Myofascial Trigger Point PainNCT02699294
The Effect Of Stretching Exercise on Pectoralis Minor Myofascial Latent Trigger Points
A study testing Manual pressure release, Contract-relax PNF stretch and Z-stretch in people with Myofascial Trigger Point Pain, run by Istanbul University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
Trial summary
This randomised-controlled trial investigates whether a single intervention of manual pressure release combined with stretching exercise has an effect on muscle length, pain perception threshold, and respiratory function in subjects with latent myofascial trigger point in the pectoralis minor muscle or not. Read more about this study
- Who is it for?
- Ages 18 to 35 yearsHealthy volunteers can take part
- Conditions the study is for
- Myofascial Trigger Point Pain
- What is being tested?
- Manual pressure release, Contract-relax PNF stretch and Z-stretch
- Could I receive a placebo?
- No, everyone receives an active treatment
- How many people
- 40 participants
- Where
- 1 siteTurkey (Türkiye)
- Study dates
- 1 Apr 2017to 11 Jul 2017
- Phase
- Interventional
- Are there results?
- None posted in the registry
Key requirements
Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.
- Ages 18 to 35 years
- All sexes
- Healthy volunteers accepted
- Adult
Who may be able to join
- Subjects diagnosed with at least one latent myofascial trigger point in the pectoralis minor muscle
Who cannot join
- Presence of active trigger points in the pectoralis minor muscle
- Any orthopaedic problems pertaining to the spine-shoulder complex (e.g., fractures, arthrosis, listhesis, sprains, strains) within the last six months
- Surgery on the spine-shoulder complex before the study
- Neurological impairment in the upper extremities
- Receiving the treatment for myofascial pain within the last three months
- Receiving anti-inflammatory and pain relief medication in the past 24 hours
Trial locations and contacts
1 site in 1 country.
About this study
Official title: Comparison of Effectiveness of Two Different Stretching Exercises Combined With Pressure Release Technique on Latent Trigger Points in The Pectoralis Minor Muscle
This randomised-controlled trial investigates whether a single intervention of manual pressure release combined with stretching exercise has an effect on muscle length, pain perception threshold, and respiratory function in subjects with latent myofascial trigger point in the pectoralis minor muscle or not. First quarter of the participants will receive a single intervention of manual pressure release combined with contract-relax PNF stretching exercise of pectoralis minor muscle, second quarter of the participants will receive a single intervention of manual pressure release combined with Z stretching exercise of pectoralis minor muscle while, only a single intervention of manual pressure release will be applied to third quarter of the participants and final quarter of them will not receive any intervention.
Read the detailed description
Myofascial trigger points are hyperirritable points located within a taut band of skeletal muscle or fascia, which cause referred pain, local tenderness and autonomic changes when compressed. They are classified as either active myofascial trigger points (ATrPs) or latent myofascial trigger points (LTrPs). ATrPs can be inactivated by different treatment strategies; however, they never fully disappear but rather convert to the latent form. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment of LTrPs is important. Invasive and noninvasive techniques are available for management of LTrPs. Invasive techniques include trigger point injections and dry needling whereas noninvasive techniques include manual therapy techniques and electrotherapy modalities. Manual therapy techniques for the treatment of myofascial trigger points include joint manipulation, strain/counterstrain, ischemic compression and pressure, massage therapy, myofascial release therapy, muscle energy techniques, point pressure release and transverse friction massage. Additionally, recent studies showed that the myofascial trigger point therapy combined with stretching exercise may be an effective for decreasing the pain level. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine what type stretching exercise is most effective and its immediate effects on muscle length in people with LTrPs. Therefore, the aim of this randomised-controlled trial is to investigate the effect on muscle length, pain perception threshold, and respiratory function after a single intervention of manual pressure release combined with stretching exercise on LTrPs in the pectoralis minor muscle.
The sample size and power calculations is performed with the sample size calculator (InStat). The calculations is based on a standard deviation of 0.5 points, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Pectoralis Minor Index of 0.89 points, an alpha level of 0.05, a β level of 5%, and a desired power of 95%. These parameters generate a sample size of at least 9 participants for each group. Total of 40 subjects will be recruited into the study in order to allow for a loss to follow-up.
