FearNCT02622529
Patients' Conscious Experience and Psychological Consequences of Awake Surgery for Intracerebral Lesions
An observational study of Fear and Anxiety, run by Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen at 1 site in Switzerland.
Trial summary
This study aims to investigate patients' experience of awake surgery of the brain. Patients therefore must suffer a disease that makes the technique of awake craniotomy necessary. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- What is being tested?
- Screening through questionnaires
- How many people
- 20 participants
- Where
- 1 siteSwitzerland
- Study dates
- Nov 2015to Jul 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: Consecutive ongoing recruitment through investigator(s) in daily clinical practice (consultations). The subjects will receive the consent form with an address and phone number indicated where further questions regarding the study can be discussed directly with the project leader. This will take place at least one week before the hospitalisation.
Who may be able to join
- Written informed consent
- Low grade glioma, cavernoma, metastasis
- age ≥ 18 years < 65 years
Who cannot join
- No given operability for anaesthetic reasons.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
Switzerland1 site
Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen
Sankt Gallen, St.Gallen, 9007
About this study
This study aims to investigate patients' experience of awake surgery of the brain. Patients therefore must suffer a disease that makes the technique of awake craniotomy necessary.
In more detail, the investigators are performing this study in order to investigate the influence of fear on pain perception during surgery for patients undergoing awake surgery for lesions within the brain. In the event of finding a correlation between fear of the surgery and intraoperative pain perception, the investigators aim to reduce possible fear beforehand.
Read more
An additional goal of the investigators is to identify psychological consequences of awake craniotomy timely and admit patients to an adequate therapy if necessary.
There will be no changes regarding the actual treatment of the disease. In case of a consent, the patient will receive questionnaires at three timepoints: 1. day before surgery. 2. third day after surgery. 3. at 3-6 months postoperatively at the outpatient clinics.
The benefit of participating in this study is the possibility of detecting psychological consequences of awake craniotomy at an early stage. If required, patients will then receive treatment timely.
There are no additional risks. Theoretically there is only a data risk after analysis.
Patients are free to decide if they want to participate within this study. There are no changes in the actual treatment if patients deny participation. In case of participation, patients have the right to quit at any time with no reasoning at all.
During the study investigators are collecting health-related data. If patients quit before the study end, data will still be used in pseudonymized form. After 10 years, data will be destroyed.
In case of participation the only duty for the patient is to fill out the questionnaires at the above mentioned three time points.
The investigators conduct this study based on all rules of law regarding data protection. Investigators only use the collected data in relation to this study. All investigators are under obligation to secrecy.
Read the detailed description
ETHICAL AND REGULATORY ASPECTS
Ethical Conduct of Study
The research project will be carried out in accordance to the research plan and with principles enunciated in the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH), the Essentials of Good Epidemiological Practice issued by Public Health Switzerland (EGEP), the Swiss Law and Swiss regulatory authority's requirements as applicable. The EC and regulatory authorities will be informed about project start and termination.
The Project Leader of this Project Leader initiated Trial acknowledges his responsibilities as both the Investigator and the Project Leader.
Risk categorisation
Risk category A: Enroled patients are not exposed to additional risks, as intraoperative mapping of brain functions using electrical stimulation in awake patients is actually considered the gold standard of treatment in intracerebral lesions in the immediate vicinity or within eloquent brain regions.
Ethics Committee (EC)
Before the project will be conducted, the project plan, the proposed participant information and consent form as well as other project-specific documents shall be submitted to a competent Ethics Committee (EC). The regular end, premature end or interruption of the research project is reported to the EC within 90 days upon completion of the project (HRO Art. 22).
Participant Information and Informed Consent
Consecutive ongoing recruitment through investigator(s) in daily clinical practice (consultations). The subjects will receive the consent form with an address and phone number indicated where further questions regarding the study can be discussed directly with the project leader. This will take place at least one week before the hospitalisation.
Participant privacy and safety
The Project Leader affirms and upholds the principle of the participants' right to dignity, privacy and health and that the project team shall comply with applicable privacy laws. Especially, anonymity of the participants shall be guaranteed when presenting the data at scientific meetings or publishing them in scientific journals.
Individual participant medical information obtained as a result of this research project is considered confidential and disclosure to third parties is prohibited. Participant confidentiality will be further ensured by utilising identification code numbers to correspond to medical information in the computer files.
