Osteoarthritis, KneePhase 3NCT02697773
Efficacy and Safety of a Subcutaneous Tanezumab Titration Dosing Regimen in Subjects With Moderate to Severe Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee
A Phase 3 study testing Tanezumab 2.5 mg and Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by Pfizer at 87 sites in 3 countries.
Trial summary
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a titration arm of tanezumab in which treatment is started at a lower dose (2.5 mg) and increased to a higher dose (5 mg) at Week 8, compared to giving 2 doses of tanezumab 2.5 mg or 2 doses of placebo. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 years and older
- Conditions the study is for
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip
- What is being tested?
- Tanezumab 2.5 mg and Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg
- Type of treatment
- Injection or infusion
- Could I receive a placebo?
- Yes, some participants may receive a placebo
- How many people
- 698 participants
- Where
- 87 sitesin 3 countries
- Study dates
- 21 Jan 2016to 14 May 2018
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Are there results?
- Yes, posted in the registrySummary in the doctors' view
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 years and older
- All sexes
- No healthy volunteers
- Adult, Older adult
Who may be able to join
- Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis of the knee or hip confirmed by X-ray
- Documented history that subject tried the following medications and had insufficient pain relief or is cannot take or tolerate them: acetaminophen, NSAIDs and either tramadol or opioids
- Meet the protocol requirements for pain at screening and pain, physical function and patient global assessment of osteoarthritis at baseline
- Willing to discontinue all pain medications except study medication and rescue medication during the course of the study and use those as directed per protocol
- Women able to have children must agree to use 2 forms of contraception during the study
Who cannot join
- Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 39
- History of diseases other than osteoarthritis in a shoulder, hip or knee (example, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, joint infections, osteonecrosis)
- Patients with x-ray showing joint conditions such as osteonecrosis (dead bone) or certain types of fractures
- Patients who have had significant trauma or surgery to a knee, hip or shoulder within the previous year
- Planned surgical procedure during the study
- Patients who are largely or wholly incapacitated (example bedridden or confined to a wheelchair, permitting little or no self-care)
Show all 12Show fewer
- Patients who would be unwilling or unable to undergo joint replacement surgery if one eventually became necessary
- Patients with significant conditions other than osteoarthritis that could interfere with assessment of pain in the joints (example fibromyalgia, lupus erythematosus)
- Patients with significant heart, neurological or psychiatric diseases
- Patients who had cancer other than certain skin cancers within the past 5 years
- Patients with alcohol, analgesic (pain medications) or drug abuse within the past 2 years
- Women who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intending to become pregnant or breast-feed during the course of the study.
Trial locations and contacts
87 sites in 3 countries.
87 sites in 3 countries
United States68 sites
New Mexico Clinical Research & Osteoporosis Center, Inc.
Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87106
Advanced Research Center, Inc
Anaheim, California, 92805
KRK Medical Research
Arlington, Texas, 76012
Atlanta Center for Medical Research
Atlanta, Georgia, 30331
Tekton Research, Inc
Austin, Texas, 78745
Urgent Care MD's
Baytown, Texas, 77521
Northwest Clinical Research Center
Bellevue, Washington, 98007
Alabama Orthopaedic Surgeons
Birmingham, Alabama, 35235
Cahaba Research, Inc.
Birmingham, Alabama, 35242
Alpine Clinical Research Center
Boulder, Colorado, 80301
New England Research Associates, LLC
Bridgeport, Connecticut, 06606
Investigators Research Group, LLC
Brownsburg, Indiana, 46112
Center for Arthritis and Rheumatic Diseases
Chesapeake, Virginia, 23320
Medex Healthcare Research Inc
Chicago, Illinois, 60602
Chicago Clinical Research Institute, Inc.
Chicago, Illinois, 60607
Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine
Chicago, Illinois, 60611
Great Lakes Clinical Trials
Chicago, Illinois, 60640
Medvin Clinical Research
Covina, California, 91722
Arthritis Care and Diagnostic Center
Dallas, Texas, 75231
Spectrum Medical, Inc
Danville, Virginia, 24541
Plains Clinical Research Center, LLC
Fargo, North Dakota, 58104
Arthritis and Osteoporosis Treatment and Research Center
Flowood, Mississippi, 39232
Clinical Physiology Associates
Fort Myers, Florida, 33912
T&R Clinic, PA
Fort Worth, Texas, 76117
Prestige Clinical Research
Franklin, Ohio, 45005
Arthritis And Osteoporosis Associates
Freehold, New Jersey, 07728
St. Jude Hospital Yorba Linda DBA St. Joseph Heritage Healthcare
Fullerton, California, 92835
Center for Advanced Research & Education (CARE)
Gainesville, Georgia, 30501
Palmetto Clinical Trial Services, LLC
Greenville, South Carolina, 29601
Drug Trials America
Hartsdale, New York, 10530
Eastern Research, Inc.
Hialeah, Florida, 33013
East-West Medical Research Institute
Honolulu, Hawaii, 96814
Centex Studies, Inc.
Houston, Texas, 77058
BI Research Center
Houston, Texas, 77084
Irvine Center for Clinical Research
Irvine, California, 92614
Robert L Freed, M.D., F.A.C.R / Clinical Interventions Research Institute
Irvine, California, 92618
Office Of Stephen H. Miller, M.D.
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89144
Baptist Health Center for Clinical Research
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205
South Florida Research Center, Inc.
