MyalgiaNCT02685202
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD) Pain in Response to Jaw Advancement in People With TMD and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
A study testing Mandibular advancement splint in people with Myalgia and Apnea, Obstructive Sleep, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
Trial summary
The purpose of this study is to characterize the course of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain in adults with TMD and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), all of whom are being treated with mandibular advancement splint (MAS) therapy. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 30 to 64 years
- Conditions the study is for
- Myalgia, Apnea, Obstructive Sleep
- What is being tested?
- Mandibular advancement splint
- Type of treatment
- Pill or oral medicine, Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 9 participants
- Where
- No sites listed yet
- Study dates
- Mar 2016to Mar 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 30 to 64 years
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Any race or ethnicity
- Meet Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD to confirm Group II: Masticatory Muscle Disorders, 1A: Myalgia
- Rate their TMD pain severity as ≥4 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale
- Have no history of treatment for OSA.
- If taking a prescription medication (with the exception of prescription formulations of NSAIDs, acetaminophen, and aspirin) episodically for the management of pain, the subject must agree to discontinue its use prior to or at the baseline visit. If taking a prescription medication daily for the management of pain, must agree to continue the daily use of the medication throughout the 16-week observation period. If taking an over-the-counter pain medication daily, the subject must agree to continue the daily use throughout the study.
Who cannot join
- <8 retained teeth per arch
- Tooth mobility
- Unmanaged periodontal disease
- Skeletal Class III occlusion
- Central sleep apnea
- Hypoventilation syndromes
- Congestive heart failure
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
About this study
Official title: The Course of Temporomandibular Pain in Response to Mandibular Advancement Therapy Among Adults With Temporomandibular Disorder and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
The purpose of this study is to characterize the course of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain in adults with TMD and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), all of whom are being treated with mandibular advancement splint (MAS) therapy.
Study participants are 12 adults with painful TMD and comorbid mild to moderate OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥5 and <30).
This is an interventional study in which 12 patients receive MAS therapy for comorbid TMD/OSA for 16 weeks. It is standard of care to treat mild or moderate OSA with MAS therapy, the the effect on MAS therapy on TMD pain in people with OSA is unknown. There is no comparison group. Care is being provided under the direction of a sleep physician by a dentist who specializes in dental sleep medicine. The investigators expect that as MAS therapy reduces the severity of OSA, painful TMD symptoms will also reduce.
Read the detailed description
Two chronic health conditions are treated with oral appliances during sleep. One condition is temporomandibular disorder (TMD); a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain in the masseter muscle and temporomandibular joint. TMD pain is treated with a stabilization splint which operates by limiting abnormal muscle activity. The other condition is obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Mild to moderate OSA is treated with a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) which holds the mandible in a protruded position to increase the pharyngeal airway space and reduce upper airway collapsibility.
The comorbidity of the two conditions is high. Approximately one in four patients with clinically diagnosed TMD has OSA diagnosed by polysomnogram (PSG). This comorbidity poses a problem for management because neither appliance is considered effective in treating both conditions. In fact, mandible advancement is assumed to worsen TMD pain. However this assumption is not well supported by scientific evidence, with some studies finding that mandibular advancement actually reduces TMD pain, albeit after a transient increase in TMD pain in some patients. Furthermore, anecdotal evidence suggests that mandibular advancement reduces TMD pain. It is believed that by maintaining an open airway with the oral appliance, patients no longer have to clench their teeth in an effort to prevent the airway from collapsing during sleep.
The overall objective of this study is to characterize the temporal nature of TMD pain in adults with comorbid TMD/OSA treated with MAS therapy. It is the first study to monitor adherence to MAS therapy objectively in this study population, using a microsensor embedded in the MAS.
Recruitment and MAS therapy will be conducted at Lane and Associates Family Dentistry; a group of 27 dental practices located throughout the Triangle and Triad region of North Carolina. Advantages of using Lane \& Associates are: large influx of new dental patients every month, fast recruitment, well-established protocols for screening for TMD and OSA and for referral of patients to sleep physicians for evaluation and PSG, standardized protocols for oral appliance therapy, and a Dental Sleep Medicine director who is highly experienced also in the management of TMD. The study coordinator is a dental hygienist in the University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Dentistry Dental Sleep Clinic who works in the School's Dental Sleep Medicine practice. She will travel to the Lane \& Associates offices to assist in clinical and administrative activities and will manage all data collection for the 12 subjects. The Dental Sleep Clinic at the UNC School of Dentistry is not considered adequate to serve as the study site because it currently operates only one day a week and accepts referrals for only patients without TMD pain.
