AzTrials
AzTrials

Myelodysplastic SyndromesPhase 2/3NCT02598661

Study to Evaluate Imetelstat (GRN163L) in Participants With International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS)

A Phase 2/3 study testing Imetelstat Sodium in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Geron Corporation at 126 sites in 17 countries.

Active, not recruiting

Under way, not looking for participants. Everyone needed has enrolled. The study is still running.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) that is relapsed/refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment in Phase 2 study and to compare the efficacy, in… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
Myelodysplastic Syndromes
What is being tested?
Imetelstat Sodium
Type of treatment
Injection or infusion
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
289 participants
Where
126 sitesin 17 countries
Study dates
12 Jan 2016to 13 Oct 2026
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Man or woman greater than or equal to (≥) 18 years of age
  • Diagnosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) according to World Health Organization (WHO) criteria confirmed by bone marrow aspirate and biopsy within 12 weeks prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 (C1D1) (Phase 2) or randomization (Phase 3). In Ventricular Repolarization Substudy, diagnosis of MDS or myelodysplastic/myeloproliferative neoplasm with ring sideroblasts and thrombocytosis (MDS/MPN-RS-T) according to WHO criteria confirmed by bone marrow aspirate and biopsy within 12 weeks prior to C1D1
  • International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) low Risk or intermediate-1 risk MDS
  • Red blood cell (RBC) transfusion dependent, defined as requiring at least 4 RBC units transfused over an 8-week period during the 16 weeks prior to Study Entry; pre-transfusion hemoglobin (Hb) should be less than or equal to (≤) 9.0 gram per deciliter (g/dL) to count towards the 4 units total
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0, 1 or 2

Who cannot join

  • Participant has known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to imetelstat sodium or its excipients
  • Participant has received an investigational drug or used an invasive investigational medical device within 30 days prior to Study Entry or is currently enrolled in an investigational study
  • Prior treatment with imetelstat sodium
  • Have received corticosteroids greater than (>) 30 milligram per day (mg/day) prednisone or equivalent, or growth factor treatment within 4 weeks prior to study entry
  • Has received an erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) or any chemotherapy, immunomodulatory, or immunosuppressive therapy within 4 weeks prior to study entry (8 weeks for long-acting ESAs)
  • Phase 3: a) Prior treatment with a hypomethylating agent (example [eg], azacitidine, decitabine); b) Prior treatment with lenalidomide
Show all 24Show fewer
  • Additional Exclusion Criteria for the Ventricular Repolarization Substudy:
  • Concurrent therapy with medications known to prolong the QT interval and have been associated with Torsade de pointes arrhythmia (TdP)
  • Cardiac function abnormalities on screening ECG as follows:
  • Resting heart rate outside of 50 to 100 beats per minute
  • QT interval by Fridericia's correction method (QTcF) >470 millisecond (msec) (or QTcF >490 msec in the presence of a right bundle branch block or ventricular conduction delay [QRS >119 msec]), determined by central assessment based on the average value of a triplicate set of ECGs
  • Diagnosed or suspected congenital long QT syndrome
  • Family history of sudden unexpected death from cardiac-related causes if indicative of a pathogenic mutation of cardiac ion channels
  • Family history of congenital long QT syndrome
  • History of Mobitz II second degree or third degree heart block
  • Implantable pacemaker or automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Complete left bundle branch block
  • Chronic or persistent atrial arrhythmia including atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter
  • History or presence of clinically relevant heart rhythm disturbances including atrial, junctional, re-entry, and ventricular tachycardia
  • Unusual T-wave morphology (i.e., bifid T-wave) likely to interfere with QT measurements
  • History or evidence for any of the following: severe or unstable angina, myocardial infarction, symptomatic congestive heart failure, arterial or venous thromboembolic events (example, pulmonary embolism, cerebrovascular accident including transient ischemic attacks) within 12 months prior to Cycle 1 Day 1, New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II to IV heart disease
  • Presence of uncontrolled hypertension (persistent systolic blood pressure [BP] ≥160 mmHg or diastolic BP ≥100 mmHg). Participants with a history of hypertension are permitted, provided that BP is controlled to within these limits by anti-hypertensive treatment
  • Any skin condition likely to interfere with electrocardiographic electrode placement or adhesion
  • History of thoracic surgery likely to cause abnormality of the electrical conduction through thoracic tissues

Trial locations and contacts

126 sites in 17 countries.

