AzTrials
AzTrials

Deep Venous ThrombosisDVTNCT02704598

Comparison Between Xarelto Versus Warfarin in the Recanalization Rate of Deep Venous Thrombosis in Patients Legs.

A study testing Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in people with Deep Venous Thrombosis, run by Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual at 1 site in Brazil.

Unknown status

Status not confirmed. The sponsor has not verified this record for over two years, so it may be out of date.

Official record
Search all trials

Trial summary

This is a prospective, randomized study, aiming to evaluate patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis in lower limbs and the recanalization rates evaluated with DUPLEX ultrasound, as so the clinical outcomes in patients submitted to oral anticoagulation with Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin. Read more about this study

Who is it for?
Ages 21 to 79 years
Conditions the study is for
Deep Venous Thrombosis
What is being tested?
Rivaroxaban and Warfarin
Type of treatment
Pill or oral medicine
Could I receive a placebo?
No, everyone receives an active treatment
How many people
84 participants
Where
1 siteBrazil
Study dates
Mar 2016to Mar 2019
Phase
Interventional
Are there results?
None posted in the registry

Key requirements

Who can take part, as listed by the sponsor. Only the study team can confirm whether you are eligible, so take this list to your doctor.

  • Ages 21 to 79 years
  • All sexes
  • No healthy volunteers
  • Adult, Older adult

The noninclusion criteria were: pregnancy, age < 18 years or > 80 years, chronic renal failure, chronic hepatic chronic failure, inferior vena cava thrombosis, contraindication for any type of anticoagulation, previous DVT on the ipsilateral affected limb, or any type of active cancer, and patients who refused to participate in the study.

The exclusion criteria were: several hemorrhagic complications that required the discontinuation of anticoagulation, death after < 30 days, allergic reaction to any anticoagulant, a diagnosis of active cancer during follow-up, loss to follow-up, difficulty in achieving proper anticoagulation due to patient nonadherence to the treatment protocol, and incomplete data.

Trial locations and contacts

1 site in 1 country.

Rafael de Athayde Soares, MD, Dr. contact

+5511999813931 ext. 8226

rafaelsoon@hotmail.com

Marcelo Fernando Matielo, MD, PhD, Dr. contact

+5511999018550

mmatielo@gmail.com

Brazil1 site, 1 recruiting
  • Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual de São Paulo

    São Paulo, São Paulo, 04028-000

    Marcelo Fernando Matielo, PhD, +551199901-8550, mmatielo@gmail.com

    Roberto Sacilotto, PhD, +5511994948178

    Recruiting

Other trials in Brazil

About this study

Official title: Comparison of the Recanalization Rate and Incidence of Postthrombotic Syndrome in Patients With Lower-limb Deep Venous Thrombosis Treated With Rivaroxaban or Warfarin

This is a prospective, randomized study, aiming to evaluate patients with Deep Venous Thrombosis in lower limbs and the recanalization rates evaluated with DUPLEX ultrasound, as so the clinical outcomes in patients submitted to oral anticoagulation with Rivaroxaban versus Warfarin.

Read the detailed description

This study was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil, and was registered at clinicaltrials.gov under NCT 02704598. This prospective, randomized, consecutive, double-blind cohort study included patients treated for acute iliofemoral and/or femoropopliteal DVT of a lower limb at the Division of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Hospital do Servidor Público Estadual, São Paulo, Brazil, between march 2016 and July 2018. The patient data were collected during an appointment at the routine follow-up, and recorded with the proper protocols. The data obtained included the patient's general and demographic characteristics, and the information recorded during the outpatient follow-up visits. This research received no specific funding.

The noninclusion criteria were: pregnancy, age < 18 years or > 80 years, chronic renal failure, chronic hepatic chronic failure, inferior vena cava thrombosis, contraindication for any type of anticoagulation, previous DVT on the ipsilateral affected limb, or any type of active cancer, and patients who refused to participate in the study.

The exclusion criteria were: several hemorrhagic complications that required the discontinuation of anticoagulation, death after < 30 days, allergic reaction to any anticoagulant, a diagnosis of active cancer during follow-up, loss to follow-up, difficulty in achieving proper anticoagulation due to patient nonadherence to the treatment protocol, and incomplete data.

The diagnosis of DVT was made with clinical signs and symptoms, laboratory tests such as D-dimer, and routine DUS of the affected limb. The criteria used to confirm acute DVT with DUS were the absence or diminution of venous flow, incompressibility of the vessel, visible thrombus, enlarged vein diameter, immobility of the valves, and loss of respiratory phasicity.13 All the patients diagnosed with acute DVT were hospitalized and received initial anticoagulation with subcutaneous enoxaparin (1 mg/kg/dose) every 12 h (12/12 h) or intravenous unfractionated heparin (IUH) (loading dose 80 UI/kg, and 18 UI/kg/h) for at least 48-72 h. The infusion dose of IUH was adjusted to achieve the therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) established by the hospital laboratory within every 4-6 h period. After initial admission, the patients were randomized into two groups: group 1 patients received oral rivaroxaban, with a loading dose of 15 mg 12/12 h for 21 days after the initial dose, and 20 mg/day for 6 months; group 2 patients received oral warfarin, sufficient to maintain an INR of 2-3 for 6 months. The patients in group 2 were kept in hospital on subcutaneous enoxaparin or intravenous unfractionated heparin until their INR was 2-3. The patients were discharged after their INR achieved the therapeutic dose.

