkologii
Olsztyn, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, 10-228
Ars Medical sp. z o.o.
Piła, Wielkopolskie Województwo, 64-920
PRATIA Poznań
Poznan, Ul. Gryfińska 1, 60-192
Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny sp.z o.o.
Słupsk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 76-200
Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny im. J. Mikulicza-Radeckiego
Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-367
Czechia4 sites
Fakultni nemocnice Brno
Brno, Brno-město, 625 00
FN Hradec Kralove
Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, 500 05
FN Kralovske Vinohrady
Prague, 100 34
Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
Prague, 128 08
Netherlands4 sites
Meander Medisch Centrum
Amersfoort, 3813 TZ
VU Medisch Centrum
Amsterdam, 1081 HV
Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen
Groningen, 9713 GZ
Radboud Umcn
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GA
Switzerland4 sites
University Hospital in Basel
Basel, Basel-Stadt (de), 4031
Inselspital - Universitätsspital Bern
Bern, Canton of Bern, 3010
Kantonsspital St. Gallen - Onkologie/Hämatologie
Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, 9007
Universitaetsspital Zuerich
Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091
United Kingdom4 sites
Aberdeen Royal Infirmary
Aberdeen, AB252ZL
The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust
Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF
Nottingham City Hospital - Clinical Haematology
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 1PB
Southampton University Hospital
Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD
Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
Cukurova University Medical Faculty
Adana, 1330
Ankara University Medical Faculty - Hematology
Ankara, Anatolia, 6590
Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi - Hematology
Izmir, İzmir, 35040
Ukraine3 sites
KNP "Cherkaskyi oblasnyi onkolohichnyi dyspanser Cherkaskoi
Cherkasy, Cherkasy Oblast, 18009
KZ "Miska bahatoprofilna klinichna likarnia No4", hematolohi
Dnipro, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, 49102
Instytut patolohii krovi ta transfusiynoi medytsyny NAMN Ukr
Lviv, Lviv Oblast, 79044
About this study
Official title: A Study to Evaluate Imetelstat (GRN163L) in Transfusion-Dependent Subjects With IPSS Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) That is Relapsed/Refractory to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Treatment
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) that is relapsed/refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment in Phase 2 study and to compare the efficacy, in terms of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI), of imetelstat sodium to placebo in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS that is relapsed/refractory to ESA treatment in Phase 3 study.
A separate Ventricular Repolarization Substudy (QTc Substudy) will evaluate the effect of imetelstat sodium on ventricular repolarization.
An Extension Phase has been included to allow continued treatment for those participants who are benefitting from imetelstat sodium and to continue to evaluate the long-term safety, overall survival (OS), and disease progression, including progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in transfusion-dependent participants with low or immediate-1 risk MDS that is relapsed/refractory to ESA treatment.
Read the detailed description
This is a Phase 2/3, multicenter study of imetelstat sodium in which 289 participants were enrolled.
- Phase 2 is an open-label, single-arm design to assess the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium. A total of 57 participants were enrolled in Phase 2, including the expansion cohort.
- Phase 3 is a double-blind, randomized design to compare the efficacy of imetelstat sodium with placebo. In the Phase 3 study, 178 participants were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either imetelstat sodium or placebo, respectively.
- In a separate Ventricular Repolarization (VR) Substudy (QTc Substudy), 54 participants were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to receive either imetelstat sodium or placebo. If after a minimum of 2 treatment cycles in the VR substudy, a participant has no significant change to packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion burden or evidence of clinical benefit per Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor the participant may be unblinded. If the participant was on placebo treatment, he/she may be permitted to start treatment with imetelstat sodium.