In the pre-enrollment phase, patients at Lane and Associates Family Dentistry will complete a standard TMD screening questionnaire. Those screening positive will be clinically examined against Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD to confirm Group II: Masticatory Muscle Disorders, 1A: Myalgia. They will also be screened for OSA using the validated STOP-BANG questionnaire. Those at high risk will be referred for evaluation by a sleep physician and a diagnostic PSG, as is the standard of care at Lane and Associates. If the PSG reveals mild to moderate OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 and <30), the patient is a candidate for oral appliance therapy, pending confirmation of the sleep physician, and thus eligible to enroll in the study.
Subjects will be consented and assessed for demographics, medical history, and medication use. Impressions of the upper and lower dental arches will be recorded, poured in dental stone and sent to the lab. A George Gauge will record a protrusive bite registration with the jaw advanced 60% from the most retruded position. The custom-made MAS will be fitted with a micro-recorder (Braebon DentiTrac Monitor) to assess adherence. The investigators define adherence as use of the splint 4 hours/night for ≥70% of nights as is standard practice for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Home sleep test (HST): Subjects will complete a series (from 2 to 5) two-night home sleep tests (HSTs) using the portable AccuSom device by NovaSom, which collects sleep parameters of AHI, minimum oxygen saturation, and snoring indices. Novosom arranges shipment of the device and offers 24-hour technical support during the sleep test. Sleep data are uploaded wirelessly from the recorder to an online portal for statistical analysis.
Following a baseline home sleep test (HST), 12 participants will enter the study wearing a MAS during sleep that protrudes the mandible to 60% of its maximal advancement. This approximates the minimum amount of jaw advancement that is expected to be efficacious. A HST will be repeated at the end of Week #4. If that HST shows that the MAS is not efficacious (i.e. has not reduced baseline apnea hypopnea index (AHI) by ≥50% or the AHI is ≥10**), and if TMD pain is not worse, the mandible will be advanced to 70% and the participant will repeat the HST at the end of Week #8. Once efficacy is achieved, there is no need for further HSTs. If efficacy is not achieved at the end of Week #8 and if TMD pain is not worse, the mandible will be advanced to 75% and the participant will repeat the HST at the end of Week #12. If efficacy is not yet achieved and if TMD pain is not worse, the mandibular will be further advanced to 80% and the participant will undergo a final HST at the end of Week #16. Once a HST indicates that the MAS is efficacious in reducing the AHI, the participant will maintain that level of advancement. The minimum number of HSTs for any one participant is 2 (baseline and 4-week follow-up) and the maximum number is 5.
- Conditions
- Myalgia, Apnea, Obstructive Sleep
- Being tested
- Mandibular advancement splint
- Keywords
- orofacial pain, sleep-disordered breathing, temporomandibular disorder, oral appliance, upper airway collapse
- Medical subject headings
- Myalgia, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Facial Pain, Sleep Apnea Syndromes, Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Mandibular advancement splintDevice
A mandibular advancement splint (MAS), functions by comfortably positioning the patient's mandibular in a forward position, clearing the obstructed airway during sleep.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Mandibular advancement splint | Experimental | An oral appliance which is standard of care in treating mild or moderate obstructive sleep apnea by repositioning the mandible in a forward position Receives: Device: Mandibular advancement splint |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change in the Weekly Mean Pain Index Score
Weekly mean pain index is computed as the arithmetic mean of daily pain index values recorded at enrollment and then at the end of each week throughout the 16 week observation period.
Daily pain index is computed as pain intensity (0-100 numeric rating scale where 0 = "no pain" and 100 = "the most intense pain imaginable") multiplied by pain duration (0-100 percentage scale) where percentage refers to the percent of waking day that the participant had facial pain) as reported in the Daily Symptom Diary.
It is computed from the weekly mean pain index (numeric rating scale 0-10), and representing the arithmetic mean of daily pain index values in the preceding 7-day period. The pain index for any given day is the product of the pain intensity score multiplied by the pain duration score, each as reported in the Daily Symptom Diary kept by the subject.
Measured: Baseline, 16 weeks
Secondary outcomes (2)
Change in the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)
The AHI is the sum of the number of apneas and hypopneas recorded during the home sleep test per hour of recorded sleep. The AHI is used to indicate the severity of obstructive sleep apnea.
Measured: Baseline, 16 weeks
Change in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score
Daytime sleepiness will be assessed using the ESS which is based on responses to self-administered questions that assess the propensity of the subject to fall asleep in 8 everyday situations (e.g., sitting and reading, talking to someone, being stopped in traffic). Scores for the ESS range from 0 to 24, with a higher score indicating greater daytime sleepiness.
