AzTrials
AzTrials

Sleep DeprivationNCT02697266

The Effects of Night Call on Intellectual Performance

An observational study of Sleep Deprivation, run by Haleh Saadat at 1 site in United States.

Completed

Finished. The study has ended and is not enrolling. Results may be posted on the official record.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

The purpose of the current proposal will be to examine the clinical performance of both physicians in training as well as experienced faculty in pre and post call situations. Groups will be matched for gender, age, experience and employment duration during regular hours versus immediate post call hour. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Any ageHealthy volunteers can take part
Conditions the study is for
Sleep Deprivation
How many people
21 participants
Where
1 siteUnited States
Study dates
Mar 2014to Sep 2016
Phase
Observational
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages Any age
  • All sexes
  • Healthy volunteers accepted
  • Child, Adult, Older adult

Study population: Twenty-four attending anesthesiologists and anesthesiology residents

Who may be able to join

  • Staff Attending Anesthesiologist who takes night shift call
  • Anesthesiology residents who take night shift call

Who cannot join

  • Staff unwilling to participate

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

United States1 site
  • Nationwide Children's Hospital

    Columbus, Ohio, 43205

Other trials in United States

About this study

Official title: Individual Coping Strategies After Night Calls: Effects on Performing Clinical and Cognitive Tasks

The purpose of the current proposal will be to examine the clinical performance of both physicians in training as well as experienced faculty in pre and post call situations. Groups will be matched for gender, age, experience and employment duration during regular hours versus immediate post call hour.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective study evaluating the reaction time among attending anesthesiologists, and anesthesiology residents who take night shift call and are suffering from sleep deprivation. Investigators plan to examine clinical performance by measuring reaction times using a 10 minute psychomotor vigilance test device on physicians in training as well as experienced physicians in pre and post call situations.

All subjects will be informed of the scope and purpose of the study.

  1. Attending Anesthesiologists: Gender, age, years of experience, years of employment at the institution, hours of sleep and circadian rhythm will be taken into effect.
  2. Residents/Fellows: Gender, age, years of experience, years of employment at the institution and circadian rhythm will be taken into effect.

All study subjects will be asked to fill a questionnaire regarding demographic data, coping strategy Index.

  1. Baseline instruments; including demographics, and coping strategy indicator (CSI), will be administrated.
  2. Reaction time, mood and simple cognitive test will be measured at approximately 7 am of a regular day, (when the subject is not on call).
  3. Reaction time, mood and simple cognitive test will be measured at approximately 7 am of after a call night.

This proposal attempts to examine the impact of night shift on mood, cognitive and motor task performance in physicians as compared to regular hours.

Being tested
No intervention
Medical subject headings
Sleep Deprivation

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • No interventionOther

    This is an observational study.

Study groups in NCT02697266
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
Post-call anesthesiologistsAttending anesthesiologists, and Anesthesiology residents
Receives: Other: No intervention
Regular-shift anesthesiologistsAttending anesthesiologists, and Anesthesiology residents
Receives: Other: No intervention

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. Reaction time

    We plan to measure reaction times via a 10-minute psychomotor vigilance test (PVT, Ambulatory Monitoring Inc., NY) device. The PVT-192 Psychomotor Vigilance Task Monitor is a hand-held, self-contained system used for repetitive reaction time measurements.

    Measured: Regular Day and Post-call shifts - Through study completion, an average of one year.

  2. Visual Analog Scale

    Subjective sleepiness and alertness (and other parameters) will be measured via the Visual Analog Scale (VAS). This Questionnaire consists of several 100 millimeter lines, each of which is labeled at one end with the words "not at all" and the other end with the word "extremely". Centered under each line are the test adjectives which are as follows: "alert, able to concentrate, " anxious", "energetic", "feel confident", "irritable", "Jittery/nervous", "sleepy", and "talkative". The participants indicate the point on the line, which corresponded to the way they feel along the continuum at the time the test is taken. The score for each item consists of a number of millimeters from the left side of the line to the location at which the participants placed their mark.

    Measured: Regular Day and Post-call shifts - Through study completion, an average of one year.

  3. Profile of mood states

    Subjective evaluations of mood will be made with the Profile of Mood States (POMS). The POMS is a 65-Item questionnaire which, when scored according to the specific templates, measures affect or mood on scales: 1) Tension-Anxiety, 2) Depression-dejection, 3) anger-hostility, 4) vigor-activity, 5) fatigue-inertia, and 6) confusion-bewilderment. Factor scores on each scale will be analyzed.

    Measured: Regular Day and Post-call shifts - Through study completion, an average of one year.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Coping Strategy Indicator (CSI):

    This is the self-report measure of three fundamental modes of coping that has demonstrated considerable psychometric strength. The CSI first instructs responders to select a recent stressful event from their lives and briefly describe it. Then, responders read a list of 33 specific coping behaviors, indicating the extent to which each was used to deal with the problem. Responders are summed to form three scales: problem solving, seeking social support and avoidance.

    Measured: Regular-shift - Through study completion, an average of one year.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted3 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2014
  3. Primary completionApr 2016
  4. Study completionSep 2016

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Observational
Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrolment
21 participants (actual)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02697266
Sponsor's protocol ID
IRB14-00143
Status last verified
Sep 2016
First submitted
21 Dec 2015
Last updated
9 Sep 2016
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
No

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

An observational study of Sleep Deprivation, run by Haleh Saadat at 1 site in United States.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

The sponsor lists 2 inclusion and 1 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 9 Sep 2016. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in United States. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

Reaction time (time frame: Regular Day and Post-call shifts - Through study completion, an average of one year.). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 9 Sep 2016.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in