Miami, Florida, 33135
New Horizon Research Center
Miami, Florida, 33175
Miami Dade Medical Research Institute, LLC
Miami, Florida, 33176
Quality Medical Research
Nashville, Tennessee, 37211
George Stanley Walker, MD
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70115
Tristan Medical Enterprises, PC dba Regeneris Medical
North Attleboro, Massachusetts, 02760
Providence Clinical Research
North Hollywood, California, 91606
NPC Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73109
Hillcrest Clinical Research
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73119
Compass Research, LLC
Orlando, Florida, 32806
Ormond Beach Clinical Research
Ormond Beach, Florida, 32174
Arizona Research Center
Phoenix, Arizona, 85023
The Pain Relief Center
Plano, Texas, 75024
Wake Research Associates, LLC
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27612
Health Concepts
Rapid City, South Dakota, 57702
National Clinical Research - Richmond, Inc
Richmond, Virginia, 23294
Michigan Orthopaedic & Spine Surgeons
Rochester Hills, Michigan, 48307
Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
San Diego, California, 92103
California Research Foundation
San Diego, California, 92123
Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
Stamford, Connecticut, 06905
University Orthopedics Center
State College, Pennsylvania, 16801
Clinical Research Institute of Arizona, LLC
Surprise, Arizona, 85374
Phoenix Clinical Research, LLC
Tamarac, Florida, 33321
Bioclinica Research
The Villages, Florida, 32162
AC Clinical Research
Tiffin, Ohio, 44883
Tucson Orthopaedic Institute
Tucson, Arizona, 85714
University of Arizona Clinical and Translational Science Research Center
Tucson, Arizona, 85724
Inland Rheumatology Clinical Trials, Inc.
Upland, California, 91786
Integrated Clinical Trial Services, Inc.
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50265
Professional Research Network of Kansas, LLC
Wichita, Kansas, 67205-1138
Canada17 sites
Aggarwal and Associates Limited
Brampton, Ontario, L6T 0G1
Manna Research Inc. (Burlington south)
Burlington, Ontario, L7R 1A4
Dawson Road Medical Centre
Guelph, Ontario, N1H 1B1
Adachi Medicine Professional Corporation
Hamilton, Ontario, L8N 1Y2
K-W Musculoskeletal Research Inc.
Kitchener, Ontario, N2M 5N6
Western Center for Public Health and Family Medicine
London, Ontario, N6G 2M1
Malton Medical Centre
Mississauga, Ontario, L4V 1P1
Diex Recheche Montreal, Inc.
Montreal, Quebec, H2Y 1S1
Rebecca Medical Associates
Oakville, Ontario, L6K 1J6
King Street Medical Clinic
Oshawa, Ontario, L1H 1G6
Recherche Clinique Sigma inc
Québec, Quebec, G1G 3Y8
Diex Recherche Quebec Inc.
Québec, Quebec, G1S 2L6
G.R.M.O. (Groupe de recherche en maladies osseuses) Inc.
Québec, Quebec, G1V 3M7
Centre de recherche Saint-Louis
Québec, Quebec, G1W 4R4
Alpha Recherche Clinique
Québec, Quebec, G3K 2P8
Bluewater Clinical Research Group
Sarnia, Ontario, N7T 4X3
Diex Research Sherbrooke Inc.
Sherbrooke, Quebec, J1L 0H8
Puerto Rico2 sites
Puerto Rico Medical Research Inc.
Ponce, PR, 00717
Mindful Medical Research
San Juan, 00918
About this study
Official title: A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A DOSE TITRATION REGIMEN FOR THE SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF TANEZUMAB IN SUBJECTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP OR KNEE
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a titration arm of tanezumab in which treatment is started at a lower dose (2.5 mg) and increased to a higher dose (5 mg) at Week 8, compared to giving 2 doses of tanezumab 2.5 mg or 2 doses of placebo. The study also evaluates the safety of the treatment regimens.
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Being tested
- Placebo, Tanezumab 2.5 mg, Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg
- Keywords
- osteoarthritis of the knee, osteoarthritis of the hip, nerve growth factor inhibitor, tanezumab
- Medical subject headings
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
PlaceboOther
Patient receives one dose of placebo to match tanezumab subcutaneously on Day 1 and one dose of placebo to match tanezumab subcutaneously at Week 8.
Tanezumab 2.5 mgBiological
Patient receives one dose of tanezumab 2.5 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and one dose of tanezumab 2.5 mg subcutaneously at Week 8.
Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mgBiological
Also called Titration Arm
Patient receives one dose of tanezumab 2.5 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and one dose of tanezumab 5 mg subcutaneously at Week 8.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | placebo administered subcutaneously at day 0 and week 8 Receives: Other: Placebo |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Experimental | tanezumab 2.5 mg administered subcutaneously at day 0 and week 8 Receives: Biological: Tanezumab 2.5 mg |
| Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg | Experimental | tanezumab 2.5 mg administered subcutaneously at day 0 and tanezumab 5 mg administered subcutaneously at week 8 Receives: Biological: Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip (index joint) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1-5, where 1=very good (no symptom and no limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worsening of condition.
Measured: Baseline, Week 16
Secondary outcomes (55)
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 24
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 24
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty/worse physical function.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip (index joint) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1-5, where 1=very good (no symptom and no limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 24
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip (index joint) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1-5, where 1=very good (no symptom and no limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants Meeting Outcomes Measures in Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index
Participants were considered as OMERACT-OARSI responders: if the change (improvement) from baseline to week of interest was greater than or equal to (>=) 50 percent and greater or equal to (>=) 2 units in either WOMAC pain subscale or physical function subscale score; if change (improvement) from baseline to week of interest was >=20 percent and >=1 unit in at least 2 of the following: 1) WOMAC pain subscale score, 2) WOMAC physical function subscale score, 3) PGA of osteoarthritis. WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [extreme pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [extreme difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and PGA of osteoarthritis (score: 1 [very good] to 5 [very poor], higher score = worse condition). Missing data was imputed using mixed baseline/last observation carried forward (BOCF/LOCF).