126 sites in 17 countries

United States22 sites
  • University of New Mexico Cancer Center

    Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87131

  • CBCC Global Research, Inc.

    Bakersfield, California, 93309

  • St. Agnes Healthcare, Inc

    Baltimore, Maryland, 21229

  • Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders

    Bethesda, Maryland, 20817

  • UAB Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Birmingham, Alabama, 35294

  • Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer

    Cleveland, Ohio, 44195

  • The Ohio State Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Columbus, Ohio, 43210

  • Texas Oncology/Methodist Charlton Cancer Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75237

  • Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center

    Dallas, Texas, 75390

  • Franciscan Health

    Indianapolis, Indiana, 46237-8601

  • UCLA Ronald Regan Medical Center

    Los Angeles, California, 90095

  • Vanderbilt University Medical - Hematology-Oncology

    Nashville, Tennessee, 37232-6307

  • Yale-New Haven Hospital (YNHH) - Smilow Cancer Hospital

    New Haven, Connecticut, 06510-3220

  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Program for the Protection of Human Subjects

    New York, New York, 10029

  • Columbia University Medical Center

    New York, New York, 10032

  • Weill Cornell Medical College-New York Presbyterian Hospital

    New York, New York, 10065

  • BRCR Medical Center

    Plantation, Florida, 33326

  • Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center (FHCRC)

    Seattle, Washington, 98109-1024

  • Washington University School of Medicine

    St Louis, Missouri, 63110

  • University of South Florida (USF) - H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center

    Tampa, Florida, 33612

  • Acrc/Arizona Clinical Research, Inc.

