AzTrials
AzTrials

Low Back PainPhase 2/3NCT02646124

Diazepam Use With Standard Management for Acute Low Back Pain

A Phase 2/3 study testing Naproxen and Diazepam in people with Low Back Pain, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an Emergency Department (ED) visit for musculoskeletal low back pain (LBP), we propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining a benzodiazepine with an NSAID is more effective than nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) monotherapy for the… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 69 years
Conditions the study is for
Low Back Pain
What is being tested?
Naproxen and Diazepam
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
How many people
114 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jun 2015to May 2016
Phase
Phase 2/3
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 69 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Present to ED primary for management of LBP, defined as pain originating between the lower border of the scapulae and the upper gluteal folds. Flank pain, that is pain originating from tissues lateral to the paraspinal muscles, will not be included.
  • Absence of non-musculoskeletal etiology of low back, such as urinary tract infection, cystic ovarian disease, or influenza like illness. The primary clinical diagnosis, at the conclusion of the ED visit, must be a diagnosis consistent with non-traumatic, non-radicular, musculoskeletal LBP.
  • Patient is to be discharged home. Patients admitted to the hospital are more likely to be treated with parenteral medication and therefore are not appropriate for this study.
  • Age 21-69 Enrollment will be limited to adults younger than 70 years because of the increased risk of adverse medication effects in the elderly.
  • Non-radicular pain: pain cannot radiate below the gluteal folds in a radicular pattern. Patients with non-radicular pain extending below the gluteal folds will not be excluded
  • Pain duration <2 weeks (336 hours). Patients with more than two weeks of pain are at increased risk of poor pain and functional outcomes.(2)
Show all 9Show fewer
  • Prior to the acute attack of LBP, back pain cannot have occurred once per month or more frequently. Patients with more frequent back pain are at increased risk of poor pain and functional outcomes.(2)
  • Non-traumatic LBP: no substantial and direct trauma to the back within the previous month
  • Functionally impairing back pain: A baseline score of > 5 on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire

Who cannot join

  • -Not available for follow-up
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding
  • Chronic pain syndrome defined as use of any analgesic medication on a daily or near-daily basis
  • Allergic to or intolerant of investigational medications
  • Contra-indications to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: peptic ulcer disease, history of gastro-intestinal bleeding, congestive heart failure, advanced renal disease, aspirin sensitive asthma
  • Contra-indications to diazepam: glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, cirrhosis, sleep apnea, history of alcoholism or substance abuse

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Montefiore Medical Center

    The Bronx, New York, 10467

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Adding Diazepam to Standard Management of Acute, Non-radicular Low Back Pain. An Emergency Department Based Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study

Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an Emergency Department (ED) visit for musculoskeletal low back pain (LBP), we propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining a benzodiazepine with an NSAID is more effective than nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) monotherapy for the treatment of acute, non-traumatic, non-radicular low back pain.

Read the detailed description

Low back pain (LBP) causes 2.4% of visits to US emergency departments (ED) resulting in 2.7 million visits annually. In general, outcomes for these patients are poor. One week after ED discharge, 70% of patients report persistent back-pain related functional impairment and 69% report analgesic use within the previous 24 hours. Three months after the ED visit, 48% of these patients report functional impairment, 42% report moderate or severe pain, and 46% report persistent analgesic use.

It is not clear how acute LBP should be treated. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are guideline-supported, first line therapy for acute LBP. NSAIDs are more efficacious than placebo with regard to pain relief, global improvement, and requirement of analgesic medication but are not sufficient therapy for as many as ½ of ED patients, who continue to suffer despite therapy with NSAIDs. Treatment of LBP with multiple concurrent medications is common in the ED--emergency physicians often prescribe benzodiazepines, skeletal muscle relaxants, or opioids in combination with NSAIDs. However, work recently completed here at Montefiore has revealed that combining skeletal muscle relaxants or opioids with NSAIDs does not improve outcomes. It remains uncertain if adding benzodiazepines to NSAIDs improves LBP outcomes.

Although benzodiazepines are used in 300,000 US ED visits for LBP annually, scant evidence exists to determine the appropriateness of this approach. Efficacy of benzodiazepines may be related to direct or centrally-mediated action on skeletal muscle or may instead work by mitigating anxiety about the condition or numbing a patient to the pain.

Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an ED visit for musculoskeletal LBP, we propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining a benzodiazepine with an NSAID is more effective than NSAID monotherapy for the treatment of acute, non-traumatic, non-radicular low back pain. Specifically, we will evaluate the following hypothesis:

A daily regimen of naproxen + diazepam will provide greater relief of LBP than naproxen + placebo one week after an ED visit, as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Conditions
Low Back Pain
Being tested
Naproxen, Placebo, Diazepam
Keywords
benzodiazepine
Medical subject headings
Low Back Pain

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • NaproxenDrug

    Naproxen 500mg by mouth two times a day, #20

  • PlaceboDrug

    Also called Placebo Diazepam

    28 placebo capsules

  • DiazepamDrug

    Diazepam 5mg capsules, 1-2 tabs by mouth two times a day, #28

Study groups in NCT02646124
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
DiazepamExperimentalNaproxen +Diazepam
Receives: Drug: Naproxen; Drug: Diazepam
PlaceboActive comparatorNaproxen + Placebo
Receives: Drug: Naproxen; Drug: Placebo

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Change in Functional Impairment as Measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire

    The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a 24 item instrument that evaluates the impact of low back pain on one's daily life. It is most sensitive for patients with mild to moderate disability due to acute, sub-acute or chronic low back pain. Each question can be answered as either a "yes" or "no". The score ranges from 0 to 24 where a higher score reflects greater impairment and, therefore, worsening in the quality of life. The change in RMDQ is obtained by subtracting the RMDQ score at one week after discharge from the baseline score.

    Measured: Between baseline and one week after emergency department discharge

Secondary outcomes (4)
  1. Number of Participants With Moderate or Severe Pain, as Measured on an Ordinal Scale

    Patients with moderate or serve pain. Worst Lower Back Pain (LBP) over the previous 24 hours, using a four point ordinal scale: severe, moderate, mild, or none.

    Measured: 1 week after discharge from emergency department

  2. Number of Participants Who Required Analgesic Medication for Low Back Pain Within the Previous 24 Hours

    Telephone questionnaire is used to assess patients needing any analgesic or low back pain medication within the previous 24 hours.

    Measured: One week after discharge from the emergency department

  3. Number of Participants Who Required Analgesic Medication for Low Back Pain Within the Previous 72 Hours

    Patients needing any analgesic or LBP medication within the previous 72 hours

    Measured: Assessed three months after emergency department discharge

  4. Participants Satisfied With Treatment

    Participants who answered "Yes" when asked the question "Do you want to receive the same combination of medications during a subsequent visit to the ER?"

    Measured: 1 week

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted5 Jan 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJun 2015
  3. Primary completionFeb 2016
  4. Study completionMay 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase 2/3
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
114 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02646124
Sponsor's protocol ID
2015-4639
Status last verified
Jul 2018
First submitted
31 Dec 2015
Last updated
1 Aug 2018
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A Phase 2/3 study testing Naproxen and Diazepam in people with Low Back Pain, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

What does this combined phase mean?

Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.

Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.

Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Jul 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Change in Functional Impairment as Measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (time frame: Between baseline and one week after emergency department discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in