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Reduction >= 30 Percent (%), >=50%, >=70% and >=90% Response
Percentage of participants with reduction in WOMAC pain intensity of at least (>=) 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 compared to baseline were classified as responders to WOMAC pain subscale and are reported here. WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Missing data was imputed using mixed BOCF/LOCF.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Percent Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with OA. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Total score range for WOMAC pain subscale score was 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0% ; >= 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, 60, 70, 80 and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC pain subscale from Baseline to Week 16 were reported, participants (%) are reported more than once in categories specified. Missing data was imputed using mixed BOCF/LOCF.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Reduction >= 30 Percent (%), >=50%, >=70% and >=90% Response
Percentage of participants with reduction in WOMAC physical function of at least (>=) 30%, 50%, 70% and 90% at weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24 compared to baseline were classified as responders to WOMAC physical function subscale. WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. WOMAC physical function subscale: 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours,calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function. Missing data was imputed using mixed BOCF/LOCF.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Percent Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function: participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. WOMAC physical function subscale: 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours, calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty),higher scores indicate extreme difficulty/worse physical function. Percentage of participants with cumulative reduction (as percent) (greater than 0 %; >= 10 %, 20 %, 30 %, 40 %, 50 %, 60 %, 70 %, 80 % and 90%; = 100 %) in WOMAC physical function subscale from Baseline to Week 16 were reported. Missing data was imputed using mixed BOCF/LOCF.
Measured: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement of >=2 Points in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1-5, where, 1=very good (no symptom and no limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worse condition. Percentage of participants with improvement of at least 2 points from Baseline in PGA of osteoarthritis were reported. Missing data was imputed using mixed BOCF/LOCF.
Measured: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Change From Baseline for Average Pain Score in the Index Joint at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16
Participants assessed their average pain in the index hip/knee in the past 24 hours using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain). Higher scores indicated higher pain. Data represents averages of the values reported during the 4-week interval up to and including the given week. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline for Average Pain Score in the Index Joint at Weeks 20 and 24
Participants assessed their average pain in the index hip/knee in the past 24 hours using a scale ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) weekly beginning at Week 16. Higher scores indicated higher pain. Data represents averages of the values reported during the 4-week interval up to and including the given week. Change from baseline was calculated using the difference between each post-baseline weekly mean and the baseline mean score.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 24
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Stiffness was defined as a sensation of decreased ease of movement in the index joint (knee or hip).The WOMAC stiffness subscale was a 2-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of stiffness experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) during the past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 2 individual questions scored on NRS of 0 (no stiffness) to 10 (extreme stiffness), where higher scores indicated higher stiffness.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [extreme pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [extreme difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and WOMAC stiffness subscale assess the amount of stiffness experienced (score: 0 [no stiffness] to 10 [extreme stiffness], higher score = higher stiffness). WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse response.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 24
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip). WOMAC pain subscale assess amount of pain experienced (score: 0 [no pain] to 10 [extreme pain], higher score = more pain), WOMAC physical function subscale assess degree of difficulty experienced (score: 0 [minimum difficulty] to 10 [extreme difficulty], higher score = worse physical function) and WOMAC stiffness subscale assess the amount of stiffness experienced (score: 0 [no stiffness] to 10 [extreme stiffness], higher score = higher stiffness). WOMAC average score was the mean of WOMAC pain, physical function and stiffness subscale scores and ranges from 0 to 10, where higher scores indicated worse response.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?". Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Week 24
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when walking on a flat surface?". Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when walking on a flat surface by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Week 24
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip). Participants answered a question: "How much pain have you had when going up or down the stairs?" Participants responded about the amount of pain they experienced when going up or down stairs by using a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Measured: Baseline, Week 24
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Osteoarthritis (WPAI:OA) Scores at Baseline
WPAI is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the impact of osteoarthritis on absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity, and daily activity impairment for a period of 7 days prior to a visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism), overall work impairment (work productivity) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are expressed as an impairment percentage (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Osteoarthritis (WPAI:OA) Scores at Week 16
WPAI is 6-question participant rated questionnaire to determine the impact of osteoarthritis on absenteeism, presenteeism, work productivity, and daily activity impairment for a period of 7 days prior to a visit. It yields 4 sub-scores: work time missed (absenteeism), impairment while working (presenteeism), overall work impairment (work productivity) and activity impairment (daily activity impairment). These sub-scores are expressed as an impairment percentage (range from 0 to 100), with higher numbers indicating greater impairment and less productivity.
