Osteoarthritis, KneeNCT02695329
Vanguard TKA With KneeAlign 2 and Without KneeAlign 2
A study testing KneeAlign 2 in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by Zimmer Biomet at 1 site in Japan.
Trial summary
Purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the KneeAlign 2 system in terms of precise implant alignment by demonstrating that KneeAlign 2 provides better tibial alignment compared to conventional instruments Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 20 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- What is being tested?
- KneeAlign 2
- Type of treatment
- Medical device
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 100 participants
- Where
- 1 siteJapan
- Study dates
- 24 May 2016to 26 Oct 2018
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 20 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Knee (either unilateral or bilateral) Osteoarthritis (varus deformity only)
- Subjects willing to return for follow-up evaluations
Who cannot join
- Knee degenerative diseases other than Knee Osteoarthritis (such as necrosis / Rheumatoid Arthritis)
- Severe OA deformation (FTA: >185 degrees or <175 degrees)
- Active Infection (or within 6 weeks after infection)
- Sepsis
- Osteomyelitis
- Any type of implant is inserted in the affected side of lower extremity
Show all 13Show fewer
- Hip disease on the affected side
- Uncooperative patient or patient with neurologic disorders who are incapable of following directions
- diagnosed Osteoporosis or Osteomalacia
- Metabolic disorders which may impair bone formation
- Distant foci of infections which may spread to the implant site
- Rapid joint destruction, marked bone loss or bone resorption apparent on roentgenogram
- Vascular insufficiency, muscular atrophy or neuromuscular disease.
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Vanguard With KneeAlign2 Navigational System Versus Vanguard Conventional
Purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the KneeAlign 2 system in terms of precise implant alignment by demonstrating that KneeAlign 2 provides better tibial alignment compared to conventional instruments
Read the detailed description
Purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the KneeAlign 2 system in terms of precise implant alignment by demonstrating that KneeAlign 2 provides better tibial alignment compared to conventional instruments.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Being tested
- KneeAlign 2
- Keywords
- navigation system, palm-sized, total knee arthroplasty
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
KneeAlign 2Device
Also called KneeAlign2
Patients suffering non-severe varus deformity Osteoarthritis will be enrolled and randomly assigned into one of two treatment groups. Patients in investigational group will be treated with total knee arthroplasty and the accelerometer-based navigational device. Patients in control group will be treated with total knee arthroplasty with conventional instrumentation.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard with KneeAlign 2 | Active comparator | Having total knee arthroplasty surgery with the use of a navigation system KneeAlign 2. Receives: Device: KneeAlign 2 |
| Vanguard without KneeAlign 2 | No intervention | Having total knee arthroplasty surgery with the use of conventional surgical instruments, and without a navigation system KneeAlign 2. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Proportion of Subjects That Have Alignment Within 2 Degrees From Neutral on Tibia
Proportion of subjects that have tibial alignment within 2 degrees from neutral and compare the accuracy of tibial component alignment between two groups.
Measured: Postoperative 6 months
Secondary outcomes (3)
Number of Participants With Tibial Posterior Slope Alignment Within Predetermined Threshold
Deviation of tibial posterior slope angle from preoperative planned angle (within 2 degrees)
Measured: Postoperative 6 months
Number of Participants With Femoral Varus/Valgus Angle Within Predetermined Threshold
Deviation of femoral valus/valgus angle from preoperative planned angle (within 2 degrees)
Measured: Postoperative 6 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events and/or Adverse Device Effects
Number of participants, who experience adverse events and/or adverse device effects
Measured: Intra-operative and Post-operative 6 months
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted1 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start24 May 2016
- Primary completion3 Oct 2018
- Study completion26 Oct 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Zimmer BiometThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind
- Who is masked
- Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Zimmer Biomet
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Yukihide Minoda, Principal investigator, Osaka City University
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02695329
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- ORTHO.CR.GK53
- Status last verified
- Jan 2020
- First submitted
- 19 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 12 Feb 2020
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 12 Feb 2020. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Randomized Controlled Study Comparing Vanguard With KneeAlign2 Navigational System Versus Vanguard Conventional
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02695329
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- ORTHO.CR.GK53
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee
- Keywords
- navigation system, palm-sized, total knee arthroplasty
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 100 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Zimmer BiometIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 24 May 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 3 Oct 2018 (actual)
- Study completion
- 26 Oct 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 1 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 3 Oct 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
Purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the KneeAlign 2 system in terms of precise implant alignment by demonstrating that KneeAlign 2 provides better tibial alignment compared to conventional instruments
Detailed description
Purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of the KneeAlign 2 system in terms of precise implant alignment by demonstrating that KneeAlign 2 provides better tibial alignment compared to conventional instruments.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Supportive care
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Single blind (outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 2
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Vanguard with KneeAlign 2 | Active comparator | Device: KneeAlign 2Having total knee arthroplasty surgery with the use of a navigation system KneeAlign 2. |
| Vanguard without KneeAlign 2 | No intervention | –Having total knee arthroplasty surgery with the use of conventional surgical instruments, and without a navigation system KneeAlign 2. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 20 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (2 listed)
- Knee (either unilateral or bilateral) Osteoarthritis (varus deformity only)
- Subjects willing to return for follow-up evaluations
Key exclusion criteria (13 listed)
- Knee degenerative diseases other than Knee Osteoarthritis (such as necrosis / Rheumatoid Arthritis)
- Severe OA deformation (FTA: >185 degrees or <175 degrees)
- Active Infection (or within 6 weeks after infection)
- Sepsis
- Osteomyelitis
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| KneeAlign 2Also: KneeAlign2Patients suffering non-severe varus deformity Osteoarthritis will be enrolled and randomly assigned into one of two treatment groups. Patients in investigational group will be treated with total knee arthroplasty and the accelerometer-based navigational device. Patients in control group will be treated with total knee arthroplasty with conventional instrumentation. | Device | Vanguard with KneeAlign 2 |
Primary outcome
Proportion of Subjects That Have Alignment Within 2 Degrees From Neutral on Tibia
Time frame: Postoperative 6 months
Proportion of subjects that have tibial alignment within 2 degrees from neutral and compare the accuracy of tibial component alignment between two groups.
3 secondary outcomes
Number of Participants With Tibial Posterior Slope Alignment Within Predetermined Threshold
Time frame: Postoperative 6 months
Number of Participants With Femoral Varus/Valgus Angle Within Predetermined Threshold
Time frame: Postoperative 6 months
Number of Participants With Adverse Events and/or Adverse Device Effects
Time frame: Intra-operative and Post-operative 6 months
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 12 Feb 2020.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Yukihide Minoda principal investigator
Osaka City University
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing KneeAlign 2 in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee, run by Zimmer Biomet at 1 site in Japan.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 13 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 12 Feb 2020. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Japan. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 3 Oct 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Proportion of Subjects That Have Alignment Within 2 Degrees From Neutral on Tibia (time frame: Postoperative 6 months). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 12 Feb 2020.