    Tucson, Arizona, 85715

  • Prairie lakes Healthcare system, Inc

    Watertown, South Dakota, 57201

Other trials in United States

Spain11 sites
  • Hosp. Univ. Germans Trias I Pujol

    Badalona, 08916

  • Hospital de Cruces

    Barakaldo, Vizcaya, 48903

  • Hosp. Univ. Vall D Hebron

    Barcelona, 08035

  • H.U.Pta.del Mar

    Cadiz, Cádiz, 11009

  • Hosp. Gral. Univ. Gregorio Maranon

    Madrid, 28007

  • Hosp. Univ. La Paz

    Madrid, 28046

  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda

    Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222

  • Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Salamanca

    Salamanca, 37007

  • Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de Valme

    Seville, Sevilla, 41014

  • Hospital Universitario Doctor

    Valencia, Valencia, 46017

  • Hospital Universitari i Politecnic La Fe

    Valencia, 46026

Other trials in Spain

France10 sites
  • Centre Hospitalier Universitai

    Angers, 49100

  • CHU de Grenoble - Hôpital Albe

    La Tronche, Isère, 38700

  • CH Le Mans - HAEMATOLOGY

    Le Mans, Sarthe, 72037

  • CHRU de Lille - Hopital Claude Huriez - Maladies du Sang

    Lille, 59037

  • CHU de Limoges, Hopital Dupuytren

    Limoges, Haute-Vienne, 87042

  • Hopital de l'Archet

    Nice, Alpes-Maritimes, 6202

  • CHU - Hôpital Saint Louis - H

    Paris, Île-de-France Region, 75010

  • CHU de Poitiers

    Poitiers, Vienne, 86021

  • CHU Tours

    Tours, Centre-Val de Loire, 37044

  • CHRU Nancy Brabois

    Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, Meurthe-et-Moselle, 54511

Other trials in France

Italy10 sites
  • AOU Ospedali Riuniti Umberto I G.M. Lancisi G. Salesi

    Ancona, 60020

  • AOU di Bologna Policlinico S. Orsola Malpighi

    Bologna, 40138

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Careggi di Firenze

    Florence, 50134

  • A.O. Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda

    Milan, Lombardy, 20162

  • Grande Ospedale Metropolitano 'Bianchi-Melacrino-Morelli' Reggio Calabria

    Reggio Calabria, 89124

  • Irccs Crob

    Rionero in Vulture, Potenza, 85028

  • A.O. Universitaria Policlinico Tor Vergata

    Roma, Roma, 00133

  • AO S. Andrea, Università degli Studi di Roma La Sapienza

    Roma, 189

  • Istituto Clinico Humanitas Rozzano, IRCCS

    Rozzano, Milano, 20089

  • Ospedale di Circolo, PO Varese

    Varese, 21100

Other trials in Italy

Israel9 sites
  • Ha'Emek Medical Center

    Afula, Northern District, 1834111

  • Carmel MC

    Haifa, 3436212

  • The Edith Wolfson Medical Center

    H̱olon, Central District, 58100

  • Hadassah Medical Organization

    Jerusalem, Jerusalem, 9112001

  • Meir Medical Center

    Kfar Saba, Central District, 44281

  • Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital

    Petah Tikva, 4941492

  • Kaplan Medical Center

    Rehovot, Hagalil Saint, 7610001

  • Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

    Tel Aviv, Tel Aviv, 49372

  • The Chaim Sheba Medical Center

    Tel HaShomer, Tel Aviv, 5265601

Other trials in Israel

Belgium8 sites
  • ZAS Middelheim

    Antwerp, Antwerpen, 2020

  • ZAS Cadix

    Antwerp, Antwerpen, 2030

  • AZ Klina

    Brasschaat, 2930

  • AZ Sint-Jan Burgge-Oostende

    Bruges, West-Vlaanderen, 8000

  • Universitair Ziekenhuis Gent

    Ghent, 9000

  • Az Groeninge

    Kortrijk, West-Vlaanderen, 8500

  • UZ Leuven - Campus Gasthuisberg

    Leuven, 3000

  • GZA Ziekenhuizen - Campus Sint

    Wilrijk, Antwerpen, 2610

Other trials in Belgium

Germany8 sites
  • Studienzentrum für Hämatologie, Onkologie,Diabetologie, Endoskopie und Fußambulanz