Potential participants will be invited through the posting of flyers at Istanbul University, Turkey. Flyer recruitment method will be used in this trial because it is the most effective, yielding the highest number of enrolments. All participants will be completed an informed consent form that described the purpose and procedures of testing. prior to participating in the study. Forty participants fitting the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of four parallel groups (ratio 1:1:1:1). For allocation of the participants, "Randomization.com" which is an online, randomisation web service will be used (http://www.randomization.com/). Simple randomisation procedures (computerized random numbers) will be done and sequentially numbered index cards with the random assignment will be prepared by an investigator with no clinical involvement in the study. The index cards will be folded and placed in sealed opaque envelopes. Then, the blind investigator will open each envelope and allocate the participants to group according to selected index card. The interventions will be performed by the same physiotherapist at a university research clinic, and assessments and data collection will be made by another therapist. Whereas interventionist will be aware of the allocated arm, patients and outcome assessor will be kept blind to allocation.
The data will be evaluated using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 21.0 program for Windows and by analyzing descriptive statistics (frequency, mean and standard deviation). Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test will be used to assess the distribution of data. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures with the Bonferroni post hoc test will used to determine whether differences in the mean scores of outcome measure among three time points (baseline, immediate after and 24 hours later) between study groups. In this study, p values less than 0.05 will be regarded as statistically significant.
- Conditions
- Myofascial Trigger Point Pain
- Being tested
- Manual pressure release, Contract-relax PNF stretch, Z-stretch
- Keywords
- Pain Threshold, Pectoralis Minor, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) Stretching, Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation
- Medical subject headings
- Myofascial Pain Syndromes
What participants receive
What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.
Manual pressure releaseOther
Subjects will be positioned supine on a treatment plinth and will be encouraged to relax as much as possible before pressure is applied. A slow pressure to myofascial latent trigger point will be applied directly over the marked pectoralis minor muscle myofascial latent trigger point site until a moderate but tolerable pain value of 7 out of 10 (0= no pain, 10= severe pain) is reported. Constant pressure will be sustained for 90 seconds if the subjects report that the pain is decreased to a value of 3, the pressure will be increased to restore perceived pain to the value of 7. Then, tissue resistance (barrier) in pectoralis minor muscle will be controlled.
Contract-relax PNF stretchOther
Subjects will be in a sitting position with hands being clasped behind the head. The pectoralis minor muscle will be passively and slowly stretched until a strong but tolerable stretch discomfort intensity level of 4 out of 10 (0= no pain, 10= severe pain) is reported. Passive stretch will be sustained for 10 seconds followed by 6 seconds of maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the pectoralis minor muscle. Then, subjects will be instructed to relax for further 4 seconds. Subjects will maintain newly active stretched position of pectoralis minor muscle for 10 seconds with a strong but tolerable stretch discomfort intensity level of 4 out of 10. The procedure will be repeated four times with 30 seconds of rest between two successive trials.
Z-stretchOther
Subjects will be positioned supine with knee bent on a treatment plinth, and the legs will be rotated to the opposite direction of the arm to be stretched placing a stabilizing distal tension on the ribs. Then, the subjects will be slowly brought the arm in a circular motion overhead pausing at the points of tightness, maintaining close contact to the treatment table until a strong but tolerable stretch discomfort intensity level of 4 out of 10 (0= no pain, 10= severe pain) is reported. Self-stretch of pectoralis minor muscle, including myofascial latent trigger points will be sustained for 30 seconds. The procedure will be repeated four times with 30 seconds of rest between two successive trials.
| Study group | Role | What they receive |
|---|---|---|
| Contract-relax PNF stretch | Experimental | A contract-relax PNF stretching techniques of the pectoralis minor muscle including latent trigger points will be applied by Group 1 after a single intervention of manual pressure release will be performed according to the techniques describe by Simons et al. (1999). Receives: Other: Manual pressure release; Other: Contract-relax PNF stretch |
| Z-stretch | Experimental | The Z- stretch of the pectoralis minor muscle including latent trigger points will be applied by Group 2 after a single intervention of manual pressure release will be performed according to the techniques describe by Simons et al. (1999). Receives: Other: Manual pressure release; Other: Z-stretch |
| Manual pressure release | Experimental | The single intervention of manual pressure release will be only applied to Group 3 according to the techniques describe by Simons et al. (1999). Receives: Other: Manual pressure release |
| Control | No intervention | This is a control group. |
What is being measured
The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.
