AzTrials
AzTrials

COPDESNMNCT02656667

Effect of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Versus Cycle Ergometer Training in a Pulmonary Rehabilitation Program

A study testing neuromuscular electrical stimulation, cycle ergometer training and Conventional pulmonary rehabilitation in people with COPD, run by University Hospital, Brest at 2 sites in France.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of quadriceps strengthening with neuromuscular electrical stimulation versus cycle ergometer as part of pulmonary rehabilitation program , in patients with severe or very severe COPD , according to GOLD with BODE index ≥ 5 . Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
COPD
What is being tested?
neuromuscular electrical stimulation, cycle ergometer training and Conventional pulmonary rehabilitation
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
102 participants
Where
2 sitesFrance
Study dates
8 Jun 2016to 21 Mar 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Patients with COPD stage 3 or 4, with BODE index ≥ 5
  • Hospitalized in the pulmonary rehabilitation unit in the hospital of Morlaix or in the center "Les Acacias" of briançon, with a 3 at 4 weeks pulmonary rehabilitation course;

Who cannot join

  • FEV ≥ 50%
  • Pneumonectomy, Lobectomy less than 6 months
  • Contraindications to muscle electrostimulation quadriceps
  • Absence of written consent
  • Inability to follow the respiratory rehabilitation program in its entirety
  • People equipped with electronic devices such as pacemakers and intracardiac defibrillators
  • Skin lesions and infectious foci on the electrode placement area.

Trial locations and contacts

2 sites in 1 country.

France2 sites
  • Centre des maladies respiratoires et allergiques - Les Acacias

    Briançon, France, 05107

  • CH de Morlaix

    Morlaix, France, 29672

Other trials in France

About this study

The aim of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of quadriceps strengthening with neuromuscular electrical stimulation versus cycle ergometer as part of pulmonary rehabilitation program , in patients with severe or very severe COPD , according to GOLD with BODE index ≥ 5 .

Read the detailed description

It's a prospective ,multicentre,randomised, single-blind study which compare the effectiveness of quadriceps strengthening with neuromuscular electrical stimulation versus cycle ergometer training as part of pulmonary rehabilitation program.

The program lasts from 3 to 4 weeks. 102 patients will included, diagnosed with COPD stages GOLD III and IV, and BODE index ≥ 5.

The commun program: training protocol performed on treadmill,quadriceps resistance training,patient therapeutic education,collective gymnastics,relaxation, session psychological care, smoking cessation program and nutritional management if necessary.

The primary criterion is the one minute sit to stand test.

Conditions
COPD
Being tested
neuromuscular electrical stimulation, cycle ergometer training, Conventional pulmonary rehabilitation
Keywords
COPD pulmonary rehabilitation, neuromuscular electrical stimulation, sit to stand test COPD, quadriceps strengthening
Medical subject headings
Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • neuromuscular electrical stimulationDevice

    quadriceps strenghthening with neuromuscular electrical stimulation (medical device)

  • cycle ergometer trainingDevice

    quadriceps strenghthening with cycle ergometer training

  • Conventional pulmonary rehabilitationOther

    excercise training on treadmill

Study groups in NCT02656667
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
neuromuscular electrical stimulationExperimentalconventional pulmonary rehabilitation including exercise training on treadmill and neuromuscular electrical stimulation with a medical device for quadriceps muscle strengthening
Receives: Device: neuromuscular electrical stimulation; Other: Conventional pulmonary rehabilitation
cycle ergometer trainingExperimentalconventional pulmonary rehabilitation including exercise training on treadmill and quadriceps strenghthening on cycle-ergometer
Receives: Device: cycle ergometer training; Other: Conventional pulmonary rehabilitation

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. functional capacity of the lower limb muscles

    Measure of the functional capacity of the lower limb muscles with the "1 minute Sit To Stand Test "

    Measured: 21 - 4 days / +7 days

Secondary outcomes (8)
  1. Maximal isometric voluntary quadriceps strength assessment

    Quadriceps strength assessment with handheld dynamometer

    Measured: 21 - 4 days / +7 days

  2. isometric voluntary quadriceps endurance assessment

    Measure of isometric voluntary quadriceps endurance assessment with handheld dynamometer

    Measured: 21 - 4 days / +7 days

  3. assessment of exercise capacity

    Six minute walking test for assessing exercise capacity

    Measured: 21 - 4 days / +7 days

  4. Quality of Life Assessment

    COPD assessment test for assessing quality of life

    Measured: 21 - 4 days / +7 days

  5. Dyspnea Assessment with Borg scale

    Measure of dyspnea with Borg scale at the end of the six minute walking test

    Measured: 21 - 4 days / +7 days

  6. Dyspnea Assessment with MRC Scale

    Measure of dyspnea with Medical Research Council Dyspnea Scale

    Measured: 21 - 4 days / +7 days

  7. Dyspnea Assessment with Dyspnea 12 questionnary

    Measure of dyspnea with Dyspnea 12 questionnary

    Measured: 21 - 4 days / +7 days

  8. Inspiratory capacity (in litres) by spirometry

    Measure of inspiratory capacity (in litres) by spirometry

    Measured: 21 - 4 days / +7 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted15 Jan 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start8 Jun 2016
  3. Primary completion21 Mar 2019
  4. Study completion21 Mar 2019

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
None (open label)
Enrolment
102 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02656667
Sponsor's protocol ID
ESNM (RB 15.058)
Acronym
ESNM
Status last verified
Apr 2019
First submitted
6 Jan 2016
Last updated
3 Dec 2025
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
Individual data sharing
No

Publications

  • Peran L, Beaumont M, Le Ber C, Le Mevel P, Berriet AC, Nowak E, Consigny M, Couturaud F. Effect of neuromuscular electrical stimulation on exercise capacity in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2022 Aug;36(8):1072-1082. doi: 10.1177/02692155221091802. Epub 2022 Apr 11.

    PubMed 35404157

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing neuromuscular electrical stimulation, cycle ergometer training and Conventional pulmonary rehabilitation in people with COPD, run by University Hospital, Brest at 2 sites in France.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 Dec 2025. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 2 sites in France. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

functional capacity of the lower limb muscles (time frame: 21 - 4 days / +7 days). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02656667, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 Dec 2025.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in