The Extension Phase was initiated at the end of the Phase 3 study (24 months after the last participant was randomized in the Phase 3) and will continue until participants who entered Phase 3 study participated in the study for up to 5 years from the first dose of imetelstat sodium (including treatment and follow-up), or 3 years of post-treatment follow-up from the last dose of study treatment, whichever occurs later, or until death, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or until a participant is lost to follow-up. Participants ongoing on imetelstat sodium and considered to be benefiting from treatment per Investigator in the Phase 3 Study or Ventricular Repolarization Substudy, have the option to continue receiving imetelstat sodium in the Extension Phase. Participants in the follow-up phase for the Phase 3 study or Ventricular Repolarization Substudy have the option to continue the follow-up in the Extension Phase.
The Phase 2, Phase 3, and VR Substudy all consist of 3 phases: a Screening phase (up to 28 days); a treatment phase; and a post-treatment follow-up phase which will continue until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or the End of the Study (whichever occurs first). The Extension Phase of the study will consist of an extended treatment phase and an extended follow-up phase which will continue until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or the End of the Study (whichever occurs first).
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Being tested
- Imetelstat Sodium, Placebo
- Keywords
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Imetelstat Sodium, GRN163L, Relapsed/refractory to ESAs, Transfusion dependent, IMerge
- Medical subject headings
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Recurrence
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Imetelstat SodiumDrug
Also called GRN163L
Imetelstat sodium IV infusion.
PlaceboDrug
Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo IV infusion.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 2: Imetelstat Sodium | Experimental | Imetelstat sodium administered intravenously (IV), at a starting dose of 7.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. Dose escalation to 9.4 mg/kg was allowed before Protocol Amendment 2. Receives: Drug: Imetelstat Sodium |
| Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium | Experimental | Imetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. Receives: Drug: Imetelstat Sodium |
| Phase 3: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo administered IV, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle), until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| QTc Substudy: Imetelstat Sodium | Experimental | Imetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. Receives: Drug: Imetelstat Sodium |
| QTc Substudy: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo administered IV, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle), until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. If after a minimum of 2 treatment cycles a participant has no significant change to pRBC transfusion burden or evidence of clinical benefit per Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor the participant, he/she may be permitted to start treatment with imetelstat sodium. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
| Extension Phase: Imetelstat Sodium | Experimental | Participants randomized to the imetelstat sodium arm in the Phase 3 and the VR QTc Substudy, based on the response will continue to receive imetelstat sodium IV, at the dose they were receiving in the Phase 3 or VR QTc Substudy, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or up to 3 years whichever occurs first. Receives: Drug: Imetelstat Sodium |
| Extension Phase: Extended Follow-up | Experimental | Participants randomized to the placebo arm in the Phase 3 study will enter the Extended Follow-up part of the Extension Phase and continue in follow up until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or whichever occurs first up to approximately 3 years. Receives: Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants)
Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period in Target Population
Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period
Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Measured: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Secondary outcomes (21)
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Deaths
TEAEs were defined as those events that 1) occurred after the first dose of study drug, through the treatment phase, and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug or until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if earlier; 2) any event that was considered study drug-related regardless of the start date of the event; or 3) any event that was presented at baseline but worsened in severity or was subsequently considered drug-related by the investigator. Serious TEAEs are any TEAEs that result in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, is medically important. Any clinically significant vital sign measurements, clinical laboratory values, and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings were reported as TEAEs. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
Measured: Adverse events: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3; Deaths: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period
Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 24 weeks (168 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2 and the day of randomization for participants enrolled in Phase 3. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)
Time to 8-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 8-week RBC TI period.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI
Time to 24-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 24-weeks RBC TI period.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI
Duration of RBC TI was defined as the first day of the longest RBC TI period to the date of the first RBC transfusion after the TI period started. The 95% CI was based on Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006
As per IWG Response Criteria 2006: HI-E was defined as a hemoglobin (Hb) increase by greater than or equal to (≥)1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusion units/8 weeks compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks. Only RBC transfusions given for a Hb of less than or equal to (≤)9 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Investigator
As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; Peripheral blood (PB): Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place. All participants in Phase 2 were evaluated by the Investigator for CR/PR/mCR regardless of bone marrow blasts at baseline.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; PB: Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. CR, PR and mCR were assessed by IRC in Phase 3 and participants were required to fit at least one of the following criteria (participants with >5% baseline blasts per central pathology reviewer assessment; participants with CR, PR, mCR, or cytogenetic response as assessed by the investigator) and have at least one post-baseline assessment.