Change from Baseline Pectoralis minor index (PMI) to 24 hours follow-up
The PMI will be calculated by dividing the resting muscle length measurement by the subject height in centimeters and multiplying by 100. The test-retest reliability for PMI measurement is 0.94 (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 0.81-0.98).
Measured: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 24 hours follow-up
Secondary outcomes (9)
Pectoralis minor length
The resting length of the pectoralis minor can be validly measured using palpable landmarks and can be reliably measured with a caliper or a cloth tape measure. These landmarks are (1) the inferomedial aspect of the coracoid process and (2) the caudal edge of the fourth rib at the sternum. The distance in centimeters between these bony reference points will be measured with using a tape measure.
Measured: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 24 hours follow-up
Pain pressure threshold of pectoralis minor muscle myofascial latent trigger point site
Digital pressure algometry showed high intra-rater reliability for pressure pain threshold measurements which might be a useful parameter in assessing the effects of treatment for musculoskeletal pain and myofascial pain syndrome.
Measured: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 24 hours follow-up
Rounded shoulder posture measure
There is no significant difference between the concurrent validity of the supine rounded shoulder posture measure an a seated assessment of scapular posture. Rounded shoulder posture will be measured from the acromion to the wall behind the subject to determine the amount of forward displacement with using a levelled metric ruler
Measured: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 24 hours follow-up
The Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
The Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) (Liter (L) will be assessed by using a portable spirometer.
Measured: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1) (L) will be assessed by using a portable spirometer.
Measured: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
The FEV1/FVC ratio
The FEV1/FVC ratio (% of predicted normal) will be assessed by using a portable spirometer.
Measured: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF) (L/s) will be assessed by using a portable spirometer.
Measured: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP) will be assessed by using a hand-held respiratory pressure meter (cmH2O).
Measured: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP)
Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP) will be assessed by using a hand-held respiratory pressure meter (cmH2O).
Measured: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
Timeline
From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.
- First posted4 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Study start1 Apr 2017
- Primary completion16 May 2017
- Study completion11 Jul 2017
Resources
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govThe registry entry this page is built from, with its full change history.
- Publications (12)Papers the sponsor has linked to this study.
- Other trials for Myofascial Trigger Point PainStudies of the same condition, open and under way.
- More trials run by Istanbul UniversityThe sponsor's other registered studies.
- What the trial phases meanHow a treatment moves from first tests in people to approval.
More details
For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.
Study design
- Study type
- Interventional
- Phase
- Phase N/A
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind
- Who is masked
- Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
Sponsor and investigators
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul University
- Sponsor type
- University, hospital or other
- Responsible party
- Principal investigator, Tansu Birinci, Istanbul University
- Investigators
- Tansu Birinci, PT, Principal investigator, Research AssistantEbru Kaya Mutlu, PhD, PT, Study director, LecturerRustem Mustafaoglu, MSc, PT, Principal investigator, Research AssistantArzu Razak Ozdincler, Prof. Dr, Study chair, Professor
IDs, dates and publications
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02699294
- Sponsor's protocol ID
- 34910702
- Status last verified
- Jul 2017
- First submitted
- 16 Nov 2015
- Last updated
- 13 Jul 2017
- Results posted
- No
- Data monitoring committee
- No
- FDA-regulated drug
- No
- FDA-regulated device
- No
- Individual data sharing
- No
Publications
Trampas A, Kitsios A, Sykaras E, Symeonidis S, Lazarou L. Clinical massage and modified Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation stretching in males with latent myofascial trigger points. Phys Ther Sport. 2010 Aug;11(3):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 May 5.
PubMed 20673857Borstad JD. Measurement of pectoralis minor muscle length: validation and clinical application. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Apr;38(4):169-74. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2723. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
PubMed 18434665Celik D, Mutlu EK. Clinical implication of latent myofascial trigger point. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013 Aug;17(8):353. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0353-8.