    Aschaffenburg, 63739

  • University Hospital Bonn

    Bonn, 53127

  • Fachärztliche Gemeinschaftspraxis mit Schwerpunkt

    Dresden, Saxony, 1307

  • Universitatsklinikum Carl Gustav Carcus Dresden

    Dresden, 01307

  • Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf

    Düsseldorf, 40225

  • University Hospital Freiburg

    Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79106

  • University Hospital Leipzig

    Leipzig, Saxony, 4107

  • Johannes Gutenberg Universität

    Mainz, 55131

Other trials in Germany

South Korea8 sites
  • Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital

    Hwasun, Jeollanam-do, 58128

  • Gachon University Gil Medical Center - oncology

    Incheon, Incheon Gwang'Yeogsi, 21565

  • Pusan National University Hospital - Hematology and Oncology

    Seogu, Incheon, 42941

  • Seoul National University Hospital

    Seoul, Seoul Teugbyeolsi, 03080

  • Asan Medical Center

    Seoul, 05505

  • Samsung Medical Center

    Seoul, 06351

  • The Catholic University of Korea Seoul St. Mary's Hospital

    Seoul, 06591

  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei Uni

    Seoul, 3722

Other trials in South Korea

Russia7 sites
  • Emergency Hospital of Dzerzhinsk

    Dzerzhinsk, 606019

  • City Clinical Hospital

    Moscow, 129301

  • Nizhniy Novgorod Region Clinical Hospital

    Nizhny Novgorod, 603126

  • Ryazan Regional Clinical Hospital

    Ryazan, 390039

  • FGU-Russian Research Institut

    Saint Petersburg, 191024

  • Clinics of Samarskiy GMU

    Samara, Volga, 443079

  • Oncologic Dispensary No.2

    Sochi, 354057

Other trials in Russia

Canada6 sites
  • Tom Baker Cancer Centre

    Calgary, Alberta, T2N 4N2

  • University of Alberta Hospital - Hematology Research

    Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2R3

  • Jewish General Hospital

    Montreal, Quebec, H3T 1E2

  • The Ottawa Hospital

    Ottawa, Ontario, K1G 8L6

  • Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

    Toronto, Ontario, M4N 3M5

  • Princess Margaret Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2L7

Other trials in Canada

Poland5 sites
  • SPZOZ MSWiA z Warminsko - Mazurskim Centrum Onkologii

    Olsztyn, Warmian-Masurian Voivodeship, 10-228

  • Ars Medical sp. z o.o.

    Piła, Wielkopolskie Województwo, 64-920

  • PRATIA Poznań

    Poznan, Ul. Gryfińska 1, 60-192

  • Wojewódzki Szpital Specjalistyczny sp.z o.o.

    Słupsk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 76-200

  • Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny im. J. Mikulicza-Radeckiego

    Wroclaw, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 50-367

Other trials in Poland

Czechia4 sites
  • Fakultni nemocnice Brno

    Brno, Brno-město, 625 00

  • FN Hradec Kralove

    Hradec Králové, Hradec Králové, 500 05

  • FN Kralovske Vinohrady

    Prague, 100 34

  • Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze

    Prague, 128 08

Other trials in Czechia

Netherlands4 sites
  • Meander Medisch Centrum

    Amersfoort, 3813 TZ

  • VU Medisch Centrum

    Amsterdam, 1081 HV

  • Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen

    Groningen, 9713 GZ

  • Radboud Umcn

    Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GA

Other trials in Netherlands

Switzerland4 sites
  • University Hospital in Basel

    Basel, Basel-Stadt (de), 4031

  • Inselspital - Universitätsspital Bern

    Bern, Canton of Bern, 3010

  • Kantonsspital St. Gallen - Onkologie/Hämatologie

    Sankt Gallen, Canton of St. Gallen, 9007

  • Universitaetsspital Zuerich

    Zurich, Canton of Zurich, 8091

Other trials in Switzerland

United Kingdom4 sites
  • Aberdeen Royal Infirmary

    Aberdeen, AB252ZL

  • The Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust

    Leeds, Leeds, LS9 7TF

  • Nottingham City Hospital - Clinical Haematology

    Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG5 1PB

  • Southampton University Hospital

    Southampton, Southampton, SO16 6YD

Other trials in United Kingdom

Turkey (Türkiye)3 sites
  • Cukurova University Medical Faculty

    Adana, 1330

  • Ankara University Medical Faculty - Hematology

    Ankara, Anatolia, 6590

  • Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi - Hematology

    Izmir, İzmir, 35040

Other trials in Turkey (Türkiye)

Ukraine3 sites
  • KNP "Cherkaskyi oblasnyi onkolohichnyi dyspanser Cherkaskoi

    Cherkasy, Cherkasy Oblast, 18009

  • KZ "Miska bahatoprofilna klinichna likarnia No4", hematolohi

    Dnipro, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, 49102

  • Instytut patolohii krovi ta transfusiynoi medytsyny NAMN Ukr

    Lviv, Lviv Oblast, 79044

Other trials in Ukraine

About this study

Official title: A Study to Evaluate Imetelstat (GRN163L) in Transfusion-Dependent Subjects With IPSS Low or Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndrome (MDS) That is Relapsed/Refractory to Erythropoiesis-Stimulating Agent (ESA) Treatment

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) that is relapsed/refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agent (ESA) treatment in Phase 2 study and to compare the efficacy, in terms of red blood cell (RBC) transfusion independence (TI), of imetelstat sodium to placebo in transfusion-dependent participants with low or intermediate-1 risk MDS that is relapsed/refractory to ESA treatment in Phase 3 study.

A separate Ventricular Repolarization Substudy (QTc Substudy) will evaluate the effect of imetelstat sodium on ventricular repolarization.