Measured: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to death from any cause. Survival time of living participants was censored on the last date a participant is known to be alive or lost to follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival.
Measured: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Progression free survival was defined as the time interval from study Day 1 to the first date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression as per IWG criteria was defined as: at least one of the following: at least 50 % decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by ≥1.5 g/dL; transfusion dependence.
Measured: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Time to progression to AML was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the date of AML diagnosis. Participants who did not progress to AML and were still alive at the cutoff date for the analysis or who withdrew from the study (withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up), data was censored at the date of the last disease evaluation.
Measured: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval
Amount of RBC transfusions for 8-week interval was defined as the total number of RBC transfusion units in a given 8-week interval during study. The best 8-week interval is a post-baseline 8-week interval where the participant had the fewest post-Study Day 1 RBC transfusion units. A valid 8-week period must start before the date of last dose of study drug + 30 days or end of treatment (EOT) visit whichever occurs first and ends before the first transfusion in post-treatment follow-up or the first day of subsequent anti-cancer therapy whichever occurs first.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden
Relative percent change in RBC transfusions per 8-week = (amount of RBC transfusions per 8-week - prior RBC transfusion burden) / prior RBC transfusion burden multiplied by 100%. Prior RBC transfusion burden was defined as the maximum number of RBC units transfused over any consecutive 8 weeks prior to study entry.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors
Percentage of participants who received any myeloid growth factors starting from Study Day 1 were reported. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration
Duration of myeloid growth factor administered starting from Study Day 1 was reported.
Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for pharmacokinetic (PK) data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.
Measured: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Area Under the Drug Concentration-Plasma Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 28 Days (AUC0-28d)
As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for PK data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.
Measured: Cycle 1 (Days 1 to 28) (Cycle duration= 28 days)
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Imetelstat Sodium
As pre-specified in the SAP, participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for immunogenicity data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Measured: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)
Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical Encounters
Outpatient medical encounters included various sites of care: a) emergency room (ER) visits, b) hospital outpatient visits, c) home care visit, d) visit to lab, e) visit to doctor's office, f) other visits. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Measured: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of Hospitalization
Hospitalization included any medical encounter defined as hospice, hospital inpatient department, and intensive care unit (ICU). Hospitalizations without end dates were not counted in the calculation of length of stay. If any participant had multiple readmissions, duration was calculated as the sum of all hospital stays.
Measured: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
QTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)
Baseline was defined as the mean of the measured ECG intervals collected at 3 time points (-1 hour, -0.5 hour, and 0 hour) prior to treatment administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length= 28 days)
Measured: Baseline, Cycle 1, Day 1: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (cycle length= 28 days)
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted6 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Study start12 Jan 2016
- Primary completion13 Oct 2023
- Study completion13 Oct 2026 (estimated)
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myelodysplastic SyndromesStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator
- Enrolment
- 289 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Geron Corporation
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Tymara Berry, MD, Study director, Geron Corporation
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02598661
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CR107947
- Other IDs
- 63935937MDS3001, EU CTIS number, 2015-002874-19, 2015
- Status last verified
- Sep 2025
- First submitted
- 27 Oct 2015
- Last updated
- 17 Jul 2026
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Sekeres MA, Zeidan AM, Santini V, Komrokji RS, Fenaux P, Savona MR, Madanat YF, Valcarcel D, Regnault A, Creel K, Sun L, Wan Y, Navada S, Berry T, Feller F, Platzbecker U, Diez-Campelo M, Oliva EN. Imetelstat improves patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: results from the phase III IMerge study. Haematologica. 2026 Jul 1;111(7):2385-2396. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2025.288956. Epub 2026 Jan 22.
