AzTrials
AzTrials

Colon Cancer ScreeningNCT02665741

Comparison of Colon Adenoma Detection Rate Using Two Distal Colonoscope Attachments

A study testing Olympus transparent cap and Medivators Endocuff in people with Colon Cancer Screening and Colon Polyps, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The goal of this study is to compare two FDA approved distal colonoscope attachment devices, in order to identify which device can increase adenoma detection rate the most without increasing procedure time or risk. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 50 years and older
What is being tested?
Olympus transparent cap and Medivators Endocuff
Type of treatment
Medical device
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
126 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Jan 2016to Feb 2017
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 50 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • At least 50 years old
  • Presenting for a screening or surveillance colonoscopy at UC Davis Endoscopy Suites

Who cannot join

  • Age less than 50 years
  • Prior history of colon cancer
  • Patients with inflammatory bowel disease
  • Patients suspected to have colon cancer based on non invasive tests such as stool tests for hemoglobin or DNA, or imaging finding suggestive of colon cancer (CT or barium enema).
  • Patients undergoing colonoscopy for evaluation of symptoms such as abdominal pain, rectal bleeding, diarrhea, constipation, etc, or patient with iron deficiency anemia suspected to be due to ongoing bleeding inside the colon
  • Patients with family history of colon cancer in 1st degree relative below the age of 60
Show all 11Show fewer
  • Patients with family history of hereditary polyposis syndromes such as Lynch syndrome, familial adenomatous polyposis etc, which are associated with an increased risk of colon cancer
  • Patients unable to consent
  • Pregnant patients
  • Incarcerated patients
  • Non-English speakers

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • University of California, Davis

    Sacramento, California, 95817

Other trials in United States

About this study

The goal of this study is to compare two FDA approved distal colonoscope attachment devices, in order to identify which device can increase adenoma detection rate the most without increasing procedure time or risk.

Read the detailed description

Although mortality from colon cancer is decreasing, it remains the second leading cause of cancer related death in the United States. There are multiple factors contributing to this decrease, such as increased awareness, improving screening techniques, etc.

Of the available modalities approved for colon cancer screening in the United States, colonoscopy is considered the gold standard. Colonoscopy has the advantage of being both diagnostic and therapeutic, allowing the removal of pre-cancerous polyps, before the polyps can transform into cancer. Colonic polyps can occur at any location from the rectum to the cecum. Colonoscopy has been shown to be more effective in decreasing incidence of cancer in the left colon but remains limited in the detection of right sided polyps /lesions 2. This difference based on location is thought to be due to several reasons. Typically the right side of the colon is less clean than the left side during colonoscopy, thereby impairing visualization of polyps. This problem has been overcome by incorporating a "split bowel preparation", which has not become standard of care. However, the problem of not being able to visualize polyps behind folds seen in the colon persists despite improvements in the quality of cleansing of the colon. Various endoscopic technologies have been introduced with the goal of assisting with the manipulation of such colonic folds, and thereby reducing chances of missing polyps behind fold. Two such colonoscope assisted devices including the distal transparent cap and the Endocuff endoscopic overtube.

The Endocuff overtube is a small device with flexible arms arranged in 2 rows. Each row has 8 short, soft arms projecting away from the device. These arms are used to peel back the colonic folds without causing physical damage to enable visualization behind colonic folds. The use of Endocuff overtube has shown promising results in terms of cecal intubation rate and time as well as adenoma detection rates 3.

The transparent cap attachment is a clear plastic device that fits at the end of the colonoscope and extends a short distance past the tip of the colonoscope. It aids in the manipulation of folds and in maintaining a suitable distance from the mucosa, with the goal of improving visualization. Although some studies comparing cap fitted colonoscopy to standard (non- attachment) colonoscopies have shown improved adenoma detection 4, others have shown no significant benefit 5.

Although, these devices have been compared with conventional colonoscopies (i.e without any distal attachment), to the investigator's knowledge, there are currently no studies that have compared these two distal colonoscope attachment devices head-to-head, and none has specifically evaluated effects on detection of right sided adenomas. Also, here at UCDavis, these devices are being used specifically in diagnostic colonoscopies for removal of large polyps and the choice of which specific device is used depends on level of comfort of the advanced endoscopist. The endoscopists participating in the investigators' study do not currently use these devices as part of their routine colonoscopies, thus it is important to provide head to head comparison of these devices to help guide management practice.