An Extension Phase has been included to allow continued treatment for those participants who are benefitting from imetelstat sodium and to continue to evaluate the long-term safety, overall survival (OS), and disease progression, including progression to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in transfusion-dependent participants with low or immediate-1 risk MDS that is relapsed/refractory to ESA treatment.

Read the detailed description

This is a Phase 2/3, multicenter study of imetelstat sodium in which 289 participants were enrolled.

  • Phase 2 is an open-label, single-arm design to assess the efficacy and safety of imetelstat sodium. A total of 57 participants were enrolled in Phase 2, including the expansion cohort.
  • Phase 3 is a double-blind, randomized design to compare the efficacy of imetelstat sodium with placebo. In the Phase 3 study, 178 participants were enrolled and randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either imetelstat sodium or placebo, respectively.
  • In a separate Ventricular Repolarization (VR) Substudy (QTc Substudy), 54 participants were enrolled and randomized 2:1 to receive either imetelstat sodium or placebo. If after a minimum of 2 treatment cycles in the VR substudy, a participant has no significant change to packed red blood cell (pRBC) transfusion burden or evidence of clinical benefit per Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor the participant may be unblinded. If the participant was on placebo treatment, he/she may be permitted to start treatment with imetelstat sodium.

The Extension Phase was initiated at the end of the Phase 3 study (24 months after the last participant was randomized in the Phase 3) and will continue until participants who entered Phase 3 study participated in the study for up to 5 years from the first dose of imetelstat sodium (including treatment and follow-up), or 3 years of post-treatment follow-up from the last dose of study treatment, whichever occurs later, or until death, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or until a participant is lost to follow-up. Participants ongoing on imetelstat sodium and considered to be benefiting from treatment per Investigator in the Phase 3 Study or Ventricular Repolarization Substudy, have the option to continue receiving imetelstat sodium in the Extension Phase. Participants in the follow-up phase for the Phase 3 study or Ventricular Repolarization Substudy have the option to continue the follow-up in the Extension Phase.

The Phase 2, Phase 3, and VR Substudy all consist of 3 phases: a Screening phase (up to 28 days); a treatment phase; and a post-treatment follow-up phase which will continue until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or the End of the Study (whichever occurs first). The Extension Phase of the study will consist of an extended treatment phase and an extended follow-up phase which will continue until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or the End of the Study (whichever occurs first).

Being tested
Imetelstat Sodium, Placebo
Keywords
Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Imetelstat Sodium, GRN163L, Relapsed/refractory to ESAs, Transfusion dependent, IMerge
Medical subject headings
Myelodysplastic Syndromes, Recurrence

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Imetelstat SodiumDrug

    Also called GRN163L

    Imetelstat sodium IV infusion.

  • PlaceboDrug

    Imetelstat sodium-matching placebo IV infusion.

Study groups in NCT02598661
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Phase 2: Imetelstat SodiumExperimentalImetelstat sodium administered intravenously (IV), at a starting dose of 7.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg), every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. Dose escalation to 9.4 mg/kg was allowed before Protocol Amendment 2.
Receives: Drug: Imetelstat Sodium
Phase 3: Imetelstat SodiumExperimentalImetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first.
Receives: Drug: Imetelstat Sodium
Phase 3: PlaceboPlacebo comparatorImetelstat sodium-matching placebo administered IV, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle), until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
QTc Substudy: Imetelstat SodiumExperimentalImetelstat sodium administered IV, at a starting dose of 7.5 mg/kg, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first.
Receives: Drug: Imetelstat Sodium
QTc Substudy: PlaceboPlacebo comparatorImetelstat sodium-matching placebo administered IV, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle), until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, or study termination whichever occurs first. If after a minimum of 2 treatment cycles a participant has no significant change to pRBC transfusion burden or evidence of clinical benefit per Investigator, after discussion with the Sponsor the participant, he/she may be permitted to start treatment with imetelstat sodium.
Receives: Drug: Placebo
Extension Phase: Imetelstat SodiumExperimentalParticipants randomized to the imetelstat sodium arm in the Phase 3 and the VR QTc Substudy, based on the response will continue to receive imetelstat sodium IV, at the dose they were receiving in the Phase 3 or VR QTc Substudy, every 4 weeks (on a 28-day cycle) until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or up to 3 years whichever occurs first.
Receives: Drug: Imetelstat Sodium
Extension Phase: Extended Follow-upExperimentalParticipants randomized to the placebo arm in the Phase 3 study will enter the Extended Follow-up part of the Extension Phase and continue in follow up until death, lost to follow-up, withdrawal of consent, study termination, or whichever occurs first up to approximately 3 years.
Receives: Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants)

    Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2

  2. Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period in Target Population

    Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2

  3. Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period

    Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 8 weeks (56 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Measured: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

Secondary outcomes (21)
  1. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Deaths

    TEAEs were defined as those events that 1) occurred after the first dose of study drug, through the treatment phase, and for 30 days following the last dose of study drug or until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if earlier; 2) any event that was considered study drug-related regardless of the start date of the event; or 3) any event that was presented at baseline but worsened in severity or was subsequently considered drug-related by the investigator. Serious TEAEs are any TEAEs that result in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect, is a suspected transmission of any infectious agent via a medicinal product, is medically important. Any clinically significant vital sign measurements, clinical laboratory values, and electrocardiogram (ECG) findings were reported as TEAEs. TEAEs included both serious and non-serious TEAEs.

    Measured: Adverse events: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3; Deaths: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

  2. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Without Any RBC Transfusion During Any Consecutive 24-Weeks Period

    Percentage of participants without any RBC transfusion during any consecutive 24 weeks (168 days) starting from Study Day 1 until subsequent anti-cancer therapy if any were reported. Study Day 1 is defined as the day of the first dose for participants enrolled in Phase 2 and the day of randomization for participants enrolled in Phase 3. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  3. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 8-Weeks RBC Transfusion Independence (TI)

    Time to 8-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 8-week RBC TI period.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  4. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to the 24-Weeks RBC TI

    Time to 24-week RBC TI was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the first day of the first 24-weeks RBC TI period.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  5. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of RBC TI

    Duration of RBC TI was defined as the first day of the longest RBC TI period to the date of the first RBC transfusion after the TI period started. The 95% CI was based on Kaplan-Meier product limit estimates.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  6. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Hematologic Improvement Including Erythroid Response (HI-E) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006

    As per IWG Response Criteria 2006: HI-E was defined as a hemoglobin (Hb) increase by greater than or equal to (≥)1.5 grams per deciliter (g/dL) relevant reduction of units of RBC transfusions by an absolute number of at least 4 RBC transfusion units/8 weeks compared with the pretreatment transfusion number in the previous 8 weeks. Only RBC transfusions given for a Hb of less than or equal to (≤)9 g/dL pretreatment were counted in the RBC transfusion response evaluation. The 95% CI was calculated using Clopper-Pearson method. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  7. Phase 2: Percentage of Participants With Complete Remission (CR), Partial Remission (PR), or Marrow Complete Remission (mCR) as Per International Working Group (IWG) Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Investigator

    As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; Peripheral blood (PB): Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place. All participants in Phase 2 were evaluated by the Investigator for CR/PR/mCR regardless of bone marrow blasts at baseline.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2

  8. Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With CR, PR, or mCR as Per IWG Response Criteria 2006 as Assessed by the Independent Review Committee (IRC)

    As per the IWG Response Criteria 2006, CR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts with normal maturation of all cell lines; PB: Hb ≥11 g/dL; platelets ≥100 x 10^9/dL; neutrophils ≥1.0 x 10^9/liter; blasts: 0%. PR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decrease by ≥50% over pretreatment; cellularity and morphology not relevant. mCR was defined as Bone marrow: ≤5% myeloblasts and decreased by ≥50% over pre-treatment PB. CR, PR and mCR were assessed by IRC in Phase 3 and participants were required to fit at least one of the following criteria (participants with >5% baseline blasts per central pathology reviewer assessment; participants with CR, PR, mCR, or cytogenetic response as assessed by the investigator) and have at least one post-baseline assessment.

