Low Back PainNCT02636777
Predictors of Self-management in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
An observational study of Low Back Pain, run by University of Nottingham at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
Trial summary
Supported self-management (SM) is one of the key recommendations in management of chronic low back pain (CLBP). SM programmes for patients with CLBP have failed to show clinically meaningful improvement in pain and disability markers, which potentially reflect the lack of treatment matching of SM programmes. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- How many people
- 270 participants
- Where
- 2 sitesUnited Kingdom
- Study dates
- Dec 2015to Feb 2018
- Phase
- Observational
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 65 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Study population: The study will include community ambulant adult patients attending or recently attended outpatient physiotherapy treatment for their chronic low back pain.
Who may be able to join
- patients with low back pain for more than three months
- aged between 18 and 65 years at baseline,
- community ambulant without walking aids,
- attending or recently attended outpatient physiotherapy treatments in the UK National Health Service (NHS) for their chronic low back pain, and
- able to read, write and understand English for completing the questionnaires
Who cannot join
- diagnosed with cancer or other self-reported specific cause [major trauma, fracture, ankylosing spondylitis, grade 3 \& 4 spondylolisthesis, severe spinal canal stenosis, or lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion or extrusion, spinal deformity] for their chronic low back pain,
- underwent surgery within last one year for the lower back or are planning or scheduled for any major surgery in the coming six months,
- pregnant or experienced childbirth in the last one year,
- patients with cognitive impairment, neurological diseases, and severe vision and hearing impairments
Trial locations and contacts
2 sites in 1 country.
United Kingdom2 sites
Nottingham CityCare Partnership
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG1 6GN
Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust
Nottingham, Nottinghamshire, NG7 2UH
About this study
Supported self-management (SM) is one of the key recommendations in management of chronic low back pain (CLBP). SM programmes for patients with CLBP have failed to show clinically meaningful improvement in pain and disability markers, which potentially reflect the lack of treatment matching of SM programmes. Patient selection for a SM programme for patients with CLBP is particularly difficult due to lack of extensive research on what predicts SM and its change. The overarching purpose of this study is to identify predictors of SM and its change over time in patients with CLBP. This study is a prospective non-experimental longitudinal study.
Read the detailed description
Materials and methods: Patients will be recruited at baseline from the physiotherapy outpatient clinics. Three different methods have been planned to identify suitable patients in this study: from the outpatient clinics, through advertisements and therapist referrals to the study. All willing participants will be screened against the study selection criteria. Eligible participants will be provided with a pre-approved information sheet and verbal explanation about the study before obtaining written consent. The consenting patients will be requested to fill in the baseline questionnaire. The patients will be requested to fill the follow up questionnaire after six months from their baseline data collection via an online, telephone or paper-based questionnaire depending on their preference. Data required for the necessary agreement between paper-based and online or telephone survey, will be collected from up to 60 participants within two weeks from their baseline data collection. All patients will receive and continue their normal treatment as recommended by their primary care team. A participant may be withdrawn by the investigators, involved in major trauma or undergoes surgery, or a female participant becomes pregnant during the course of the study. Sample size was estimated using G*Power (version 3.1.5). The statistical analyses will be performed using a statistical software (IBM SPSS 22) with statistical significance set at p<0.05 for the entire analysis, unless mentioned. Descriptive statistics, interclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman limits of agreement plots, significance testing, correlations and regression analyses will be employed.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- no intervention
- Keywords
- low back pain, chronic pain, self-management, longitudinal study, predictive modelling
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain, Chronic Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
no interventionOther
Patients will be allowed to continue their usual treatment as recommended by their care team.
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Health Education Impact Questionnaire
Measured: baseline and 6-month follow up
Secondary outcomes (8)
Duration of low back pain
Measured: baseline
Numeric Pain Intensity Scale
Measured: baseline and 6-month follow up
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Measured: baseline and 6-month follow up
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Short Form)
Measured: baseline and 6-month follow up
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Measured: baseline and 6-month follow up
Pain Catastrophising Scale
Measured: baseline and 6-month follow up
Patient Health Questionnaire 9
Measured: baseline and 6-month follow up
Patients Global Impression of Change
Measured: 6-month follow up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted22 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startDec 2015
- Primary completionFeb 2018
- Study completionFeb 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (1)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of NottinghamThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Observational
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
- Enrolment
- 270 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of Nottingham
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Paul Hendrick, PhD, Principal investigator, University of Nottingham
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02636777
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 15084
- Other IDs
- 188664
- Status last verified
- Jun 2018
- First submitted
- 15 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 21 Jun 2018
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Banerjee A, Hendrick P, Blake H. Predictors of self-management in patients with chronic low back pain: a longitudinal study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 7;23(1):1071. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05933-2.