Therefore, the investigators' goal is to compare the Endocuff overtube assisted, transparent cap fitted, and non-cap fitted (standard) colonoscopy in patients presenting to UC Davis Medical Center for screening colonoscopies.

In addition, 2 of the 3 investigators will employ the water exchange method during for all arms of the trial, while the other investigator will employ the conventional air method of colonoscopy.

Being tested
Olympus transparent cap, Medivators Endocuff, Control
Keywords
distal colonoscope attachments, colon cancer screening, screening colonoscopy, adenoma detection
Medical subject headings
Colonic Polyps

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Olympus transparent capDevice

    distal colonoscope attachment

  • Medivators EndocuffDevice

    distal colonoscope attachment

  • ControlDevice

    No distal colonoscope attachments

Study groups in NCT02665741
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
ControlOtherStandard colonoscopy - no distal colonoscope attachment will be used in this arm
Receives: Device: Control
Olympus transparent capExperimentalThe Olympus transparent cap will be attached to the distal end of colonoscope prior to starting the procedure
Receives: Device: Olympus transparent cap
Medivators EndocuffExperimentalThe Medivators Endocuff will be attached to the distal end of colonoscope prior to starting the procedure
Receives: Device: Medivators Endocuff

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Adenoma Detection Rate

    The investigators will compare adenoma detection rate at completion of study across the 3 arms

    Measured: Completion of procedure

Secondary outcomes (3)
  1. Proximal Adenoma Detection Rate

    The investigators will compare proximal adenoma detection rate at completion of study across the 3 arms

    Measured: Completion of procedure

  2. Cecal Intubation Rate

    The investigators will compare cecal intubation rate at completion of study across the 3 arms

    Measured: Completion of procedure

  3. Withdrawal Time

    The investigators will compare colonoscopy withdrawal time rate at completion of study across the 3 arms

    Measured: Completion of procedure

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted28 Jan 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startJan 2016
  3. Primary completionFeb 2017
  4. Study completionFeb 2017

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Participant
Enrolment
126 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02665741
Sponsor's protocol ID
797109
Status last verified
Jun 2020
First submitted
25 Jan 2016
Last updated
18 Jun 2020
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
Yes

Publications

  • Brenner H, Hoffmeister M, Arndt V, Stegmaier C, Altenhofen L, Haug U. Protection from right- and left-sided colorectal neoplasms after colonoscopy: population-based study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010 Jan 20;102(2):89-95. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp436. Epub 2009 Dec 30.

    PubMed 20042716
  • Pioche M, Matsumoto M, Takamaru H, Sakamoto T, Nakajima T, Matsuda T, Abe S, Kakugawa Y, Otake Y, Saito Y. Endocuff-assisted colonoscopy increases polyp detection rate: a simulated randomized study involving an anatomic colorectal model and 32 international endoscopists. Surg Endosc. 2016 Jan;30(1):288-95. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4208-8. Epub 2015 Apr 11.

    PubMed 25861907
  • Westwood DA, Alexakis N, Connor SJ. Transparent cap-assisted colonoscopy versus standard adult colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum. 2012 Feb;55(2):218-25. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31823461ef.

    PubMed 22228167
  • Harada Y, Hirasawa D, Fujita N, Noda Y, Kobayashi G, Ishida K, Yonechi M, Ito K, Suzuki T, Sugawara T, Horaguchi J, Takasawa O, Obana T, Oohira T, Onochi K, Kanno Y, Kuroha M, Iwai W. Impact of a transparent hood on the performance of total colonoscopy: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Mar;69(3 Pt 2):637-44. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.029.

    PubMed 19251004

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Olympus transparent cap and Medivators Endocuff in people with Colon Cancer Screening and Colon Polyps, run by University of California, Davis at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 11 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 18 Jun 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 18 Jun 2020). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Adenoma Detection Rate (time frame: Completion of procedure). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02665741, which also lists 4 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 18 Jun 2020.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in