PubMed 23801006Halbertsma JP, van Bolhuis AI, Goeken LN. Sport stretching: effect on passive muscle stiffness of short hamstrings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jul;77(7):688-92. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90009-x.
PubMed 8669996Hanten WP, Olson SL, Butts NL, Nowicki AL. Effectiveness of a home program of ischemic pressure followed by sustained stretch for treatment of myofascial trigger points. Phys Ther. 2000 Oct;80(10):997-1003.
PubMed 11002435Borstad JD, Ludewig PM. Comparison of three stretches for the pectoralis minor muscle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.08.011.
PubMed 16679233Park G, Kim CW, Park SB, Kim MJ, Jang SH. Reliability and usefulness of the pressure pain threshold measurement in patients with myofascial pain. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;35(3):412-7. doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.412. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
PubMed 22506152Lee JH, Cynn HS, Yoon TL, Ko CH, Choi WJ, Choi SA, Choi BS. The effect of scapular posterior tilt exercise, pectoralis minor stretching, and shoulder brace on scapular alignment and muscles activity in subjects with round-shoulder posture. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Feb;25(1):107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
PubMed 25467545Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
PubMed 8628042Wong CK, Coleman D, diPersia V, Song J, Wright D. The effects of manual treatment on rounded-shoulder posture, and associated muscle strength. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Oct;14(4):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
PubMed 20850039Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983 May;16(1):87-101. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-X.
PubMed 6602967Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:63.0.CO;2-L.
PubMed 8773720
Study at a glance
From the registry record, last updated by the sponsor on 13 Jul 2017. Recruitment status is as the sponsor reported it: confirm with the study team.
- Official title
- Comparison of Effectiveness of Two Different Stretching Exercises Combined With Pressure Release Technique on Latent Trigger Points in The Pectoralis Minor Muscle
- ClinicalTrials.gov ID
- NCT02699294
- Acronym / sponsor ID
- 34910702
- Conditions
- Myofascial Trigger Point Pain
- Keywords
- Pain Threshold, Pectoralis Minor, Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) Stretching, Physiotherapy, Rehabilitation
- Study type
- Interventional
- Recruitment status
- Completed
- Enrolment
- 40 participants (actual)
- Lead sponsor
- Istanbul UniversityUniversity, hospital or other
- Study start
- 1 Apr 2017 (actual)
- Primary completion
- 16 May 2017 (actual)
- Study completion
- 11 Jul 2017 (actual)
- First posted
- 4 Mar 2016 (estimated)
- Results
- Not posted in the source record
Clinical summary
The research question as the sponsor registered it. This describes what the study plans to test, not what it found.
This randomised-controlled trial investigates whether a single intervention of manual pressure release combined with stretching exercise has an effect on muscle length, pain perception threshold, and respiratory function in subjects with latent myofascial trigger point in the pectoralis minor muscle or not. First quarter of the participants will receive a single intervention of manual pressure release combined with contract-relax PNF stretching exercise of pectoralis minor muscle, second quarter of the participants will receive a single intervention of manual pressure release combined with Z stretching exercise of pectoralis minor muscle while, only a single intervention of manual pressure release will be applied to third quarter of the participants and final quarter of them will not receive any intervention.
Detailed description
Myofascial trigger points are hyperirritable points located within a taut band of skeletal muscle or fascia, which cause referred pain, local tenderness and autonomic changes when compressed. They are classified as either active myofascial trigger points (ATrPs) or latent myofascial trigger points (LTrPs). ATrPs can be inactivated by different treatment strategies; however, they never fully disappear but rather convert to the latent form. Therefore, the diagnosis and treatment of LTrPs is important. Invasive and noninvasive techniques are available for management of LTrPs. Invasive techniques include trigger point injections and dry needling whereas noninvasive techniques include manual therapy techniques and electrotherapy modalities. Manual therapy techniques for the treatment of myofascial trigger points include joint manipulation, strain/counterstrain, ischemic compression and pressure, massage therapy, myofascial release therapy, muscle energy techniques, point pressure release and transverse friction massage. Additionally, recent studies showed that the myofascial trigger point therapy combined with stretching exercise may be an effective for decreasing the pain level. However, there is insufficient evidence to determine what type stretching exercise is most effective and its immediate effects on muscle length in people with LTrPs. Therefore, the aim of this randomised-controlled trial is to investigate the effect on muscle length, pain perception threshold, and respiratory function after a single intervention of manual pressure release combined with stretching exercise on LTrPs in the pectoralis minor muscle.
