Low Back PainPhase 2/3NCT02646124
Diazepam Use With Standard Management for Acute Low Back Pain
A Phase 2/3 study testing Naproxen and Diazepam in people with Low Back Pain, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
Trial summary
Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an Emergency Department (ED) visit for musculoskeletal low back pain (LBP), we propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining a benzodiazepine with an NSAID is more effective than nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) monotherapy for the… Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 21 to 69 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Low Back Pain
- What is being tested?
- Naproxen and Diazepam
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 114 participants
- Where
- 1 siteUnited States
- Study dates
- Jun 2015to May 2016
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 21 to 69 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Present to ED primary for management of LBP, defined as pain originating between the lower border of the scapulae and the upper gluteal folds. Flank pain, that is pain originating from tissues lateral to the paraspinal muscles, will not be included.
- Absence of non-musculoskeletal etiology of low back, such as urinary tract infection, cystic ovarian disease, or influenza like illness. The primary clinical diagnosis, at the conclusion of the ED visit, must be a diagnosis consistent with non-traumatic, non-radicular, musculoskeletal LBP.
- Patient is to be discharged home. Patients admitted to the hospital are more likely to be treated with parenteral medication and therefore are not appropriate for this study.
- Age 21-69 Enrollment will be limited to adults younger than 70 years because of the increased risk of adverse medication effects in the elderly.
- Non-radicular pain: pain cannot radiate below the gluteal folds in a radicular pattern. Patients with non-radicular pain extending below the gluteal folds will not be excluded
- Pain duration <2 weeks (336 hours). Patients with more than two weeks of pain are at increased risk of poor pain and functional outcomes.(2)
Show all 9Show fewer
- Prior to the acute attack of LBP, back pain cannot have occurred once per month or more frequently. Patients with more frequent back pain are at increased risk of poor pain and functional outcomes.(2)
- Non-traumatic LBP: no substantial and direct trauma to the back within the previous month
- Functionally impairing back pain: A baseline score of > 5 on the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire
Who cannot join
- -Not available for follow-up
- Pregnant or breast-feeding
- Chronic pain syndrome defined as use of any analgesic medication on a daily or near-daily basis
- Allergic to or intolerant of investigational medications
- Contra-indications to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: peptic ulcer disease, history of gastro-intestinal bleeding, congestive heart failure, advanced renal disease, aspirin sensitive asthma
- Contra-indications to diazepam: glaucoma, myasthenia gravis, cirrhosis, sleep apnea, history of alcoholism or substance abuse
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
United States1 site
Montefiore Medical Center
The Bronx, New York, 10467
About this study
Official title: Adding Diazepam to Standard Management of Acute, Non-radicular Low Back Pain. An Emergency Department Based Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study
Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an Emergency Department (ED) visit for musculoskeletal low back pain (LBP), we propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining a benzodiazepine with an NSAID is more effective than nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) monotherapy for the treatment of acute, non-traumatic, non-radicular low back pain.
Read the detailed description
Low back pain (LBP) causes 2.4% of visits to US emergency departments (ED) resulting in 2.7 million visits annually. In general, outcomes for these patients are poor. One week after ED discharge, 70% of patients report persistent back-pain related functional impairment and 69% report analgesic use within the previous 24 hours. Three months after the ED visit, 48% of these patients report functional impairment, 42% report moderate or severe pain, and 46% report persistent analgesic use.
It is not clear how acute LBP should be treated. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are guideline-supported, first line therapy for acute LBP. NSAIDs are more efficacious than placebo with regard to pain relief, global improvement, and requirement of analgesic medication but are not sufficient therapy for as many as ½ of ED patients, who continue to suffer despite therapy with NSAIDs. Treatment of LBP with multiple concurrent medications is common in the ED--emergency physicians often prescribe benzodiazepines, skeletal muscle relaxants, or opioids in combination with NSAIDs. However, work recently completed here at Montefiore has revealed that combining skeletal muscle relaxants or opioids with NSAIDs does not improve outcomes. It remains uncertain if adding benzodiazepines to NSAIDs improves LBP outcomes.
Although benzodiazepines are used in 300,000 US ED visits for LBP annually, scant evidence exists to determine the appropriateness of this approach. Efficacy of benzodiazepines may be related to direct or centrally-mediated action on skeletal muscle or may instead work by mitigating anxiety about the condition or numbing a patient to the pain.
Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an ED visit for musculoskeletal LBP, we propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining a benzodiazepine with an NSAID is more effective than NSAID monotherapy for the treatment of acute, non-traumatic, non-radicular low back pain. Specifically, we will evaluate the following hypothesis:
A daily regimen of naproxen + diazepam will provide greater relief of LBP than naproxen + placebo one week after an ED visit, as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Being tested
- Naproxen, Placebo, Diazepam
- Keywords
- benzodiazepine
- Medical subject headings
- Low Back Pain
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
NaproxenDrug
Naproxen 500mg by mouth two times a day, #20
PlaceboDrug
Also called Placebo Diazepam
28 placebo capsules
DiazepamDrug
Diazepam 5mg capsules, 1-2 tabs by mouth two times a day, #28
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Diazepam | Experimental | Naproxen +Diazepam Receives: Drug: Naproxen; Drug: Diazepam |
| Placebo | Active comparator | Naproxen + Placebo Receives: Drug: Naproxen; Drug: Placebo |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in Functional Impairment as Measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a 24 item instrument that evaluates the impact of low back pain on one's daily life. It is most sensitive for patients with mild to moderate disability due to acute, sub-acute or chronic low back pain. Each question can be answered as either a "yes" or "no". The score ranges from 0 to 24 where a higher score reflects greater impairment and, therefore, worsening in the quality of life. The change in RMDQ is obtained by subtracting the RMDQ score at one week after discharge from the baseline score.
Measured: Between baseline and one week after emergency department discharge
Secondary outcomes (4)
Number of Participants With Moderate or Severe Pain, as Measured on an Ordinal Scale
Patients with moderate or serve pain. Worst Lower Back Pain (LBP) over the previous 24 hours, using a four point ordinal scale: severe, moderate, mild, or none.
Measured: 1 week after discharge from emergency department
Number of Participants Who Required Analgesic Medication for Low Back Pain Within the Previous 24 Hours
Telephone questionnaire is used to assess patients needing any analgesic or low back pain medication within the previous 24 hours.
Measured: One week after discharge from the emergency department
Number of Participants Who Required Analgesic Medication for Low Back Pain Within the Previous 72 Hours
Patients needing any analgesic or LBP medication within the previous 72 hours
Measured: Assessed three months after emergency department discharge
Participants Satisfied With Treatment
Participants who answered "Yes" when asked the question "Do you want to receive the same combination of medications during a subsequent visit to the ER?"
Measured: 1 week
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted5 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Study startJun 2015
- Primary completionFeb 2016
- Study completionMay 2016
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Low Back PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Montefiore Medical CenterThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical Center
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Benjamin W. Friedman, MD, Montefiore Medical Center
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02646124
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 2015-4639
- Status last verified
- Jul 2018
- First submitted
- 31 Dec 2015
- Last updated
- 1 Aug 2018
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 1 Aug 2018. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Adding Diazepam to Standard Management of Acute, Non-radicular Low Back Pain. An Emergency Department Based Randomized Comparative Effectiveness Study
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02646124
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 2015-4639
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Keywords
- benzodiazepine
- Phase
- Phase 2/3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 114 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Montefiore Medical CenterUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Jun 2015
- Primary completion
- Feb 2016 (actual)
- Study completion
- May 2016 (actual)
- First posted
- 5 Jan 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Jul 2018
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an Emergency Department (ED) visit for musculoskeletal low back pain (LBP), we propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining a benzodiazepine with an NSAID is more effective than nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) monotherapy for the treatment of acute, non-traumatic, non-radicular low back pain.
Detailed description
Low back pain (LBP) causes 2.4% of visits to US emergency departments (ED) resulting in 2.7 million visits annually. In general, outcomes for these patients are poor. One week after ED discharge, 70% of patients report persistent back-pain related functional impairment and 69% report analgesic use within the previous 24 hours. Three months after the ED visit, 48% of these patients report functional impairment, 42% report moderate or severe pain, and 46% report persistent analgesic use.
It is not clear how acute LBP should be treated. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) are guideline-supported, first line therapy for acute LBP. NSAIDs are more efficacious than placebo with regard to pain relief, global improvement, and requirement of analgesic medication but are not sufficient therapy for as many as ½ of ED patients, who continue to suffer despite therapy with NSAIDs. Treatment of LBP with multiple concurrent medications is common in the ED--emergency physicians often prescribe benzodiazepines, skeletal muscle relaxants, or opioids in combination with NSAIDs. However, work recently completed here at Montefiore has revealed that combining skeletal muscle relaxants or opioids with NSAIDs does not improve outcomes. It remains uncertain if adding benzodiazepines to NSAIDs improves LBP outcomes.
Although benzodiazepines are used in 300,000 US ED visits for LBP annually, scant evidence exists to determine the appropriateness of this approach. Efficacy of benzodiazepines may be related to direct or centrally-mediated action on skeletal muscle or may instead work by mitigating anxiety about the condition or numbing a patient to the pain.