Measured: Baseline and Week 16
European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Dimensions Score
EQ-5D-5L is a standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life and translates that score into an index value or utility score. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional visual analogue scale (VAS). EQ-5D health state profile is comprised of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. The health utility score for a patient with no problems in all 5 items is 1 for all countries (except for Zimbabwe where it is 0.9), and is reduced where a patient reports greater levels of problems across the five dimensions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16
European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Overall Health Utility Score/Index Value
EQ-5D-5L: standardized participant completed questionnaire that measures health-related quality of life and translates that score into an index value or utility score. EQ-5D-5L consists of two components: a health state profile and an optional VAS. EQ-5D health state profile comprises of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: 1=no problems, 2=slight problems, 3=moderate problems, 4=severe problems, and 5=extreme problems. Responses from the five domains were used to calculate a single utility index (the Overall health utility score) where values are <=1. The Overall health utility score for a patient with no problems in all 5 items is 1 for all countries (except for Zimbabwe where it is 0.9), and is reduced where a patient reports greater levels of problems across the five dimensions.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Visits of Services Directly Related to Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Visits of services directly related to osteoarthritis evaluated were: visits to primary care physician, neurologist, rheumatologist, physician assistant or nurse practitioner, pain specialist, orthopedist, physical therapist, chiropractor, alternative medicine or therapy, podiatrist, nutritionist/dietitian, radiologist, home healthcare services and other practitioner.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Who Visited the Emergency Room Due to Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Domain evaluated was number of participants who visited the emergency room due to osteoarthritis (OA).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Visits to the Emergency Room Due to Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Domain evaluated was number of visits to the emergency room due to OA.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Hospitalized Due to Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Domain evaluated was number of participants who were hospitalized due to OA.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Nights Stayed in the Hospital Due to Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Domain evaluated was number of nights stayed in the hospital due to OA.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Who Used Any Aids/Devices for Doing Things
Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage during last 3 months (for Baseline and Week 40) and past 8 weeks (for Week 24). Domain evaluated was number of participants who used any aids/devices for doing things. Aids such as walking aid, wheelchair, device or utensil for dress/bathe/eat and any other aids/devices.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Who Quit Job Due to Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage (during 3 months prior to baseline) at baseline, Week 24 and Week 40. Domain evaluated was number of participants who quit job due to OA.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Duration Since Quitting Job Due to Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis HCRU assessed healthcare usage (during 3 months prior to baseline) at baseline, Week 24 and Week 40. Domain evaluated was duration since quitting job due to OA.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy
Number of participants who withdrew from treatment due to lack of efficacy have been reported here.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time to discontinuation due to lack of efficacy was defined as the time interval from the date of first study drug administration up to the date of discontinuation of participant from treatment due to lack of efficacy.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication During Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
In case of inadequate pain relief, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 3 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication between day 1 and week 16. Number of participants with any use of rescue medication during the particular study week were summarized.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Number of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication During Week 24
In case of inadequate pain relief, after Week 16, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 7 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication and use was reported weekly via diary. Number of participants with any use of rescue medication during the 4 weeks up to the particular study week were summarized.
Measured: Week 24
Number of Days of Rescue Medication Use at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
In case of inadequate pain relief during the treatment period, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 3 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication. Number of days the participants used the rescue medication during the particular study weeks were summarized.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Number of Days of Rescue Medication Use at Week 24
In case of inadequate pain relief, after Week 16, acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 7 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication and use was reported weekly via diary. Number of days per week the participants used the rescue medication during the 4 weeks up to the particular study week were summarized.
Measured: Week 24
Amount of Rescue Medication Taken at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
In case of inadequate pain relief , acetaminophen up to 3000 mg per day up to 3 days in a week could be taken as rescue medication. The total dosage of acetaminophen in milligrams used during the specified week were summarized.
Measured: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 40 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pretreatment state. AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 40
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Treatment-Related Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Treatment-related AE was any untoward medical occurrence attributed to study drug in a participant who received study drug. SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. Treatment-emergent were events between first dose of study drug and up to Week 40 that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. Relatedness to study drug was assessed by the investigator.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 40
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities With Regard to Normal Baseline
Primary Abnormality criteria: hemoglobin; hematocrit; RBC count [less than{<}0.8* lower limit of normal[LLN]; Ery. mean corpuscular volume/ hemoglobin/ HGB concentration, erythrocytes distribution width <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; platelets <0.5*LLN,>1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN); white blood cell count<0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; Lymphocytes,Leukocytes,Neutrophils <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes >1.2*ULN; Prothrombin time/Intl. normalized ratio >1.1*ULN; total bilirubin>1.5*ULN; aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT,LDH, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN; total protein; albumin<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, Cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN; Urate >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN,>1.05*ULN; potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; phosphate <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN;Hemoglobin A1C >1.3*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN, specific gravity <1.003, >1.030; pH<4.5, >8; Urine Leukocytes >=20.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 40
Number of Participants With Laboratory Test Abnormalities With Regard to Abnormal Baseline
Primary Abnormality criteria: hemoglobin; hematocrit; RBC count < 0.8*LLN; Ery. mean corpuscular volume/ hemoglobin/ HGB concentration, erythrocytes distribution width <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; platelets <0.5*LLN,>1.75*upper limit of normal (ULN); white blood cell count<0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; Lymphocytes, Leukocytes, Neutrophils <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; Basophils, Eosinophils, Monocytes >1.2*ULN; Prothrombin time/Intl. normalized ratio >1.1*ULN; total bilirubin>1.5*ULN; aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, gamma GT,LDH, alkaline phosphatase >3.0*ULN; total protein; albumin<0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, Cholesterol, triglycerides >1.3*ULN; Urate >1.2*ULN; sodium <0.95*LLN,>1.05*ULN; potassium, chloride, calcium, magnesium, bicarbonate <0.9*LLN, >1.1*ULN; phosphate <0.8*LLN, >1.2*ULN; glucose <0.6*LLN, >1.5*ULN; Hemoglobin A1C >1.3*ULN; creatine kinase >2.0*ULN; Urine erythrocytes >=20.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 40
Change From Baseline in Blood Pressure (BP) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 40
Measurement of BP included sitting systolic (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP).