    Measured: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  9. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Overall Survival (OS)

    OS was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to death from any cause. Survival time of living participants was censored on the last date a participant is known to be alive or lost to follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival.

    Measured: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

  10. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Progression Free Survival (PFS)

    Progression free survival was defined as the time interval from study Day 1 to the first date of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurs first. Disease progression as per IWG criteria was defined as: at least one of the following: at least 50 % decrement from maximum response levels in granulocytes or platelets; reduction in hemoglobin by ≥1.5 g/dL; transfusion dependence.

    Measured: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

  11. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Time to Progression to Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML)

    Time to progression to AML was defined as the interval from Study Day 1 to the date of AML diagnosis. Participants who did not progress to AML and were still alive at the cutoff date for the analysis or who withdrew from the study (withdrawal of consent or lost to follow-up), data was censored at the date of the last disease evaluation.

    Measured: Up to 6.6 years in Phase 2 and up to 4 years in Phase 3

  12. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Amount of RBC Transfusions in the Best 8-week Interval

    Amount of RBC transfusions for 8-week interval was defined as the total number of RBC transfusion units in a given 8-week interval during study. The best 8-week interval is a post-baseline 8-week interval where the participant had the fewest post-Study Day 1 RBC transfusion units. A valid 8-week period must start before the date of last dose of study drug + 30 days or end of treatment (EOT) visit whichever occurs first and ends before the first transfusion in post-treatment follow-up or the first day of subsequent anti-cancer therapy whichever occurs first.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  13. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percent Change in RBC Transfusions Relative to Prior Transfusion Burden

    Relative percent change in RBC transfusions per 8-week = (amount of RBC transfusions per 8-week - prior RBC transfusion burden) / prior RBC transfusion burden multiplied by 100%. Prior RBC transfusion burden was defined as the maximum number of RBC units transfused over any consecutive 8 weeks prior to study entry.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  14. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Who Received Any Myeloid Growth Factors

    Percentage of participants who received any myeloid growth factors starting from Study Day 1 were reported. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  15. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Duration of Myeloid Growth Factors Administration

    Duration of myeloid growth factor administered starting from Study Day 1 was reported.

    Measured: Up to 5 years in Phase 2 and up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  16. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax)

    As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for pharmacokinetic (PK) data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.

    Measured: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)

  17. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Area Under the Drug Concentration-Plasma Time Curve From Time Zero to Time 28 Days (AUC0-28d)

    As pre-specified in the statistical analysis plan (SAP), participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for PK data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. PK parameters were determined by population PK model.

    Measured: Cycle 1 (Days 1 to 28) (Cycle duration= 28 days)

  18. Phase 2 and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants With Anti-drug Antibodies (ADA) to Imetelstat Sodium

    As pre-specified in the SAP, participants in the imetelstat sodium arm group of Phase 2 and Phase 3 were pooled for immunogenicity data collection and analyses in this outcome measure. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Measured: Pre-dose on Cycle 1 Day 1 and pre-dose on Day 1 of every 3 cycles from Cycle 4 up to Cycle 66 in Phase 2 and Cycle 34 in Phase 3 (each cycle length= 28 days)

  19. Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Percentage of Participants With Outpatient Medical Encounters

    Outpatient medical encounters included various sites of care: a) emergency room (ER) visits, b) hospital outpatient visits, c) home care visit, d) visit to lab, e) visit to doctor's office, f) other visits. Percentages were rounded off to the nearest single decimal place.

    Measured: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  20. Phase 3: Medical Resource Utilization Assessed Based on Duration of Hospitalization

    Hospitalization included any medical encounter defined as hospice, hospital inpatient department, and intensive care unit (ICU). Hospitalizations without end dates were not counted in the calculation of length of stay. If any participant had multiple readmissions, duration was calculated as the sum of all hospital stays.