The sample size and power calculations is performed with the sample size calculator (InStat). The calculations is based on a standard deviation of 0.5 points, the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for Pectoralis Minor Index of 0.89 points, an alpha level of 0.05, a β level of 5%, and a desired power of 95%. These parameters generate a sample size of at least 9 participants for each group. Total of 40 subjects will be recruited into the study in order to allow for a loss to follow-up.
Potential participants will be invited through the posting of flyers at Istanbul University, Turkey. Flyer recruitment method will be used in this trial because it is the most effective, yielding the highest number of enrolments. All participants will be completed an informed consent form that described the purpose and procedures of testing. prior to participating in the study. Forty participants fitting the inclusion criteria will be randomly assigned to one of four parallel groups (ratio 1:1:1:1). For allocation of the participants, "Randomization.com" which is an online, randomisation web service will be used (http://www.randomization.com/). Simple randomisation procedures (computerized random numbers) will be done and sequentially numbered index cards with the random assignment will be prepared by an investigator with no clinical involvement in the study. The index cards will be folded and placed in sealed opaque envelopes. Then, the blind investigator will open each envelope and allocate the participants to group according to selected index card. The interventions will be performed by the same physiotherapist at a university research clinic, and assessments and data collection will be made by another therapist. Whereas interventionist will be aware of the allocated arm, patients and outcome assessor will be kept blind to allocation.
The data will be evaluated using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences 21.0 program for Windows and by analyzing descriptive statistics (frequency, mean and standard deviation). Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test will be used to assess the distribution of data. The one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for repeated measures with the Bonferroni post hoc test will used to determine whether differences in the mean scores of outcome measure among three time points (baseline, immediate after and 24 hours later) between study groups. In this study, p values less than 0.05 will be regarded as statistically significant.
Study design
- Primary purpose
- Treatment
- Allocation
- Randomised
- Intervention model
- Parallel groups
- Masking
- Triple blind (participant, investigator, outcomes assessor)
- Number of arms
- 4
| Arm | Type | Receives |
|---|---|---|
| Contract-relax PNF stretch | Experimental | Other: Manual pressure release, Other: Contract-relax PNF stretchA contract-relax PNF stretching techniques of the pectoralis minor muscle including latent trigger points will be applied by Group 1 after a single intervention of manual pressure release will be performed according to the techniques describe by Simons et al. (1999). |
| Z-stretch | Experimental | Other: Manual pressure release, Other: Z-stretchThe Z- stretch of the pectoralis minor muscle including latent trigger points will be applied by Group 2 after a single intervention of manual pressure release will be performed according to the techniques describe by Simons et al. (1999). |
| Manual pressure release | Experimental | Other: Manual pressure releaseThe single intervention of manual pressure release will be only applied to Group 3 according to the techniques describe by Simons et al. (1999). |
| Control | No intervention | –This is a control group. |
Who may qualify
- Ages
- 18 to 35 years
- Sex
- All
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
- Age groups
- Adult
Key inclusion criteria (1 listed)
- Subjects diagnosed with at least one latent myofascial trigger point in the pectoralis minor muscle
Key exclusion criteria (6 listed)
- Presence of active trigger points in the pectoralis minor muscle
- Any orthopaedic problems pertaining to the spine-shoulder complex (e.g., fractures, arthrosis, listhesis, sprains, strains) within the last six months
- Surgery on the spine-shoulder complex before the study
- Neurological impairment in the upper extremities
- Receiving the treatment for myofascial pain within the last three months
Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening; this overview does not establish that a patient qualifies. Full inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Interventions
| Intervention | Type | Arms |
|---|---|---|