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 40
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12,16, 24, 40
Heart rate was measured at sitting position.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 40
Change From Baseline in Electrocardiogram (ECG) Parameters at Weeks 16 and 40
A 12-lead ECG was recorded after participants had rested for at least 5 minutes in the supine position in a quiet environment. All standard intervals (PR, QRS, QT, QTcF, QTcB, QTcF, RR intervals) were collected.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 16, 40
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate (as Assessed by ECG) at Weeks 16 and 40
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 16 and 40
Percentage of Participants With Adjudicated Joint Safety Outcomes
Incidence of participants with any of the joint safety adjudication outcomes of primary osteonecrosis, rapidly progressive osteoarthritis (OA) (type 1 and type 2), subchondral insufficiency fracture (or SPONK), or pathological fracture.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 40
Percentage of Participants With Total Joint Replacements
Percentage of participants who underwent total knee, hip or shoulder joint replacement surgery.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 40
Change From Baseline in Neuropathy Impairment Score (NIS) at Weeks 2, 4, 8,12,16, 24 and 40
NIS is a standardized instrument used to evaluate participant for signs of peripheral neuropathy. NIS is the sum of scores of 37 items, from both the left and right side, where 24 items scored from 0 (normal) to 4 (paralysis), higher score indicated higher abnormality/impairment and 13 items scored from 0 (normal), 1 (decreased) and 2 (absent), higher score indicated higher impairment. NIS possible overall score ranged from 0 (no impairment) to 244 (maximum impairment), higher scores indicated increased impairment.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8,12,16, 24 and 40
Number of Participants With Confirmed Orthostatic Hypotension
Orthostatic hypotension was defined as postural change (supine to standing) that met the following criteria: For systolic BP <=150 mmHg (mean supine): Reduction in systolic BP>=20 mmHg or reduction in diastolic BP>=10 mmHg at the 1 and/or 3 minute standing BP measurements. For systolic BP >150 mmHg (mean supine): Reduction in systolic BP>=30 mmHg or reduction in diastolic BP>=15 mmHg at the 1 and/or 3 minute standing BP measurements. If the 1 minute or 3 minute standing BP in a sequence met the orthostatic hypotension criteria, then that sequence was considered positive. If 2 of 2 or 2 of 3 sequences were positive, then orthostatic hypotension was considered confirmed.
Measured: Baseline up to Week 40
Change From Baseline in Survey of Autonomic Symptom (SAS) Scores at Weeks 24 and 40
The SAS is a 12 item (11 for females) questionnaire, from which the total number of symptoms (0-12 for males and 0-11 for females) is calculated. Each positive symptom is rated from 1 (not at all) to 5 (a lot). The total impact score was the sum of all symptom rating scores, with 0 assigned where the participant did not have the particular symptom. The range for the total impact score is 0-60 for males and 0-55 for females, higher scores indicating higher impact.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Number of Participants With Anti-Tanezumab Antibodies
Human serum ADA samples were analyzed for the presence or absence of anti-tanezumab antibodies by using a semi quantitative enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Participants listed as having anti-tanezumab antibodies had ADA titer level >=3.32. Less than 3.32 was considered below the limit of quantitation.
Measured: Baseline, Weeks 8,16, 24 and 40
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted3 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start21 Jan 2016
- Primary completion5 Dec 2017
- Study completion14 May 2018
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, outcome measures and adverse events reported by the sponsor.
- Publications (17)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Osteoarthritis, KneeStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by PfizerThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 698 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Pfizer
- Sponsor type
- Industry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Responsible party
- Sponsor
- Investigators
- Pfizer CT.gov Call Center, Study director, Pfizer
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02697773
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- A4091056
- Other IDs
- 2013-002222-23, OA TITRATION STUDY
- Status last verified
- Apr 2021
- First submitted
- 11 Feb 2016
- Last updated
- 3 May 2021
- Results posted
- Yes, on ClinicalTrials.gov
- Data monitoring committee
- Yes
- FDA-regulated drug
- Yes
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- Yes: Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical\_trials/trial\_data\_and\_results/data\_requests.
Publications
Schnitzer TJ, Conaghan PG, Berenbaum F, Abraham L, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Viktrup L, Yang R, Brown MT. Effect size varies based on calculation method and may affect interpretation of treatment effect: an illustration using randomised clinical trials in osteoarthritis. Adv Rheumatol. 2024 Apr 22;64(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s42358-024-00358-y.
PubMed 38650049Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Kompel AJ, Diaz LE, Crema MD, Brown MT, Hickman A, Pixton GC, Viktrup L, Fountaine RJ, Burr A, Sherlock SP, West CR. Inter-Reader Consistency and Exclusionary Findings During Radiographic Screening for Phase 3 Trials of Tanezumab in Patients With Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Imaging. 2022 Sep-Dec;2(3-4):100082. doi: 10.1016/j.ostima.2022.100082. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
PubMed 38343426Ren J, Bushmakin AG, Cislo PR, Abraham L, Cappelleri JC, Dworkin RH, Farrar JT. Meaningful within-patient change for clinical outcome assessments: model-based approach versus cumulative distribution functions. J Biopharm Stat. 2025 Aug;35(5):826-838. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2281575. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
PubMed 37982583Carrino JA, McAlindon TE, Schnitzer TJ, Guermazi A, Hochberg MC, Conaghan PG, Brown MT, Burr A, Fountaine RJ, Pixton GC, Viktrup L, Verburg KM, West CR. Characterization of adverse joint outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis treated with subcutaneous tanezumab. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2023 Dec;31(12):1612-1626. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
PubMed 37652258Shoji S, Suzuki A, Nouri P, Cai CH, Gaitonde P, Marshall S. Prediction of relative change in free nerve growth factor following subcutaneous administration of tanezumab, a novel monoclonal antibody to nerve growth factor. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023 Sep;12(9):1358-1370. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13015. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
PubMed 37470295Brown MT, Cornblath DR, Koltzenburg M, Gorson KC, Hickman A, Pixton GC, Gaitonde P, Viktrup L, West CR. Peripheral Nerve Safety of Nerve Growth Factor Inhibition by Tanezumab: Pooled Analyses of Phase III Clinical Studies in Over 5000 Patients with Osteoarthritis. Clin Drug Investig. 2023 Jul;43(7):551-563. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01286-3. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
PubMed 37460782Colloca L, Dworkin RH, Farrar JT, Tive L, Yang J, Viktrup L, Dasic G, West CR, Whalen E, Brown MT, Gilbert SA, Verburg KM. Predicting Treatment Responses in Patients With Osteoarthritis: Results From Two Phase III Tanezumab Randomized Clinical Trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Apr;113(4):878-886. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2842. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
PubMed 36621827Hunter DJ, Schnitzer TJ, Hall J, Semel D, Davignon I, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Abraham L. Time to first and sustained improvement in WOMAC domains among patients with osteoarthritis receiving tanezumab. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022 Jul 2;4(3):100294. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100294. eCollection 2022 Sep.