For data verification purposes, authorised representatives of the Project Leader, a competent ethics committee may require direct access to parts of the medical records relevant to the project, including participants' medical history.
Early termination of Project
The Project Leader (and any competent authority) may terminate the project prematurely according to certain circumstances (insufficient participant recruitment, change of project leader or any other reason that would prevent the project execution according to the research plan). The premature end or interruption of the research project would be reported to the EC within 90 days upon completion of the project (HRO Art. 22).
Amendments, Changes
Significant changes to the project plan would be communicated to relevant parties (e.g., investigators, EC). The Project Leader would submit to the EC any application documents, which are affected by the change. At the same time, the project leader would provide information on the reasons for the change. Substantial amendments are only implemented after approval of the EC.
BACKGROUND
Intraoperative mapping of brain functions using electrical stimulation in awake patients has been proven to be a safe technique that enables increased tumor removal while preserving the functional status of the patients. Former studies reported that the conscious experienced procedure is generally well tolerated and psychological sequelae due to awake craniotomy seem to be rare (Milian et al., 2014). Fear, anxiety and pain are the most commonly seen phenomena intraoperatively (Milian et al., 2014). It is also known that fear and anxiety may aggravate pain perception (Keefe et al., 2001). The investigators hypothesize that patients with less preoperative anxiety experience less intraoperative pain.
Rationale for the research Project
Potential postoperative psychological sequelae could be considered and affected patients could benefit of early recognition and treatment.
Risk-Benefit Assessment
Enroled patients are not exposed to additional risks, as intraoperative mapping of brain functions using electrical stimulation in awake patients is actually considered the gold standard of treatment in intracerebral lesions in the immediate vicinity or within eloquent brain regions. Potential postoperative psychological sequelae could be considered and affected patients could benefit of early recognition and treatment.
PROJECT DESIGN
Type of research and general project design
Research project in which health-related personal data is collected. Data will be pseudonymized. Prospective, monocentric, descriptive, cohort study. Overall study duration will be about one year. Patients are recruited at the investigators in daily clinical practice, which can be days to weeks prior to surgery. Once the surgery is started the study duration for each patient will last 6 months post-surgery.
Procedures
Standardized questionnaires will be completed by the selected patients as follows:
1st day preoperatively: MMSE, NRS-anxiety, HADS-D, PDS-1, BPI, PHQ-D, BDI. Intraoperatively: NRS for anxiety and pain at three timepoints during surgery: before skin incision, after removal of the bone flap, after tumor resection.
3rd day postoperatively: HADS-D, PHQ-D, PDS-1, BPI, NRS for pain. 6 months postoperatively at the outpatient clinics: PHQ-D, BDI, HADS-D, PDS-1, BPI.
Recruitment and Screening
Consecutive ongoing recruitment through investigator(s) in daily clinical practice (consultations). The subjects will receive the consent form with an address and phone number indicated where further questions regarding the study can be discussed directly with the project leader. This will take place at least one week before the hospitalisation.
Methods of minimising bias
The use of validated questionnaires. Blinding is not necessary as there are no randomized/different therapies offered. Additional factors to be considered as they influence primary and secondary endpoints: Assessment of gender and age.
STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY
The study is a non-interventional, monocentric cohort study. The scores which will be analysed as primary and secondary endpoints are in general not assumed to follow a normal distribution. Differences in the raw (untransformed) scores and for changes of the scores over time, will be described by descriptive statistics. The hypotheses of the primary and secondary endpoints described below, will not be examined by any statistical tests.
Hypothesis
The investigators hypothesize that intraoperative pain perception, measured by the NRS, in patients with less preoperative fear and anxiety must be lower. The scores listed as secondary endpoints are hypothesized not to change between pre- and post-operative measurement.
As the expected sample size is not large enough to carry out a statistical test with adequate power, no hypothesis testing will be carried out for this study. The evidence for differences in the scores of the primary and secondary endpoints will be discussed based on the descriptive statistics.
Determination of Sample Size
The primary objective of this study is of descriptive nature, i.e., to assess the conscious experience and experience and psychological consequences of awake surgery among the patient collective at the Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen (Kantonsspital St. Gallen, KSSG). The number of included patients is governed by the duration of the study, which is planned to be one year. Within this year it is expected that around 20 patients, recruited at the KSSG, will be included in the study.
Statistical criteria of termination of Trial
There will be no statistical criteria, which would trigger early termination of this trial, as long as the data gathering process is not impaired.
