TelemedicineTELNCT02644343
Safety and Efficacy of Remote Programming of Nucleus Cochlear Implants
A study testing Custom Sound in people with Telemedicine, run by Cochlear at 4 sites in United States.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Nucleus cochlear implant programming via telecommunication. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 12 years and olderHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Telemedicine
- What is being tested?
- Custom Sound
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 4 sitesUnited States
- Study dates
- Jan 2016to 17 May 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 12 years and older
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Individuals aged greater than 12 years that are native English speakers and are capable of completing the study evaluation as deemed by their primary audiologist
- Unilateral or bilateral cochlear implant recipients of a CI24RE, CI422 or CI500 series implant who are in possession of a backup sound processor
- A minimum of 12 months' experience with a CP800 or CP900 series sound processor, and current MAP programmed within 12 months prior to Visit 1
- Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol
- Able to demonstrate protocol competence as confirmed by primary audiologist
Who cannot join
- Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations of remote service delivery
- Unwillingness or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements
- Additional handicaps that would prevent or restrict participation in the audiological evaluations
- Inability to demonstrate basic technological skills for simple computer-based tasks and device connecting after training by primary audiologist
Trial locations and contacts
4 sites in 1 country.
United States4 sites
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48108
University of North Carolina
Chapel Hill, North Carolina, 27713
Rocky Mountain Ear Center
Englewood, Colorado, 80113
The Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, 53226
About this study
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Nucleus cochlear implant programming via telecommunication.
Read the detailed description
Cochlear implant recipients will undergo remapping at a location remote from their audiologist via telehealth. Audiologists will use an internet meeting platform to remotely log into the subject's computer and control the programming software. Remote programming sessions will be completed both with and without the assistance of a trained facilitator, and speech understanding will be tested in between mapping sessions.
- Conditions
- Telemedicine
- Being tested
- Custom Sound
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Custom SoundDevice
Custom Sound is the programming software used to program Nucleus cochlear implants.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Remote Programming Group | Experimental | Subjects will undergo remote programming of Nucleus cochlear implants via Custom Sound software using an online interactive meeting platform.
The intervention is the programming of the cochlear implant, the experimental aspect is the remote delivery method. Receives: Device: Custom Sound |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Speech Perception on Monosyllabic Word Test, CNC Words
Subjects will listen to and repeat monosyllabic words from the Consonant Nucleus Consonant word test measured by percentage of words correct to examine their speech perception abilities after each remote programming session.
Measured: 2-4 weeks post remote programming session
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted31 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Study startJan 2016
- Primary completion17 May 2017
- Study completion17 May 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (4)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for TelemedicineStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by CochlearThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Cochlear
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02644343
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- CAM 5650
- Acronym
- TEL
- Status last verified
- Nov 2020
- First submitted
- 28 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 24 Nov 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- Yes
Publications
Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):85-99. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050014.
PubMed 15035561PETERSON GE, LEHISTE I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb;27:62-70. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62. No abstract available.
PubMed 14485785Wesarg T, Wasowski A, Skarzynski H, Ramos A, Falcon Gonzalez JC, Kyriafinis G, Junge F, Novakovich A, Mauch H, Laszig R. Remote fitting in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;130(12):1379-88. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2010.492480. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
PubMed 20586675McElveen JT Jr, Blackburn EL, Green JD Jr, McLear PW, Thimsen DJ, Wilson BS. Remote programming of cochlear implants: a telecommunications model. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Sep;31(7):1035-40. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d35d87.
PubMed 20147864
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 24 Nov 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Safety and Efficacy of Remote Programming of Nucleus Cochlear Implants
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02644343
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- TEL / CAM 5650
- Conditions
- Telemedicine
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- CochlearIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- Jan 2016
- Primary completion
- 17 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 17 May 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 31 Dec 2015 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 10 Nov 2020
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of Nucleus cochlear implant programming via telecommunication.