PubMed 36474952Atkinson J, Edwards RA, Bonfanti G, Barroso J, Schnitzer TJ. A Two-Step, Trajectory-Focused, Analytics Approach to Attempt Prediction of Analgesic Response in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis. Adv Ther. 2023 Jan;40(1):252-264. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02336-6. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
PubMed 36301512Mease P, Kuritzky L, Wright WL, Mallick-Searle T, Fountaine R, Yang R, Sadrarhami M, Faison W, Johnston E, Viktrup L. Efficacy and safety of tanezumab, NSAIDs, and placebo in patients with moderate to severe hip or knee osteoarthritis and a history of depression, anxiety, or insomnia: post-hoc analysis of phase 3 trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Nov;38(11):1909-1922. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2113689. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
PubMed 35980115Schnitzer TJ, Bonfanti G, Atkinson J, Donevan S, Viktrup L, Barroso J, Whalen E, Edwards RA. Characterizing 16-Week Responder Profiles Using Group-Based Trajectory Modeling in Over 4300 Clinical Trial Participants Receiving Pharmaceutical Treatment for Moderate to Severe Osteoarthritis. Adv Ther. 2022 Oct;39(10):4742-4756. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02290-3. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
PubMed 35960482Conaghan PG, Dworkin RH, Schnitzer TJ, Berenbaum F, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Viktrup L, Abraham L. WOMAC Meaningful Within-patient Change: Results From 3 Studies of Tanezumab in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee. J Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;49(6):615-621. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.210543. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
PubMed 35232805Conaghan PG, Abraham L, Viktrup L, Cislo P. Impact of tanezumab on health status, non-work activities and work productivity in adults with moderate-to-severe osteoarthritis. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2022 Feb 1;23(1):106. doi: 10.1186/s12891-022-05029-x.
PubMed 35105318Berenbaum F, Schnitzer T, Kivitz A, Viktrup L, Johnston E, Yang R, Whalen E, Tive L, Semel D. Gender, age, disease severity, body mass index and diabetes may not affect response to subcutaneous tanezumab in patients with osteoarthritis after 16 weeks of treatment. A subgroup analysis of placebo-controlled trials. Int J Clin Pract. 2021 Dec;75(12):e14975. doi: 10.1111/ijcp.14975. Epub 2021 Oct 21.
PubMed 34626502Berenbaum F, Schnitzer TJ, Kivitz AJ, Viktrup L, Hickman A, Pixton G, Brown MT, Davignon I, West CR. General Safety and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Tanezumab for Osteoarthritis: A Pooled Analysis of Three Randomized, Placebo-Controlled Trials. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2022 Jun;74(6):918-928. doi: 10.1002/acr.24637. Epub 2022 Mar 25.
PubMed 33973384
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 3 May 2021. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- A PHASE 3 RANDOMIZED, DOUBLE-BLIND, PLACEBO-CONTROLLED, MULTICENTER STUDY OF THE ANALGESIC EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF A DOSE TITRATION REGIMEN FOR THE SUBCUTANEOUS ADMINISTRATION OF TANEZUMAB IN SUBJECTS WITH OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE HIP OR KNEE
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02697773
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- A4091056
- Conditions
- Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip
- Keywords
- osteoarthritis of the knee, osteoarthritis of the hip, nerve growth factor inhibitor, tanezumab
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 698 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- PfizerIndustry (pharma, biotech, devices)
- Study start
- 21 Jan 2016 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 5 Dec 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 14 May 2018 (actual)
- First posted
- 3 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Posted 23 Apr 2019
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
The primary purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of a titration arm of tanezumab in which treatment is started at a lower dose (2.5 mg) and increased to a higher dose (5 mg) at Week 8, compared to giving 2 doses of tanezumab 2.5 mg or 2 doses of placebo. The study also evaluates the safety of the treatment regimens.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Quadruple blind (participant, care provider, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 3
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo comparator | Other: Placeboplacebo administered subcutaneously at day 0 and week 8 |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mg | Experimental | Biological: Tanezumab 2.5 mgtanezumab 2.5 mg administered subcutaneously at day 0 and week 8 |
| Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg | Experimental | Biological: Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mgtanezumab 2.5 mg administered subcutaneously at day 0 and tanezumab 5 mg administered subcutaneously at week 8 |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 years and older
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
- Age groups
- Adult, Older adult
Key inclusion criteria (5 listed)
- Diagnosis of Osteoarthritis of the knee or hip confirmed by X-ray
- Documented history that subject tried the following medications and had insufficient pain relief or is cannot take or tolerate them: acetaminophen, NSAIDs and either tramadol or opioids
- Meet the protocol requirements for pain at screening and pain, physical function and patient global assessment of osteoarthritis at baseline
- Willing to discontinue all pain medications except study medication and rescue medication during the course of the study and use those as directed per protocol
- Women able to have children must agree to use 2 forms of contraception during the study
Key exclusion criteria (12 listed)
- Body Mass Index (BMI) greater than 39
- History of diseases other than osteoarthritis in a shoulder, hip or knee (example, rheumatoid arthritis, gout, joint infections, osteonecrosis)
- Patients with x-ray showing joint conditions such as osteonecrosis (dead bone) or certain types of fractures
- Patients who have had significant trauma or surgery to a knee, hip or shoulder within the previous year
- Planned surgical procedure during the study
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| PlaceboPatient receives one dose of placebo to match tanezumab subcutaneously on Day 1 and one dose of placebo to match tanezumab subcutaneously at Week 8. | Other | Placebo |
| Tanezumab 2.5 mgPatient receives one dose of tanezumab 2.5 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and one dose of tanezumab 2.5 mg subcutaneously at Week 8. | Biological | Tanezumab 2.5 mg |
| Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mgAlso: Titration ArmPatient receives one dose of tanezumab 2.5 mg subcutaneously on Day 1 and one dose of tanezumab 5 mg subcutaneously at Week 8. | Biological | Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg |
Primary outcome
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. The WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis of index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of scores from 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (extreme pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
WOMAC: self-administered, disease-specific questionnaire which assesses clinically important, participant-relevant symptoms for pain, stiffness and physical function in participants with osteoarthritis. Physical function refers to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale is a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (extreme difficulty), where higher scores indicated extreme difficulty/worse physical function.