Planned Analyses
The following measures will be reported: mean, standard deviation, 95% confidence interval, median, 1st and 3rd quartile, minimum, and maximum.
Further the same descriptive statistics will be reported for patient characteristics on continuous scale (e.g. age) and percentages will be reported for categorical variables (e.g. gender). The Spearman rank correlation, which is a non-parametric measure for correlations, for the same scores measured at different occasions, will be reported for the scores in the primary and secondary endpoint.
Datasets to be analysed, analysis populations
The analysis population includes all eligible patients which were recruited in the study. Patients will be included in the analysis if they have included any of the questionnaires. Characteristics of patients which did not meet the inclusion criteria will be reported separately. If a patient has a missing value, or missed a follow-up visit, only the observed measurements will be included and no data imputation will be applied. This implies that the data will be analysed according to the intention to treat principle, which should not be problematic as no intervention is planned in this study.
Essentially no subgroup analyses are planned but under the assumption of equal group sizes, a descriptive analysis of the examined scores for subgroups of gender and age will complement the analysis.
Primary Analyses
Descriptive statistics will be displayed for the NRS score and for the changes in the NRS score between the pre-operative and intra-operative and the pre-operative and post-operative measurements.
Secondary Analyses
For the measures of the secondary analysis (PHQ-D, BDI, MMSE, HADS-D, PDS-1 and BPI) descriptive statistics for each measurement occasion and for the changes in the measures will be carried out.
Interim Analyses
No interim analysis is planned. The duration of the study will be one year. However, interim analyses are possible if requested by the investigator, as the data will be analysed with descriptive statistics only and no intervention is planned.
Deviations from the original statistical plan
Deviations from the planned statistical analysis will be documented and justified in the final statistical report.
Handling of missing data and drop-outs
Patients who have not submitted any of the questionnaires will be excluded from the analysis. However, patient characteristics for patients submitting and not or only partially submitting questionnaires will be compared to determine if there are any statistically significant or clinically relevant differences between the two groups. This may affect how the results of the study should be interpreted.
DATA AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Data handling and record keeping / archiving
All data will be recorded in an excel-file, only accessible by authorised personnel, such as Werner Surbeck, Hejrati Nader. The questionnaires will be saved by Werner Surbeck in his locked bureau during the study. On the Case Report Forms (CRF) and other project specific documents, subjects are not identified by their names, but by a unique subject number (UPN).
Confidentiality, Data Protection
Project data will be handled with uttermost discretion and is only accessible to authorized personnel who require the data to fulfil their duties. On the CRFs and other project specific documents, subjects are not identified by their names, but by a unique subject number (UPN). UPN will not consist of initials of the subjects or their date of birth.
The UPN will be distributed to all subjects to whom the questionnaires will be given and used from this moment on exclusively. Subject identification list will be compiled and stored by Dr W. Surbeck in an Excel sheet only on his personal laptop secured by a strong password. A regular backup of the subject identification list will be stored on a Universal Serial Bus (USB) device by Dr Surbeck and locked securely in his office. All alterations in the list will be done by Dr W. Surbeck exclusively.
Coding
On the CRFs and other project specific documents, subjects are not identified by their names, but by a unique subject number (UPN).
Archiving and Destruction
All trial data, including documents necessary for patient identification and post-trial care, will be archived for a minimum of 10 years upon premature- or trial termination.
ANNNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS
In the event of serious announcements, they will be performed according to Art. 21 (HFV).
PUBLICATION AND DISSEMINATION POLICY
Publication of results
Publication of the study results is planned. An acknowledgement to the Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) St. Gallen is enclosed in any publication that will result from this study. The study will be registered at clinicaltrials.gov.
FUNDING AND SUPPORT
No funding necessary.
INSURANCE
In the event of study-related damage or injuries, the public liability insurance of the Sponsor (i.e. the Kantonsspital St. Gallen) provides compensation, except for claims that arise from wilful misconduct or gross negligence.