PubMed 36476492
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 21 Jun 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Predictors of Self-management in Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02636777
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 15084
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- low back pain, chronic pain, self-management, longitudinal study, predictive modelling
- Study type
- Observational
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 270 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of NottinghamUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Dec 2015 (actual)
- Primary completion
- Feb 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- Feb 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 22 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Supported self-management (SM) is one of the key recommendations in management of chronic low back pain (CLBP). SM programmes for patients with CLBP have failed to show clinically meaningful improvement in pain and disability markers, which potentially reflect the lack of treatment matching of SM programmes. Patient selection for a SM programme for patients with CLBP is particularly difficult due to lack of extensive research on what predicts SM and its change. The overarching purpose of this study is to identify predictors of SM and its change over time in patients with CLBP. This study is a prospective non-experimental longitudinal study.
Detailed description
Materials and methods: Patients will be recruited at baseline from the physiotherapy outpatient clinics. Three different methods have been planned to identify suitable patients in this study: from the outpatient clinics, through advertisements and therapist referrals to the study. All willing participants will be screened against the study selection criteria. Eligible participants will be provided with a pre-approved information sheet and verbal explanation about the study before obtaining written consent. The consenting patients will be requested to fill in the baseline questionnaire. The patients will be requested to fill the follow up questionnaire after six months from their baseline data collection via an online, telephone or paper-based questionnaire depending on their preference. Data required for the necessary agreement between paper-based and online or telephone survey, will be collected from up to 60 participants within two weeks from their baseline data collection. All patients will receive and continue their normal treatment as recommended by their primary care team. A participant may be withdrawn by the investigators, involved in major trauma or undergoes surgery, or a female participant becomes pregnant during the course of the study. Sample size was estimated using G*Power (version 3.1.5). The statistical analyses will be performed using a statistical software (IBM SPSS 22) with statistical significance set at p<0.05 for the entire analysis, unless mentioned. Descriptive statistics, interclass correlation coefficients, Bland-Altman limits of agreement plots, significance testing, correlations and regression analyses will be employed.
Study design
- Observational model
- Other
- Time perspective
- Prospective
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 65 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
- Study population
- The study will include community ambulant adult patients attending or recently attended outpatient physiotherapy treatment for their chronic low back pain.
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- patients with low back pain for more than three months
- aged between 18 and 65 years at baseline,
- community ambulant without walking aids,
- attending or recently attended outpatient physiotherapy treatments in the UK National Health Service (NHS) for their chronic low back pain, and
- able to read, write and understand English for completing the questionnaires
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- diagnosed with cancer or other self-reported specific cause [major trauma, fracture, ankylosing spondylitis, grade 3 \& 4 spondylolisthesis, severe spinal canal stenosis, or lumbar intervertebral disc protrusion or extrusion, spinal deformity] for their chronic low back pain,
- underwent surgery within last one year for the lower back or are planning or scheduled for any major surgery in the coming six months,
- pregnant or experienced childbirth in the last one year,
- patients with cognitive impairment, neurological diseases, and severe vision and hearing impairments
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| no interventionPatients will be allowed to continue their usual treatment as recommended by their care team. | Other | – |
Primary outcome
Change in Health Education Impact Questionnaire
Time frame: baseline and 6-month follow up
8 secondary outcomes
Duration of low back pain
Time frame: baseline
Numeric Pain Intensity Scale
Time frame: baseline and 6-month follow up
Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time frame: baseline and 6-month follow up
International Physical Activity Questionnaire (Short Form)
Time frame: baseline and 6-month follow up
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia
Time frame: baseline and 6-month follow up
Pain Catastrophising Scale
Time frame: baseline and 6-month follow up
Patient Health Questionnaire 9
Time frame: baseline and 6-month follow up
Patients Global Impression of Change
Time frame: 6-month follow up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 21 Jun 2018.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36476492Banerjee A, Hendrick P, Blake H. Predictors of self-management in patients with chronic low back pain: a longitudinal study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Dec 7;23(1):1071. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05933-2.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Paul Hendrick, PhD principal investigator
University of Nottingham
2 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
An observational study of Low Back Pain, run by University of Nottingham at 2 sites in United Kingdom.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 21 Jun 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 2 sites in United Kingdom. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Health Education Impact Questionnaire (time frame: baseline and 6-month follow up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02636777, which also lists 1 linked publication.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 21 Jun 2018.