| Manual pressure releaseSubjects will be positioned supine on a treatment plinth and will be encouraged to relax as much as possible before pressure is applied. A slow pressure to myofascial latent trigger point will be applied directly over the marked pectoralis minor muscle myofascial latent trigger point site until a moderate but tolerable pain value of 7 out of 10 (0= no pain, 10= severe pain) is reported. Constant pressure will be sustained for 90 seconds if the subjects report that the pain is decreased to a value of 3, the pressure will be increased to restore perceived pain to the value of 7. Then, tissue resistance (barrier) in pectoralis minor muscle will be controlled. | Other | Contract-relax PNF stretch, Manual pressure release, Z-stretch |
| Contract-relax PNF stretchSubjects will be in a sitting position with hands being clasped behind the head. The pectoralis minor muscle will be passively and slowly stretched until a strong but tolerable stretch discomfort intensity level of 4 out of 10 (0= no pain, 10= severe pain) is reported. Passive stretch will be sustained for 10 seconds followed by 6 seconds of maximal voluntary isometric contraction of the pectoralis minor muscle. Then, subjects will be instructed to relax for further 4 seconds. Subjects will maintain newly active stretched position of pectoralis minor muscle for 10 seconds with a strong but tolerable stretch discomfort intensity level of 4 out of 10. The procedure will be repeated four times with 30 seconds of rest between two successive trials. | Other | Contract-relax PNF stretch |
| Z-stretchSubjects will be positioned supine with knee bent on a treatment plinth, and the legs will be rotated to the opposite direction of the arm to be stretched placing a stabilizing distal tension on the ribs. Then, the subjects will be slowly brought the arm in a circular motion overhead pausing at the points of tightness, maintaining close contact to the treatment table until a strong but tolerable stretch discomfort intensity level of 4 out of 10 (0= no pain, 10= severe pain) is reported. Self-stretch of pectoralis minor muscle, including myofascial latent trigger points will be sustained for 30 seconds. The procedure will be repeated four times with 30 seconds of rest between two successive trials. | Other | Z-stretch |
Primary outcome
Change from Baseline Pectoralis minor index (PMI) to 24 hours follow-up
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 24 hours follow-up
The PMI will be calculated by dividing the resting muscle length measurement by the subject height in centimeters and multiplying by 100. The test-retest reliability for PMI measurement is 0.94 (95 % Confidence Interval (CI): 0.81-0.98).
9 secondary outcomes
Pectoralis minor length
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 24 hours follow-up
Pain pressure threshold of pectoralis minor muscle myofascial latent trigger point site
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 24 hours follow-up
Rounded shoulder posture measure
Time frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 24 hours follow-up
The Forced Vital Capacity (FVC)
Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1)
Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
The FEV1/FVC ratio
Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
Peak Expiratory Flow (PEF)
Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
Maximum Inspiratory Pressure (MIP)
Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
Maximal Expiratory Pressure (MEP)
Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours follow-up
Results and safety
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
Research links
- Official record on ClinicalTrials.govLast updated by the sponsor 13 Jul 2017.
- Background: PubMed 20673857Trampas A, Kitsios A, Sykaras E, Symeonidis S, Lazarou L. Clinical massage and modified Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation stretching in males with latent myofascial trigger points. Phys Ther Sport. 2010 Aug;11(3):91-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ptsp.2010.02.003. Epub 2010 May 5.
- Background: PubMed 18434665Borstad JD. Measurement of pectoralis minor muscle length: validation and clinical application. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Apr;38(4):169-74. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2723. Epub 2007 Nov 21.
- Background: PubMed 23801006Celik D, Mutlu EK. Clinical implication of latent myofascial trigger point. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2013 Aug;17(8):353. doi: 10.1007/s11916-013-0353-8.
- Background: PubMed 8669996Halbertsma JP, van Bolhuis AI, Goeken LN. Sport stretching: effect on passive muscle stiffness of short hamstrings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996 Jul;77(7):688-92. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90009-x.
- Background: PubMed 11002435Hanten WP, Olson SL, Butts NL, Nowicki AL. Effectiveness of a home program of ischemic pressure followed by sustained stretch for treatment of myofascial trigger points. Phys Ther. 2000 Oct;80(10):997-1003.