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline, Week 16
PGA of osteoarthritis was assessed by asking a question from participants: "Considering all the ways your osteoarthritis in your knee or hip (index joint) affects you, how are you doing today?" Participants responded on a scale ranging from 1-5, where 1=very good (no symptom and no limitation of normal activities), 2= good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3= fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4= poor (severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities), and 5 = very poor (very severe symptoms and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher scores indicated worsening of condition.
55 secondary outcomes
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8 and 12
Change From Baseline in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Percentage of Participants Meeting Outcomes Measures in Arthritis Clinical Trials-Osteoarthritis Research Society International (OMERACT-OARSI) Responder Index
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants Achieving Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Reduction >= 30 Percent (%), >=50%, >=70% and >=90% Response
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Percent Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale Reduction >= 30 Percent (%), >=50%, >=70% and >=90% Response
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Percentage of Participants With Cumulative Percent Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Physical Function Subscale at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline to Week 16
Percentage of Participants Achieving Improvement of >=2 Points in Patient's Global Assessment (PGA) of Osteoarthritis
Time frame: Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12, 16 and 24
Change From Baseline for Average Pain Score in the Index Joint at Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline for Average Pain Score in the Index Joint at Weeks 20 and 24
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 20 and 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Stiffness Subscale at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Average Score at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Item (Pain When Walking on a Flat Surface) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale (Pain When Going up or Down Stairs) at Week 24
Time frame: Baseline, Week 24
Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Osteoarthritis (WPAI:OA) Scores at Baseline
Time frame: Baseline
Change From Baseline in Work Productivity and Activity Impairment Questionnaire for Osteoarthritis (WPAI:OA) Scores at Week 16
Time frame: Baseline and Week 16
European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Dimensions Score
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16
European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions-5 Levels (EQ-5D-5L) Overall Health Utility Score/Index Value
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 8 and 16
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Visits of Services Directly Related to Osteoarthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Who Visited the Emergency Room Due to Osteoarthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Visits to the Emergency Room Due to Osteoarthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Hospitalized Due to Osteoarthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Nights Stayed in the Hospital Due to Osteoarthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Who Used Any Aids/Devices for Doing Things
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Number of Participants Who Quit Job Due to Osteoarthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Health Care Resource Utilization (HCRU): Duration Since Quitting Job Due to Osteoarthritis
Time frame: Baseline, Weeks 24 and 40
Number of Participants Who Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Time to Discontinuation Due to Lack of Efficacy
Time frame: Baseline up to Week 16
Number of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication During Weeks 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Number of Participants Who Took Rescue Medication During Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Number of Days of Rescue Medication Use at Week 2, 4, 8, 12 and 16
Time frame: Week 2, 4, 8, 12, 16
Number of Days of Rescue Medication Use at Week 24
Time frame: Week 24
Results and safety
Loading the posted results from ClinicalTrials.gov…
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 3 May 2021.