- Being tested
- Screening through questionnaires
- Keywords
- Awake craniotomy, Psychological consequences, Fear and Anxiety
- Medical subject headings
- Anxiety Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Screening through questionnairesOther
Distribution of Questionnaires to every participant within the single existent Arm at three times.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Screening through Questionnaires | All of the patients within this single existent Arm will receive the questionnaires. Receives: Other: Screening through questionnaires |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Changes in Pain and Anxiety (NRS)
Numeric rating scale (NRS). (Kremer et al., 1981; Farrar et al., 2000) Preoperative assessment of anxiety is evaluated using the NRS on a scale of 0-10. Intraoperatively the NRS is used at three time points to assess for anxiety and pain. 0 indicates the absence of pain or anxiety, whereas 10 indicates the maximum possible patients' perception of pain or anxiety
Measured: 1st day preop, intraoperatively, 3rd day postop, 6th month postop
Secondary outcomes (6)
Cognition
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE, Folstein et al., 1983)
Measured: 1st preoperative day
Changes in General psychological symptoms
The patients health questionnaire (PHQ-D, Gräfe et al., 2004)
Measured: 1st preoperative day, 3rd day postoperative visit, 6th month postop
Changes in General psychological symptoms
Beck Depression Inventory (BDI, Beck et al., 1961)
Measured: 1st preoperative day, 6th month postop
Changes in Stress and Anxiety
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D, Bjelland et al., 2002)
Measured: 1st preoperative day, 3rd day postoperative visit, 6th month postop
Changes in Stress and Anxiety
The Posttraumatic Stress Diagnostic Scale (PDS-1, Griesel et al., 2006)
Measured: 1st preoperative day, 3rd day postoperative visit, 6th month postop
Changes in Pain
The Brief Pain Inventory (BPI, Cleeland and Ryan, 1994; Radbruch et al., 1999)
Measured: 1st preoperative day, 3rd day postoperative visit, 6th month postop
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startNov 2015
- Primary completionMar 2018
- Study completionJul 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (14)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for FearStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Nader Hejrati, Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen
- Investigators
- Werner Surbeck, MD, Principal investigator, Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Switzerland
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02622529
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- EKSG 15/157
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 30 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 18 Jul 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
Publications
Verordnung über die Humanforschung mit Ausnahme der klinischen Versuche (Humanforschungsverordnung, HFV) / Ordonnance relative à la recherche sur l'être humain à l'exception des essais cliniques (Ordonnance relative à la recherche sur l'être humain, ORH) / Ordinance on Human Research with the Exception of Clinical Trials (Human Research Ordinance, HRO)
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296.
PubMed 17941714Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297.
PubMed 17941715BECK AT, WARD CH, MENDELSON M, MOCK J, ERBAUGH J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. No abstract available.
PubMed 13688369Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3.
PubMed 11832252Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
PubMed 8080219Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000 Dec 1;88(3):287-294. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00339-0.
PubMed 11068116Folstein MF, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 Jul;40(7):812. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790060110016. No abstract available.
PubMed 6860082Griesel D, Wessa M, Flor H. Psychometric qualities of the German version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PTDS). Psychol Assess. 2006 Sep;18(3):262-8. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.3.262.
PubMed 16953729Gräfe K, Zipfel S, Herzog W, Löwe B. Screening psychischer Störungen mit dem "Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D)" Daignostica 2004; 50(4): 11
Keefe FJ, Lumley M, Anderson T, Lynch T, Studts JL, Carson KL. Pain and emotion: new research directions. J Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;57(4):587-607. doi: 10.1002/jclp.1030.
PubMed 11255208Kremer E, Atkinson HJ, Ignelzi RJ. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain. 1981 Apr;10(2):241-248. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90199-8.
PubMed 7267140Milian M, Tatagiba M, Feigl GC. Patient response to awake craniotomy - a summary overview. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2014 Jun;156(6):1063-70. doi: 10.1007/s00701-014-2038-4. Epub 2014 Mar 5.
PubMed 24595540Radbruch L, Loick G, Kiencke P, Lindena G, Sabatowski R, Grond S, Lehmann KA, Cleeland CS. Validation of the German version of the Brief Pain Inventory. J Pain Symptom Manage. 1999 Sep;18(3):180-7. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(99)00064-0.
PubMed 10517039
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 18 Jul 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Patients' Conscious Experience and Psychological Consequences of Awake Surgery for Intracerebral Lesions
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02622529
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- EKSG 15/157
- Keywords
- Awake craniotomy, Psychological consequences, Fear and Anxiety
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 20 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Cantonal Hospital of St. GallenUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Nov 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Mar 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Jul 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This study aims to investigate patients' experience of awake surgery of the brain. Patients therefore must suffer a disease that makes the technique of awake craniotomy necessary.