Measured: Baseline, 16 weeks
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted18 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Study startMar 2016
- Primary completionMar 2017
- Study completionMar 2017
Why it stopped: Funding depleted
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for MyalgiaStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by University of North Carolina, Chapel HillThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Anne E Sanders, PhD, Principal investigator, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02685202
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 16-4598
- Status last verified
- Oct 2017
- First submitted
- 12 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 14 Nov 2017
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 14 Nov 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- The Course of Temporomandibular Pain in Response to Mandibular Advancement Therapy Among Adults With Temporomandibular Disorder and Obstructive Sleep Apnea
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02685202
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 16-4598
- Conditions
- Myalgia, Apnea, Obstructive Sleep
- Keywords
- orofacial pain, sleep-disordered breathing, temporomandibular disorder, oral appliance, upper airway collapse
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- TerminatedReason stopped: Funding depleted
- Enrolment
- 9 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- University of North Carolina, Chapel HillUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- Mar 2016
- Primary completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- Mar 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 18 Feb 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 14 Nov 2017
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The purpose of this study is to characterize the course of temporomandibular disorder (TMD) pain in adults with TMD and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), all of whom are being treated with mandibular advancement splint (MAS) therapy.
Study participants are 12 adults with painful TMD and comorbid mild to moderate OSA (apnea-hypopnea index ≥5 and <30).
This is an interventional study in which 12 patients receive MAS therapy for comorbid TMD/OSA for 16 weeks. It is standard of care to treat mild or moderate OSA with MAS therapy, the the effect on MAS therapy on TMD pain in people with OSA is unknown. There is no comparison group. Care is being provided under the direction of a sleep physician by a dentist who specializes in dental sleep medicine. The investigators expect that as MAS therapy reduces the severity of OSA, painful TMD symptoms will also reduce.
Detailed description
Two chronic health conditions are treated with oral appliances during sleep. One condition is temporomandibular disorder (TMD); a musculoskeletal disorder characterized by pain in the masseter muscle and temporomandibular joint. TMD pain is treated with a stabilization splint which operates by limiting abnormal muscle activity. The other condition is obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Mild to moderate OSA is treated with a mandibular advancement splint (MAS) which holds the mandible in a protruded position to increase the pharyngeal airway space and reduce upper airway collapsibility.
The comorbidity of the two conditions is high. Approximately one in four patients with clinically diagnosed TMD has OSA diagnosed by polysomnogram (PSG). This comorbidity poses a problem for management because neither appliance is considered effective in treating both conditions. In fact, mandible advancement is assumed to worsen TMD pain. However this assumption is not well supported by scientific evidence, with some studies finding that mandibular advancement actually reduces TMD pain, albeit after a transient increase in TMD pain in some patients. Furthermore, anecdotal evidence suggests that mandibular advancement reduces TMD pain. It is believed that by maintaining an open airway with the oral appliance, patients no longer have to clench their teeth in an effort to prevent the airway from collapsing during sleep.
The overall objective of this study is to characterize the temporal nature of TMD pain in adults with comorbid TMD/OSA treated with MAS therapy. It is the first study to monitor adherence to MAS therapy objectively in this study population, using a microsensor embedded in the MAS.
Recruitment and MAS therapy will be conducted at Lane and Associates Family Dentistry; a group of 27 dental practices located throughout the Triangle and Triad region of North Carolina. Advantages of using Lane \& Associates are: large influx of new dental patients every month, fast recruitment, well-established protocols for screening for TMD and OSA and for referral of patients to sleep physicians for evaluation and PSG, standardized protocols for oral appliance therapy, and a Dental Sleep Medicine director who is highly experienced also in the management of TMD. The study coordinator is a dental hygienist in the University of North Carolina (UNC) School of Dentistry Dental Sleep Clinic who works in the School's Dental Sleep Medicine practice. She will travel to the Lane \& Associates offices to assist in clinical and administrative activities and will manage all data collection for the 12 subjects. The Dental Sleep Clinic at the UNC School of Dentistry is not considered adequate to serve as the study site because it currently operates only one day a week and accepts referrals for only patients without TMD pain.
In the pre-enrollment phase, patients at Lane and Associates Family Dentistry will complete a standard TMD screening questionnaire. Those screening positive will be clinically examined against Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD to confirm Group II: Masticatory Muscle Disorders, 1A: Myalgia. They will also be screened for OSA using the validated STOP-BANG questionnaire. Those at high risk will be referred for evaluation by a sleep physician and a diagnostic PSG, as is the standard of care at Lane and Associates. If the PSG reveals mild to moderate OSA (apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) ≥5 and <30), the patient is a candidate for oral appliance therapy, pending confirmation of the sleep physician, and thus eligible to enroll in the study.
Subjects will be consented and assessed for demographics, medical history, and medication use. Impressions of the upper and lower dental arches will be recorded, poured in dental stone and sent to the lab. A George Gauge will record a protrusive bite registration with the jaw advanced 60% from the most retruded position. The custom-made MAS will be fitted with a micro-recorder (Braebon DentiTrac Monitor) to assess adherence. The investigators define adherence as use of the splint 4 hours/night for ≥70% of nights as is standard practice for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) therapy. Home sleep test (HST): Subjects will complete a series (from 2 to 5) two-night home sleep tests (HSTs) using the portable AccuSom device by NovaSom, which collects sleep parameters of AHI, minimum oxygen saturation, and snoring indices. Novosom arranges shipment of the device and offers 24-hour technical support during the sleep test. Sleep data are uploaded wirelessly from the recorder to an online portal for statistical analysis.