- Background: PubMed 16679233Borstad JD, Ludewig PM. Comparison of three stretches for the pectoralis minor muscle. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2006 May-Jun;15(3):324-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2005.08.011.
- Background: PubMed 22506152Park G, Kim CW, Park SB, Kim MJ, Jang SH. Reliability and usefulness of the pressure pain threshold measurement in patients with myofascial pain. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;35(3):412-7. doi: 10.5535/arm.2011.35.3.412. Epub 2011 Jun 30.
- Background: PubMed 25467545Lee JH, Cynn HS, Yoon TL, Ko CH, Choi WJ, Choi SA, Choi BS. The effect of scapular posterior tilt exercise, pectoralis minor stretching, and shoulder brace on scapular alignment and muscles activity in subjects with round-shoulder posture. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2015 Feb;25(1):107-14. doi: 10.1016/j.jelekin.2014.10.010. Epub 2014 Oct 28.
- Background: PubMed 8628042Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996 Mar;34(3):220-33. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003.
- Background: PubMed 20850039Wong CK, Coleman D, diPersia V, Song J, Wright D. The effects of manual treatment on rounded-shoulder posture, and associated muscle strength. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Oct;14(4):326-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.05.001. Epub 2009 Jun 26.
- Background: PubMed 6602967Carlsson AM. Assessment of chronic pain. I. Aspects of the reliability and validity of the visual analogue scale. Pain. 1983 May;16(1):87-101. doi: 10.1016/0304-3959(83)90088-X.
- Background: PubMed 8773720Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996 Jun;29(6):602-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199606)29:63.0.CO;2-L.
- Simons et al., 1999Link provided by the sponsor.
- Fryer and Hodgson, 2005Link provided by the sponsor.
- Individual participant dataSharing planned: No
Related trials for Myofascial Trigger Point Pain
Not yet recruiting
Effects of IASTM, Deep Friction Massage, and Sham Instrument-Assisted Soft Tissue Mobilization on Electromyographical Activation, Pain and Function in Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Low Back Pain, Trigger Point Pain, Myofascial
Recruiting
Comparing Myofascial Exercise and Trigger Point Therapy for Non-Specific Low Back Pain
Non-specific Low Back Pain
Recruiting
Evaluation of the Effect of Adding Sodium Bicarbonate to Lidocaine in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome
Myofacial Pain, Myofacial Pain Syndrome
Not yet recruiting
Focused Versus Multi-Target Trigger Point Injection for Chronic Myofascial Neck Pain
Myofacial Pain Syndrome, Chronic Neck Pain
Not yet recruiting
Comparison of Suboccipital Release and Muscle Energy Technique in Subjects With Mechanical Neck Pain and Forward Head Posture
Myofascial Trigger Points, Neck Pain
Referral and contact
AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals. Contact the study team or a site listed below; they decide who can take part. This study is not recruiting at the moment.
Tansu Birinci, PT principal investigator
Research Assistant
Ebru Kaya Mutlu, PhD, PT study director
Lecturer
Rustem Mustafaoglu, MSc, PT principal investigator
Research Assistant
1 site in 1 country: see every site and its status.
Questions about this trial
What is this clinical trial studying?
A study testing Manual pressure release, Contract-relax PNF stretch and Z-stretch in people with Myofascial Trigger Point Pain, run by Istanbul University at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye).
The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.
Who may be eligible to take part?
The sponsor lists 1 inclusion and 6 exclusion criteria. Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.
Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?
The record says: finished, as of the sponsor's last update on 13 Jul 2017. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.
Where is the study taking place?
The record lists 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.
What are the possible benefits and risks?
They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.
Are results available for this study?
The study is completed, but results are not available in the source record. That does not mean the treatment did or did not work.
How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?
The record lists no contact. The official record names the sponsor, who can be asked directly. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.
What does the primary outcome measure?
Change from Baseline Pectoralis minor index (PMI) to 24 hours follow-up (time frame: Baseline, immediately after intervention, and 24 hours follow-up). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.
Where can I read the original study information?
On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02699294, which also lists 12 linked publications.
Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?
No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.
How often is this information updated?
AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 13 Jul 2017.