During the follow-up visits, all the patients were subjected to a DUS analysis by a physician blinded to the type of drug therapy, with defined protocols that assessed the compressibility of the external iliac vein, common femoral vein, superficial femoral vein, and popliteal vein. Flow recanalization was evaluated by confirming the total vein flow, the partial vein flow, or the absence of vein flow. All vessels evaluated were tested for the absence or presence of reflux and the grade of reflux.

The following ultrasound criteria were used to determine absence of recanalization flow: partial compressibility of the vein, diminution of the vessel diameter, heterogeneous and hyperechoic thrombus, multiple channels of flow inside the veins, reflux, and collateral circulation.13 All the patients were followed-up with outpatient visits at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after discharge. The following information was recorded at each visit: physical examination, DUS and laboratory tests, such as D-dimer, for all patients, and INR for patients receiving warfarin. The patients in group 2 were seen once a week to ensure that their INR remained at 2-3 and to confirm adequate anticoagulation. At the physical examination, the thigh was measured with a tape measure in the medium segment and the legs in the proximal segments, to record their diameters, in order to objectively assess the improvement in the swelling and edema of the leg.

A diagnosis of PTS was made with the Villalta scale when the patient's symptoms had remained unresolved for 6 months after treatment.9 The scale's components (five symptoms and six signs) are each rated on a 4-point severity scale, and the points are summed to produce a total score. A score > 4 indicates PTS. The five symptoms (pain, cramps, heaviness, pruritus, and paresthesia) were assessed by patient self-report, and the six signs (edema, skin induration, hyperpigmentation, venous ectasia, redness, and pain during calf compression) by a clinician. The severity of each symptom and sign was rated as 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate), or 3 (severe). These were summed to yield the total Villalta PTS score: 0-4, no PTS; 5-9, mild PTS; 10-14, moderate PTS; ≥ 15 or presence of an ulcer, severe PTS.

The purpose of this study was to examine the long-term outcomes (after 12 months) in two groups of patients after treatment for DVT, by comparing the DUS-detected recanalization rates and the occurrence of PTS. The secondary end-points of the analysis were the prevalence of pulmonary embolism, death, complications of treatment, and DVT relapse.

The statistical analyses were performed with SPSS 15.0 for Windows® (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL), as percentages of patients and descriptive statistics. The χ2 test and Student's t test were used to compare univariate data and differences between groups. Linear and Cox's regressions were used in the univariate and multivariable analyses, and the results are reported as adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) with the accompanying 95% confidence intervals (CIs). ANOVA and a post hoc test were used in the analysis of groups. In all analyses, p values of < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Being tested
Rivaroxaban, Warfarin
Medical subject headings
Venous Thrombosis

What participants receive

What participants receive. In a randomised study each person is assigned to one group by chance.

  • RivaroxabanDrug

    Also called xarelto

    Evaluate the efficacy of the oral anticoagulants in the treatment of deep venous tromboses, assessing clinical signs and symptoms, as so the recanalization rate using DUPLEX SCAN.

  • WarfarinDrug

    Also called Marevan

    Evaluate the efficacy of the oral anticoagulants in the treatment of deep venous tromboses, assessing clinical signs and symptoms, as so the recanalization rate using DUPLEX SCAN.

Study groups in NCT02704598
Study groupRoleWhat they receive
RivaroxabanActive comparatorPatients with deep venous thrombosis using Rivaroxaban for 6 months, and then will be evaluated with DUPLEX SCAN to assess the recanalization rate, and also the clinical signs and symptoms.
Receives: Drug: Rivaroxaban
WarfarinActive comparatorPatients with deep venous thrombosis using Warfarin for 6 months, and then will be evaluated wiht DUPLEX SCAN to assess the recanalization rate, and also the clinical signs and symptoms.
Receives: Drug: Warfarin

What is being measured

The primary outcome is the main question the study is designed to answer.

  1. the long-term outcomes (after 12 months) in two groups of patients after treatment for DVT, by comparing the DUS-detected recanalization rates and the occurrence of PTS.

    The patients are evaluated within 6 months with Duplex ultrasound to assess the recanalization rate. The criteria to assess Deep venous thrombosis are defined as as visualization of thrombus and/or lack of complete compressibility of the vein. Thrombus involving popliteal and/or more proximal veins was classified as proximal Deep venous thrombosis (DVT). The US findings in DVT include: the presence of echoes within the vascular lumen; the veins in axial scans are not compressible. Pulsed Doppler and duplex Doppler combine the morphologic and functional study. Injury caused by DVT at the valvular level (postphlebitic syndrome) is visualized. Venous segments were examined whether they were occluded, partially recanalized, or totally recanalized, and the development of venous reflux was evaluated.