Following a baseline home sleep test (HST), 12 participants will enter the study wearing a MAS during sleep that protrudes the mandible to 60% of its maximal advancement. This approximates the minimum amount of jaw advancement that is expected to be efficacious. A HST will be repeated at the end of Week #4. If that HST shows that the MAS is not efficacious (i.e. has not reduced baseline apnea hypopnea index (AHI) by ≥50% or the AHI is ≥10**), and if TMD pain is not worse, the mandible will be advanced to 70% and the participant will repeat the HST at the end of Week #8. Once efficacy is achieved, there is no need for further HSTs. If efficacy is not achieved at the end of Week #8 and if TMD pain is not worse, the mandible will be advanced to 75% and the participant will repeat the HST at the end of Week #12. If efficacy is not yet achieved and if TMD pain is not worse, the mandibular will be further advanced to 80% and the participant will undergo a final HST at the end of Week #16. Once a HST indicates that the MAS is efficacious in reducing the AHI, the participant will maintain that level of advancement. The minimum number of HSTs for any one participant is 2 (baseline and 4-week follow-up) and the maximum number is 5.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Not applicable
- Intervention model
- Single group
- Masking
- None (open label)
- Number of arms
- 1
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Mandibular advancement splint | Experimental | Device: Mandibular advancement splintAn oral appliance which is standard of care in treating mild or moderate obstructive sleep apnea by repositioning the mandible in a forward position |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 30 to 64 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Any race or ethnicity
- Meet Research Diagnostic Criteria for TMD to confirm Group II: Masticatory Muscle Disorders, 1A: Myalgia
- Rate their TMD pain severity as ≥4 on a 0-10 numeric rating scale
- Have no history of treatment for OSA.
- If taking a prescription medication (with the exception of prescription formulations of NSAIDs, acetaminophen, and aspirin) episodically for the management of pain, the subject must agree to discontinue its use prior to or at the baseline visit. If taking a prescription medication daily for the management of pain, must agree to continue the daily use of the medication throughout the 16-week observation period. If taking an over-the-counter pain medication daily, the subject must agree to continue the daily use throughout the study.
Key exclusion criteria (8 listed)
- <8 retained teeth per arch
- Tooth mobility
- Unmanaged periodontal disease
- Skeletal Class III occlusion
- Central sleep apnea
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Mandibular advancement splintA mandibular advancement splint (MAS), functions by comfortably positioning the patient's mandibular in a forward position, clearing the obstructed airway during sleep. | Device | Mandibular advancement splint |
Primary outcome
Change in the Weekly Mean Pain Index Score
Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks
Weekly mean pain index is computed as the arithmetic mean of daily pain index values recorded at enrollment and then at the end of each week throughout the 16 week observation period. Daily pain index is computed as pain intensity (0-100 numeric rating scale where 0 = "no pain" and 100 = "the most intense pain imaginable") multiplied by pain duration (0-100 percentage scale) where percentage refers to the percent of waking day that the participant had facial pain) as reported in the Daily Symptom Diary. It is computed from the weekly mean pain index (numeric rating scale 0-10), and representing the arithmetic mean of daily pain index values in the preceding 7-day period. The pain index for any given day is the product of the pain intensity score multiplied by the pain duration score, each as reported in the Daily Symptom Diary kept by the subject.
2 secondary outcomes
Change in the Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI)
Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks
Change in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) Score
Time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 14 Nov 2017.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Myalgia
Recruiting
Recovery After Fatigue in Young Athletes: Comparison Between TECAR Therapy and Cycle Ergometer"
Muscle Fatigue, Healthy Adult
Recruiting
Marine Lipids Ease Painful TMD
Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD)
RecruitingPhase 2
Reishi Mushroom Extract for Fatigue and/or Arthralgias/Myalgias in Patients With Breast Cancer on Aromatase Inhibitors
Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Carcinoma
Recruiting
Shower Gel and Participant-Reported Post-Exercise Soreness in Regular Exercisers
Post-Exercise Recovery, Muscle Soreness
Enrolling by invitation
Fareon Open Label Device Clinical Trial
Cognitive Dysfunction, Acquired Brain Injury
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Anne E Sanders, PhD principal investigator
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Mandibular advancement splint in people with Myalgia and Apnea, Obstructive Sleep, run by University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 8 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: stopped early, as of the sponsor's last update on 14 Nov 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 14 Nov 2017). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change in the Weekly Mean Pain Index Score (time frame: Baseline, 16 weeks). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 14 Nov 2017.