PubMed 41568521Kim N, Pulte ED, Ehrlich LA, Ionan AC, Haupert S, Vallejo J, Green F, Zheng N, Wang Y, Liu J, Blanco JG, Dorff SE, Booth B, Choe M, Gehrke B, Bhatnagar V, Theoret M, Pazdur R, De Claro RA, Norsworthy KJ. US Food and Drug Administration Approval Summary: Imetelstat for Selected Patients With Low- to Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Transfusion-Dependent Anemia. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Dec 10;43(35):3760-3768. doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-01369. Epub 2025 Oct 24.
PubMed 41135032Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Sekeres MA, Savona MR, Madanat YF, Diez-Campelo M, Valcarcel D, Illmer T, Jonasova A, Belohlavkova P, Sherman LJ, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Xia Q, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Ikin A, Navada S, Feller F, Komrokji RS, Zeidan AM. Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2024 Jan 20;403(10423):249-260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01724-5. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
PubMed 38048786Steensma DP, Fenaux P, Van Eygen K, Raza A, Santini V, Germing U, Font P, Diez-Campelo M, Thepot S, Vellenga E, Patnaik MM, Jang JH, Varsos H, Bussolari J, Rose E, Sherman L, Sun L, Wan Y, Dougherty S, Huang F, Feller F, Rizo A, Platzbecker U. Imetelstat Achieves Meaningful and Durable Transfusion Independence in High Transfusion-Burden Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in a Phase II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;39(1):48-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01895. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
PubMed 33108243
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 17 Jul 2026. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A Study to Evaluate Imetelstat (GRN163L) in Transfusion-Dependent Subjects With IPSS Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) That is Relapsed/Refractory to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Treatment
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02598661
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- CR107947
- Conditions
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes
- Keywords
- Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Imetelstat Sodium, GRN163L, Relapsed/refractory to ESAs, Transfusion dependent, IMerge
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrolment
- 289 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Geron CorporationIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 12 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 13 Oct 2023 (actual)
- Study completion
- 13 Oct 2026 (estimated)
- First posted
- 6 Nov 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Feb 2025
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) that is relapsed/refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment in Phase 2 study and to compare the efficacy, in terms of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI), of imetelstat sodium to placebo in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS that is relapsed/refractory to ESA treatment in Phase 3 study.
A separate Ventricular Repolarization Substudy (QTc Substudy) will evaluate the effect of imetelstat sodium on ventricular repolarization.
An Extension Phase has been included to allow continued treatment for those participants who are benefitting from imetelstat sodium and to continue to evaluate the long-term safety, overall survival (OS), and disease progression, including progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in transfusion-dependent participants with low or immediate-1 risk MDS that is relapsed/refractory to ESA treatment.
Detailed description
This is a Phase 2/3, multicenter study of imetelstat sodium in which 289 participants were enrolled.
- Phase 2 is an open-label, single-arm design to assess the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium. A total of 57 participants were enrolled in Phase 2, including the expansion cohort.
- Phase 3 is a double-blind, randomized design to compare the efficacy of imetelstat sodium with placebo. In the Phase 3 study, 178 participants were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either imetelstat sodium or placebo, respectively.
- In a separate Ventricular Repolarization (VR) Substudy (QTc Substudy), 54 participants were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to receive either imetelstat sodium or placebo. If after a minimum of 2 treatment cycles in the VR substudy, a participant has no significant change to packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion burden or evidence of clinical benefit per Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor the participant may be unblinded. If the participant was on placebo treatment, he/she may be permitted to start treatment with imetelstat sodium.
The Extension Phase was initiated at the end of the Phase 3 study (24 months after the last participant was randomized in the Phase 3) and will continue until participants who entered Phase 3 study participated in the study for up to 5 years from the first dose of imetelstat sodium (including treatment and follow-up), or 3 years of post-treatment follow-up from the last dose of study treatment, whichever occurs later, or until death, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or until a participant is lost to follow-up. Participants ongoing on imetelstat sodium and considered to be benefiting from treatment per Investigator in the Phase 3 Study or Ventricular Repolarization Substudy, have the option to continue receiving imetelstat sodium in the Extension Phase. Participants in the follow-up phase for the Phase 3 study or Ventricular Repolarization Substudy have the option to continue the follow-up in the Extension Phase.