- Posted resultsParticipant flow, baseline, all outcome measures and adverse events.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38650049Schnitzer TJ, Conaghan PG, Berenbaum F, Abraham L, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Viktrup L, Yang R, Brown MT. Effect size varies based on calculation method and may affect interpretation of treatment effect: an illustration using randomised clinical trials in osteoarthritis. Adv Rheumatol. 2024 Apr 22;64(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s42358-024-00358-y.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 38343426Guermazi A, Roemer FW, Kompel AJ, Diaz LE, Crema MD, Brown MT, Hickman A, Pixton GC, Viktrup L, Fountaine RJ, Burr A, Sherlock SP, West CR. Inter-Reader Consistency and Exclusionary Findings During Radiographic Screening for Phase 3 Trials of Tanezumab in Patients With Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthr Imaging. 2022 Sep-Dec;2(3-4):100082. doi: 10.1016/j.ostima.2022.100082. Epub 2022 Nov 15.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37982583Ren J, Bushmakin AG, Cislo PR, Abraham L, Cappelleri JC, Dworkin RH, Farrar JT. Meaningful within-patient change for clinical outcome assessments: model-based approach versus cumulative distribution functions. J Biopharm Stat. 2025 Aug;35(5):826-838. doi: 10.1080/10543406.2023.2281575. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37652258Carrino JA, McAlindon TE, Schnitzer TJ, Guermazi A, Hochberg MC, Conaghan PG, Brown MT, Burr A, Fountaine RJ, Pixton GC, Viktrup L, Verburg KM, West CR. Characterization of adverse joint outcomes in patients with osteoarthritis treated with subcutaneous tanezumab. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2023 Dec;31(12):1612-1626. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2023.08.010. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37470295Shoji S, Suzuki A, Nouri P, Cai CH, Gaitonde P, Marshall S. Prediction of relative change in free nerve growth factor following subcutaneous administration of tanezumab, a novel monoclonal antibody to nerve growth factor. CPT Pharmacometrics Syst Pharmacol. 2023 Sep;12(9):1358-1370. doi: 10.1002/psp4.13015. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 37460782Brown MT, Cornblath DR, Koltzenburg M, Gorson KC, Hickman A, Pixton GC, Gaitonde P, Viktrup L, West CR. Peripheral Nerve Safety of Nerve Growth Factor Inhibition by Tanezumab: Pooled Analyses of Phase III Clinical Studies in Over 5000 Patients with Osteoarthritis. Clin Drug Investig. 2023 Jul;43(7):551-563. doi: 10.1007/s40261-023-01286-3. Epub 2023 Jul 18.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36621827Colloca L, Dworkin RH, Farrar JT, Tive L, Yang J, Viktrup L, Dasic G, West CR, Whalen E, Brown MT, Gilbert SA, Verburg KM. Predicting Treatment Responses in Patients With Osteoarthritis: Results From Two Phase III Tanezumab Randomized Clinical Trials. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2023 Apr;113(4):878-886. doi: 10.1002/cpt.2842. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36474952Hunter DJ, Schnitzer TJ, Hall J, Semel D, Davignon I, Cappelleri JC, Bushmakin AG, Abraham L. Time to first and sustained improvement in WOMAC domains among patients with osteoarthritis receiving tanezumab. Osteoarthr Cartil Open. 2022 Jul 2;4(3):100294. doi: 10.1016/j.ocarto.2022.100294. eCollection 2022 Sep.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 36301512Atkinson J, Edwards RA, Bonfanti G, Barroso J, Schnitzer TJ. A Two-Step, Trajectory-Focused, Analytics Approach to Attempt Prediction of Analgesic Response in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Osteoarthritis. Adv Ther. 2023 Jan;40(1):252-264. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02336-6. Epub 2022 Oct 27.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35980115Mease P, Kuritzky L, Wright WL, Mallick-Searle T, Fountaine R, Yang R, Sadrarhami M, Faison W, Johnston E, Viktrup L. Efficacy and safety of tanezumab, NSAIDs, and placebo in patients with moderate to severe hip or knee osteoarthritis and a history of depression, anxiety, or insomnia: post-hoc analysis of phase 3 trials. Curr Med Res Opin. 2022 Nov;38(11):1909-1922. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2022.2113689. Epub 2022 Aug 28.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35960482Schnitzer TJ, Bonfanti G, Atkinson J, Donevan S, Viktrup L, Barroso J, Whalen E, Edwards RA. Characterizing 16-Week Responder Profiles Using Group-Based Trajectory Modeling in Over 4300 Clinical Trial Participants Receiving Pharmaceutical Treatment for Moderate to Severe Osteoarthritis. Adv Ther. 2022 Oct;39(10):4742-4756. doi: 10.1007/s12325-022-02290-3. Epub 2022 Aug 12.
- Derived from this study: PubMed 35232805Conaghan PG, Dworkin RH, Schnitzer TJ, Berenbaum F, Bushmakin AG, Cappelleri JC, Viktrup L, Abraham L. WOMAC Meaningful Within-patient Change: Results From 3 Studies of Tanezumab in Patients With Moderate-to-severe Osteoarthritis of the Hip or Knee. J Rheumatol. 2022 Jun;49(6):615-621. doi: 10.3899/jrheum.210543. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
- To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: Yes. Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.
Related trials for Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
Holistic Healing for Knee Osteoarthritis
Knee Osteoarthritis (Knee OA)
Recruiting
Effect of Anti-inflammatory Diet in Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Active, not recruitingPhase 2/3
Single vs Triple Hyaluronic Acid in Knee Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis, Knee
Not yet recruiting
The Feasibility of a Virtual/Home-based OA Treatment Program in Older Adults With OA and Multimorbidity
Osteoarthritis of the Knee
RecruitingObservational study
Exploring Factors Linked to Worsening Over Time in People With Early-stage Knee Osteoarthritis and Those With Prior Proven Acute Knee Injury.
Knee Osteoarthritis
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center study director
Pfizer
87 sites in 3 countries: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A Phase 3 study testing Tanezumab 2.5 mg and Tanezumab 2.5mg/5mg in people with Osteoarthritis, Knee and Osteoarthritis, Hip, run by Pfizer at 87 sites in 3 countries.
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 5 inclusion and 12 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 3 May 2021. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 87 sites in United States, Canada, Puerto Rico. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. Some participants in this study may receive a placebo. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
What does this phase mean?
Phase 3 studies compare the treatment with the current standard treatment or a placebo in a large group, to confirm how well it works and watch for side effects.
Not every study follows the same path, and some studies (observational studies, device studies) have no phase.
Are results available for this study?
Yes. Results are posted in the registry (first posted 23 Apr 2019). A summary is in the For doctors view, and the full results are on ClinicalTrials.gov.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change From Baseline in Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale at Week 16 (time frame: Baseline, Week 16). The study lists 3 primary outcomes in all. It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02697773, which also lists 17 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 3 May 2021.