    Measured: Up to 3.7 years in Phase 3

  21. QTc Substudy: Change From Baseline in QT Interval by Fridericia's Correction Method (ΔQTcF)

    Baseline was defined as the mean of the measured ECG intervals collected at 3 time points (-1 hour, -0.5 hour, and 0 hour) prior to treatment administration on Cycle 1 Day 1 (Cycle length= 28 days)

    Measured: Baseline, Cycle 1, Day 1: 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours post-dose (cycle length= 28 days)

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted6 Nov 2015 (estimated)
  2. Study start12 Jan 2016
  3. Primary completion13 Oct 2023
  4. Study completion13 Oct 2026 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Double blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator
Enrolment
289 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02598661
Sponsor's protocol ID
CR107947
Other IDs
63935937MDS3001, EU CTIS number, 2015-002874-19, 2015
Status last verified
Sep 2025
First submitted
27 Oct 2015
Last updated
17 Jul 2026
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Sekeres MA, Zeidan AM, Santini V, Komrokji RS, Fenaux P, Savona MR, Madanat YF, Valcarcel D, Regnault A, Creel K, Sun L, Wan Y, Navada S, Berry T, Feller F, Platzbecker U, Diez-Campelo M, Oliva EN. Imetelstat improves patient-reported outcomes and quality of life in lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes: results from the phase III IMerge study. Haematologica. 2026 Jul 1;111(7):2385-2396. doi: 10.3324/haematol.2025.288956. Epub 2026 Jan 22.

    PubMed 41568521
  • Kim N, Pulte ED, Ehrlich LA, Ionan AC, Haupert S, Vallejo J, Green F, Zheng N, Wang Y, Liu J, Blanco JG, Dorff SE, Booth B, Choe M, Gehrke B, Bhatnagar V, Theoret M, Pazdur R, De Claro RA, Norsworthy KJ. US Food and Drug Administration Approval Summary: Imetelstat for Selected Patients With Low- to Intermediate-1 Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes With Transfusion-Dependent Anemia. J Clin Oncol. 2025 Dec 10;43(35):3760-3768. doi: 10.1200/JCO-25-01369. Epub 2025 Oct 24.

    PubMed 41135032
  • Platzbecker U, Santini V, Fenaux P, Sekeres MA, Savona MR, Madanat YF, Diez-Campelo M, Valcarcel D, Illmer T, Jonasova A, Belohlavkova P, Sherman LJ, Berry T, Dougherty S, Shah S, Xia Q, Sun L, Wan Y, Huang F, Ikin A, Navada S, Feller F, Komrokji RS, Zeidan AM. Imetelstat in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes who have relapsed or are refractory to erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (IMerge): a multinational, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2024 Jan 20;403(10423):249-260. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(23)01724-5. Epub 2023 Dec 1.

    PubMed 38048786
  • Steensma DP, Fenaux P, Van Eygen K, Raza A, Santini V, Germing U, Font P, Diez-Campelo M, Thepot S, Vellenga E, Patnaik MM, Jang JH, Varsos H, Bussolari J, Rose E, Sherman L, Sun L, Wan Y, Dougherty S, Huang F, Feller F, Rizo A, Platzbecker U. Imetelstat Achieves Meaningful and Durable Transfusion Independence in High Transfusion-Burden Patients With Lower-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes in a Phase II Study. J Clin Oncol. 2021 Jan 1;39(1):48-56. doi: 10.1200/JCO.20.01895. Epub 2020 Oct 27.

    PubMed 33108243

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Imetelstat Sodium in people with Myelodysplastic Syndromes, run by Geron Corporation at 126 sites in 17 countries.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 24 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: under way, not looking for participants, as of the sponsor's last update on 17 Jul 2026. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 126 sites in United States, Spain, France, Italy, Israel and 12 more countries. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Feb 2025). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Phase 2: Percentage of Participants Without Any Red Blood Cell (RBC) Transfusion During Any Consecutive 8-Weeks Period (All Participants) (time frame: Up to 5 years in Phase 2). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02598661, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 17 Jul 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in