    Measured: 6 months after the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.

Secondary outcomes (1)
  1. Clinical Signs and Symptoms in 84 patients..

    The patients are evaluated within 6 months with clinical examination, to evaluate presence of pain in lower limbs, swelling and varicose veins. The post-thrombotic syndrome is characterized by aching pain on standing, dependent oedema, and the frequent develop-ment of brawny, tender induration of the subcutaneous tissues of the medial lower limb, a condition that has been termed lipodermatosclerosis. Pruritus and eczematous skin changes are frequently present, and a proportion of patients develop secondary superficial varicose veins as the syndrome evolves.Ulceration, often precipitated by minor trauma, arises in a considerable number of patients and is characteristically chronic and indolent with a high recurrence rate, once healing has been achieved. Uncommonly, patients with persistent obstruction may experience venous claudication, a bursting pain in the leg during exercise, which, in some respects,mimics arterial claudication (Immelman \& Jeffrey, 1984).

    Measured: 6 months the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.

Timeline

From the start of the study to its completion; the mark is today. Estimated dates are the sponsor’s plan.

  1. First posted10 Mar 2016 (estimated)
  2. Study startMar 2016
  3. Primary completionDec 2018 (estimated)
  4. Study completionMar 2019 (estimated)

Resources

More details

For doctors and researchers: how the study is designed, who runs it, and its registry IDs.

Study design
Study type
Interventional
Phase
Phase N/A
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomised
Intervention model
Factorial
Masking
Triple blind
Who is masked
Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor
Enrolment
84 participants (estimated)
IDs, dates and publications
ClinicalTrials.gov ID
NCT02704598
Sponsor's protocol ID
123456
Acronym
DVT
Status last verified
Oct 2018
First submitted
28 Feb 2016
Last updated
10 Oct 2018
Results posted
No
Data monitoring committee
Yes
Individual data sharing
No: We preserve confidential data.

Publications

  • Rivaroxaban (Xarelto): Treatment of Venous Thromboembolic Events (Deep Vein Thrombosis [DVT], Pulmonary Embolism [PE]) and Prevention of Recurrent DVT and PE [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2015 Aug. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK344331/

    PubMed 26913324
  • Isaacs AN, Doolin M, Morse C, Shiltz E, Nisly SA. Medication utilization evaluation of dabigatran and rivaroxaban within a large, multi-center health system. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2016 Mar 1;73(5 Suppl 1):S35-41. doi: 10.2146/sp150031.

    PubMed 26896524
  • Finks SW, Trujillo TC, Dobesh PP. Management of Venous Thromboembolism: Recent Advances in Oral Anticoagulation Therapy. Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Jun;50(6):486-501. doi: 10.1177/1060028016632785. Epub 2016 Feb 25.

    PubMed 26917821

Questions about this trial

What is this clinical trial studying?

A study testing Rivaroxaban and Warfarin in people with Deep Venous Thrombosis, run by Hospital do Servidor Publico Estadual at 1 site in Brazil.

The full registered description is in the About this study section and the official record.

Who may be eligible to take part?

Eligibility is decided by the study team after screening, so read the full criteria and contact a listed site.

Is this clinical trial currently recruiting?

The record says: status not confirmed, as of the sponsor's last update on 10 Oct 2018. Status can change between updates, so confirm with the study contact before making plans.

Where is the study taking place?

The record lists 1 site in Brazil. Whether a site is taking part right now should be confirmed with that site. See every site.

What are the possible benefits and risks?

They depend on the study and the treatment, and no study can promise a benefit. The study team explains the known risks during informed consent, before anyone joins; the record itself does not list them.

Are results available for this study?

Results are not available in the source record.

How can a doctor refer a patient or contact the research team?

Contact Rafael de Athayde Soares, MD, Dr. (+5511999813931 ext. 8226, rafaelsoon@hotmail.com), or a site near the patient. AzTrials does not enrol participants or take referrals.

What does the primary outcome measure?

the long-term outcomes (after 12 months) in two groups of patients after treatment for DVT, by comparing the DUS-detected recanalization rates and the occurrence of PTS. (time frame: 6 months after the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis.). It is what the study was designed to measure, not a finding.

Where can I read the original study information?

On the ClinicalTrials.gov record for NCT02704598, which also lists 3 linked publications.

Does a listing mean the treatment is approved or proven to work?

No. A listing means the study is registered. It does not show that the treatment is safe, works, or is approved by a regulator.

How often is this information updated?

AzTrials copies changed records from ClinicalTrials.gov every night and reloads the whole registry every week. The sponsor last updated this record on 10 Oct 2018; AzTrials last refreshed its copy on 7 Nov 2026.

Free account

Log in to keep searching

You’ve used your 3 free searches. AzTrials is free: log in or create a free account to keep searching clinical trials and save the ones you want to follow.

Create a free accountLog in