In more detail, the investigators are performing this study in order to investigate the influence of fear on pain perception during surgery for patients undergoing awake surgery for lesions within the brain. In the event of finding a correlation between fear of the surgery and intraoperative pain perception, the investigators aim to reduce possible fear beforehand.
An additional goal of the investigators is to identify psychological consequences of awake craniotomy timely and admit patients to an adequate therapy if necessary.
There will be no changes regarding the actual treatment of the disease. In case of a consent, the patient will receive questionnaires at three timepoints: 1. day before surgery. 2. third day after surgery. 3. at 3-6 months postoperatively at the outpatient clinics.
The benefit of participating in this study is the possibility of detecting psychological consequences of awake craniotomy at an early stage. If required, patients will then receive treatment timely.
There are no additional risks. Theoretically there is only a data risk after analysis.
Patients are free to decide if they want to participate within this study. There are no changes in the actual treatment if patients deny participation. In case of participation, patients have the right to quit at any time with no reasoning at all.
During the study investigators are collecting health-related data. If patients quit before the study end, data will still be used in pseudonymized form. After 10 years, data will be destroyed.
In case of participation the only duty for the patient is to fill out the questionnaires at the above mentioned three time points.
The investigators conduct this study based on all rules of law regarding data protection. Investigators only use the collected data in relation to this study. All investigators are under obligation to secrecy.
Detailed description
ETHICAL AND REGULATORY ASPECTS
Ethical Conduct of Study
The research project will be carried out in accordance to the research plan and with principles enunciated in the current version of the Declaration of Helsinki (DoH), the Essentials of Good Epidemiological Practice issued by Public Health Switzerland (EGEP), the Swiss Law and Swiss regulatory authority's requirements as applicable. The EC and regulatory authorities will be informed about project start and termination.
The Project Leader of this Project Leader initiated Trial acknowledges his responsibilities as both the Investigator and the Project Leader.
Risk categorisation
Risk category A: Enroled patients are not exposed to additional risks, as intraoperative mapping of brain functions using electrical stimulation in awake patients is actually considered the gold standard of treatment in intracerebral lesions in the immediate vicinity or within eloquent brain regions.
Ethics Committee (EC)
Before the project will be conducted, the project plan, the proposed participant information and consent form as well as other project-specific documents shall be submitted to a competent Ethics Committee (EC). The regular end, premature end or interruption of the research project is reported to the EC within 90 days upon completion of the project (HRO Art. 22).
Participant Information and Informed Consent
Consecutive ongoing recruitment through investigator(s) in daily clinical practice (consultations). The subjects will receive the consent form with an address and phone number indicated where further questions regarding the study can be discussed directly with the project leader. This will take place at least one week before the hospitalisation.
Participant privacy and safety
The Project Leader affirms and upholds the principle of the participants' right to dignity, privacy and health and that the project team shall comply with applicable privacy laws. Especially, anonymity of the participants shall be guaranteed when presenting the data at scientific meetings or publishing them in scientific journals.
Individual participant medical information obtained as a result of this research project is considered confidential and disclosure to third parties is prohibited. Participant confidentiality will be further ensured by utilising identification code numbers to correspond to medical information in the computer files.
For data verification purposes, authorised representatives of the Project Leader, a competent ethics committee may require direct access to parts of the medical records relevant to the project, including participants' medical history.
Early termination of Project
The Project Leader (and any competent authority) may terminate the project prematurely according to certain circumstances (insufficient participant recruitment, change of project leader or any other reason that would prevent the project execution according to the research plan). The premature end or interruption of the research project would be reported to the EC within 90 days upon completion of the project (HRO Art. 22).
Amendments, Changes
Significant changes to the project plan would be communicated to relevant parties (e.g., investigators, EC). The Project Leader would submit to the EC any application documents, which are affected by the change. At the same time, the project leader would provide information on the reasons for the change. Substantial amendments are only implemented after approval of the EC.
BACKGROUND
Intraoperative mapping of brain functions using electrical stimulation in awake patients has been proven to be a safe technique that enables increased tumor removal while preserving the functional status of the patients. Former studies reported that the conscious experienced procedure is generally well tolerated and psychological sequelae due to awake craniotomy seem to be rare (Milian et al., 2014). Fear, anxiety and pain are the most commonly seen phenomena intraoperatively (Milian et al., 2014). It is also known that fear and anxiety may aggravate pain perception (Keefe et al., 2001). The investigators hypothesize that patients with less preoperative anxiety experience less intraoperative pain.