Given the poor pain and functional outcomes that persist beyond an ED visit for musculoskeletal LBP, we propose a clinical trial to evaluate whether combining a benzodiazepine with an NSAID is more effective than NSAID monotherapy for the treatment of acute, non-traumatic, non-radicular low back pain. Specifically, we will evaluate the following hypothesis:
A daily regimen of naproxen + diazepam will provide greater relief of LBP than naproxen + placebo one week after an ED visit, as measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Diazepam | Experimental | Drug: Naproxen, Drug: DiazepamNaproxen +Diazepam |
| Placebo | Active comparator | Drug: Naproxen, Drug: PlaceboNaproxen + Placebo |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 21 to 69 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (9 listed)
- Present to ED primary for management of LBP, defined as pain originating between the lower border of the scapulae and the upper gluteal folds. Flank pain, that is pain originating from tissues lateral to the paraspinal muscles, will not be included.
- Absence of non-musculoskeletal etiology of low back, such as urinary tract infection, cystic ovarian disease, or influenza like illness. The primary clinical diagnosis, at the conclusion of the ED visit, must be a diagnosis consistent with non-traumatic, non-radicular, musculoskeletal LBP.
- Patient is to be discharged home. Patients admitted to the hospital are more likely to be treated with parenteral medication and therefore are not appropriate for this study.
- Age 21-69 Enrollment will be limited to adults younger than 70 years because of the increased risk of adverse medication effects in the elderly.
- Non-radicular pain: pain cannot radiate below the gluteal folds in a radicular pattern. Patients with non-radicular pain extending below the gluteal folds will not be excluded
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- -Not available for follow-up
- Pregnant or breast-feeding
- Chronic pain syndrome defined as use of any analgesic medication on a daily or near-daily basis
- Allergic to or intolerant of investigational medications
- Contra-indications to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: peptic ulcer disease, history of gastro-intestinal bleeding, congestive heart failure, advanced renal disease, aspirin sensitive asthma
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| NaproxenNaproxen 500mg by mouth two times a day, #20 | Drug | Diazepam, Placebo |
| PlaceboAlso: Placebo Diazepam28 placebo capsules | Drug | Placebo |
| DiazepamDiazepam 5mg capsules, 1-2 tabs by mouth two times a day, #28 | Drug | Diazepam |
Primary outcome
Change in Functional Impairment as Measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire
Time frame: Between baseline and one week after emergency department discharge
The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) is a 24 item instrument that evaluates the impact of low back pain on one's daily life. It is most sensitive for patients with mild to moderate disability due to acute, sub-acute or chronic low back pain. Each question can be answered as either a "yes" or "no". The score ranges from 0 to 24 where a higher score reflects greater impairment and, therefore, worsening in the quality of life. The change in RMDQ is obtained by subtracting the RMDQ score at one week after discharge from the baseline score.
4 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Moderate or Severe Pain, as Measured on an Ordinal Scale
Time frame: 1 week after discharge from emergency department
Number of Participants Who Required Analgesic Medication for Low Back Pain Within the Previous 24 Hours
Time frame: One week after discharge from the emergency department
Number of Participants Who Required Analgesic Medication for Low Back Pain Within the Previous 72 Hours
Time frame: Assessed three months after emergency department discharge
Participants Satisfied With Treatment
Time frame: 1 week
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 1 Aug 2018.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
Related trials for Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Hip Hinge Exercises on Pain, Range of Motion and Functional Disability in Non-specific Low Back Pain.
Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effect of Lumbar Stabilization Exercises With and Without YTWL (Scapular Stabilization Exercises) on Reducing Chronic Low Back Pain and Related Disability. A Randomized Clinical Trial,
Chronic Non Specific Mechanical Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparing Non-Medicine Strategies for Improving Low Back Pain
Chronic Low-back Pain (cLBP), High-Impact Chronic Pain (HICP)
Not yet recruiting
Effects of Whole-Body Vibration and Cervical Stabilization With Core Stabilization in Young Adults With Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Nonspecific Low Back Pain
Not yet recruiting
Spinery Basivertebral Nerve Ablation for Vertebrogenic Chronic Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP)
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
The record lists no contact. Use the official record to reach the sponsor.
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 2/3 study testing Naproxen and Diazepam in people with Low Back Pain, run by Montefiore Medical Center at 1 site in United States.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 9 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 1 Aug 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this combined phase mean?
Phase 2 studies give the treatment to a larger group to see whether it has the intended effect and to keep checking safety.
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Jul 2018). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in Functional Impairment as Measured by the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (time frame: Between baseline and one week after emergency department discharge). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 1 Aug 2018.