Detailed description
Cochlear implant recipients will undergo remapping at a location remote from their audiologist via telehealth. Audiologists will use an internet meeting platform to remotely log into the subject's computer and control the programming software. Remote programming sessions will be completed both with and without the assistance of a trained facilitator, and speech understanding will be tested in between mapping sessions.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Remote Programming Group | Experimental | Device: Custom SoundSubjects will undergo remote programming of Nucleus cochlear implants via Custom Sound software using an online interactive meeting platform. The intervention is the programming of the cochlear implant, the experimental aspect is the remote delivery method. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 12 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Child, Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Individuals aged greater than 12 years that are native English speakers and are capable of completing the study evaluation as deemed by their primary audiologist
- Unilateral or bilateral cochlear implant recipients of a CI24RE, CI422 or CI500 series implant who are in possession of a backup sound processor
- A minimum of 12 months' experience with a CP800 or CP900 series sound processor, and current MAP programmed within 12 months prior to Visit 1
- Willingness to participate in and to comply with all requirements of the protocol
- Able to demonstrate protocol competence as confirmed by primary audiologist
Key exclusion criteria (4 listed)
- Unrealistic expectations on the part of the subject, regarding the possible benefits, risks, and limitations of remote service delivery
- Unwillingness or inability of the candidate to comply with all investigational requirements
- Additional handicaps that would prevent or restrict participation in the audiological evaluations
- Inability to demonstrate basic technological skills for simple computer-based tasks and device connecting after training by primary audiologist
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Custom SoundCustom Sound is the programming software used to program Nucleus cochlear implants. | Device | Remote Programming Group |
Primary outcome
Speech Perception on Monosyllabic Word Test, CNC Words
Time frame: 2-4 weeks post remote programming session
Subjects will listen to and repeat monosyllabic words from the Consonant Nucleus Consonant word test measured by percentage of words correct to examine their speech perception abilities after each remote programming session.
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 24 Nov 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Background: PubMed 15035561Gatehouse S, Noble W. The Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale (SSQ). Int J Audiol. 2004 Feb;43(2):85-99. doi: 10.1080/14992020400050014.
- Background: PubMed 14485785PETERSON GE, LEHISTE I. Revised CNC lists for auditory tests. J Speech Hear Disord. 1962 Feb;27:62-70. doi: 10.1044/jshd.2701.62. No abstract available.
- Background: PubMed 20586675Wesarg T, Wasowski A, Skarzynski H, Ramos A, Falcon Gonzalez JC, Kyriafinis G, Junge F, Novakovich A, Mauch H, Laszig R. Remote fitting in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients. Acta Otolaryngol. 2010 Dec;130(12):1379-88. doi: 10.3109/00016489.2010.492480. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
- Background: PubMed 20147864McElveen JT Jr, Blackburn EL, Green JD Jr, McLear PW, Thimsen DJ, Wilson BS. Remote programming of cochlear implants: a telecommunications model. Otol Neurotol. 2010 Sep;31(7):1035-40. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181d35d87.
Related trials for Telemedicine
Recruiting
Tele-HOPE: A Telehealth Pharmacist Opioid Patient Education Pilot Study
Hematopoietic and Lymphatic System Neoplasm, Malignant Solid Neoplasm
Recruiting
Telerehabilitation Compared With Clinic-Based Physiotherapy in Children With Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Spastic Cerebral Palsy
Recruiting
Scalable TELeheaLth Cancer CARe: The STELLAR Program to Treat Cancer Risk Behaviors
Obesity, Smoking Cessation
Active, not recruiting
Enhancing Telemedicine for T2D
Type 2 Diabetes
Recruiting
The Impact of Telemedicine, Using the Caller's Mobile Phone Camera, on the Quality of Care Provided to Adult Patients Contacting the 15 Centre for Acute Dyspnea
Dyspnea
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
4 sites in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Custom Sound in people with Telemedicine, run by Cochlear at 4 sites in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 4 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 24 Nov 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 4 sites in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 10 Nov 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Speech Perception on Monosyllabic Word Test, CNC Words (time frame: 2-4 weeks post remote programming session). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02644343, which also lists 4 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 24 Nov 2020.