Rationale for the research Project
Potential postoperative psychological sequelae could be considered and affected patients could benefit of early recognition and treatment.
Risk-Benefit Assessment
Enroled patients are not exposed to additional risks, as intraoperative mapping of brain functions using electrical stimulation in awake patients is actually considered the gold standard of treatment in intracerebral lesions in the immediate vicinity or within eloquent brain regions. Potential postoperative psychological sequelae could be considered and affected patients could benefit of early recognition and treatment.
PROJECT DESIGN
Type of research and general project design
Research project in which health-related personal data is collected. Data will be pseudonymized. Prospective, monocentric, descriptive, cohort study. Overall study duration will be about one year. Patients are recruited at the investigators in daily clinical practice, which can be days to weeks prior to surgery. Once the surgery is started the study duration for each patient will last 6 months post-surgery.
Procedures
Standardized questionnaires will be completed by the selected patients as follows:
1st day preoperatively: MMSE, NRS-anxiety, HADS-D, PDS-1, BPI, PHQ-D, BDI. Intraoperatively: NRS for anxiety and pain at three timepoints during surgery: before skin incision, after removal of the bone flap, after tumor resection.
3rd day postoperatively: HADS-D, PHQ-D, PDS-1, BPI, NRS for pain. 6 months postoperatively at the outpatient clinics: PHQ-D, BDI, HADS-D, PDS-1, BPI.
Recruitment and Screening
Consecutive ongoing recruitment through investigator(s) in daily clinical practice (consultations). The subjects will receive the consent form with an address and phone number indicated where further questions regarding the study can be discussed directly with the project leader. This will take place at least one week before the hospitalisation.
Methods of minimising bias
The use of validated questionnaires. Blinding is not necessary as there are no randomized/different therapies offered. Additional factors to be considered as they influence primary and secondary endpoints: Assessment of gender and age.
STATISTICAL METHODOLOGY
The study is a non-interventional, monocentric cohort study. The scores which will be analysed as primary and secondary endpoints are in general not assumed to follow a normal distribution. Differences in the raw (untransformed) scores and for changes of the scores over time, will be described by descriptive statistics. The hypotheses of the primary and secondary endpoints described below, will not be examined by any statistical tests.
Hypothesis
The investigators hypothesize that intraoperative pain perception, measured by the NRS, in patients with less preoperative fear and anxiety must be lower. The scores listed as secondary endpoints are hypothesized not to change between pre- and post-operative measurement.
As the expected sample size is not large enough to carry out a statistical test with adequate power, no hypothesis testing will be carried out for this study. The evidence for differences in the scores of the primary and secondary endpoints will be discussed based on the descriptive statistics.
Determination of Sample Size
The primary objective of this study is of descriptive nature, i.e., to assess the conscious experience and experience and psychological consequences of awake surgery among the patient collective at the Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen (Kantonsspital St. Gallen, KSSG). The number of included patients is governed by the duration of the study, which is planned to be one year. Within this year it is expected that around 20 patients, recruited at the KSSG, will be included in the study.
Statistical criteria of termination of Trial
There will be no statistical criteria, which would trigger early termination of this trial, as long as the data gathering process is not impaired.
Planned Analyses
The following measures will be reported: mean, standard deviation, 95% confidence interval, median, 1st and 3rd quartile, minimum, and maximum.
Further the same descriptive statistics will be reported for patient characteristics on continuous scale (e.g. age) and percentages will be reported for categorical variables (e.g. gender). The Spearman rank correlation, which is a non-parametric measure for correlations, for the same scores measured at different occasions, will be reported for the scores in the primary and secondary endpoint.
Datasets to be analysed, analysis populations
The analysis population includes all eligible patients which were recruited in the study. Patients will be included in the analysis if they have included any of the questionnaires. Characteristics of patients which did not meet the inclusion criteria will be reported separately. If a patient has a missing value, or missed a follow-up visit, only the observed measurements will be included and no data imputation will be applied. This implies that the data will be analysed according to the intention to treat principle, which should not be problematic as no intervention is planned in this study.
Essentially no subgroup analyses are planned but under the assumption of equal group sizes, a descriptive analysis of the examined scores for subgroups of gender and age will complement the analysis.
