AzTrials
AzTrials

End-Stage Renal DiseaseCONNECTNCT02670512

Assessment of Telehome Monitoring in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

A study testing Telehome Monitoring in people with End-Stage Renal Disease, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 11 sites in Canada.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

Compared to hemodialysis, patients on peritoneal dialysis live longer and healthier, have a higher quality of life and cost approximately $40,000 less to the healthcare system per patient per year. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 18 years and older
Conditions the study is for
End-Stage Renal Disease
What is being tested?
Telehome Monitoring
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
467 participants
Where
11 sitesCanada
Study dates
21 Jun 2016to 1 Sep 2021
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 18 years and older
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

Who may be able to join

  • Able to provide informed consent
  • Patient or primary care giver able to read and speak English
  • Over 18 years of age
  • Patient on PD (APD/CAPD) for at least 3 months
  • Patient or primary care giver cognitively and physically capable and willing to interact with a tablet computer and perform self-measurements (e.g. taking weight)

Who cannot join

  • Scheduled kidney transplant within 1 year (identified, processed and medically worked out their donor)
  • Life expectancy <1 year (estimated by physician)
  • In long-term care facility
  • Deemed unable to comply with the telehome monitoring support system (e.g. due to vision problems, literacy, lack of manual dexterity to accurately interact with the tablet, or decreased cognitive function such as memory loss) by physician
  • Participating in another interventional trial that could influence the intervention or outcome of this trial
  • Was in another interventional trial that could influence the intervention or outcome of this trial, ≤4 weeks prior to recruitment
  • Patients on hybrid dialysis (those on both peritoneal dialysis and hemodialysis)

Trial locations and contacts

11 sites in 1 country.

11 sites in 1 country

Canada11 sites
  • QEII Health Sciences Centre - Nova Scotia Health Authority

    Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 1V7

  • St. Joseph's Healthcare Hamilton

    Hamilton, Ontario, L8G 5E4

  • Kingston General Hospital

    Kingston, Ontario, K7L 2V7

  • London Health Sciences Centre

    London, Ontario, N6A 5W9

  • Trillium Health Partners - Mississauga Hospital

    Mississauga, Ontario, L4Z 3N6

  • Royal Columbian Hospital - Fraser Health Authority

    New Westminster, British Columbia, V3L 3W7

  • Mackenzie Health

    Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4E 4L6

  • St. Paul's Hospital

    Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, S7M 0Z9

  • Scarborough Health Network - General Hospital

    Scarborough Village, Ontario, M1P 2V5

  • Humber River Hospital

    Toronto, Ontario, M3M 0B2

  • Seven Oaks General Hospital

    Winnipeg, Manitoba, R2V 3M3

Other trials in Canada

About this study

Official title: Assessment of Telehome Monitoring in Patients on Peritoneal Dialysis (CONNECT Trial): A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial

Compared to hemodialysis, patients on peritoneal dialysis live longer and healthier, have a higher quality of life and cost approximately $40,000 less to the healthcare system per patient per year. However, only 18% of dialysis patients in Canada currently use peritoneal dialysis because patients often feel isolated from the healthcare team and lack the confidence to manage treatments by themselves. This study will assess a telehome monitoring system (eQ Connect™), allowing for up-to-date data transmission and digital interaction between the patients at home and their healthcare team. From the patients' perspective, this technology is an easier way to communicate with their healthcare providers, track their treatment and supplies, and receive training and support. From the providers' perspective, eQ Connect™ delivers up-to-date patient data and provides an efficient way to keep track of the patients' progress. This intervention has the potential to improve the patients' clinical outcomes, quality of life, reduce the costs of dialysis to the healthcare system and ultimately empower patients to start and stay on peritoneal dialysis.

Being tested
Telehome Monitoring
Keywords
End-Stage Renal Disease, Peritoneal Dialysis, Telehomecare, Telehome Monitoring
Medical subject headings
Kidney Failure, Chronic

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • Telehome MonitoringDevice

    Also called eQ Connect™

Study groups in NCT02670512
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Telehome MonitoringExperimentalPatients in this arm will use the telehome monitoring device (a mobile tablet) to support them with their peritoneal dialysis (communication, treatment tracking, supply tracking, appointment reminders, educational content).
Receives: Device: Telehome Monitoring
Standard of CareNo interventionPatients in this arm use the standard of care for peritoneal dialysis, which is simple telephone communication and using pen and paper log to track their treatments and supplies.

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Composite clinical outcome

    The primary outcome is a composite of technique failure (switching to hemodialysis for ≥12 weeks), infections (peritonitis, exit-site, tunnel) and hospital encounters (ER visits, hospitalizations).

    Measured: 1 year (plus 12 weeks for complete follow-up of technique failure)

Secondary outcomes (9)
  1. Health-related Quality of Life

    This study will utilize the Kidney Disease Quality of Life-36 (KDQOL-36) Instrument and EQ-5D to assess HRQOL.

    Measured: 1 year

  2. Time spent communicating

    This measure captures the time a patient spends communicating with the healthcare team. This is measured through automated telephone logs and paper telephone logs that are documented by nurses. For patients in the intervention arm, investigators will also obtain the duration of video calls and amount of time spent on the message screen (number of minutes). We will also capture the number of messages that are sent on the telehome monitoring device.

    Measured: 1 year

  3. Number of missed appointments

    Investigators will examine the number of appointments that a patient has missed, which is documented through a scheduling software from the clinic.

    Measured: 1 year

  4. Nurse Overtime hours

    Investigators deliver care for the patients. The number of hours worked over-time are documented in a telephone log manually, which includes the patient's name, reason for call and call duration.

    Measured: 1 year

  5. Number of clinic visits

    The number of clinic visits will be collected through scheduling software from the PD clinic.

    Measured: 1 year

  6. Hospitalization Days

    Investigators will compare the length of hospitalizations (in days) between intervention and control group.

    Measured: 1 year

  7. Nursing Costs

    Investigators will compare costs by applying each centre's hourly nursing cost to the number of hours nurses spent communicating with the patient (derived from "time spent communicating" measure).

    Measured: 1 year

  8. Healthcare Utilization Costs

    Investigators will use the Case Costing Macro at ICES to compare the health utilization costs between two groups, including costs from emergency room visits and hospitalizations. (This is only applicable to the Ontario Centres).

    Measured: 1 year

  9. Dialysis Supplies Costs

    Investigators will compare the cost of supplies between the intervention and control group.

    Measured: 1 year

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted1 Feb 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study start21 Jun 2016
  3. Primary completion30 Mar 2021
  4. Study completion1 Sep 2021

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Parallel groups
Masking
Single blind
Who is masked
Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
467 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02670512
Sponsor's protocol ID
Connect1.13
Acronym
CONNECT
Status last verified
Nov 2020
First submitted
18 Jan 2016
Last updated
19 Aug 2022
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No

Publications

  • Jeffs L, Jain AK, Man RH, Onabajo N, Desveaux L, Shaw J, Hensel J, Agarwal P, Saragosa M, Jamieson T, Wong I, Maione M, Bhatia RS. Exploring the utility and scalability of a telehomecare intervention for patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing peritoneal dialysis-a study protocol. BMC Nephrol. 2017 May 10;18(1):155. doi: 10.1186/s12882-017-0557-y.

    PubMed 28486991

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Telehome Monitoring in people with End-Stage Renal Disease, run by London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's at 11 sites in Canada.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 7 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 19 Aug 2022. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 11 sites in Canada. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Composite clinical outcome (time frame: 1 year (plus 12 weeks for complete follow-up of technique failure)). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02670512, which also lists 1 linked publication.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 19 Aug 2022.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in