AzTrials
AzTrials

ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIANCT02662920

Investigating the Prevalence and Prognostic Importance of Polypharmacy in Adults Treated for Newly Diagnosed Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML)

An observational study of ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Prevalence and prognostic significance of polypharmacy has not been evaluated in adults undergoing treatment for AML. Investigating the significance of polypharmacy in this population may help improve patient assessment and provide an opportunity to design simple interventions to minimize unnecessary morbidity… Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 60 years and older
Conditions the study is for
ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA
How many people
209 participants
Where
No sites listed yet
Study dates
Aug 2010to Nov 2014
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 60 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Study population: Adults age ≥60 who received treatment while hospitalized for AML

Who may be able to join

  • Hospitalized between January 2004 and December 2009 with newly diagnosed AML
  • Age ≥60 years at the time of diagnosis
  • Received treatment while hospitalized for AML

Who cannot join

  • 30-day mortality data unavailable

About this study

Prevalence and prognostic significance of polypharmacy has not been evaluated in adults undergoing treatment for AML. Investigating the significance of polypharmacy in this population may help improve patient assessment and provide an opportunity to design simple interventions to minimize unnecessary morbidity associated with treatment.

Read the detailed description

The incidence of acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) increases with age. Older AML patients, generally defined by age 60 years and above, have worse treatment outcomes than younger patients. While selected older patients can benefit from standard therapies, as a group they experience increased treatment-related toxicity, decreased remission rates, decreased disease-free survival and decreased overall survival. Outcome disparity is in part explained by age related biologic features. Older patients are more likely to present with unfavorable cytogenetic abnormalities, multidrug resistance phenotypes, and secondary AML. However, even older adults with favorable tumor biology have a worse prognosis compared to younger patients. Patient-specific factors including impaired physical function and comorbidity independently predict increased treatment toxicity and decreased survival. Improving patient assessment strategies is critical to identify those patients who are most likely to benefit from induction and post-remission therapies.

Treatment decision-making for older adults is hampered by the difficulty of accurately predicting vulnerability to toxicity. Increasing age alone is a risk factor for poor response to therapy. Older adults of the same chronologic age represent a heterogeneous population. Multiple patient-specific factors may impact an older adult's ability to tolerate tumor burden and treatments. Comorbid disease, functional status and cognitive status are examples of factors that reflect an individual patient's reserve capacity; none of these can be adequately assessed with chronologic age alone.

Translating geriatric assessment strategies into the evaluation of older patients with acute leukemia should help refine the treatment approach to this population. One strategy commonly used in geriatric medicine is the comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA). CGA refers to a multidisciplinary evaluation of geriatric domains, including comorbid disease, physical function, cognitive function, psychological state, nutritional status, and medication management. In older cancer patients CGA can identify problems that may interfere with cancer treatment and is recommended by the NCCN Guidelines for "Senior Adult Oncology". The optimal measures to use and how to change management based on results are less clear.

Medication management may be of particular importance for older adults with AML due to the potentially high prevalence of polypharmacy in this population. Studies of older adults with cancer report average numbers of medications ranging from 4-9. These numbers may be higher for patients being actively treated for acute leukemia. Polypharmacy is associated with increased adverse drug reactions and increased risk of drug-drug interactions. Careful medication review with discontinuation of potentially unnecessary or inappropriate medications may minimize negative consequences of polypharmacy.

To date, however, prevalence and prognostic significance of polypharmacy has not been evaluated in adults undergoing treatment for AML. Investigating the significance of polypharmacy in this population may help improve patient assessment and provide an opportunity to design simple interventions to minimize unnecessary morbidity associated with treatment.

Being tested
No Intervention
Medical subject headings
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No InterventionOther

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Prevalence of polypharmacy in adults ≥60 years of age hospitalized for treatment of newly diagnosed AML

    Number of medications at baseline

    Measured: Day 1 (admission)

  2. Prevalence of polypharmacy in adults ≥60 years of age hospitalized for treatment of newly diagnosed AML

    Number of medications at discharge

    Measured: Through hospitilization, an average of 30 days

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted26 Jan 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startAug 2010
  3. Primary completionApr 2014
  4. Study completionNov 2014

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrolment
209 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02662920
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB00014134
Other IDs
CCCWFU 22410
Status last verified
Jun 2018
First submitted
19 Jan 2016
Last updated
2 Jul 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of ACUTE MYELOGENOUS LEUKEMIA, run by Wake Forest University Health Sciences.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 3 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 2 Jul 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Prevalence of polypharmacy in adults ≥60 years of age hospitalized for treatment of newly diagnosed AML (time frame: Day 1 (admission)). The study lists 2 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 2 Jul 2018.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in