Primary Analyses
Descriptive statistics will be displayed for the NRS score and for the changes in the NRS score between the pre-operative and intra-operative and the pre-operative and post-operative measurements.
Secondary Analyses
For the measures of the secondary analysis (PHQ-D, BDI, MMSE, HADS-D, PDS-1 and BPI) descriptive statistics for each measurement occasion and for the changes in the measures will be carried out.
Interim Analyses
No interim analysis is planned. The duration of the study will be one year. However, interim analyses are possible if requested by the investigator, as the data will be analysed with descriptive statistics only and no intervention is planned.
Deviations from the original statistical plan
Deviations from the planned statistical analysis will be documented and justified in the final statistical report.
Handling of missing data and drop-outs
Patients who have not submitted any of the questionnaires will be excluded from the analysis. However, patient characteristics for patients submitting and not or only partially submitting questionnaires will be compared to determine if there are any statistically significant or clinically relevant differences between the two groups. This may affect how the results of the study should be interpreted.
DATA AND QUALITY MANAGEMENT
Data handling and record keeping / archiving
All data will be recorded in an excel-file, only accessible by authorised personnel, such as Werner Surbeck, Hejrati Nader. The questionnaires will be saved by Werner Surbeck in his locked bureau during the study. On the Case Report Forms (CRF) and other project specific documents, subjects are not identified by their names, but by a unique subject number (UPN).
Confidentiality, Data Protection
Project data will be handled with uttermost discretion and is only accessible to authorized personnel who require the data to fulfil their duties. On the CRFs and other project specific documents, subjects are not identified by their names, but by a unique subject number (UPN). UPN will not consist of initials of the subjects or their date of birth.
The UPN will be distributed to all subjects to whom the questionnaires will be given and used from this moment on exclusively. Subject identification list will be compiled and stored by Dr W. Surbeck in an Excel sheet only on his personal laptop secured by a strong password. A regular backup of the subject identification list will be stored on a Universal Serial Bus (USB) device by Dr Surbeck and locked securely in his office. All alterations in the list will be done by Dr W. Surbeck exclusively.
Coding
On the CRFs and other project specific documents, subjects are not identified by their names, but by a unique subject number (UPN).
Archiving and Destruction
All trial data, including documents necessary for patient identification and post-trial care, will be archived for a minimum of 10 years upon premature- or trial termination.
ANNNOUNCEMENTS AND REPORTS
In the event of serious announcements, they will be performed according to Art. 21 (HFV).
PUBLICATION AND DISSEMINATION POLICY
Publication of results
Publication of the study results is planned. An acknowledgement to the Clinical Trials Unit (CTU) St. Gallen is enclosed in any publication that will result from this study. The study will be registered at clinicaltrials.gov.
FUNDING AND SUPPORT
No funding necessary.
INSURANCE
In the event of study-related damage or injuries, the public liability insurance of the Sponsor (i.e. the Kantonsspital St. Gallen) provides compensation, except for claims that arise from wilful misconduct or gross negligence.
Study design
- Observational model
- Cohort
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Screening through Questionnaires | – | Other: Screening through questionnairesAll of the patients within this single existent Arm will receive the questionnaires. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- Consecutive ongoing recruitment through investigator(s) in daily clinical practice (consultations). The subjects will receive the consent form with an address and phone number indicated where further questions regarding the study can be discussed directly with the project leader. This will take place at least one week before the hospitalisation.
Key inclusion criteria (3 listed)
- Written informed consent
- Low grade glioma, cavernoma, metastasis
- age ≥ 18 years < 65 years
Key exclusion criteria (1 listed)
- No given operability for anaesthetic reasons.
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Screening through questionnairesDistribution of Questionnaires to every participant within the single existent Arm at three times. | Other | Screening through Questionnaires |
Primary outcome
Changes in Pain and Anxiety (NRS)
Time frame: 1st day preop, intraoperatively, 3rd day postop, 6th month postop
Numeric rating scale (NRS). (Kremer et al., 1981; Farrar et al., 2000) Preoperative assessment of anxiety is evaluated using the NRS on a scale of 0-10. Intraoperatively the NRS is used at three time points to assess for anxiety and pain. 0 indicates the absence of pain or anxiety, whereas 10 indicates the maximum possible patients' perception of pain or anxiety
6 secondary outcomes
Cognition
Time frame: 1st preoperative day
Changes in General psychological symptoms
Time frame: 1st preoperative day, 3rd day postoperative visit, 6th month postop
Changes in General psychological symptoms
Time frame: 1st preoperative day, 6th month postop
Changes in Stress and Anxiety
Time frame: 1st preoperative day, 3rd day postoperative visit, 6th month postop
Changes in Stress and Anxiety
Time frame: 1st preoperative day, 3rd day postoperative visit, 6th month postop
Changes in Pain
Time frame: 1st preoperative day, 3rd day postoperative visit, 6th month postop
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 18 Jul 2018.