The Phase 2, Phase 3, and VR Substudy all consist of 3 phases: a Screening phase (up to 28 days); a treatment phase; and a post-treatment follow-up phase which will continue until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or the End of the Study (whichever occurs first). The Extension Phase of the study will consist of an extended treatment phase and an extended follow-up phase which will continue until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or the End of the Study (whichever occurs first).
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Double blind (participant, investigator)
- Number of arms
- 7
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Phase 2: Imetelstat Sodium | Experimental | Drug: Imetelstat SodiumImetelstat sodium administered intravenously (IV), at a starting dose of 7.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. Dose escalation to 9.4 mg/kg was allowed before Protocol Amendment 2. |
| Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium | Experimental | Drug: Imetelstat SodiumImetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. |
| Phase 3: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboImetelstat sodium-matching placebo administered IV, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle), until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. |
| QTc Substudy: Imetelstat Sodium | Experimental | Drug: Imetelstat SodiumImetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. |
| QTc Substudy: Placebo | Placebo comparator | Drug: PlaceboImetelstat sodium-matching placebo administered IV, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle), until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. If after a minimum of 2 treatment cycles a participant has no significant change to pRBC transfusion burden or evidence of clinical benefit per Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor the participant, he/she may be permitted to start treatment with imetelstat sodium. |
| Extension Phase: Imetelstat Sodium | Experimental | Drug: Imetelstat SodiumParticipants randomized to the imetelstat sodium arm in the Phase 3 and the VR QTc Substudy, based on the response will continue to receive imetelstat sodium IV, at the dose they were receiving in the Phase 3 or VR QTc Substudy, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or up to 3 years whichever occurs first. |
| Extension Phase: Extended Follow-up | Experimental | Drug: PlaceboParticipants randomized to the placebo arm in the Phase 3 study will enter the Extended Follow-up part of the Extension Phase and continue in follow up until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or whichever occurs first up to approximately 3 years. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Man or woman greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age
- Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria confirmed by bone marrow aspirate and biopsy within 12 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) (Phase 2) or randomization (Phase 3). In Ventricular Repolarization Substudy, diagnosis of MDS or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) according to WHO criteria confirmed by bone marrow aspirate and biopsy within 12 weeks prior to C1D1
- International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low Risk or intermediate-1 risk MDS
- Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent, defined as requiring at least 4 RBC units transfused over an 8-week period during the 16 weeks prior to Study Entry; pre-transfusion hemoglobin (Hb) should be less than or equal to (≤) 9.0 gram per deciliter (g/dL) to count towards the 4 units total
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2
Key exclusion criteria (24 listed)
- Participant has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to imetelstat sodium or its excipients
- Participant has received an investigational drug or used an invasive investigational medical device within 30 days prior to Study Entry or is currently enrolled in an investigational study
- Prior treatment with imetelstat sodium
- Have received corticosteroids greater than (>) 30 milligram per day (mg/day) prednisone or equivalent, or growth factor treatment within 4 weeks prior to study entry
- Has received an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or any chemotherapy, immunomodulatory, or immunosuppressive therapy within 4 weeks prior to study entry (8 weeks for long-acting ESAs)
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Imetelstat SodiumAlso: GRN163LImetelstat sodium IV infusion. | Drug | Extension Phase: Imetelstat Sodium, Phase 2: Imetelstat Sodium, Phase 3: Imetelstat Sodium, QTc Substudy: Imetelstat Sodium |
| PlaceboImetelstat sodium-matching placebo IV infusion. | Drug | Extension Phase: Extended Follow-up, Phase 3: Placebo, QTc Substudy: Placebo |
Primary outcome
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants)
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2
Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period in Target Population
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2
Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period
Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.
21 secondary outcomes
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Deaths
Time frame: Adverse events: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3; Deaths: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Investigator
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)
Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)
Time frame: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Time frame: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)
Time frame: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration
Time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)
Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Area Under the Drug Concentration-Plasma Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 28 Days (AUC0-28d)
Time frame: Cycle 1 (Days 1 to 28) (Cycle duration= 28 days)
Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Imetelstat Sodium
Time frame: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)
Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical Encounters
Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of Hospitalization
Time frame: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3
QTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)
Time frame: Baseline, Cycle 1, Day 1: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (cycle length= 28 days)
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 17 Jul 2026.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41568521Sekeres MA, Zeidan AM, Santini V, Komrokji RS, Fenaux P, Savona MR, Madanat YF, Valcarcel D, Regnault A, Creel K, Sun L, Wan Y, Navada S, Berry T, Feller F, Platzbecker U, Diez-Campelo M, Oliva EN. Imetelstat improves patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: results from the phase III IMerge study. Haematologica. 2026 Jul 1;111(7):2385-2396. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2025.288956. Epub 2026 Jan 22.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 41135032Kim N, Pulte ED, Ehrlich LA, Ionan AC, Haupert S, Vallejo J, Green F, Zheng N, Wang Y, Liu J, Blanco JG, Dorff SE, Booth B, Choe M, Gehrke B, Bhatnagar V, Theoret M, Pazdur R, De Claro RA, Norsworthy KJ. US Food and Drug Administration Approval Summary: Imetelstat for Selected Patients With Low- to Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Transfusion-Dependent Anemia. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Dec 10;43(35):3760-3768. doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-01369. Epub 2025 Oct 24.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38048786Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Sekeres MA, Savona MR, Madanat YF, Diez-Campelo M, Valcarcel D, Illmer T, Jonasova A, Belohlavkova P, Sherman LJ, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Xia Q, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Ikin A, Navada S, Feller F, Komrokji RS, Zeidan AM. Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2024 Jan 20;403(10423):249-260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01724-5. Epub 2023 Dec 1.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 33108243Steensma DP, Fenaux P, Van Eygen K, Raza A, Santini V, Germing U, Font P, Diez-Campelo M, Thepot S, Vellenga E, Patnaik MM, Jang JH, Varsos H, Bussolari J, Rose E, Sherman L, Sun L, Wan Y, Dougherty S, Huang F, Feller F, Rizo A, Platzbecker U. Imetelstat Achieves Meaningful and Durable Transfusion Independence in High Transfusion-Burden Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in a Phase II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;39(1):48-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01895. Epub 2020 Oct 27.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 2
Testing New Therapies for Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia Who Are Newly Diagnosed and Have Not Yet Started Treatment (A MyeloMATCH Treatment Trial)
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasm
Active, not recruitingPhase 1/2
Omacetaxine + Azacitidine in Untreated Patients With High Grade MDS
High Grade Myelodysplastic Syndromes
RecruitingPhase 1/2
Pacritinib, a Kinase Inhibitor of CSF1R, IRAK1, JAK2, and FLT3, in Adults and Pediatric Participants 12 Years of Age or Older With Myelodysplastic Syndromes or Myelodysplastic/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Active, not recruitingPhase 2
Clofarabine and Melphalan Before Donor Stem Cell Transplant in Treating Patients With Myelodysplasia, Acute Leukemia in Remission, or Chronic Myelomonocytic Leukemia
Adult Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia in Remission, Acute Myeloid Leukemia Arising From Previous Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Not yet recruitingPhase 1
ATRN-119 in Combination With Decitabine in Patients With TP53-Mutated AML or Higher-Risk MDS
Acute Myeloid Leukemia, High-risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tymara Berry, MD study director
Geron Corporation
126 sites in 17 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Imetelstat Sodium in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Geron Corporation at 126 sites in 17 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 126 sites in United States, Spain, France, Italy, Israel and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants) (time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02598661, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2026.