- BackgroundVerordnung über die Humanforschung mit Ausnahme der klinischen Versuche (Humanforschungsverordnung, HFV) / Ordonnance relative à la recherche sur l'être humain à l'exception des essais cliniques (Ordonnance relative à la recherche sur l'être humain, ORH) / Ordinance on Human Research with the Exception of Clinical Trials (Human Research Ordinance, HRO)
- Background: PubMed 17941714von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gotzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e296. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040296.
- Background: PubMed 17941715Vandenbroucke JP, von Elm E, Altman DG, Gotzsche PC, Mulrow CD, Pocock SJ, Poole C, Schlesselman JJ, Egger M; STROBE Initiative. Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE): explanation and elaboration. PLoS Med. 2007 Oct 16;4(10):e297. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040297.
- Background: PubMed 13688369BECK AT, WARD CH, MENDELSON M, MOCK J, ERBAUGH J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961 Jun;4:561-71. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1961.01710120031004. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 11832252Bjelland I, Dahl AA, Haug TT, Neckelmann D. The validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. An updated literature review. J Psychosom Res. 2002 Feb;52(2):69-77. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(01)00296-3.
- Background: PubMed 8080219Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1994 Mar;23(2):129-38.
- Background: PubMed 11068116Farrar JT, Portenoy RK, Berlin JA, Kinman JL, Strom BL. Defining the clinically important difference in pain outcome measures. Pain. 2000 Dec 1;88(3):287-294. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3959(00)00339-0.
- Background: PubMed 6860082Folstein MF, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983 Jul;40(7):812. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.1983.01790060110016. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 16953729Griesel D, Wessa M, Flor H. Psychometric qualities of the German version of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PTDS). Psychol Assess. 2006 Sep;18(3):262-8. doi: 10.1037/1040-3590.18.3.262.
- BackgroundGräfe K, Zipfel S, Herzog W, Löwe B. Screening psychischer Störungen mit dem "Gesundheitsfragebogen für Patienten (PHQ-D)" Daignostica 2004; 50(4): 11
- Background: PubMed 11255208Keefe FJ, Lumley M, Anderson T, Lynch T, Studts JL, Carson KL. Pain and emotion: new research directions. J Clin Psychol. 2001 Apr;57(4):587-607. doi: 10.1002/jclp.1030.
- Background: PubMed 7267140Kremer E, Atkinson HJ, Ignelzi RJ. Measurement of pain: patient preference does not confound pain measurement. Pain. 1981 Apr;10(2):241-248. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(81)90199-8.
- Declaration of Helsinki, Version November 2013Link provided by the sponsor.
- Essentials of Good Epidemiological PracticeLink provided by the sponsor.
Related trials for Fear
RecruitingObservational study
Lived Experiences of Women Diagnosed With HPV Infection
Human Papillomavirus Infection
Recruiting
Effects of Virtual Reality Environments on Walking in Adults With and Without Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis
RecruitingPhase 4
The Effects of Orexin Antagonism on Fear Extinction in PTSD
Insomnia, PTSD
Recruiting
An Innovative Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment For Chronic Orofacial Pain
Chronic Primary Orofacial Pain (CPOP), Persistent Idiopathic Facial Pain (PIFP)
Not yet recruiting
Multicomponent Exercise and Pain Science Education for Fall Prevention in Older Adults With Chronic Musculoskeletal Pain (MovePainFall)
Chronic Pain, Musculoskeletal Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Werner Surbeck, MD principal investigator
Department of Neurosurgery, Cantonal Hospital St. Gallen, Switzerland
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Fear and Anxiety, run by Cantonal Hospital of St. Gallen at 1 site in Switzerland.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Switzerland. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Changes in Pain and Anxiety (NRS) (time frame: 1st day preop, intraoperatively, 3rd day postop, 6th month postop). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02622529, which also lists 14 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jul 2018.